Home / Washington / Spokane
Sunshine Health & Rehab
10410 East Ninth Avenue, Spokane, WA 99206 · Spokane County · (509) 926-3547
37 certified beds, about 32 residents a day · For profit - Individual · Medicare and Medicaid since 1992
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 505411 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 30, 2026, inspectors cited 9 health deficiencies (the Washington average is 15.8, the national average 9.2).
None of its 32 health citations since June 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.99 hours per resident per day, against 4.36 across Washington and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.64 of those hours.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 32 health citations on file.
January 30, 2026Standard inspection · 9 citations
- E Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents, families and visitors had access to grievance forms if they wanted to file a grievance anonymously. The facility also failed to ensure residents knew the process for filing grievances for 4 of 4 residents (Resident's 61,15, 66 and 51) reviewed for the grievance process in Resident Council. Additionally, staff were unaware of the location of grievance forms in the event a resident, family member or visitor requested a form. This failure placed the residents at risk for not being able to voice concerns and have their concerns resolved in a timely manner.
- E Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 6 of 7 residents (Residents 44, 7, 64, 61, 20, and 49) were accurately assessed for activity preferences to mitigate the risk of boredom and enhance quality of life. Additionally, the facility failed to have a registered nurse ensure the activity assessments were timely and appropriately completed. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet psycho-social needs and a diminished quality of life.
- E Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent. Four medication errors were identified for 3 of 8 residents (Residents 31, 61 and 75) observed during 25 medication administration opportunities that resulted in an error rate of 16%. This failure placed residents at risk for not receiving the full therapeutic effect of the medication and possible adverse side effects.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed infection control measures, including Personal Protective Equipment [(PPE) protective garments and gear used to minimize exposure to hazards that can cause injury or illness], intended to mitigate the transmission of shingles (a viral infection that causes a painful, burning rash with blisters) were followed for transmission-based precautions [(TBP) additional precautions used with residents that are suspected or confirmed to have an infection] for 7 of 7 staff members (Staff L, M, N, O, P, Q, K); Additionally the facility failed to ensure medical supplies were maintained in a manner to prevent healthcare-associated infections by failing to remove expired sterile and non-sterile clinical supplies from 1 of 1 treatment storage rooms, reviewed for infection control. [...]
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that resident dignity was maintained for 2 of 3 residents (Resident's 32 and 58) reviewed for resident rights to privacy and a dignified existence. Residents 32 and 58 had their medical information discussed and were assessed in front of other residents and visitors while in the common area. This failure placed them at risk for embarrassment and lack of confidentiality related to their medical care.
- D PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to review, and validate the Preadmission Screening and Resident Reviews (PASARR, an assessment to ensure individuals with serious mental illness [SMI] or intellectual/developmental disabilities [ID/DD] are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) were correct on admission or updated for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 64) reviewed for PASARR. This failure placed the residents at risk for not receiving the care and services appropriate for their needs.
- D Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to: A) establish a Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) policy for the inclusion/utilization of information from all resident care departments, including residents/resident representatives (RR) feedback/input data that would be used to identify high risk, problem prone areas or opportunities for improvement and, B) implement an effective QAPI program that incorporated a thorough collection/analysis of resident/RR feedback data and information from all departments/staff involved in 1 of 1 QAPI Program. This failure placed residents at an increased risk for unidentified complications, prompted corrective action towards high-risk/problem prone areas and unmet care needs.
- D Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee included the required members and met at least quarterly (once every quarter of the year or every three months) for 2 of 4 quarters (Q2 and Q3) reviewed for QAA. The failure to meet quarterly increased the facility's risk of unrecognized quality deficiencies, the facility's ability to effectively correct identified issues and ongoing unmet care needs regarding residents' quality of life.
- D Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary (relating to the conditions that affect hygiene and health) environment for 1 of 1 Laundry room (LR 1), reviewed for a functional environment. This failure placed residents and staff at an increased risk of cross-contamination (the harmful spread of diseases).
June 16, 2025Complaint inspection · 3 citations
- D Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 5) were fully informed of their care in language they could understand. This failure placed the resident at risk of poor understanding in their health care decisions and a diminished quality of life.
- D Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice related to nursing assessments for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for quality of care. This failure placed the resident at risk for injury and adverse outcomes.
- C Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that direct care staffing information was accurate upon submission to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for Quarter 3 of 2024 (July 1, 2024 through September 30, 2024) reviewed for Payroll Based Journal (PBJ - mandatory reporting of staffing information based on payroll data) submission. This failure caused CMS to have inaccurate data related to facility staffing levels and had the potential to impact resident care and services.
October 29, 2024Standard inspection · 13 citations
- F Not require residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits, or pay privately as a condition of admission; and must tell residents what care they do not provide.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to not request or require residents to waive their rights to retain personal property including items of value to admit to the facility for 4 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 23, 76, 184, and 185), reviewed for resident rights. This failure placed all residents at risk of inability to exercise their resident rights, unmet needs, and diminished quality of life.
- F Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to review policies and/or procedures yearly as required, perform hand hygiene when indicated, and store soiled laundry in a manner to prevent the spread of infection. In addition, the facility failed to implement, follow, and discontinue transmission-based precautions when indicated for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 23 and 135), reviewed for infection control. This failure placed all residents, staff, and visitors at risk of development of a multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDRO), communicable diseases, and diminished quality of life
- F Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the designated Infection Preventionist met the qualifications for experience, education, training and/or certification for the role to assume responsibility of the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program for 1 of 1 sampled staff (Staff C), reviewed for infection preventionist qualifications. This failure placed all residents, staff, and visitors at risk of contracting communicable diseases, unmet infection control issues, and lack of oversite of the facility staff's infection control practices.
- E Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to routinely encode and transmit resident assessment data to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) within the required timeframe for 7 of 7 sampled residents (Residents 6, 7, 8, 25, 48, 50, and 53), reviewed for timeliness in encoding and transmission of Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool). This failure affected federal health information data gathering and placed residents at risk for inaccurate monitoring of the residents' progress over time, untimely comprehensive review of residents' health data/information, and a diminished quality of life.
- E Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently provide bathing for 2 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 28 and 234), reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). This failure placed residents at risk for poor personal hygiene, unmet care needs, and diminished quality of life.
- E Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to routinely implement a system with sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation of all controlled drugs, including the facilities emergency medication supply in 1 of 1 sampled medication rooms (Victorian Rose) reviewed for medication storage. This failure placed the facility at increased risk for potential controlled substance drug diversion and detracted from the facility's ability to promptly identify drug diversion.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety for 1 of 1 facility kitchens, reviewed. This failure placed residents at risk for food borne illness and diminished quality of life.
- E Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to routinely provide education on benefits and potential side effects of vaccinations, offer pneumococcal (bacteria that could cause respiratory infections) and influenza (flu, contagious viral respiratory illness) vaccinations when indicated, and document in the resident's medical record accordingly for 3 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 4, 52 and 78), reviewed for immunizations. These failures placed residents at risk of being unable to make informed decisions regarding immunizations, acquiring communicable diseases, and diminished quality of life.
- E Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide documented evidence of the required annual 12-hours of in-service training, which included dementia training for 5 of 5 nursing assistants (I, L, M, O, V ), reviewed for nursing assistant continuing education and abuse prevention for 2 of 5 staff (I, V), as required. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk of being cared for by inadequately trained staff, and unmet care needs.
- D Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident was evaluated and assessed by the interdisciplinary team (IDT), a physician order was obtained, and care planned for safe self-administration of medications, as required for 1 of 4 sampled residents, (Resident 23), reviewed for resident rights. This failure placed residents at risk of medication errors, adverse side effects, and diminished quality of life.
- D Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent. Specifically, two medication errors were identified during 26 medication administration opportunities. This resulted in an error rate of 7.69 %. This failure placed residents at risk of receiving subtherapeutic effects of their medications, possible adverse side effects, and diminished quality of life.
- D Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
Inspectors wroteF801 Based on interview and record review the facility failed to employ a dietician that had the licensure and/or certification to practice as a Registered Dietician in Washington State, as required for 1 of 1 staff (Staff U), reviewed for Registered Dietician qualifications. This failure placed all residents at risk for unmet nutritional needs and diminished quality of life.
- D Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to implement antibiotic protocols to ensure antibiotics were appropriately prescribed for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 4), reviewed for antibiotic stewardship. This failure placed residents at risk of development of [NAME]-drug-resistant organisms (MDRO), adverse side effects, and diminished quality of life.
June 7, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop an individualized care plan for 1 of 3 residents (1) reviewed who had unique environmental fall risk concerns. Specifically, Resident 1 was at risk for tripping over their lengthy oxygen tubing, and this was not identified and included in their fall prevention care plan. This failure placed Resident 1 and other residents at risk for avoidable falls, injury and decreased quality of life.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure orders for oxygen were implemented during a transportation to the facility for admission for 1 of 3 residents (1) reviewed. Specifically, Resident 1 did not wear oxygen when transported from the hospital to the facility. Shortly after arrival, the resident had low blood pressure and developed chest pain and was returned to the emergency department for evaluation. This failure put the resident at risk for decompensation and unintended deterioration of their health.
January 26, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 sample residents (Resident 1), admitted with impaired skin integrity, and at increased risk for continued skin breakdown, was consistently monitored to prevent development of pressure areas and worsening of identified areas. This failure caused a diminished quality of life for Resident 1 when they developed a pressure ulcer on their coccyx (tailbone area) and worsening of identified at risk areas on both heels.
June 8, 2023Standard inspection · 4 citations
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 4 dietary staff members (Staff K, L, M, and N) wore facial hair coverings while in the kitchen, as required. In addition, the facility failed to monitor the temperature and contents of 2 refrigerators that contained resident food. Failure to monitor refrigerator temperatures and contents for expired or spoiled food, and staff not wearing beard coverings in the kitchen placed all residents at risk for food-borne illness and contamination.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement infection surveillance (an ongoing, systematic collection, analysis, and interpretation of data relating to infections to reduce spread of infections), for 6 of 7 sampled residents (Residents 20, 28, 238, 236, 3 and 21), who were reviewed for physician orders related to infections. These failures placed the residents and staff at risk for development of contagious disease.
- D Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify an allegation as potential misappropriation of resident property, report the allegation to the State Survey Agency, and complete a thorough investigation as required for 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident 1), reviewed for personal property. This failure placed residents at risk for potential misappropriation of personal property and a diminished quality of life.
- D Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to act upon the pharmacist recommendation reports for 3 consecutive months, for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 10), reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed the resident at risk of adverse medication effects and a diminished quality of life.
Fire safety inspections
19 fire safety citations on file: 4 on January 30, 2026, 8 on October 29, 2024, 7 on June 8, 2023.
Every fire safety citation19 citations
- E Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- E Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
- D Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- D Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- F Address patient/client population and determine types of services needed.
- F Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Ensure that corridors are separated from use areas by walls constructed to limit the passage of smoke.
- E Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
- D Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
- D Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
- F Address subsistence needs for staff and patients.
- F Establish emergency prep training and testing.
- F Establish staff and initial training requirements.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- F Ensure that personnel concerned with handling of medical gases and cylinders are trained on the risk.
- E Establish policies and procedures including evacuation.
- D Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Washington | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.99 | 4.36 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.64 | 0.94 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.04 | 3.80 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.65 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.70 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | not reported | 45.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 45.4% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.64 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.36 on weekdays and 4.04 on weekends, 25% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.85 in April to June 2025 to 4.99 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.99 | 1.64 | 5.36 | 4.04 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 32 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 5.02 | 1.52 | 5.33 | 4.22 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 33 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.73 | 1.52 | 5.07 | 3.85 | 7.0% | 0 of 92 | 35 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.85 | 1.80 | 5.19 | 4.00 | 12.7% | 0 of 91 | 34 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Washington, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.21 | 0.90 | 4.44 | 3.66 | 3.7% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Washington | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 13.3 | 19.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 10.7 | 13.4 | 12.0 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: SUNSHINE HEALTH FACILITIES, INC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dikes, Carol | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 21% | 01/01/2021 |
| Dikes, David | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 21% | 01/01/2021 |
| Dikes, Nathan | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 40% | 01/01/2021 |
| Rhoads, Patrick | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 19% | 01/01/2021 |
| Dikes, Nathan | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 01/01/2007 | |
| Rhoads, Patrick | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 01/01/2007 | |
| Dikes, Carol | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2007 | |
| Dikes, David | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2007 | |
| Dikes, Jennifer | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2007 | |
| Dikes, Nathan | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2007 | |
| Rhoads, Patrick | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2007 | |
| Rhoads, Sherri | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2007 | |
| Ulrich, William | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/04/2014 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on January 30, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on January 30, 2026: "Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on January 30, 2026: "Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on January 30, 2026: "Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Aurora Valley Care Spokane, 0.6 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 102 citations
- Sullivan Park Care Center Spokane, 2.8 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 83 citations
- Alderwood Manor Spokane, 4.2 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 61 citations
- Spokane Valley Health and Rehabilitation of Cascad Spokane Valley, 5.6 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 52 citations
- South Hill Rehabilitation and Care Center Spokane, 6.5 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 30 citations
- Spokane Veterans Home Spokane, 6.5 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 46 citations
- Rockwood South Hill Spokane, 7 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 46 citations
- Spokane Health & Rehabilitation Spokane, 7.7 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 97 citations
Washington contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Washington. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Washington DSHS Aging and Long-Term Support Administration, Residential Care Services, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Washington State Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, 1-800-562-6028. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is Sunshine Health & Rehab's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Sunshine Health & Rehab 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Sunshine Health & Rehab get at its last inspection?
- 9 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on January 30, 2026. The Washington average is 15.8.
- Has Sunshine Health & Rehab been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Sunshine Health & Rehab accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Sunshine Health & Rehab?
- CMS lists 13 owners and managers. Legal business name: SUNSHINE HEALTH FACILITIES, INC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.