Find a nursing home

Home / Texas / Spring

The Village at Gleannloch Farms

9505 North Pointe Blvd, Spring, TX 77379 · Harris County · (281) 569-2999

35 certified beds, about 32 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare since 2009

CMS high performing icon Part of a continuing care retirement community Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
5 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 676234 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on September 10, 2025, inspectors cited 2 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).

None of its 8 health citations since June 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.28 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.60 of those hours.

48.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).

CMS links it to Healthpeak Properties, Inc., an affiliated group of 15 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 8 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
7D
1E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
September 10, 2025Standard inspection · 2 citations
  1. E
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 30, 2025
    Inspectors wroteNumber of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 1 of 2 medication carts (Cart B) and 1 of 1 medication storage rooms, reviewed for medication storage.- The facility failed to ensure 2 albuterol inhalers without an open date for Resident #24 and a Fluticasone-Salmeterol inhaler without an open date for Resident #24, were removed from Medication Cart B.- The facility failed to ensure a box of Juven packets with 19 packets in it, expired 9/1/25, and a glucose test trip bottle without an open date on it, were removed from Medication Cart B.- The facility failed to ensure a box of Align with 7 capsules in it, expired 8/31/25, was removed from the medication storage room. [...]
  2. D
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    F759 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 30, 2025
    Inspectors wroteNumber of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 10%, based on 3 errors out of 28 opportunities, which involved 1 of 4 residents (Resident #13) reviewed for medication administration.- RN A failed to administer Fluticasone Propionate nasal spray 50mcg/act, Biotin 5000mcg, and Magnesium Oxide 400mg to Resident #13 on 9/9/25, resulting in missed doses. This failure could place residents at risk of incomplete therapeutic outcomes, increased negative side effects, and decline in health.
August 21, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 5 citations
  1. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 30, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to conduct a comprehensive and accurate assessment of (Resident #20, Resident #8 and Resident #2) of 8 residents whose records were reviewed for accurate assessments. -The facility failed to list Resident #20's fall on 1/8/24 and 6/14/24 on the MDS. -The facility failed to list Resident #8's oxygen continuously at 2 lpm via NC, on the MDS. -The facility failed to list Resident #2's oxygen PRN at 2 lpm via NC, on the MDS. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the care needed to maintain their highest, practicable, physical, social, and psychosocial level of well-being.
  2. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 30, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning is provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, the resident's goals, and preferences for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #15) reviewed for oxygen therapy. - Resident #15's oxygen setting was on 4 L instead of 2 L as ordered by the physician. This failure could place residents at risk of adverse side effects or inadequate therapeutic outcomes.
  3. D
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    F700 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 30, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess the resident for risk of entrapment, reviewed the benefits of bed rails with resident and resident representative, obtained Physician consent prior to use for 2 of 8 residents (Resident #11 and Resident #3) reviewed for bed rails. -The facility failed to obtain a physician's order, assess the need for, and consent for Resident #11's bed rails. -The facility failed to obtain a physician's order and consent for Resident #3's bed rails. This failure could place residents with bed rails at risk of restricted movement, entrapment, decline in ADLs function, and psychological distress.
  4. D
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 30, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food under sanitary conditions in accordance with professional standards for food safety in 1 of 1 facility kitchen . -The facility failed to ensure [NAME] A wore a hair restraint while preparing meals in the kitchen. This failure could place residents receiving food from the facility kitchen at risk for cross contamination.
  5. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 30, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (Resident #138) of 8 residents reviewed for infection control. -CNA B failed to wear appropriate PPE and change her gloves when she provided incontinence care to Resident #138, who was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions. This failure could place residents and staff at risk for cross-contamination, spread of infection and could potentially affect all others in the building.
June 30, 2023Standard inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 6, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 3 kitchens in that: The facility failed to ensure that all dietary personnel in the food preparation area wore a hair restraint or head covering. This failure could place residents that consume facility prepared meals at risk for physical contamination of food by hair.

Fire safety inspections

8 fire safety citations on file: 1 on September 10, 2025, 6 on August 21, 2024, 1 on June 30, 2023.

Every fire safety citation8 citations
  1. E
    Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
    K 372 · September 10, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Have properly located and lighted "Exit" signs.
    K 293 · August 21, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. F
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · August 21, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. F
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · August 21, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. F
    Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
    K 372 · August 21, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. D
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · August 21, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. C
    Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
    K 511 · August 21, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. E
    Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
    K 372 · June 30, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeTexasUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.283.393.86
Registered nurses1.600.430.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.482.983.42
Nurse aides2.41
Licensed practical nurses0.26
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)48.9%55.3%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover35.7%54.6%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 4.16 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.61 on weekdays and 3.48 on weekends, 25% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.58 in April to June 2025 to 4.28 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.281.604.613.48 0.0%0 of 9032
Oct to Dec 20254.511.694.823.71 0.0%0 of 9231
Jul to Sep 20254.821.775.203.82 0.0%0 of 9228
Apr to Jun 20254.581.604.903.79 0.0%0 of 9131
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Texas, Jan to Mar 20263.330.403.502.932.2%0.7% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.

Official wage estimates for Texas

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Texas, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$18.03$16.97 to $20.7188,680
LPNs and LVNs$29.92$27.46 to $32.8957,560
Registered nurses$46.14$38.06 to $50.53271,380
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeTexasUS
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.00.30.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.40.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
17.93.33.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.81.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.53.84.6
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
28.825.723.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
13.812.312.0

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for The Village at Gleannloch Farms's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (69.5% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

69.5% this home

Better than the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Texas: 116 better, 50 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 320 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

10.7% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Texas: 0 better, 9 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 333 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

6.0% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Texas: 4 better, 11 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 188 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

64.1% this home

Median of homes: Texas57.3% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 184 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

1.2% this home

Median of homes: Texas0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 244 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

1.2% this home

Median of homes: Texas1.3% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 244 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

97.0% this home

Median of homes: Texas98.5% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 165 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: CCRC OPCO - GLEANNLOCH FARMS LLC. CMS links this home to Healthpeak Properties, Inc., a group of 15 nursing homes averaging 3.6 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Hcp Ma3 Gp Holding, LLCIndirect ownership interestOrganization03/19/2026
Hcp Ventures II Trs LLCIndirect ownership interestOrganization03/19/2026
Janus Living Trs LLCIndirect ownership interestOrganization03/19/2026
Ocean Acquisition I LLCIndirect ownership interestOrganization03/19/2026
CCRC Propco - Gleannloch Farms, LLC5% or greater security interestOrganization11/17/2015
Cheng, PatrickManaging control - governing bodyIndividual01/01/2022
Russo, FrankManaging control - governing bodyIndividual01/01/2022
Life Care Services LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization02/01/2020
Arnold, LisaOperational/managerial controlIndividual02/13/2023
Coble, SheldonOperational/managerial controlIndividual02/01/2020
Nguyen, CharlesOperational/managerial controlIndividual03/01/2025
Hcp Ma3, LPLimited partnership interestOrganization03/19/2026
Hcp Partners LPLimited partnership interestOrganization03/19/2026
Blackrock IncAdp of the SNFOrganization03/19/2026
CCRC Propco - Gleannloch Farms, LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization11/17/2015
CCRC Propco Ventures, LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization03/19/2026
Hcp Ma3, LPAdp of the SNFOrganization03/19/2026
Hcp Partners LPAdp of the SNFOrganization03/19/2026
Hcp S-H 2014 Member LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization11/17/2015
Hcp Ventures II Partner LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization03/19/2026
Hcp/Ls 2011 Reit, LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization03/19/2026
Healthpeak Op LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization02/10/2023
Healthpeak Properties IncAdp of the SNFOrganization02/01/2020
Janus Living Op LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization03/19/2026
Janus Living, Inc.Adp of the SNFOrganization03/19/2026
Janus Member, LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization03/19/2026
Life Care Services LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization04/10/2025
Ocean Acquisition I LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization03/19/2026
State Street CorporationAdp of the SNFOrganization03/19/2026
Vanguard Group IncAdp of the SNFOrganization03/19/2026
Coble, SheldonAdp of the SNFIndividual04/04/2025
Nguyen, CharlesAdp of the SNFIndividual04/04/2025

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on September 10, 2025: "Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs."
  2. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on August 21, 2024: "Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed."
  3. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on August 21, 2024: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
  4. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on August 21, 2024: "Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment."

Other nursing homes nearby

Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is The Village at Gleannloch Farms's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates The Village at Gleannloch Farms 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 5 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did The Village at Gleannloch Farms get at its last inspection?
2 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on September 10, 2025. The Texas average is 9.4.
Has The Village at Gleannloch Farms been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does The Village at Gleannloch Farms accept Medicaid?
CMS lists it as "Medicare", so it is not certified for Medicaid.
Who owns The Village at Gleannloch Farms?
CMS lists 32 owners and managers, and links the home to Healthpeak Properties, Inc.. Legal business name: CCRC OPCO - GLEANNLOCH FARMS LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection