3100 S Rigsbee Rd, Plano, TX 75074 · Collin County · (972) 423-6217
120 certified beds, about 58 residents a day · Non profit - Church related · Medicare and Medicaid since 1995
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 675453 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on August 7, 2025, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 24 health citations since April 2023, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (3 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $51,973 in the last three years; the largest was $51,973, and the latest is dated May 22, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.19 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.38 of those hours.
23.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Paramount Healthcare, an affiliated group of 8 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 24 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed established infection control policies and procedures for enhanced barrier precautions and facility surveillance for multidrug-resistant organisms. The facility must establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This deficient practice affected 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for infection control. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection for 2 (Resident #1 and Resident#2) of 4 residents reviewed for infection control. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely for 10 of 15 resident rooms on the 500 - hall (Resident rooms #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9 and #10). Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely for 10 of 15 resident rooms on the 500 - hall (Resident rooms #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9 and #10). The facility failed to ensure Resident rooms #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9 and #10, were thoroughly cleaned and sanitized. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #7) reviewed for ADL care provided to dependent residents. Based on interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #7) reviewed for ADL care provided to dependent residents. The facility failed to ensure Resident #7 received any of her scheduled showers based on records reviewed for July 2025. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident consistent with the resident rights that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet the resident's medical, nursing, and psychosocial needs identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 (Resident #10) of 4 residents reviewed for care plan review and revision. The facility failed to review and revise Resident #10's care plan interventions after he fell on [DATE] and sustained injuries that did not require transfer to the hospital for treatment. This failure could affect all residents and contribute to residents not receiving the care and services they needed to prevent falls.
Inspectors wroteBased observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (Resident #37) of five residents reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure that CNA B changed her gloves and performed hand hygiene when providing incontinence care to Resident #37 on 08/05/2025. These failures could place residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, received appropriate treatment and services to correct the assessed problem or to attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being, for one (Resident #2) of six residents reviewed for behavioral health services. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 was not roommates with another resident who affect her diagnoses of anxiety and PTSD, when she told staff she felt anxious about the new roommate, Resident #1. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 was immediately provided behavioral health services or put interventions in place after having suicidal ideations and threatening to harm herself. An Immediate Jeopardy was identified on 05/21/2025. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of property for 2 (Resident #2 and Resident #3) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 was free from abuse on 01/05/25, when Resident #1 told Resident #3 she would stab her. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 was free from abuse on 01/07/25, when Resident #1 walked into Resident #2's room and hit her repeatedly in the head, with a pole like object causing her to be sent to the hospital, where she was diagnosed with an eye injury, bruises, and abrasions. An Immediate Jeopardy was identified on 05/21/2025. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 4:38 PM. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of 6 residents, reviewed for care plans. 1. The facility failed to address Resident #1's verbal abuse towards others and threat toward Resident #3, on 01/05/25, on the comprehensive care plan. 2. The facility failed to address Resident #2's suicidal ideations on 09/26/24, 12/11/24, and 01/03/25 on the comprehensive care plan. An Immediate Jeopardy was identified on 05/21/2025. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 4:38 PM. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate and report findings to the State Survey Agency within 5 working days of the incident and the corrective action taken if the alleged violation was verified for 1 (Resident #3) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. 1. The facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation when Resident #3 told staff her roommate threatened to stab her on 01/05/25. This failure could place residents at risk of not having allegations of abuse, neglect, and neglect investigated and reported to the State Agency.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments and permit only authorized personnel to have access for one (Treatment Cart #1) of one treatment cart reviewed. The facility failed to ensure Treatment Cart #1 was locked when unattended on 05/21/25. This failure could place residents at risk of having access to unauthorized medications and/or lead to possible harm or drug diversion.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent neglect for 1 (Resident #12) of 1 resident reviewed for reporting. 1. The facility failed to follow their policy to report to the State Agency when Resident #12 told staff she had pulled the call light cord around her neck to kill herself on 12/10/24. 2. The facility failed to ensure the Administrator or person(s) delegated followed their policy to report to the State Agency and initiate an investigation after Resident #12 told staff she pulled the call light around her neck to kill herself on 12/10/24. This failure could place residents at the facility at risk of continued abuse and neglect.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to thoroughly investigate and report findings to the State Survey Agency within 5 working days of the incident and the corrective action taken if the alleged violation was verified. The facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation when Resident #12 told staff she had wrapped her call light around her neck to kill herself on 12/10/24. This failure could place residents at risk of not having allegations of abuse, neglect, and neglect investigated and reported to the State Agency.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen, reviewed for food storage, labeling, dating, and kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure food in the facility's refrigerator, was labeled and dated according to guidelines. The facility failed to ensure food in the facility's freezer, was labeled and dated according to guidelines. The facility failed to discard expired foods according to guidelines. The facility failed to discard dented cans according to guideline. The facility failed to ensure all damaged eggs were removed from the other eggs stored in its original container. These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and other air-borne illnesses.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for four (Resident #2, Resident #21, Resident #51, and Resident #54) of sixteen residents reviewed for reasonable accommodation of needs. The facility failed to ensure the call light system in Resident #2, Resident #21, Resident #51, and Resident #54's rooms were in a position that was accessible to the residents. This failure could place the residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance when needed and help in the event of an emergency.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely for 6 rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], #507, #509, #511, #510, and #610) of 10 rooms observed for environment. The facility failed to ensure that Resident room [ROOM NUMBER], #507, #509, #511, #510, and #610 were cleaned and sanitized. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of living in an unclean and unsanitary environment which could lead to a decreased quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received an accurate assessment, reflective of the resident's status for three (Resident #35, Resident #40, and Resident #46) of six residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The facility failed to ensure Resident #35's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 06/14/2024, accurately reflected that Resident #35 had impairments to both upper extremities. The facility failed to ensure Resident #40's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 04/26/2024, accurately reflected that Resident #40 had impairments to both upper extremities. The facility failed to ensure Resident #46's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 04/04/2024, accurately reflected that Resident #46 had impairment to right upper extremity. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 (Resident #50) of 6 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #50 was care planned for his diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (nerve disorder). This failure could place the resident at risk of needs not being met.
Inspectors wroteBased observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for two (Resident #21 and Resident #46) of eight residents observed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure that CNA D performed hand hygiene and changed his gloves while providing incontinence care to Resident #21. The facility failed to ensure that CNA D performed hand hygiene and changed his gloves while providing incontinence care to Resident #46. These failures could place the residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of infection.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for five (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #5) of twelve residents reviewed for reasonable accommodation of needs. The facility failed to ensure the call light system in Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5's rooms was in a position that was accessible to the residents. This failure could place the residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance when needed and help in the event of an emergency.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for two (Resident #3 and Resident #6) of four residents reviewed for Care Plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3, and Resident #6 were care planned for Hospice Care. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs, diminished function of health, and regressions in their overall health.
Inspectors wroteBased observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure to ensure resident had the right to be treated with respect and dignity, including the right to be free from any physical restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience, and not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #58) observed for physical restraints. Resident #58 failed to have physician orders for a scoop mattress for fall prevention. This failure placed Resident #58 at risk of getting injured because of attempting to get out of bed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of the facility's only kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure food located in the facility only kitchen refrigerator, freezer and dry food pantry were properly sealed. 2. The facility failed to ensure that staff properly covered their head while conducting dietary duties. These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and other bacteria illnesses.
Inspectors wroteBased observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (MA S) of three staff observed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure MA S sanitized the blood pressure machine and cuff between Resident #53 and Resident #55's care. This failure placed residents at risk of cross-contamination and infections. Findings Included: During observation of MA S on 04/26/23 at 9:06 AM, she obtained Resident #53's blood pressure by applying the blood pressure cuff to Resident #53's left forearm. MA S then returned the blood pressure machine to her medication cart and administered Resident #53's medications. [...]
5 fire safety citations on file: 2 on August 7, 2025, 1 on June 27, 2024, 2 on April 27, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2025 | Fine | $51,973 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.19 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.38 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.05 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.95 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.86 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 23.1% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 50.0% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.56 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.25 on weekdays and 3.05 on weekends, 6% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.9% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.28 in April to June 2025 to 3.20 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.20 | 0.38 | 3.25 | 3.05 | 0.9% | 0 of 90 | 58 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.91 | 0.43 | 3.95 | 3.82 | 0.8% | 0 of 92 | 60 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.35 | 0.50 | 3.43 | 3.16 | 1.6% | 0 of 92 | 59 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.28 | 0.41 | 3.33 | 3.15 | 1.3% | 0 of 91 | 62 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $16.97 to $20.71 | 88,680 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.92 | $27.46 to $32.89 | 57,560 |
| Registered nurses | $46.14 | $38.06 to $50.53 | 271,380 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 25.8 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 19.4 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.4 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 45.4 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 5.0 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.9 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.3 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Collinwood Nursing and Rehabilitation's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 51.5% · Texas: 116 better, 50 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 14 eligible stays.
10.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Texas: 0 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 33 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Texas: 4 better, 11 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 18 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Texas57.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 16 residents counted.
3.5% this home
Median of homes: Texas0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 29 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Texas1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 29 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Texas98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 4 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: HAMILTON COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT. CMS links this home to Paramount Healthcare, a group of 8 nursing homes averaging 3.1 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slakey, Diana | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Individual | 05/01/2023 | |
| Slakey, Philip | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Individual | 05/01/2023 | |
| Hooper, Grady | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/01/2023 | |
| Dsj Healthcare Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 05/01/2023 | |
| Golden, Lauren | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2023 | |
| Langford, Randall | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2023 | |
| Prince, Danny | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2023 | |
| Dsj Healthcare Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/22/2025 | |
| Plano Investment Partners | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/01/2023 | |
| Langford, Randall | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2023 | |
| Lone, Jamal | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2023 | |
| Slakey, Diana | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2023 | |
| Slakey, Philip | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.