99 Rigby Owen Rd., Conroe, TX 77304 · Montgomery County · (936) 756-1240
146 certified beds, about 44 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1993
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 675229 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on March 21, 2025, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 26 health citations since September 2022, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (3 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 3 fines totaling $58,580 in the last three years; the largest was $22,920, and the latest is dated May 15, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.14 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.32 of those hours.
53.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Slp Operations, an affiliated group of 7 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 26 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 (Resident#1) out of 7 residents reviewed for reporting. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve foods that were palatable and attractive and prepare food by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance for 3 (Resident #1, #2, and #3) of 6 residents reviewed for food services. 1. Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3 received a piece of undercooked bacon on 04/12/26 on a BLT sandwich served during dinner service. These failures could place residents at risk of decreased food intake, hunger, unwanted weight loss, and diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to consult with the resident's physician when there was An accident involving the resident that had the potential for requiring physician intervention for 1 of 4 residents (CR #1) reviewed for notification of changes. The DON failed to consult with CR #1's physician and hospice service on [DATE] between 4 pm to 5 pm. after an unwitnessed fall. CR #1 was prescribed a blood thinner (medication that prevents or slows down blood clotting). CR # 1 expired at the facility on [DATE]. An immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on [DATE] at 1:40 p.m. While the IJ was removed on [DATE] at 1:00 p.m., the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of Immediate Jeopardy to resident health or safety and a scope of isolation as the facility continued to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their plan of removal. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review: facility staff failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 (CR#1) resident reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to complete neurological checks for CR #1 from [DATE]-[DATE] after an unwitnessed fall on [DATE]. CR # 1 was on an anticoagulant and experienced pain in the following days. The DON failed to complete a head-to-toe assessment, pain assessment, post fall assessment, progress note, SBAR, incident report, initiated neurological checks, or obtain vital signs after CR#1 had an unwitnessed fall on [DATE]. An immediate jeopardy (IJ) was identified on [DATE] at 1:40 p.m. While the IJ was removed on [DATE] at 1:00 p.m., the facility remained out of compliance as the facility continued to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their plan of removal. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, and misappropriation were reported immediately but not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation did not involve abuse and did not result in serious bodily injury to the State Survey Agency (SSA) for 3 of 19 residents (CR #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) reviewed for reporting. The facility failed to report neglect regarding the lack of intervention and assessment after the resident's fall to the SSA and then CR #1 subsequently passed away. The facility failed to report an allegation of misappropriation to the SSA when Resident #2 informed the ADM she had lost her debit card on 3/24/26. The facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse to the SSA when Resident #3 informed staff she was sexually assaulted on 2/8/26 by her roommate. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to thoroughly investigate and to prevent further potential abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment while the investigation is in process, and failed to ensure corrective action must be taken for 3 of 19 residents (CR #1, Resident #2 and Resident #3) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to investigate neglect regarding the lack of intervention and assessment after the resident's unwitnessed fall, and then CR #1 subsequently passed away. The facility failed to investigate an allegation of misappropriation after Resident #2 informed the ADM she had lost her debit card on 3/24/26. The facility failed to investigate sexual abuse allegation after Resident #3 informed staff she was sexually assaulted on 2/8/26 by her roommate. These failures could place residents at risk of ongoing abuse, neglect, exploitation, and mistreatment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received food that is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 3 of 6 residents (Resident #5, Resident #6, and Resident #7) for nutritive value, flavor, and appearance. The facility served overcooked fried fish that was not palatable and attractive to Resident #5 and Resident #6 for the lunch meal on 03/06/2026. This failure could place residents at risk for poor food intake and/or dissatisfaction with the meals served.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility failed to provide Resident #5 with comprehensive per-centered care plan to address his diet. This failure could place residents at risk of not having personalized plans developed to address their specific care needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received necessary services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene for 2 out of 19 residents (Resident #2 and Resident #4) reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to provide scheduled showers, three times a week to Resident #2 for the week of 3/29/26-4/4/26. The facility failed to provide scheduled showers, three times a week to Resident #4 for the week of 3/29/26-4/4/26. This failure could place residents at risk of skin breakdown, infection, and reduced feelings of self-worth.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the daily staffing was posted and readily accessible for review for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for required postings.- The facility failed to update the facility Daily Staff Posting on 02/10/26. This failure could affect residents, facility visitors, vendors, and emergency personnel by placing them at risk of not having access to information regarding daily nursing staffing in a timely manner. Findings Include:An observation on 02/10/26 at 10:39 AM revealed the facility did not have a posting with the nurse staffing posting information. The placard on the wall facing the lobby, across from the nursing station, was empty. In an interview on 02/12/26 at 08:01 AM, the DON said she was responsible for updating the staffing posting. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for one of six residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accident hazards in that: -The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had interventions in place after she fell on 8/10/2025, 8/11/2025, or 8/14/2025 when she sustained a hematoma to her forehead and on 8/16/2025 when she fell again and suffered a laceration over the right eye requiring 7 sutures.-The facility failed to adequately supervise Resident #1 after she experienced the first fall on 8/10/2025. -The facility failed to determine the causative factors of the falls and address those factors timely. Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE]. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 8/22/2025 at 3:40pm. The IJ template was provided to the facility on 8/22/2025 at 3:40pm. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for sanitation in that: 1. [NAME] A placed a 10lb pack of ground beef in the sink underneath running hot water to defrost for lunch service. 2. Intern A failed to secure her waist length hair in a hair net. 3. [NAME] A failed to use gloves when handling the ground beef for lunch service. 4. During a food temperature check, [NAME] A placed the thermometer in each item of food without properly sanitizing the thermometer between checks. 5. [NAME] A failed to wash hands before utilizing gloves. 6. [NAME] A touched the top of the trashcan with his gloved hands and proceeded to prepare a test tray for the investigator. 7. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to serve foods that were palatable and attractive and prepare food by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance for 4 (Resident #1, #2, #3, and #4) of 7 residents reviewed. 1. Resident #3 revealed pictures of meals on 06/26/25, 06/23/25, and 06/22/25 that showed small meal portions with unpalatable and unrecognizable food items. 2. A test tray was provided for the lunch meal service that contained a chopped steak that resembled a slab of meat covered in gravy and a hashbrown casserole that was bland and gummy. These failures could place residents at risk of decreased food intake, hunger, unwanted weight loss, and diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice to including but not limited to the residents right to make choices about aspects of his or her life in the facility that are significant to the resident, healthcare and providers of healthcare services consistent with his or her interest, assessments, and plan of care and other applicable provisions of this part for 1 (Resident #4) of 8 residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to honor Resident #4's request to be assisted to shower on Saturdays. This failure could place residents at risk for lack of choices/decision making resulting in depression, and diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal medical records for 2 (Resident #34 and Resident #18) of 8 residents reviewed for personal privacy. The facility failed to ensure LVN C protected resident's right to privacy by verbalizing that Resident #34 was going to receive Insulin within earshot of Resident #18. This failure could place residents' protected HIPPA information at risk of being overheard resulting in low self-esteem and a diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #31) reviewed for infection control. -CNA A failed to change gloves and perform hand hygiene during incontinent care on Resident #31. This failure could place residents who required incontinent care at risk for cross contamination and infection.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for (1)of 4 residents reviewed. The facility failed to conduct a head-to-toe assessment to determine if Resident # 1 had sustained any injuries from his apparent fall. This failure could place residents at risk of not having necessary care and services to address the resident's individual needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible and each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for (1) of (4) residents reviewed. The facility failed to use proper lifting technique or lifting device to remove resident#1 off the floor. This failure could place residents at risk of accidents and injuries.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to treat the resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner that promotes enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for 4 (Resident #1,#2,#3,#4) of 6 residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to provide Resident #1 with scheduled showers and grooming. The facility failed to provide Resident #2 with scheduled showers. The facility failed to provide Resident #3 with scheduled showers. The facility failed to provide Resident #4 with scheduled showers and grooming. This failure could place residents at risk for loss of dignity.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene for 4 of 6 residents (Resident #1, #2, #3, #4) reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to provide Resident #1 with scheduled showers and personal grooming (shaving of beard and nasal hairs). The facility failed to provide Resident #2 with scheduled showers. The facility failed to provide Resident #3 with scheduled showers. The facility failed to provide Resident #4 with scheduled showers and personal grooming (shaving of beard). This failure could place residents at risk for discomfort, and dignity issues.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, comfortable, and homelike environment for three of twelve residents (Resident #12, Resident #26, and Resident #200) reviewed for a safe, clean, and homelike environment. -The facility failed to ensure Resident #12's restroom vent was clean. -The facility failed to ensure Resident #26's room had a clean air vent, clean restroom door, or a restroom door did not have a hole in it. -The facility failed to ensure Resident #200's ceiling was unstained. These failures could place the residents at risk of risk of decreased quality of like due to the lack of a well-maintained environment or possible health concerns from the particles in the air vents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five percent (%) or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 6% based on 2 errors out of 32 opportunities, which involved 2 of 5 residents (Residents #37 and #38) reviewed for medication errors. -MA A administered the wrong dose of Vitamin D to Resident #37 according to Physician orders. -MA A administered expired Sodium Bicarbonate tablets (an antacid that neutralizes stomach acid) to Resident #38. These failures could place residents at risk of inadequate therapeutic outcomes.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property, and exploitation for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #36) reviewed for misappropriation of property and exploitation. The facility failed to prevent misappropriation of Resident #36's finances when CNA E accepted $400 from Resident #36. This failure could place residents at an increased risk for misappropriation of their property.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to complete an accurate assessment of resident's functional capacity for 1 (Resident #1) out of 3 residents reviewed for MDS assessment. Facility failed to document stage II pressure ulcer in Resident #1's MDS dated [DATE]. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving adequate services and/or care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for dietary services. 1. The facility failed to ensure [NAME] A wore his mask over his nose and mouth in the kitchen. 2. The facility failed to ensure [NAME] A cleaned/sanitized his hands after pulling his mask up with his hand and then began serving the residents' food. 3. The facility failed to ensure [NAME] A properly cleaned/sanitized hands after handling cleaning supplies and then pulled raw defrosted meat out of a water bath in the sink with his bare hands. 4. The facility failed to ensure Dietary Manager secured all hair in a hairnet. 5. The facility failed to ensure there was minimal carbon build-up on 5 large baking pans. 6. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program (PASRR) for 1 (Residents # 22) of 4 residents reviewed for PASRR. The facility failed to complete a Level II PASRR Evaluation for Resident # 22 after an incorrectly completed Level 1 PASRR. This failure could affect residents with a diagnosis of mental illness and could result in these residents not receiving needed services.
7 fire safety citations on file: 2 on March 21, 2025, 2 on December 21, 2023, 3 on September 28, 2022.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2026 | Fine | $22,920 |
| April 3, 2026 | Fine | $13,605 |
| August 25, 2025 | Fine | $22,055 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.14 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.32 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.85 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.69 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.12 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 53.7% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 100.0% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.43 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.25 on weekdays and 2.85 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.98 in April to June 2025 to 3.14 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.14 | 0.32 | 3.25 | 2.85 | 0.0% | 1 of 90 | 44 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.21 | 0.29 | 3.31 | 2.96 | 0.0% | 2 of 92 | 45 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 2.88 | 0.25 | 3.02 | 2.52 | 0.0% | 8 of 92 | 50 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 2.98 | 0.21 | 3.14 | 2.58 | 0.0% | 20 of 91 | 49 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $16.97 to $20.71 | 88,680 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.92 | $27.46 to $32.89 | 57,560 |
| Registered nurses | $46.14 | $38.06 to $50.53 | 271,380 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 19.0 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.3 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.3 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 19.7 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.3 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.9 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Woodland Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 51.5% · Texas: 116 better, 50 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 8 eligible stays.
11.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Texas: 0 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 26 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Texas: 4 better, 11 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 8 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Texas57.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 1 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Texas0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 5 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Texas1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 5 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Median of homes: Texas98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: SLP CONROE LLC. CMS links this home to Slp Operations, a group of 7 nursing homes averaging 2.1 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slp Omega Operations, LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 09/01/2020 |
| Senior Living Properties LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 09/01/2020 | |
| Slp Management Holdings, LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 09/01/2020 | |
| Slp Operations, LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 09/01/2020 | |
| Boswell, Darren | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 09/01/2020 | |
| Eden, James | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 09/01/2020 | |
| Whitworth, Gary | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 09/01/2020 | |
| Conroe Rigby Owen Road LLC | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 09/01/2020 | |
| Leonard, Joshua | Corporate officer | Individual | 10/01/2024 | |
| Aslam, Hunain | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2020 | |
| Leonard, Joshua | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/01/2024 | |
| Conroe Rigby Owen Road LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2020 | |
| Aslam, Hunain | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/01/2020 | |
| Wahl, Erich | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/07/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.