826 West Desmond Street, Winslow, AZ 86047 · Navajo County · (928) 289-4678
119 certified beds, about 99 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1999
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 035254 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 15, 2026, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Arizona average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 39 health citations since March 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 4 fines totaling $95,591 in the last three years; the largest was $62,205, and the latest is dated September 26, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 0.45 hours per resident per day, against 3.98 across Arizona and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.02 of those hours.
72.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Arizona average 45.1%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 39 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, clinical record review, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure adequate assessment, monitoring, and supervision to prevent elopement for one (Resident #7) of the four sampled residents. The deficient practice could result in injury to residents. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on resident and staff interviews, facility documentation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. The census was 100 residents. The deficient practice could result in residents not receiving appropriate care and treatment that they need.
Inspectors wroteNumber of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene was conducted during medication administration. The deficient practice could result in contaminated medications being administered to residents along with medication contamination, and potential infection .
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, review of clinical record and policy review, the facility failed to protect the rights of 2 of 21 residents sampled (#70, #37) to be free from physical abuse between residents. The universe was 100 residents. The deficient practice could result in resident injury, psychological, or behavioral harm as well as continued resident to resident abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, facility documentation, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy involving an allegation of abuse with 2 of 21 residents (#70 and #37). The universe was 100 residents. The deficient practice could result in the appropriate State Agencies not being notified and allegations of abuse not being thoroughly investigated.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility documentation, and policy review, the facility failed to implement its policy to ensure that an allegation of abuse for 2 out of 21 residents (#70, #37) was reported to all applicable state agencies. The universe was 100 residents. The deficient practice could result in further allegations of neglect not being reported.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical records, review of facility documentation, staff interviews and review of policy and procedure facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse for 2 of 21 residents (#70, #37) was fully investigated. The universe was 100 residents. The deficient practice could result in allegations of abuse not being thoroughly investigated and abuse occurring in the facility.
Inspectors wroteNumber of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on a review of clinical records, staff and resident interviews, and facility policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that pain medication for one (Resident # 111) of the five sampled residents was administered in accordance with physician orders. This deficient practice had the potential to result in either overmedication or undermedication of the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interviews, facility documents, and policy, the facility failed to ensure a call system was operational for 1 out of 20 residents sampled (# 5). The universe was 100 residents. The deficient practice could place residents' safety at risk.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interviews, facility documentation, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure controlled medications were recorded, stored, and reconciled accurately for one of three sampled residents (#1). The deficient practice could result in the inability to ensure the safe and effective use of medication. Findings Include:Resident #1 was initially admitted on [DATE], and re-admitted on [DATE], with a diagnosis that included Senile degeneration of the brain, dementia, cellulitis of the toe, nutritional deficiency, psychotic disturbance, anxiety, Pneumonia, and chronic pain. The individual Resident Controlled Substances record dated March 4, 2025, for Resident #1 revealed that Morphine Sulfate was received in an amount of 30 mL (milliliter). It further identified that the dosage to be given to the resident was 0.25mL by mouth. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, interviews, and review of policies, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#61), did not receive medication prescribed to another resident (#71). The deficient practice could result in complications and adverse medication side effects.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, facility documentation, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents are free from abuse from another resident (Residents #1 and #3). The deficient practice could lead to additional resident-to-resident altercations, thereby creating an unsafe environment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, review of records, and review of facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that two sampled residents (#88 and #71) were not physically abused by residents (#76 and #84). The sample size was 6. The deficient practice could lead to physical and psychosocial harm to residents. Findings Include:-Regarding residents #88 and #76Resident #88 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: unspecified dementia, with other behavioral disturbance, and insomnia. An admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 7, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of the care plan for resident #88 reveals a focus starting on July 16, 2025, for exhibiting behaviors of pacing in common areas, wandering, invading others personal space. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, review of records, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure a resident (#6) was not abused by another resident (#3). The deficient practice could lead to physical and psychosocial harm to residents. Regarding Resident #6: Resident #6 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included senile degeneration of brain, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. A quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 4, indicating severe cognitive impairment. A progress note dated April 18, 2025, revealed at 7:45 AM, the nurse was notified by certified nursing assistants (CNAs) that another resident hit Resident #6 in the right arm during breakfast. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, observation, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (#41) was free from physical abuse by a resident (#37). The deficient practice could result in further incidents of resident to resident abuse and could lead to injury.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, staff interviews, and review of facility documentation and policy, the facility failed to evaluate and implement effective care plan interventions related to falls for one resident (#11). The deficient practice resulted in the resident experiencing multiple falls in the facility, and could result in other residents failing to receive effective fall-prevention measures.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, facility documentation, observation, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that two residents (#25 and #20) were free from physical abuse. The deficient practice could result in further incidents of resident to resident abuse and lead to injury.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, facility documentation, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure eight residents (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7 and #8) were provided adequate supervision to prevent resident abuse. The deficient practice could result in residents being at risk for abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that 7 residents were not abused (72, 76, 92, 42, 67, 54, 32 and 19). The deficient practice could result in physical and emotional harm to residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, facility process and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that dishes and utensils were cleaned using professional standards of practice for sanitary conditions. The deficient practice could result in residents becoming ill.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that monitoring and evaluation of physical restraints are completed for the continued use of physical restraints for one resident (Resident #36). The deficient practice could lead to increased isolation and/or other psychosocial harm.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a copy of the notice of one of one discharges for one resident (# 101 ) to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. The failure may result in residents not having the advocacy and support from the State Long-Term Ombudsman during the discharge process.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that residents care plans were revised as needed for 3 residents (#72, #76, and #45).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure that one of one sampled residents (#304) was safe to self-adminster medication. The deficient practice could result in a medication overdose. Findings Include: Resident #304 was initially admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of dementia, type 2 diabetes, and dysphagia. Review of physician orders revealed active orders for the following medications: Bisacodyl 10mg Polyethylene glycol 3350 power solution Melatonin 3 mg tab Docusate sodium 100mg cap Quetiapine 25 mg tablet Acetaminophen 325 mg tab Diclofenac sodium 1 percent topical cream A in progress admission Assessment Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, which indicated intact cognition. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that resident #45 received specialized services to meet therapeutic needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (#66) was offered pneumococcal vaccine. The deficient practice could pose the risk of the residents contracting pneumonia and its associated complications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, interviews, and review of facility documentation and policy, the facility failed to ensure two residents (#2, and #3) were not abused by one resident (#1). The deficient practice could lead to physical harm, mental anguish, and psychosocial harm to a resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, interviews, facility surveillance footage, the State Agency (SA) complaint tracking system, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident #3 was free from abuse from resident #4. The deficient practice could result in further resident abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, staff interviews and reviews of facility policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that basic life support, including CPR (cardio-pulmonary resuscitation) in accordance to the advance directives for one resident (#1). The deficient practice resulted in actual harm to the resident and has the potential to result in advance directives not being followed for additional residents. As a result, the condition of Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) and Substandard Quality of Care was identified.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, staff interviews, facility documentation, policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was implemented related to the need for repositioning for one resident's (#2). The deficient practice could result in residents not receiving the services as outlined in their care plan.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility's infection control program documentation, staff interviews, personnel files, and facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to implement a COVID-19 screening and consistent testing program during a COVID-19 breakout. The deficient practice could result in residents becoming ill.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, interviews, and review of facility documentation, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of a change in condition for one resident (#1). The deficient practice could result in resident not receiving continuity and coordination of needed care.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff and resident interviews, facility documentation, policies and procedures, the facility failed to protect the rights of one resident (#525) to be free from abuse from visitors/family member. The deficient practice could result in further abuse of residents and appropriate action not taken.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews, review of facility documentation, policy and procedures the facility failed to implement their policy on abuse and resident protection for one resident (#525). The deficient practice could result in abuse continuing and not being prevented.
Inspectors wroteRegarding residents #6 and #116 (September 21, 2022) -Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dementia with agitation, Alzheimer's disease, major depressive disorder, repeated falls, and dysphagia-oral phase. A review of resident #6's care plan dated January 20, 2020, revealed that the resident exhibited behaviors that included verbal aggression toward staff and other residents, physical aggression toward staff, verbalizing hallucinations, and excessive crying related to dementia. A review of resident #6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 6 that indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered as ordered by the physician for one of 3 sampled residents (#13). The deficient practice could result in residents not receiving adequate oxygen to prevent hypoxia.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility documentation, policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that nine residents (#5, #15, #35, #40, #50, #65, #20, #80, and #25) were free from abuse of another. The deficient practice could result in other residents being abused.
Inspectors wroteBased on closed record review, staff interviews, review of facility documentation, policy and procedures, the facility failed to report allegations of abuse for two residents in a within the required timeframe (#5 and #15). The deficient practice could result in abuse allegations not being reported.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (#41) who was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL) such as grooming and hygiene, received the necessary services to maintain good hygiene. The facility census was 108, and the sample was 22. The risk of not cleaning/trimming nails could result in harboring of bacteria that can contribute to the spread of infections.
20 fire safety citations on file: 6 on May 15, 2026, 7 on January 31, 2025, 7 on March 16, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| September 26, 2024 | Fine | $21,850 |
| May 15, 2024 | Fine | $62,205 |
| December 11, 2023 | Fine | $7,342 |
| November 6, 2023 | Fine | $4,194 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Arizona | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 0.45 | 3.98 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.02 | 0.70 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 0.47 | 3.51 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 0.15 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.28 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 72.5% | 45.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 66.7% | 43.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.40 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 0.44 on weekdays and 0.47 on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 100.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.33 in April to June 2025 to 0.45 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 0.45 | 0.02 | 0.44 | 0.47 | 100.0% | 40 of 90 | 99 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.43 | 0.38 | 3.55 | 3.12 | 15.2% | 0 of 92 | 101 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.42 | 0.36 | 3.56 | 3.06 | 14.7% | 0 of 92 | 103 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.33 | 0.34 | 3.47 | 2.98 | 13.7% | 0 of 91 | 98 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Arizona, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.87 | 0.63 | 4.05 | 3.43 | 3.3% | 0.5% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arizona, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $21.53 | $18.43 to $22.42 | 20,320 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $37.05 | $32.10 to $39.36 | 6,530 |
| Registered nurses | $47.84 | $39.33 to $52.20 | 73,150 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Arizona | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.5 | 10.7 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.8 | 2.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.5 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.4 | 12.8 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.5 | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 30.9 | 10.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 16.7 | 23.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 18.5 | 10.4 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 6.4 | 1.4 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Winslow Campus of Care's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 51.5% · Arizona: 74 better, 1 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 16 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 10.7% · Arizona: 4 better, 1 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 22 eligible stays.
6.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Arizona: 6 better, 1 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 26 eligible stays.
83.3% this home
Median of homes: Arizona69.9% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 30 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Arizona0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 37 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Arizona0.6% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 37 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Arizona95.1% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 19 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: WINSLOW CONVALESCENT CENTER INC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanderknoop, Trudy | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 25% | 09/21/1976 |
| Wetherbee, Dawn | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 25% | 06/04/2010 |
| Williams, Cathleen | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 25% | 09/21/1976 |
| Acwin Management and Investment Corp | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 04/01/1984 | |
| The Five Seas, LLC | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 04/01/1984 | |
| Brown, Barbara | Direct ownership interest | Individual | 06/04/2010 | |
| Brown, Barbara | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/04/2010 | |
| Vanderknoop, Trudy | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 09/21/1976 | |
| Wetherbee, Dawn | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/04/2010 | |
| Williams, Cathleen | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 09/21/1976 | |
| Brown, Barbara | Corporate director | Individual | 06/04/2010 | |
| Vanderknoop, Trudy | Corporate director | Individual | 09/21/1976 | |
| Wetherbee, Dawn | Corporate director | Individual | 06/04/2010 | |
| Williams, Cathleen | Corporate director | Individual | 09/21/1976 | |
| Williams, Cathleen | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/21/1976 | |
| Acwin Management and Investment Corp | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 04/01/1984 | |
| The Five Seas, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 04/01/1984 | |
| Belisle, Daniel | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/19/2024 | |
| Brown, Barbara | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/04/2010 | |
| Ebeid, Sadek | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/02/2019 | |
| Vanderknoop, Trudy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/21/1976 | |
| Wetherbee, Dawn | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/04/2010 | |
| Williams, Cathleen | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/21/1976 | |
| Brown, Barbara | General partnership interest | Individual | 06/04/2010 | |
| Wetherbee, Dawn | General partnership interest | Individual | 06/04/2010 | |
| Acwin Management and Investment Corp | Trustee of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/1984 | |
| The Five Seas, LLC | Trustee of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/1984 | |
| Acwin Management and Investment Corp | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/1984 | |
| The Five Seas, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/1984 | |
| Belisle, Daniel | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/19/2024 | |
| Brown, Barbara | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/04/2010 | |
| Ebeid, Sadek | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/02/2019 | |
| Vanderknoop, Trudy | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/21/1976 | |
| Wetherbee, Dawn | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/04/2010 | |
| Williams, Cathleen | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/21/1976 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Arizona. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.