Aidan Senior Living at Reedsport
600 Ranch Road, Reedsport, OR 97467 · Douglas County · (541) 271-5841
29 certified beds, about 25 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1984
Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 385164 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on March 28, 2025, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Oregon average is 9.2, the national average 9.2).
Of 34 health citations since October 2022, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,018 in the last three years; the largest was $8,018, and the latest is dated July 22, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 6.42 hours per resident per day, against 5.03 across Oregon and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.88 of those hours.
43.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Oregon average 47.4%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
710/22
109/23
1912/23
107/24
603/25
Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 34 health citations on file.
Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
1G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
24D
7E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
1C
March 28, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 6 citations
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure food was stored properly in 1 of 1 resident refrigerator, and failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and handled properly in 1 of 1 kitchen. This put residents at risk for food borne illnesses.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a personalized care plan was created for 1 of 1 resident (#4) reviewed for activities. This put residents at risk for lack of personal preferences being honored.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's environment remained free from accident hazards for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#19) reviewed for falls. This placed residents at risk for accidents.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident medication was not expired for 1 of 1 medication storage refrigerator. This placed residents at risk for lack of medication efficacy and adverse reactions from expired medications.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow infection control standards for 1 of 5 residents (#18) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for exposure and contraction of infectious diseases.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders for 2 of 5 residents (#s 18 and 19) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for delayed treatment and unmet needs.
July 22, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- G Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow care plan transfer interventions for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#1) reviewed for accidents. This failure resulted in a fall for Resident 1 with hospitalization for a fractured back.
December 14, 2023Standard inspection · 19 citations
- F Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to assess and develop a water management plan and failed to perform laundry in a sanitary manner for 1 of 1 facility. This placed residents at risk for infections.
- E Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, it was determined the facility failed to have a system in place to deliver mail on Saturdays. This placed residents at risk for lack of timely written communication.
- E Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to clean filters on the heater air-conditioning equipment for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for unclean and unhomelike environment.
- E Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to implement its abuse prevention program policy and procedure for screening for 1 of 5 sampled staff members (#16) reviewed for facility personnel. This placed residents at risk for abuse and neglect of care.
- E Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to revise care plan interventions for 5 of 6 sampled residents (#s 7, 8, 12, 13, and 19) reviewed for accidents, nutrition, dignity, activities, and medications. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to maintain cleanliness for 1 of 1 Kitchen and 1 of 1 dining room. This placed residents at risk for cross contamination.
- D Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to review a consent for medications with a resident's representative for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#12) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for unnecessary medications.
- D Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to provide the risks and benefits for the use of psychotropic medications prior to administration for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#18) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for lack of informed consent.
- D Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to assist a resident with completing an advance directive for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#2) reviewed for advance directives. This placed residents at risk for end of life choices not being honored.
- D Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provided a two day notice prior to the ending of skilled services for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#71) reviewed for beneficiary notifications. This placed residents at risk for lack of timely appeals.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to developed care plans for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 12 and 18) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for lack of social engagement.
- D Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's nails were trimmed for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#8) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for lack of hygiene.
- D Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure CNA staff annual performance reviews were completed for 3 of 5 sampled CNA staff (#s 8, 11, and 12) reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for a lack of competent staff.
- D Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure proper monitoring prior to medication administration for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 7 and 18) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication reactions.
- D Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents did not receive unnecessary psychotropic medications for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 8 and 18) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse side effects of psychotropic medications.
- D Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided routine dental care for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#11) reviewed for dental. This placed residents at risk for dental pain.
- D Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure antibiotics were not used unless indicated for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#18) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for the development of antibiotic resistant organisms.
- D Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure pneumonia vaccines were offered for 3 of 5 sampled residents (#s 3, 5, and 9) reviewed for immunizations. This placed residents at risk for pneumonia.
- D Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure CNA staff received required 12 hours of in-service training annually for 2 of 5 sampled CNAs (#s 9 and 10) reviewed for sufficient and competent nurse staffing. This placed residents at risk for lack of competent staff.
September 1, 2023Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from mental and verbal abuse by staff and a resident for 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 501 and 502) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse.
October 21, 2022Standard inspection · 7 citations
- E Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to thoroughly investigate incidents for 5 of 7 sampled residents (#s 1, 2, 5, 16, and 17) reviewed for abuse and accidents. This placed residents at risk for abuse.
- D Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated with respect and dignity for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#17) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for lack of self-worth.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to accurately assess, monitor and document skin issues for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#9) reviewed for skin conditions. This placed residents at risk for additional skin issues.
- D Provide appropriate foot care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide adequate foot care for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#9) reviewed for ADL care. This placed residents at risk for unmet foot care needs.
- D Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide ROM/RA services for 3 of 4 residents (#s 12, 13 and 17) reviewed for positioning and mobility. This placed residents at risk for decline in mobility.
- D Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to assess the risk of entrapment, attempt alternatives and explain the risk and benefits for the use of side rails for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#5) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for side rail injuries.
- C Post nurse staffing information every day.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the daily staff posting was accurate for 17 out of 30 days reviewed for staffing report accuracy. This placed residents at risk for lack of staffing information.
Fire safety inspections
14 fire safety citations on file: 1 on March 28, 2025, 11 on December 14, 2023, 2 on October 21, 2022.
Every fire safety citation14 citations
- D Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- F Develop Emergency Preparedness policies and procedures.
- F Address subsistence needs for staff and patients.
- F Establish policies and procedures for sheltering.
- F Establish roles under a Waiver declared by secretary.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- F Have restrictions on the use of highly flammable decorations.
- F To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- D Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- D Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
- E To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
- E Have power receptacles that are properly grounded.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| July 22, 2024 | Fine | $8,018 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Oregon | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 6.42 | 5.03 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.88 | 0.72 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 5.64 | 4.51 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 4.61 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.92 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 43.1% | 47.4% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 51.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.97 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 6.73 on weekdays and 5.64 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 2.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.98 in April to June 2025 to 6.42 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 6.42 | 0.88 | 6.73 | 5.64 | 2.4% | 0 of 90 | 25 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 5.81 | 0.63 | 5.99 | 5.36 | 5.7% | 1 of 92 | 26 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 5.66 | 0.60 | 5.88 | 5.10 | 0.5% | 0 of 92 | 26 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 5.98 | 0.65 | 6.25 | 5.31 | 1.8% | 0 of 91 | 26 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Oregon, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.91 | 0.64 | 5.12 | 4.40 | 6.2% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
Staff pay at this home
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
Official wage estimates for Oregon
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oregon, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $23.96 | $22.83 to $28.40 | 14,800 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $38.69 | $35.11 to $43.60 | 4,260 |
| Registered nurses | $62.02 | $51.55 to $64.63 | 39,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Oregon | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.5 | 14.9 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.4 | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 2.4 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.3 | 5.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.3 | 13.9 | 15.4 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: AIDAN SENIOR LIVING AT REEDSPORT INC..
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aidan Senior Living at Reedsport Inc. | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 02/26/2017 | |
| Anderson, Troy | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 05/01/2010 | |
| Bell, Ronald | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 05/01/2010 | |
| Brooks, Scott | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 04/01/2014 | |
| Woolley, Jennifer | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 05/01/2010 | |
| Aidan Health Services Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 05/01/2010 | |
| Aidan Senior Living at Reedsport Inc. | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 04/01/2010 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 9 problems in this area, most recently on March 28, 2025: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on December 14, 2023: "Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on March 28, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on March 28, 2025: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Regency Florence Florence, 20.1 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 30 citations
- Avamere Rehabilitation of Coos Bay Coos Bay, 21.7 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 45 citations
- Life Care Center of Coos Bay Coos Bay, 22.4 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 45 citations
Oregon contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Oregon. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Oregon Department of Human Services, Nursing Facility Licensing, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Oregon Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman, (800) 522-2602. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Oregon Licensed Long-Term Care Settings Search, where Oregon publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Aidan Senior Living at Reedsport's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Aidan Senior Living at Reedsport 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Aidan Senior Living at Reedsport get at its last inspection?
- 5 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on March 28, 2025. The Oregon average is 9.2.
- Has Aidan Senior Living at Reedsport been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,018 in the last three years.
- Does Aidan Senior Living at Reedsport accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Aidan Senior Living at Reedsport?
- CMS lists 7 owners and managers. Legal business name: AIDAN SENIOR LIVING AT REEDSPORT INC..
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.