627 E North H Street, Gas City, IN 46933 · Grant County · (765) 674-8516
75 certified beds, about 38 residents a day · Government - County · Medicare and Medicaid since 1984
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 155232 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on August 14, 2025, inspectors cited 2 health deficiencies (the Indiana average is 7.2, the national average 9.2).
None of its 8 health citations since September 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.57 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Indiana and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.52 of those hours.
40.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Indiana average 45.9%).
CMS links it to Hcf Management Indiana, an affiliated group of 6 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 8 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents or their representatives were provided with bed hold policies prior to hospitalization for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization. (Residents 11, 19, and 25)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to appropriately date opened insulin pens for 2 of 4 medication carts observed for medication storage. (A Unit cart and C Unit cart) This had the potential to affect 6 of 6 residents who received insulin from A Unit and C Unit carts.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly prevent and/or contain COVID-19 by not wearing appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) in areas requiring transmission-based precautions (TBP) during random observations on the 100 and 200 halls.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications given by gastrostomy tube (G-tube) were administered according to physician's orders and facility policy for 1 of 7 residents observed for medication administration, resulting in an 8.89 % medication error rate. (Resident 31)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication (insulin) was administered according to professional standards for 5 of 41 residents (Residents 8, 9, 22, 11, and 19), resulting in a medication administration error rate of 12.2%.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's code status was correctly listed and readily available in the resident's electronic medical record (EMR) for 1 of 16 residents reviewed for advance directives (Resident 83).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the State Agency for 1 of 1 resident-to-resident altercations reviewed for abuse (Resident 9 and 26).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the results report from the last annual Indiana Department of Health (IDOH) survey were posted at an accessible height and in a readily accessible location for 2 of 2 residents interviewed in a group setting (Residents 4 and 5). This deficient practice had the potential to impact 34 of 34 residents/or representatives for those residents who resided in the facility.
4 fire safety citations on file: 3 on September 17, 2024, 1 on September 25, 2023.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Indiana | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.57 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.52 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.28 | 3.25 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.13 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.92 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 40.5% | 45.9% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 40.3% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.58 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.68 on weekdays and 3.28 on weekends, 11% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 3.9% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.72 in April to June 2025 to 3.57 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.57 | 0.52 | 3.68 | 3.28 | 3.9% | 0 of 90 | 38 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.69 | 0.42 | 3.89 | 3.18 | 5.4% | 5 of 92 | 39 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.71 | 0.48 | 3.95 | 3.09 | 3.8% | 8 of 92 | 37 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.72 | 0.58 | 3.88 | 3.33 | 2.5% | 0 of 91 | 37 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Indiana, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.63 | 0.62 | 3.80 | 3.19 | 3.4% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indiana, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.43 | $17.80 to $21.36 | 33,640 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.60 | $29.35 to $35.30 | 14,480 |
| Registered nurses | $40.14 | $37.86 to $48.28 | 68,980 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Indiana | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.2 | 11.0 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.1 | 3.9 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 19.8 | 11.9 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 3.6 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.5 | 13.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 10.3 | 22.2 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 9.3 | 10.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.2 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.1 | 1.4 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Twin City Health Care's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 51.5% · Indiana: 111 better, 7 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 23 eligible stays.
10.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Indiana: 0 better, 17 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 33 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Indiana: 0 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 24 eligible stays.
62.1% this home
Median of homes: Indiana60.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 29 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Indiana0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 33 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Indiana1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 33 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Indiana100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 8 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: WITHAM MEMORIAL HOSPITAL. CMS links this home to Hcf Management Indiana, a group of 6 nursing homes averaging 3.7 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Witham Memorial Hospital | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 11/01/2011 |
| Bayston, Brett | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Brand, John | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2015 | |
| Castetter, Andrea | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Hawkins, Claude | Corporate director | Individual | 09/01/2013 | |
| Hornbecker, Michael | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Reagan, Julie | Corporate director | Individual | 09/25/2024 | |
| Braverman, Kelly | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/01/2021 | |
| Sellers, Daniel | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/20/2024 | |
| Magnolia Health Management VII | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 11/01/2011 | |
| Offerle, Andrew | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/29/2025 | |
| Reed, Stuart | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2011 | |
| Sanders, Jessica | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/29/2025 | |
| Reed, Michael | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 11/13/2025 | |
| Magnolia Health Systems 59, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/13/2025 | |
| Magnolia Health Systems Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/01/2011 | |
| Sabra Health Care Limited Partnership | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/01/2011 | |
| Offerle, Andrew | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/29/2025 | |
| Sanders, Jessica | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/29/2025 | |
| Ward, Jonathan | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/01/2011 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Indiana. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.