8555 South Lewis Avenue, Tulsa, OK 74137 · Tulsa County · (918) 299-2661
80 certified beds, about 69 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 2009
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 375531 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on December 5, 2024, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the Oklahoma average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).
None of its 15 health citations since October 2021 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.36 hours per resident per day, against 3.79 across Oklahoma and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.94 of those hours.
48.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Oklahoma average 55.5%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 15 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were palatable for three (#22, 47 and #54) of three residents who were reviewed for food palatability. The staff engagement coordinator identified 71 residents who received nourishment from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure foods were served in a sanitary manner in two of two dining areas. The staff engagement coordinator identified 65 resident who ate food in the dining rooms.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure arbitration agreements contained language which indicated a neutral arbitrator would be utilized and the arbitration would take place at a venue convenient to both parties for three (#20, 38, and #120) of three sampled residents who were reviewed for arbitration agreements. The administrator identified 56 residents who had signed an arbitration agreement.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure privacy was provided during urinary catheter care for one (#2) of two sampled residents who were reviewed for urinary catheters. The staff engagement coordinator identified six residents who had urinary catheters.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were secured in locked medication carts for two (#1 and #2) of seven medication carts observed. The administrator identified 72 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure records were accurate for one (#21) of five sampled residents who were reviewed for unnecessary medications. The administrator identified 74 residents who resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure arbitration agreements contained language residents and/or resident representatives could rescind the agreement within 30 days of signing and signing the agreement was not a condition of admission for three (#20, 38, and #120) of three sampled residents who were reviewed for arbitration agreements. The administrator identified 56 residents who had signed an arbitration agreement.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure catheter tubing was maintained to prevent infection for two (#2 and #27) of two residents who were reviewed for catheter infection prevention. The staff engagement coordinator identified six residents who had catheters.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to inspect a hospice supplied bed for safety prior to use by a resident for one (#1) of three sampled residents reviewed for bed safety. The administrator identified 68 residents resided at the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to administer oxygen according to physician orders for one (#213) of four sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, dated 09/22/23, documented 11 residents received respiratory treatments.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure blood pressure medications were administered as ordered for one (#12) of five sampled residents reviewed for medications. The DON identified 31 residents who had blood pressure medications with parameters.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. staff were COVID tested during outbreak status per policy and procedure; b. staff wore appropriate PPE for COVID posted isolation precaution rooms per policy and procedure; and c. staff washed their hands with glove changes during wound care per policy and procedure. The DON identified six resident who were on isolation precautions for COVID-19 and two residents who were receiving wound care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview. the facility failed to ensure a resident had a physician order to self-administer a nebulizer treatment for one (#16) of one sample resident reviewed for self-administration of medications. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 09/22/23, documented 11 residents who received respiratory treatments.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician of a surgical wound change for one (#212) of one sampled residents reviewed for surgical wounds. The DON identified three residents who had surgical wounds.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to implement correct hand hygiene infection control for one (#35) of five sampled residents reviewed for wound care. The facility facility wound flow sheet documented 14 residents had wounds.
6 fire safety citations on file: 6 on October 8, 2021.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Oklahoma | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.36 | 3.79 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.94 | 0.34 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.94 | 3.44 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.75 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.68 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 48.1% | 55.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 30.8% | 53.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.55 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.53 on weekdays and 3.94 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 2.3% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.76 in April to June 2025 to 4.36 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.36 | 0.94 | 4.53 | 3.94 | 2.3% | 0 of 90 | 69 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.51 | 0.95 | 4.66 | 4.13 | 1.4% | 0 of 92 | 68 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.47 | 0.84 | 4.64 | 4.05 | 5.5% | 0 of 92 | 68 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.76 | 0.95 | 5.05 | 4.03 | 8.6% | 0 of 91 | 67 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Oklahoma, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.79 | 0.32 | 3.94 | 3.42 | 2.2% | 1.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $17.27 | $15.82 to $18.39 | 19,410 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $28.04 | $24.06 to $29.84 | 11,540 |
| Registered nurses | $39.87 | $37.19 to $47.55 | 38,270 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Oklahoma | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.0 | 13.6 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 2.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.4 | 4.7 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 22.7 | 13.7 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.0 | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.6 | 17.5 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 21.9 | 27.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 12.6 | 16.6 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.7 | 2.3 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.7 | 3.0 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for University Village Retirement Community's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it worse than the national rate (36.2% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
36.2% this home
Worse than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Oklahoma: 24 better, 16 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 170 eligible stays.
9.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Oklahoma: 1 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 159 eligible stays.
6.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Oklahoma: 0 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 84 eligible stays.
71.7% this home
Median of homes: Oklahoma54.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 92 residents counted.
1.8% this home
Median of homes: Oklahoma0.7% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 109 residents counted.
4.2% this home
Median of homes: Oklahoma2.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 109 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: Oklahoma100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 66 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: UNIVERSITY VILLAGE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY, LLC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fail, Blake | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 38% | 07/29/2011 |
| Gawey, Matthew | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 38% | 07/29/2011 |
| Roberts, Keith | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 24% | 07/29/2011 |
| Fail, Blake | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/29/2011 | |
| Gawey, Matthew | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/29/2011 | |
| Roberts, Keith | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/29/2011 | |
| Triad Aspen Partners, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 08/01/2011 | |
| Brown, Tammy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/12/2025 | |
| Luiskutty, Thomas | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/03/2022 | |
| Neal, Vanessa | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/29/2011 | |
| Triad Aspen Partners, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/15/2025 | |
| Brown, Tammy | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/12/2025 | |
| Luiskutty, Thomas | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/03/2022 | |
| Neal, Vanessa | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/29/2011 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Oklahoma. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.