Home / California / Danville
The Reutlinger Community
4000 Camino Tassajara, Danville, CA 94506 · Contra Costa County · (925) 648-2800
60 certified beds, about 46 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1967
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 055534 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on November 21, 2024, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the California average is 15.6, the national average 9.2).
None of its 21 health citations since May 2019 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.83 hours per resident per day, against 4.52 across California and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.05 of those hours.
55.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (California average 36.7%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 21 health citations on file.
June 1, 2026Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide one of four sampled Residents (Resident 1) adequate notice of Medicare Non-Coverage. This failure had the potential to negatively impact Resident 1's right to an appeal process. During record review of Resident 1's admission record, printed on 5/21/26, Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE]. During record review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to guide care), dated 4/14/26, indicated Resident 1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment tool used to assess mental status) score was 15 out of 15, which indicated Resident 1's cognition was intact. [...]
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled Residents (Resident 1) had complete and accurate documentation recorded in the electronic health record regarding the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) document. This failure had the potential to negatively impact Resident 1's right to an appeal process. During record review of Resident 1's admission record, printed on 5/21/26, Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE]. During record review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to guide care) dated 4/14/26, indicated Resident 1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment tool used to assess mental status) score was 15 out of 15, and indicated Resident 1's cognition was intact. [...]
April 2, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin for one of three sampled Residents (Resident 1) in a timely manner when Resident 1's left middle fingernail came off on 3/6/26, and no staff knew what had caused it. This failure placed Resident 1 at risk of continued injury, as the lack of timely reporting could delay the investigation and the implementation of necessary protective measures. A review of Resident 1's Face Sheet (FS, a summary document in a resident's medical record that contains key identifying and administrative information), printed on 4/2/26, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. [...]
January 13, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident 1 to assess and maintain psychosocial well-being. This failure had the potential to negatively impact Resident's safety, psychosocial well-being and quality of life. During a record review of admission record, printed on 1/13/26, Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE]. During a record review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment used to guide care), dated 9/23/25, the MDS indicated Resident 1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment used to assess mental status) score was 3 out of 15, which indicated Resident 1's cognition was severely impaired. [...]
February 12, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the Facility Assessment Tool (a document with facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for its residents competently during day-to-day operations), prior to accepting one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) at the facility. Facility did not ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) was available to care for Resident 1, who required continuous Antibiotic Intravenous Therapy (IV ATB- administration of antibiotic medications directly into the bloodstream through a vein to treat infection) for a period of three weeks. This failure resulted in Resident 1 to experience discomfort, frustration; an unplanned, and an avoidable discharge back to the hospital after three (3) days of being at the facility.
November 21, 2024Standard inspection · 7 citations
- F Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete annual performance review and maintain competency/skills records for 17 of 17 sampled Licensed Nurses (LN's). A licensed nurse is a healthcare professional who has met requirements by state board of nursing to practice nursing skills within defined scope. This failure placed residents residing at the facility at risk to receive care from incompetent LN's.
- E Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Drug Regimen Reviews (DRR- review of all medications the residents were using in order to optimize therapy, identify any potential drug reactions, ineffective drug therapy or duplicate drug therapy) by the Consultant Pharmacist (CP, a pharmacist with specialized training to review safety aspects of medication use) were acted upon on a monthly basis for two of four sampled residents (Residents 4 and Resident 34). This failure had the potential to result in not addressing medication safety irregularities in a timely manner and/or help optimize the drug therapy for Resident 4 and Resident 34.
- E Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly store drugs for one out of 12 sampled Residents (Resident 18). These failures had the potential for Resident 18 to take expired, less effective and discontinued medication.
- E Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to intervene for one of the sampled residents (Resident 34), when his dentures were not fitting properly for over a month. This failure resulted in Resident 34 feeling frustrated, awful, and placed him at risk for unintended weight loss.
- E Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the therapeutic diet ordered by the physician were followed for two of four sampled residents (Resident 7 and Resident 35) during a dining observation when: 1. Resident 35, who was on mechanical soft diet (a texture-modified diet that consists of foods that are easy to chew and swallow) with ground meats received a piece of meat, not in bite size as indicated on the meal ticket. 2. Resident 7, who was on a mechanical soft diet received a regular texture of snap peas vegetable. This failure had the potential for Resident 7 and Resident 35 to choke and/or aspirate (inhalation of a foreign object into the airway or lungs).
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared under sanitary conditions when: 1. Freezer had plant-based patties that were soft to touch and had beyond use date. 2. A tabletop can opener had brownish matter. 3. There was black matter on the ice sweep part of the residents' ice machine. These failures had potential to put residents at risk for food borne illness and cross-contamination (transfer of bacteria or other microorganisms from one substance to another) that could result in infection or spread of infection.
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 7) was treated with respect and dignity when Resident 7 was not promptly assisted during lunch on 11/18/24. This failure had the potential to affect Resident 7's psychosocial well-being and nutritional needs.
October 17, 2024Complaint inspection · 3 citations
- D Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure completion of a physician ' s order of stat (immediate) lab draw for one of the residents (Resident 1) for eight hours. This failure resulted in Resident 1 having a delay in the completion of a physician ' s order of stat blood draw which potentially impacted Resident 1 ' s treatment and well-being.
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide accurate patient records when one resident (Resident 1) was transferred to a hospital. This failure resulted in Resident 1 not having the correct records at the hospital which potentially delayed identification and treatment.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify one resident ' s (Resident 1) emergency contact family member of a Covid outbreak at the facility. This failure resulted in Resident 1 ' s family member not receiving Covid exposure status of Resident 1. Resident 1 subsequently tested Covid positive and was hospitalized .
November 17, 2022Standard inspection · 2 citations
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe food storage and preparation when: 1. Frozen fish products were stored on the same level as frozen poultry products. 2. Staff did not perform hand hygiene when switching between tasks. 3. Personal items were stored in the dried food storage area. These failures placed residents at risk for food borne illness.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, for two of two sampled residents (Resident 22 and Resident 7), the facility failed to implement infection prevention and control practices when: 1. Licensed Vocational Nurse 2 (LVN 2) did not wear gloves prior to Resident 22's eye drop administration to both eyes. 2. LVN 1 did not perform hand hygiene and glove changes on two occasions; did not set up a clean area for the treatment supplies; did not sanitize reusable scissors after use; and did not dispose and/or sanitize contaminated supplies after performing Resident 7's wound care to top of head, right heel, and left heel. These failures created a risk for cross-contamination (transfer of bacteria or other microorganisms from one substance to another) that could result in infection or spread of infection.
May 9, 2019Standard inspection · 4 citations
- E Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility stored 37 of 37 vials of various vaccines in an unlocked refrigerator with no method of monitoring temperature control, comingled with staff food items, and in a shared office with the social worker (SW) who was not a nurse, and was not licensed to have access to vaccines. These failures had the potential for the medications to become ineffective, contaminated, or diverted for unauthorized use.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow food service safety measures by: 1. Cooking staff did not wash hands between glove changes during tray line service. 2. Ice machine filters had layers of gray particulate matter. 3. The nursing station ice machine drip tray had layers of foreign substances. These failures placed residents at risk to acquire food borne illness and infection.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, for one (Resident 5) of four residents with pressure ulcers (A pressure ulcer develops when one or more layers of skin and tissue are damaged as a result of continuous pressure to the area.), the facility failed to follow Resident 5's care plan to turn and reposition to avoid further breakdown of Resident 5's Stage II pressure injury. This failure had the potential for Resident 5's Stage II pressure ulcers to worsen.
- B Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, nursing staff did not have readily accessible information for the treatment decisions documented in the Physician Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST, an approach to end-of-life planning where patients choose what treatments they do or do not want and their wishes are documented as physician orders) for one (Resident 201) of six sampled residents with POLST orders. For Resident 201, the failure to include her POLST in her medical record had the potential to result in provision of unwanted resuscitation (treatment to restore breathing and/or circulation) if her breathing and heart were to cease functioning.
Fire safety inspections
19 fire safety citations on file: 5 on November 21, 2024, 8 on November 17, 2022, 6 on May 9, 2019.
Every fire safety citation19 citations
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- E Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- D Meet requirements for the use of electrical equipment.
- D Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
- F Properly provide smoke detection systems in areas open to corridors.
- E Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- E Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- D Provide emergency officials' contact information.
- D Implement emergency and standby power systems.
- D Have properly located and lighted "Exit" signs.
- D Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- D Meet requirements for the use of electrical equipment.
- E Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
- E Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
- D Install emergency lighting that can last at least 1 1/2 hours.
- D Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- D Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- D Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | California | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.83 | 4.52 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.05 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.07 | 4.09 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.80 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.98 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 55.4% | 36.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 56.3% | 38.1% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.59 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.14 on weekdays and 4.07 on weekends, 21% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 3.3% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.82 in April to June 2025 to 4.83 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.83 | 1.05 | 5.14 | 4.07 | 3.3% | 0 of 90 | 46 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 5.11 | 1.09 | 5.44 | 4.29 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 45 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.80 | 1.09 | 5.16 | 3.90 | 9.7% | 0 of 92 | 45 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.82 | 0.98 | 5.11 | 4.12 | 13.4% | 0 of 91 | 45 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| California, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.36 | 0.59 | 4.52 | 3.97 | 2.3% | 0.5% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
Staff pay at this home
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
Official wage estimates for California
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| California, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.90 | $22.04 to $26.35 | 110,060 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $38.34 | $35.98 to $45.06 | 82,850 |
| Registered nurses | $67.44 | $58.87 to $83.25 | 338,940 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | California | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 26.0 | 10.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.5 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.3 | 1.6 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.5 | 9.8 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.5 | 12.0 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 29.3 | 22.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 12.9 | 11.2 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.8 | 2.3 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.9 | 1.6 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: THE REUTLINGER COMMUNITY.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eskaton | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 04/21/2020 |
| Baik, Ginna | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Heffernan, Nancy | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 08/15/2021 | |
| Hewitt, Maureen | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 08/15/2021 | |
| Lindeman, David | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 04/21/2020 | |
| Munoz, Mary | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Peifer, Sheri | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 04/21/2020 | |
| Rose, Jordan | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 04/21/2020 | |
| Sheldon, Mariann | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 08/15/2021 | |
| Unnava, Hanumantha | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Yotopoulos, Amy | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 04/21/2020 | |
| Baik, Ginna | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Heffernan, Nancy | Corporate director | Individual | 08/15/2021 | |
| Hewitt, Maureen | Corporate director | Individual | 08/15/2021 | |
| Lindeman, David | Corporate director | Individual | 04/21/2020 | |
| Munoz, Mary | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Peifer, Sheri | Corporate director | Individual | 04/21/2020 | |
| Rose, Jordan | Corporate director | Individual | 04/21/2020 | |
| Sheldon, Mariann | Corporate director | Individual | 08/15/2021 | |
| Unnava, Hanumantha | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Yotopoulos, Amy | Corporate director | Individual | 04/21/2020 | |
| Garberson, Thomas | Corporate officer | Individual | 10/01/2023 | |
| Jenkins, Mark | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/21/2020 | |
| Peifer, Sheri | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/21/2020 | |
| Eskaton Properties Incorporated | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 04/21/2020 | |
| Hansen Hunter LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 06/25/2021 | |
| Garberson, Thomas | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/01/2023 | |
| Jenkins, Mark | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/21/2020 | |
| Kallio, Brian | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/21/2021 | |
| Kazemi, Mustafa | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/15/2019 | |
| Peifer, Sheri | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/21/2020 | |
| Saroya, Harmandeep | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/31/2025 | |
| Eskaton Properties Incorporated | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/12/2025 | |
| Moss Adams LLP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2011 | |
| South Pacific Rehabilitation Services, Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/05/2024 | |
| Garberson, Thomas | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/01/2023 | |
| Jenkins, Mark | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/21/2020 | |
| Kallio, Brian | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/21/2021 | |
| Kazemi, Mustafa | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/15/2019 | |
| Peifer, Sheri | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/21/2020 | |
| Saroya, Harmandeep | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/31/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on June 1, 2026: "Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on November 21, 2024: "Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on June 1, 2026: "Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on November 21, 2024: "Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 4.07 hours per resident per day, below the California average of 4.09.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Danville Post-Acute Rehab Danville, 5.7 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 17 citations
- Creekview Skilled Nursing Pleasanton, 7.7 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 12 citations
- Pleasanton Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Pleasanton, 9.9 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 13 citations
- Tice Valley Post Acute Walnut Creek, 10.7 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 26 citations
- The Vineyards Healthcare Center Livermore, 10.7 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 23 citations
- Walnut Creek Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation Cent Walnut Creek, 10.8 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 61 citations
- Rossmoor Post Acute Walnut Creek, 10.8 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 38 citations
- Stratford Villa Post-Acute Livermore, 10.9 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 16 citations
California contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in California. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: California Department of Public Health, Center for Health Care Quality, Licensing and Certification Program, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: California Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, 1-800-231-4024. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Cal Health Find, where California publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is The Reutlinger Community's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates The Reutlinger Community 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did The Reutlinger Community get at its last inspection?
- 7 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on November 21, 2024. The California average is 15.6.
- Has The Reutlinger Community been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does The Reutlinger Community accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns The Reutlinger Community?
- CMS lists 41 owners and managers. Legal business name: THE REUTLINGER COMMUNITY.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.