What is Zarrow Pointe's Medicare star rating?

CMS rates Zarrow Pointe 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).

How many deficiencies did Zarrow Pointe get at its last inspection?

2 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on August 29, 2025. The Oklahoma average is 6.4.

Does Zarrow Pointe accept Medicaid?

It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.

Zarrow Pointe: Inspections, Staffing & Ratings

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on August 29, 2025, inspectors cited 2 health deficiencies (the Oklahoma average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).

Of 19 health citations since February 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.

CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,278 in the last three years; the largest was $8,278, and the latest is dated May 19, 2025.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.57 hours per resident per day, against 3.79 across Oklahoma and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.66 of those hours.

41.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Oklahoma average 55.5%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

702/23

704/24

305/25

208/25

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 19 health citations on file.

Severity

Isolated

Pattern

Widespread

Immediate jeopardy

Actual harm

Potential for more than minimal harm

Potential for minimal harm

August 29, 2025Standard inspection · 2 citations

D

Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.

F640 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 26, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure assessments were completed for 1 (#20) of 16 sampled residents whose assessments were reviewed. The administrator identified 55 residents resided in the facility.
D

Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 26, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately code a significant change MDS assessment for 1 (#41) of 14 sampled residents who were reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The administrator identified 55 residents resided in the facility.

May 19, 2025Complaint inspection · 3 citations

G

Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 16, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed to include the amount of assistance needed for incontinent care and bed mobility for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. The DON identified 56 residents resided in the facility.
G

Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from falls during incontinent care for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents who were reviewed for falls. The DON identified 18 residents who required the assistance of two staff during incontinent care.
D

Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

F580 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 16, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure responsible parties were notified immediately after an accident/fall for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents who were reviewed for notification after an accident/fall. The DON identified 56 residents resided in the facility.

April 5, 2024Standard inspection · 7 citations

E

Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 14, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to: a. speak to a resident in a respectful manner for one (#28); and b. ensure resident clothing labels were not visible for one (#39) of three sampled residents reviewed for dignity. The DON identified a census of 58.
E

Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 14, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to revise care plans for two (#22 and #37) of 18 sampled residents reviewed for accuracy of care plans. The DON identified a census of 58.
E

Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 14, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure harmful chemicals were secured. The Administrator identified six residents that required wander guards to be worn for safety. The DON identified a census of 58.
D

Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 14, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to insure an injury of unknown origin was reported to OSDH for one (#52) of three sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The DON identified a census of 58.
D

Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.

F661 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 14, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a discharge summary was developed for one (#61) of three sampled residents reviewed for discharge. The DON identified a census of 58.
D

Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.

F770 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 14, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain physician ordered labs for one (#56) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The DON identified a census of 58.
D

Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 14, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food items were properly secured, dated, and labeled for one of one kitchen observations. The DON identified a census of 58.

February 24, 2023Standard inspection · 7 citations

E

Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 28, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments were accurate for two (#8 and #28) of two residents reviewed for falls and one (#27) of one resident who was reviewed for a PEG (feeding) tube. The Administrator reported 56 residents had falls in the last 12 months and one resident had a PEG tube.
E

Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 28, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed for one (#27) of one resident reviewed for a PEG tube, one (#28) of two residents reviewed for falls, and one (#42) of one resident reviewed for a venous ulcer. The Administrator reported one resident had a PEG tube, 56 residents had falls in the last 12 months, and one resident had a venous ulcer.
E

Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 28, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a fall care plan was revised for two (#8 and #13) of three residents reviewed for falls. The Administrator reported 56 residents had falls in the last 12 months.
E

Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 28, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. weights were obtained as ordered by the physician for one (#13) of one resident with congestive heart failure; b. a care plan was accurate for one (#27) of one resident reviewed for a PEG tube, and c. communication was documented between hospice and the facility for one (#38) of two residents on hospice. The Administrator reported 13 residents had congestive heart failure, one resident had a peg tube, and two residents were on hospice.
E

Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 28, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow their fall protocol policy for three (#8, 13, and #28) of three residents reviewed for falls. The Administrator reported 56 residents had falls in the last 12 months.
D

Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted

F655 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 28, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for one (#109) of two new admissions reviewed. The Administrator reported 121 residents had been admitted in the last year.
D

Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.

F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 28, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for two (#5 and #109) of two residents reviewed for oxygen therapy. The Administrator reported 13 residents received oxygen therapy.

Fire safety inspections

4 fire safety citations on file: 3 on April 5, 2024, 1 on February 13, 2020.

Every fire safety citation4 citations

E
Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.

K 321 · April 5, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.

K 372 · April 5, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
C
To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.

K 761 · April 5, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Have properly located and lighted "Exit" signs.

K 293 · February 13, 2020 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

Date	Penalty	Amount or length
May 19, 2025	Fine	$8,278

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

Measure	This home	Oklahoma	United States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)	5.57	3.79	3.86
Registered nurses	0.66	0.34	0.69
All nursing staff on weekends	4.98	3.44	3.42
Nurse aides	3.89
Licensed practical nurses	1.02
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)	41.0%	55.5%	45.8%
Registered nurse turnover	41.7%	53.6%	42.9%
Administrators who left	1

CMS expects 3.37 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.80 on weekdays and 4.98 on weekends, 14% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.84 in April to June 2025 to 5.57 in January to March 2026.

Quarter	All nursing staff	Registered nurses	Weekdays	Weekends	Contract staff share	Days with no RN hours	Residents a day
Jan to Mar 2026	5.57	0.66	5.80	4.98	0.0%	0 of 90	59
Oct to Dec 2025	5.79	0.69	6.02	5.21	0.0%	0 of 92	55
Jul to Sep 2025	6.19	0.96	6.49	5.44	0.0%	0 of 92	55
Apr to Jun 2025	5.84	1.00	6.07	5.24	0.0%	0 of 91	58
United States, Jan to Mar 2026	3.75	0.62	3.92	3.33	5.3%	0.5% of days
Oklahoma, Jan to Mar 2026	3.79	0.32	3.94	3.42	2.2%	1.6% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

Measure	This home	Oklahoma	US
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	7.6	13.6	13.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.0	1.9	0.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	4.7	2.8	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	4.6	4.7	3.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	1.6	1.8	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	4.3	13.7	14.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	5.2	4.7	4.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	6.1	17.5	15.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	8.5	27.3	23.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	10.9	16.6	12.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	3.1	2.3	1.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	1.5	3.0	1.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: THE TULSA JEWISH COMMUNITY RETIREMENT AND HEALTH CARE CENTER INC.

Name	Role	Type	Since
The Tulsa Jewish Community Retirement and Health Care Center Inc	Direct ownership interest	Organization	07/01/2020
Adelson, David	Managing control - governing body	Individual	04/30/2023
Bumgarner, Leslie	Managing control - governing body	Individual	06/14/2020
Burnstein, Daniel	Managing control - governing body	Individual	04/30/2023
Burnstein, Irene	Managing control - governing body	Individual	07/01/2011
Carment, John	Managing control - governing body	Individual	07/01/2008
Cash, Sharon	Managing control - governing body	Individual	06/14/2020
Clayman, John	Managing control - governing body	Individual	04/28/2024
Coretz, Robert	Managing control - governing body	Individual	04/27/2014
Coretz, Tyler	Managing control - governing body	Individual	04/27/2025
Enriquez, Glenda	Managing control - governing body	Individual	02/22/2024
Finer, Adam	Managing control - governing body	Individual	04/27/2025
Finer, Janis	Managing control - governing body	Individual	07/01/2011
Friedland, David	Managing control - governing body	Individual	07/28/2024
Heyman, Ross	Managing control - governing body	Individual	04/29/2018
Jakubovitz, James	Managing control - governing body	Individual	07/11/2018
Magoon, Bruce	Managing control - governing body	Individual	07/01/2011
Newman, Russell	Managing control - governing body	Individual	04/28/2026
Roberts, Joseph	Managing control - governing body	Individual	04/27/2025
Schumann, Sarah-Anne	Managing control - governing body	Individual	04/28/2024
Snyder, Mathew	Managing control - governing body	Individual	01/24/2025
Stolper, Jon	Managing control - governing body	Individual	06/14/2020
Sylvan, Barbara	Managing control - governing body	Individual	04/27/2014
Weiss, Mark	Managing control - governing body	Individual	04/28/2024
Winder Dr, Ronald	Managing control - governing body	Individual	04/26/2026
Winder, Barbara	Managing control - governing body	Individual	06/14/2020
Wolff, Diana	Managing control - governing body	Individual	04/29/2018
Zeligson, Stephen	Managing control - governing body	Individual	07/01/2011
Adelson, David	Corporate director	Individual	04/30/2023
Bumgarner, Leslie	Corporate director	Individual	06/14/2020
Burnstein, Daniel	Corporate director	Individual	04/30/2023
Burnstein, Irene	Corporate director	Individual	07/01/2011
Cash, Sharon	Corporate director	Individual	06/14/2020
Clayman, John	Corporate director	Individual	04/28/2024
Coretz, Robert	Corporate director	Individual	04/27/2014
Coretz, Tyler	Corporate director	Individual	04/27/2025
Finer, Adam	Corporate director	Individual	04/27/2025
Finer, Janis	Corporate director	Individual	07/01/2011
Friedland, David	Corporate director	Individual	04/28/2024
Heyman, Ross	Corporate director	Individual	04/29/2018
Jakubovitz, James	Corporate director	Individual	07/01/2011
Magoon, Bruce	Corporate director	Individual	07/01/2011
Newman, Russell	Corporate director	Individual	04/28/2026
Roberts, Joseph	Corporate director	Individual	04/27/2025
Schumann, Sarah-Anne	Corporate director	Individual	04/28/2024
Stolper, Jon	Corporate director	Individual	06/14/2020
Sylvan, Barbara	Corporate director	Individual	04/27/2014
Weiss, Mark	Corporate director	Individual	04/28/2024
Winder Dr, Ronald	Corporate director	Individual	04/26/2026
Winder, Barbara	Corporate director	Individual	06/14/2020
Wolff, Diana	Corporate director	Individual	04/29/2018
Zeligson, Stephen	Corporate director	Individual	07/01/2011
Jakubovitz, James	Corporate officer	Individual	07/01/2011
The Tulsa Jewish Community Retirement and Health Care Center Inc	Operational/managerial control	Organization	07/01/2020
Bumgarner, Leslie	Operational/managerial control	Individual	06/14/2020
Carment, John	Operational/managerial control	Individual	07/01/2008
Enriquez, Glenda	Operational/managerial control	Individual	02/22/2024
Heyman, Ross	Operational/managerial control	Individual	04/29/2018
Jakubovitz, James	Operational/managerial control	Individual	07/01/2011
Magoon, Bruce	Operational/managerial control	Individual	07/01/2011
Sylvan, Barbara	Operational/managerial control	Individual	04/27/2014
The Tulsa Jewish Community Retirement and Health Care Center Inc	Adp of the SNF	Organization	07/01/2020
Carment, John	Adp of the SNF	Individual	07/01/2008
Enriquez, Glenda	Adp of the SNF	Individual	02/22/2024
Jakubovitz, James	Adp of the SNF	Individual	07/01/2018
Snyder, Mathew	Adp of the SNF	Individual	01/24/2024

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 9 problems in this area, most recently on August 29, 2025: "Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment."
How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on May 19, 2025: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on May 19, 2025: "Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident."
How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on April 5, 2024: "Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities."
How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

Ambassador Manor Nursing Center
Tulsa, 1.2 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 25 citations
The Villages at Southern Hills
Tulsa, 1.7 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 3 citations
University Village Retirement Community
Tulsa, 2 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 15 citations
Colonial Manor Nursing Home
Tulsa, 2.1 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 18 citations
Grace Skilled Nursing and Therapy Jenks
Jenks, 2.4 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 33 citations
Sherwood Manor Nursing Home
Tulsa, 2.5 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 31 citations
Covenant Living at Inverness
Tulsa, 2.8 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 3 citations
Southern Hills Rehabilitation Center
Tulsa, 3.5 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 22 citations

Oklahoma contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Oklahoma. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Inspections and complaints: Oklahoma State Department of Health, Long Term Care Service, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
Resident advocate: Oklahoma Long-Term Care Ombudsman, Office of the Attorney General, 1-800-211-2116. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
State inspection reports: OSDH Long Term Care Surveys search, where Oklahoma publishes its own records on licensed homes.

Common questions

What is Zarrow Pointe's Medicare star rating?: CMS rates Zarrow Pointe 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Zarrow Pointe get at its last inspection?: 2 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on August 29, 2025. The Oklahoma average is 6.4.
Has Zarrow Pointe been fined?: Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,278 in the last three years.
Does Zarrow Pointe accept Medicaid?: It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Zarrow Pointe?: CMS lists 66 owners and managers. Legal business name: THE TULSA JEWISH COMMUNITY RETIREMENT AND HEALTH CARE CENTER INC.

Sources

Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.