2104 N Karnes Ave, Cameron, TX 76520 · Milam County · (254) 697-4985
105 certified beds, about 41 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2006
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 676089 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 22, 2025, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 34 health citations since February 2023, 5 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (4 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $51,479 in the last three years; the largest was $40,930, and the latest is dated August 14, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.27 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.25 of those hours.
87.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Creative Solutions in Healthcare, an affiliated group of 149 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 34 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 of 3 medication carts (Medication Cart #1) reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure Medication Cart #1 were locked and medications were secured and not accessible to other staff, residents, or visitors. This failure could place residents at risk of having unauthorized access to prescriptions, biologicals, and over-the counter medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from exploitation and misappropriation of property for one of four residents (Resident #1) reviewed for misappropriation of resident property. The facility failed to prevent a diversion (misappropriation) of Resident #1's Hydrocodone Oral Tablet 10-300 mg, 38 pills reported missing on 05/07/2026. Hydrocodone was used to treat pain. This failure could place residents at risk for decreased quality of life, unrelieved pain, and dignity.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the facility remained free of accidents and hazards a for one of two housekeepers carts (Housekeeping Cart #1) reviewed for hazards. The facility failed to ensure Housekeeping Cart #1, with chemicals inside the compartments, was locked when unsupervised. The housekeeping cart was located on 400 hall in front of room [ROOM NUMBER]. This failure could place residents at risk for injuries, illness, and hospitalization. Observation on 05/12/2026 at 9:03 am Housekeeping Cart #1 was located in front of 405 room. The compartment where chemicals were stored was not locked. The compartment had micro-kill bleach, disinfectant cleaner, Clorox, and two bottles filled with chemicals without a label on the bottles. Housekeeper G was not standing near the housekeeping cart. She exited room [ROOM NUMBER] at 9:00 a.m. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that licensed nurses have the specific competencies, and skill sets necessary to care for residents' needs for 1 (LVN A) of 3 staff reviewed for nursing competency assessments after a fall for Resident # 1. The facility failed to ensure LVN A assessed Resident #1 for injuries after a fall. This failure could potentially affect the residents by placing them at risk for injuries.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for accidents and supervision. (Resident #1)The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received adequate supervision to prevent elopement. On 08/07/2025 at an unknown time Resident #1 eloped from the facility by reading the door code that was placed by the door and let herself out the front door. Resident # 1 was found by CNA A standing on the front porch when she left work between 6:30PM and 7:00PM. The non-compliance was identified as past non-compliance. The immediate jeopardy began on 08/07/2025 at 6:50 PM and ended on 08/08/2025 2:20 PM .The facility had corrected the noncompliance prior to the start of the survey. The facility had implemented corrective actions and returned to compliance before the investigation began. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 3 (Resident #24, Resident #11 and Resident #18) of 9 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. 1. The facility failed to ensure that Residents #24's call light was within reach. 2. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #11's call light was within reach. 3. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #18's call light was within reach. These failures placed residents at risk of not being able to call for assistance and have their needs met.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals for one of one medication storage rooms in the facility and one of three medication carts reviewed for medication safety. A. The facility failed to ensure expired supplies and/or medications were removed from the nurse's medication cart for the secure unit. B. The facility failed to ensure expired/discontinued supplies and/or medications were removed from the medication storage room. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefits of their medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure that assistance was provided to Resident #6 to remove all BM from hands and face before the lunch meal on 05/20/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of cross contamination and not being provided care and assistance when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible and that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 6 residents (Residents #15) reviewed for accidents hazards and supervision: The facility failed to ensure Resident #15 had a fall mat in place and the bed was in the low position on 05/20/2025 while in bed. This failure could place the residents at risk for falls with the possibility of injury, including fractures.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free of unnecessary drugs for one (Resident #32) of five residents reviewed for adequate monitoring of medication. The facility failed to discontinue an order for antipsychotic medication when ordered by the Medical Director with Medication Regimen Review with a Review date of 02/19/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving discontinued and unnecessary antipsychotic medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to immediately inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician, and notify, consistent with his or her authority, the resident's representative when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for change in condition . The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's RP was notified when she developed MASD (Moisture Associated Skin Damage) on her buttocks on 01/15/2025, and when it progressed to a non-pressure open area with drainage on 01/28/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of their responsible party/family members being unaware of their change in condition.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation , interview and record review the facility failed to ensure, based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, the resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for one of four (Resident #1) residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to document Resident #1 received all her wound care treatments as ordered by the Physician and failed to note in the progress note if she refused care for those treatments. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving necessary medical care and lead to worsening wounds, pain, infection and hospitalization.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, a resident received care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers and did not develop ulcers unless the individual's clinical condition demonstrated that they were unavoidable a resident with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for one of four residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 who had MASD (Moisture Associated Skin Damage) and was at risk for worsening skin breakdown received 8 of her ordered treatments in February 2025 and 2 of her ordered treatments in March 2025. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for significant medication errors. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received the medication Xarelto, an anticoagulant/blood thinner, which could have resulted in the resident developing or the worsening of a blood clot diagnosed soon after Resident #1 missed 24 doses of the medication from 05/15/24 to 06/08/24. This failure could place residents at risk of increased pain and health deterioration.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately notify the resident's physician when there was an unwitnessed fall in the resident's physical status for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's Physician was notified on 05/03/2024 when resident was found on the floor by CMA A. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 05/30/2024 at 6:05 PM. While the IJ was removed on 05/31/2024 at 7:05 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy because all staff had not be trained on falls. This failure placed residents at risk of injury, uncontrolled pain, and a decreased quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure services provided or arranged by the facility, as outlined by the comprehensive care plan were provided by qualified persons in accordance with each residents written plan of care for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for qualified persons. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received assessment after an unwitnessed fall by a qualified staff member on 05/03/2024 when CMA A stated she conducted range of motion assessment, transferred the resident from the floor to the wheelchair and did not inform administrative staff. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 05/30/2024 at 6:05 PM. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record review , the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1, who was found on the floor by CMA A was properly assessed or monitored on 05/3/2024 until Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] at approximately 10:30 AM. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 05/30/2024 at 6:05 PM. While the IJ was removed on 05/31/2024 at 7:05 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy because all staff had not be trained on falls. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a Registered Nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week on 22 out of 22 weekends reviewed for RN coverage. The facility did not have an RN in the facility for 8 hours on every weekend from 11/4/2023 through 03/31/2024. This failure could place residents at risk for lack of continuity of care and the level of care provided by the oversight of an RN.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food under sanitary conditions in the facility's only kitchen reviewed for sanitation. The facility failed to label and date meat products stored in the facility's walk-in freezer. The facility failed to ensure that food products were not stored on the floor in the walk-in freezer. The facility failed to remove dented cans from the dry storage area to prevent service to residents. The facility failed to clean the industrial can opener. The facility failed to maintain cleanliness of the dining plate storage cart. These failures could place residents at risk of cross contamination, loss of nutritional value, weight loss, and foodborne illness.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide maintenance services necessary to maintain a safe, sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior for four (room [ROOM NUMBER], 406, 411, and 412) of eleven rooms reviewed for environmental conditions. The facility failed to cut down and cap the two mounting bolts that secure the toilet's base to the floor, which ensures that the toilet does not move or leak in room [ROOM NUMBER], 406, 411, and 412. The facility failed to ensure that room [ROOM NUMBER]'s heat lamp control panel was covered and had a knob to activate the heat lamp and adjust the time of use. These failures could place residents at risk of living in an unsafe, unhomelike, and uncomfortable environment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident, for 2 of 2 halls narcotic logbooks (Halls 200 and 500) reviewed for drug administration. The facility failed to ensure nurses signed the narcotic logbook counts on two medication carts. This failure could have resulted in drug diversions and the inability of residents/staff to determine the time frame of the potential drug diversion.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure medications and biologicals were stored in locked compartments for 1 of 1 treatment carts reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure nursing staff locked a treatment cart for 50 minutes while it was located at the nurse's station and facing hall 500. This failure could have resulted in harm due to unauthorized access to medications, biologicals, and needles.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and provide care in a manner that promoted maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life for one (Resident #7) of eight residents reviewed for rights. The facility failed to ensure the dining rights and dignity of Resident #7 by making her wait over ten minutes for lunch in the secure unit dining room after all other residents in the room were served their lunch. Resident #7 was also the only resident seated in the secure unit dining room at a table by herself. These failures placed residents at risk of a decline in their sense of dignity, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings of self-worth.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan consistent with residents rights and include the services to be furnished for one (Resident #3) of eight residents care plan reviewed for DNR and hospice. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan consistent with resident rights because Resident#3's care plan indicated full code resulting in an inaccurate care plan. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #3's care plan reflected their choice of DNR (Do Not Resuscitate). The facility failed to ensure that Resident #3's care plan reflected that they were under Hospice Care. These failures could place residents at risk of not having their medical, physical, and psychosocial needs meet.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene for 2 of 15 residents (Residents #95 and #23) reviewed for ADLS. A. Resident #95's adult pull-up was soiled with feces, and she stated she had not been changed since the previous evening. B. Resident #23's top sheet had feces on it and his adult brief and under pad were soiled with feces. His left hand was contractured with long fingernails. These failures could place residents at risk of skin breakdown, pain, infection, and loss of self-esteem.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 5 resident (Resident #31) reviewed for fall mats. The facility failed to ensure Resident #31 had a fall mat in place beside her bed. This failure could place residents at risk of falls, injuries, pain, and hospitalization.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care, is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 (Resident #3) of 5 residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #3's Nebulizer tubing and mask, which includes the nebulizing chamber (unit into which liquid medicine is converted into aerosol or mist by the pressurized air pumped through the tubing) was dated. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #3's Nebulizer mask was properly bagged when not in use. These failures could place residents at risk for respiratory compromise and infection.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours, 7 days a week. The facility had been without full-time weekend RN coverage for six months. This failure placed residents at risk for lack of continuity of care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents unable to carry out activities of daily living, received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 3 of 13 residents (Resident's #2, #39, and #22) reviewed for quality of care. A) The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 received incontinent care frequently enough to prevent sheets saturated with urine, strong odor smell and redness to peri-area. B) The facility failed to ensure Resident #39's fingernails on her contractured right hand were trimmed. C) The facility failed to ensure Resident #22's fingernails on her contractured left hand were trimmed. D) The facility failed to ensure Resident #27 received services to maintain good personal hygiene when he was found with feces on his bed sheets, blankets, towel in the bed and on the fall mat beside the bed. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for six (Resident #13, #14, #18, #20, #28, #200 and #201) of 14 residents reviewed for accidents and hazards and resided on the locked unit within the facility. The facility failed to ensure adequate supervision for six (Resident #13, #14, #18, #20, #28, #200 and #201) of 14 residents who resided on the locked unit and were supervised by one CNA. This failure could place residents at risk for injury and decreased quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services by sufficient numbers of each of the following types of personnel on a 24-hour basis to provide nursing care to all residents in accordance with resident care plans and the facility assessment for residents reviewed for care and services. (Residents #2, and #39) The facility did not provide sufficient staff on the 6 am-6 pm shift on 02/14/2023. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 received incontinent care frequently enough to prevent sheets saturated with urine, strong odor smell and redness to peri-area. The facility failed to ensure Resident #39's brief was checked after breakfast and failed to assist her out of bed at her preferred time. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired/discontinued medications were removed and destroyed for 1 of 1 medication storage rooms reviewed for medications. The facility failed to remove two bottles of expired medication from the medication storage room. This failure could place all residents at an increased risk of receiving expired medication resulting in adverse health consequences.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident received appealing options of similar nutritive value to residents who choose not to eat food that is initially served or who request a different meal choice for one resident (Resident #17) out of 12 residents reviewed for substitutes. The facility failed to offer Resident #17 an appealing option of similar nutritive value when he did not eat the food initially served to him. These failures could place residents at risk for weight loss, decreased oral intake and poor quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to post the nurse staffing data that reflected the actual hours worked for the unlicensed staff for 1 of 3 days during the annual survey. The facility did not update the actual staffing for 02/14/2023. This failure could place residents, their families and facility visitors at risk of not having access to information regarding accurate staffing data.
8 fire safety citations on file: 5 on May 22, 2025, 3 on April 4, 2024.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| August 14, 2025 | Fine | $10,549 |
| May 31, 2024 | Fine | $40,930 |
| May 31, 2024 | Payment Denial | 20 days from July 2, 2024 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.27 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.25 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.86 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.16 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.87 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 87.5% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 83.3% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 3.70 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.44 on weekdays and 2.86 on weekends, 17% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.65 in April to June 2025 to 3.27 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.27 | 0.25 | 3.44 | 2.86 | 0.0% | 3 of 90 | 41 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.19 | 0.34 | 3.36 | 2.77 | 0.0% | 2 of 92 | 41 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.15 | 0.45 | 3.27 | 2.83 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 38 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 2.65 | 0.33 | 2.73 | 2.43 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 38 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $16.97 to $20.71 | 88,680 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.92 | $27.46 to $32.89 | 57,560 |
| Registered nurses | $46.14 | $38.06 to $50.53 | 271,380 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 19.4 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.7 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.1 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.6 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 22.5 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.9 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.7 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Winnie L Nursing & Rehabilitation's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 51.5% · Texas: 116 better, 50 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 9 eligible stays.
9.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Texas: 0 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 34 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Texas: 4 better, 11 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 24 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Texas57.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 7 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Texas0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 8 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Texas1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 8 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Median of homes: Texas98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: WINNIE-STOWELL HOSPITAL DISTRICT. CMS links this home to Creative Solutions in Healthcare, a group of 149 nursing homes averaging 2.1 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Murrell, Edward | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 11/01/2012 | |
| Rollo, Jeffery | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 11/01/2012 | |
| Stramecki, Anthony | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 11/01/2016 | |
| Way, George | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 11/01/2018 | |
| Huggins, Linda | Corporate director | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Willig, Zachary | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Murrell, Edward | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Cameron I Enterprises, L.L.C. | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 08/01/2024 | |
| Blake, Gary | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Blake, Malisa | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Cameron I Enterprises, L.L.C. | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/12/2025 | |
| Blake, Gary | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| House, Janelle | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/12/2025 | |
| Johnson, Chris | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/24/2026 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.