The Park in Plano
3208 Thunderbird Lane, Plano, TX 75075 · Collin County · (972) 422-2214
120 certified beds, about 73 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1993
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 675113 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 9, 2026, inspectors cited 2 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
None of its 36 health citations since October 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.13 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.44 of those hours.
93.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Creative Solutions in Healthcare, an affiliated group of 149 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 36 health citations on file.
July 15, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to receive written notice of a room change before the change was made for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for right to receive written notification in that: The facility failed to follow their policy, which required a 5 day written notice of a room change, before Resident #1 was moved to a different room on 06/29/26. This failure could place all residents at risk for being displaced without notice and/or reason and decrease quality of life being in a new environment.
April 9, 2026Standard inspection · 2 citations
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen. The facility failed to ensure food items in the facility's freezer and prep area were labeled and dated. These failures could affect residents by placing them at risk for food-borne illness, and food contamination.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (Resident #42) of five residents, reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure CNA A performed hand hygiene during incontinence care for Resident #42. This failure placed residents at risk for healthcare associated cross contamination and infections.
February 5, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 of 15 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to keep Resident #1 free from physical abuse by the Private Sitter on 01/30/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse, harm, pain, mental anguish and emotional distress.
June 5, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident consistent with the resident rights that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet the resident's medical, nursing, and psychosocial needs identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 residents reviewed for care plan review and revision. The facility failed to review and revise Resident #1's care plan after a fall on 05/06/2025 and a fall with major injury on 05/13/2025. This failure could affect all residents and contribute to residents not receiving the care and services they needed to prevent falls.
April 30, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observations, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs for two (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of three residents reviewed for pharmacy services. The Charge Nurse failed to administer Resident #1 and Resident #2 medications within one hour before or after the scheduled medication time in the morning of 04/29/2025. 1. The facility failed to administer on time Resident #1's Ascorbic Acid Tablet 500 MG , Oral tablet two times a day as ordered on 03/24/2025. 2. The facility failed to administer on time Resident #1 Carvedilol Tablet 3.125 MG, 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for Hypertension on 04/29/25. 3. [...]
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (Resident #3) of 3 residents reviewed for infection control. 1. The Charge Nurse failed to sanitize the blood pressure cuff and the pulse oximeter between Resident #2 and Resident #3 on 04/29/25. This failure could put residents at risk of infection from cross contamination.
January 30, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 8 citations
- E Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely for 5 of 12 resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], #2, #3, #4, and #5) reviewed for environment. The facility failed to ensure Resident Rooms #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5 were thoroughly cleaned and sanitized. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of living in an unclean and unsanitary environment which could lead to a decreased quality of life.
- E Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 3 of 20 residents (Resident #11, #27, and Resident #29) reviewed for ADL care provided to dependent residents. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #11 received proper podiatry care to treat feet. 2. The facility failed to provide fingernail care for Residents #27 and #29. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene, skin integrity, or decreased self- esteem. Findings Include: 1. Record review of Resident #11's face sheet, dated 01/28/25, reflected an [AGE] year-old male who was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. [...]
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distributed, and serve in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen, reviewed for food and nutrition services. 1. The facility failed to ensure the food stored in the refrigerator and freezer were labeled with the date the product was received from the vendor or date the product was stored after being used. 2. The facility failed to ensure the food stored in the freezer was properly sealed from air-borne contaminants. 3. The facility failed to ensure the ice machine in the dining area was cleaned. 4. The facility failed to cover a large trash can stored in the kitchen area. These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and other air-borne illnesses.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for nine (Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #18, Resident #26, Resident #27, Resident #33, Resident #39, Resident #43 and Resident #52) of eighteen residents reviewed for Infection Control. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA G performed hand hygiene before checking on Resident #27 on 01/28/2025. 2. The facility failed to ensure LVN A did not bring the whole container of test strips used for checking blood sugar inside Resident #33's room on 01/28/2025. 3. [...]
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on , interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights that included measurable objectives and timeframes to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable mental nad psychosocial well-being for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #53) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #53 was care planned for the weekly psychological services being received based on physician orders dated 11/24/2024. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the necessary care and services needed.
- D Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore continence to the extent possible for one of three residents (Resident #5) reviewed for Incontinent Care. The facility failed to ensure CNA D used proper technique to clean Resident 5's perineal area (area between the legs) on 01/29/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of urinary tract infections.
- D Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding for one (Resident #52) of two residents reviewed for feeding tube (a way of providing nutrition directly to the stomach). The facility failed to ensure LVN A cleaned the syringe and flushed the g-tube during Resident #52's medication administration through gastrostomy tube (G-tube: a tube inserted through the abdomen that delivers nutrition directly to the stomach) on 01/28/2025. These failures could place residents with G-tubes were at risk for infection, dehydration, and drug-to-drug interaction.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents, who needed respiratory care, were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for one (Resident #18) of twelve residents reviewed for Respiratory Care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #18's nasal cannula (flexible tube used to deliver oxygen to the nose through two prongs) was properly stored when not in use on 01/28/2025. This failure could place residents at risk for respiratory infection and not having their respiratory needs met.
December 18, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights set forth that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for a resident for two (Resident #1 and Resident #20) of eight residents reviewed for Care Plans. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was care planned for oxygen administration. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #20 was care planned for oxygen therapy (oxygen delivered through a flexible tube to the nose through two prongs) and droplet precautions (prevent infection with germs that can be spread by speaking, sneezing, or coughing). [...]
November 6, 2024Complaint inspection · 6 citations
- D Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for two (Resident #1 and Resident #5) of twenty residents reviewed for Reasonable Accommodation of Needs. The facility failed to ensure the call light was in reach and accessible for Resident #1 and Resident #5 on 11/05/2024. This failure could place the residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance when needed and help in the event of an emergency.
- D Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 1 (Residents #4) of 4 residents reviewed for (ADLs) care provided to dependent residents. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4 received scheduled bed baths reviewed from October 1, 2024 - October 31, 2024. This failure placed the resident at risk of not receiving necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene, skin breakdown, and decreased self- esteem.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents' environment remained free of accident hazards as was possible for 1 ( unknown Resident) of 68 residents at the facility reviewed for accident prevention . The facility failed to secure a coffee station on 11/06/24 that allowed for residents to self-serve coffee, which could result in skin burns. This failure could prevent residents from having an environment that was free and clear of accidents and hazards.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents, who needed respiratory care, were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for two (Resident #2 and Resident #6) of twelve residents reviewed for Respiratory Care. 1. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #2's nasal cannula (flexible tube used to deliver oxygen to the nose through two prongs) was properly stored on 11/05/2024. 2. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #6's oxygen concentrator (machine that produces oxygen) had a humidification bottle (adds moisture to reduce nasal irritation) connected to it on 11/05/2024. These failures could place the residents at risk for respiratory infection and not having their respiratory needs met.
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one (Resident #3) of five residents were provided medications and/or biologicals and pharmaceutical services to meet their needs. The facility failed to ensure LVN A did not leave Resident #3's medications inside the resident's room on 11/05/2024. This failure could place the residents at risk of not receiving medications as ordered by the physician.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (Resident #4) of eight residents reviewed for Infection Control. The facility failed to ensure that CNA D changed her gloves and performed hand hygiene while providing incontinent care to Resident #4 on 11/06/2024. This failure could place the residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of infections.
August 21, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- E Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for medication errors in that: The facility failed to administer Resident #1's blood pressure medications as ordered by the physician. This failure could place residents at risk of medical complications and a decrease in therapeutic dosages of their medications as ordered by the physician.
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat residents with respect and dignity for 1 of five (Resident #2) residents reviewed for dignity in that: The facility failed to ensure staff did not stand over Resident #2 while assisting the resident with her meal in the dining area on 08/21/2024 This failure could affect residents who require assistance with activities of daily living and placed them at risk for psychosocial harm due to a diminished quality of life.
December 14, 2023Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 11 citations
- F Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
Inspectors wroteBased interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week, for 21 days of the 4-month review period, reviewed for RN coverage. The facility failed to ensure the facility maintained the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day on Saturdays and Sundays for 21 days of the four months (July 20023 - December 2023) reviewed. This failure placed residents at risk of receiving higher levels of patient care.
- E Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for two (Resident #70 and Resident #46) of eight residents reviewed for reasonable accommodation of needs. The facility failed to ensure the call light system in Residents #70 and #46's rooms was in a position that was accessible to the residents. This failure could place the residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance when needed and help in the event of an emergency.
- E Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely for areas in the facility for 8 (Resident #'s 2, 10, 12, 31, 36, 38, 50, and 51's) of 27 resident rooms observed for a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #'s 2, 10, 12, 31, 36, 38, 50, and 51's rooms were cleaned, sanitized, and maintained, based on observations made on 12/12/23. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of infections and living in an uncomfortable environment leading to a decreased quality of life.
- E Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident was free from any physical or chemical restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience, and not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms for 4 of 8 (Resident #2, #26, #35 and #43) residents reviewed for restraints. The facility failed to ensure Residents #2, #26, #35 and #43 had physician orders as of 12/12/2023 for the bolster side rails on their mattress . These failures could unnecessarily inhibit the residents' freedom of movement or activity.
- E Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, which included both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments for 3 of 6 residents (Resident #2, #38, and #59) reviewed for Care Plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2, #38, and #59's Care Plan was reviewed and updated quarterly, based on record reviews made on 12/13/23. This failure could place residents at risk of their needs not being met.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure foods in the facility's dry storage area, refrigerators, and freezer were labeled and dated according to guidelines and in a sanitary manner in the facility's only kitchen. The facility failed to ensure the kitchen was clean and sanitized. These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and other air-borne illnesses.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 (Resident #43 and Resident #55 ([NAME]) of 8 residents reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure the ADON performed hand hygiene while providing incontinence care to Resident #43. 2. The facility failed to ensure the WCN performed hand hygiene while providing wound care to Resident #55. This failure could place residents at risk of cross-contamination resulting in infections.
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #42) reviewed for resident rights. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA A provided privacy to Resident #42 while transporting her to the shower room. This failure placed the residents at risk of not having their privacy respected.
- D Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carryout activities of daily living received services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #43) reviewed for quality of life. The facility failed to ensure CNA B provided Resident #43 with timely incontinent care. These failures could place residents at risk for a decreased quality of life and pressure ulcers.
- D Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding for one (Resident #45) of three residents reviewed for feeding tube. The facility failed to ensure LVN H would cap the tip of Resident #45's gastrostomy tube (G-tube-a tube inserted through the abdomen that delivers nutrition directly to the stomach) when not in use. This failure could place residents with G-tubes at risk of infection.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for one (Resident #67) of two residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #67's oxygen concentrator had a humidifier.
October 19, 2023Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care was provided with such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had oxygen concentrator filters free of sediment and debris. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving proper delivery of oxygen, cross contamination, respiratory compromise and/or infection and residents not having their respiratory needs met. Findings Included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet on 10/19/2023 revealed she was an [AGE] year-old female re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. [...]
Fire safety inspections
10 fire safety citations on file: 8 on April 9, 2026, 1 on January 30, 2025, 1 on December 14, 2023.
Every fire safety citation10 citations
- F Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- E Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- D Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
- D Have properly located and lighted "Exit" signs.
- D Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- E Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- E Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.13 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.44 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.69 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.61 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.08 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 93.2% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 83.3% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 3.73 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.31 on weekdays and 2.69 on weekends, 19% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.20 in April to June 2025 to 3.13 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.13 | 0.44 | 3.31 | 2.69 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 73 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.19 | 0.41 | 3.39 | 2.66 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 77 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.24 | 0.52 | 3.35 | 2.97 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 71 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.20 | 0.40 | 3.37 | 2.76 | 0.0% | 1 of 91 | 69 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.2 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.3 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.1 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 17.4 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.8 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.4 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 29.3 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 10.7 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 4.1 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.2 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: FANNIN COUNTY HOSPITAL AUTHORITY. CMS links this home to Creative Solutions in Healthcare, a group of 149 nursing homes averaging 2.1 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fannin County Hospital Authority | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 04/01/2022 |
| Holt, Erin | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 02/25/2020 | |
| Keeton, Wendy | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 10/29/2012 | |
| Kissling, Monica | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/21/2017 | |
| McBean, Patricia | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 08/30/2021 | |
| Sanderson, Clark | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 10/29/2012 | |
| Trompler, Kelly | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 02/22/2022 | |
| Huggins, Linda | Corporate director | Individual | 10/01/2022 | |
| Willig, Zachary | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Sanderson, Clark | Corporate officer | Individual | 10/29/2012 | |
| Plano I Enterprises, L.L.C. | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 10/01/2022 | |
| Blake, Gary | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/01/2022 | |
| Blake, Malisa | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/01/2022 | |
| Plano I Enterprises, L.L.C. | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/13/2025 | |
| Blake, Gary | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/01/2022 | |
| Kavikondala, Vijaya | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/13/2025 | |
| Vaughan, Jason | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/13/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 11 problems in this area, most recently on January 30, 2025: "Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on July 15, 2026: "Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on April 9, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on June 5, 2025: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.69 hours per resident per day, below the Texas average of 2.98.
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 2 administrators who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Collinwood Nursing and Rehabilitation Plano, 2.7 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 24 citations
- Life Care Center of Plano Plano, 3.3 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 23 citations
- The Healthcare Resort of Plano Plano, 3.3 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 25 citations
- Landmark of Plano Rehabilitation and Nursing Cente Plano, 3.6 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 42 citations
- Remington Transitional Care of Richardson Richardson, 3.8 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 11 citations
- San Remo Richardson, 3.9 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 32 citations
- Continuing Care at Highland Springs Dallas, 4.3 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 17 citations
- Carrara Plano, 4.6 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 13 citations
Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Resident advocate: Texas Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 800-252-2412. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is The Park in Plano's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates The Park in Plano 2 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 1 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did The Park in Plano get at its last inspection?
- 2 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 9, 2026. The Texas average is 9.4.
- Has The Park in Plano been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does The Park in Plano accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns The Park in Plano?
- CMS lists 17 owners and managers, and links the home to Creative Solutions in Healthcare. Legal business name: FANNIN COUNTY HOSPITAL AUTHORITY.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.