Life Care Center of Coos Bay
2890 Ocean Blvd, Coos Bay, OR 97420 · Coos County · (541) 267-5433
114 certified beds, about 59 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1983
Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
2 of 5
Health inspections
2 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 385157 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on December 19, 2025, inspectors cited 9 health deficiencies (the Oregon average is 9.2, the national average 9.2).
Of 45 health citations since June 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $62,868 in the last three years; the largest was $62,868, and the latest is dated September 27, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.76 hours per resident per day, against 5.03 across Oregon and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.75 of those hours.
58.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Oregon average 47.4%).
CMS links it to Life Care Centers of America, an affiliated group of 194 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
1106/23
2309/24
912/25
204/26
Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 45 health citations on file.
Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
2G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
35D
8E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
April 16, 2026Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to keep a resident free from physical restraint for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#6) reviewed for physical restraints. This placed residents at risk for potential abuse or neglect.
- D Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to provide a safe and orderly discharge for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#5) reviewed for discharge. This placed residents at risk for unsafe discharge.
December 19, 2025Standard inspection · 9 citations
- E Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to make prompt efforts to resolve resident grievances for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for grievances. This placed residents at risk for unresolved grievances.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene was completed during meals for 1 of 1 dining room reviewed for dining. This placed residents at risk for cross contamination.
- D Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide information regarding the risks and benefits for the use of psychotropic medications prior to administration for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 5 and 24) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for lack of informed consent.
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were reported to the State Agency within two hours for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#52) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for continued abuse.
- D Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to notify the resident in writing of the reason for transfer to the hospital for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 8 and 66) reviewed for hospitalization. This place residents at risk for lack of information related to transfer.
- D Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received restorative therapies for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#1) reviewed for rehab services and falls. This placed residents at risk for a decline in ADLs and falls.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders for 2 of 7 sampled residents (#s 24 and 45) reviewed for medications and skin. This placed residents at risk for worsening wounds and unmet medical needs.
- D Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure an antibiotic was indicated for use for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#5) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for antibiotic resistant organisms and unresolved infections.
- D Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure lab services were provided when ordered for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#24) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for unnecessary blood draws.
September 27, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 23 citations
- G Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from accidents and update care plans after accidents for 3 of 4 sampled residents (#s 21, 36 and 48) reviewed for accidents and non-pressure wounds. Resident 21 fell from a mechanical lift resulting in a left arm fracture and hospitalization.
- G Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received appropriate pain management for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 41 and 52) reviewed for pain. Resident 41 was not administered pain medication for five days resulting in unresolved severe pain which limited her/his usual activities.
- E Post nurse staffing information every day.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the staffing information was posted in a location easily accessible to residents and visitors. The facility also failed to post accurate and complete staffing information for 4 of 46 days reviewed for staffing. This placed residents and visitors at risk for incomplete, inaccessible, and inaccurate information.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions (EBP; requires staff to wear gown and gloves with resident contact) and transmission based precautions for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 3 and 9) reviewed for pressure and non-pressure ulcers. This placed residents at risk for cross-contamination.
- E Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure CNA staff received 12 hours of in-service training annually for 5 of 6 staff members (#s 11, 18, 38, 39 and 40) reviewed for in-service training. This placed residents at risk for lack of competent staff.
- D Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were included in care planning for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#31) reviewed for care planning. This placed residents at risk for not being involved in the care planning process.
- D Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' current advance directive information was reflected in clinical records for 3 of 5 sampled residents (#s 3, 45 and 51) reviewed for advance directives. This placed residents at risk for end of life choices not being honored.
- D Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident representative was notified of hospitalizations for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#33) reviewed for notification. This placed resident representatives at risk for lack of care decisions.
- D Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide written notification regarding a change in coverage for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#9) reviewed for Medicare notification of non-coverage. This placed residents and their representatives at risk for unknown financial liabilities.
- D Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to provide a building in good repair 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 11 and 20) reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for unsafe and unhomelike environment.
- D Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to protect residents' rights to be free from verbal and physical abuse by Staff for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#56) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse.
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to report to the State Survey Agency an allegation of abuse for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#56) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse.
- D Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to investigate an allegation of abuse for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#56) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to update the care plan for 3 of 7 sampled residents (#s 3, 9, and 43) reviewed for positioning and pressure ulcers. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs.
- D Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide shaving for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#43) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for lack of self esteem.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide care to a non-pressure skin injury and failed to provide preparation for a medical procedure for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 3 and 21) reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions and medical procedures. This placed residents at risk for delayed care needs and treatment.
- D Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure treatment was provided for a resident's decreased ROM for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#36) reviewed for positioning. This placed residents at risk for pain.
- D Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide adequate urinary catheter care and incontinent care for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#43) reviewed for pain and incontinence. This placed residents at risk for unmet urinary catheter needs and UTI.
- D Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow the nutritional care plan for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#36) reviewed for nutrition. This placed residents at risk for weight loss.
- D Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure non-pharmacological interventions were provided prior medication administration and document a rational for no gradual dose reduction for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#43) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication reactions.
- D Have an agreement with an approved laboratory to obtain services, if on-site laboratory services aren't provided.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a blood sample was obtained for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#21) reviewed for laboratory tests. This placed residents at risk for delayed treatment.
- D Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was offered a dental appointment for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#3) reviewed for dental services. This placed residents at risk for oral pain.
- D Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure antibiotics were not used unless indicated and failed to monitor antibiotic usage for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#48) reviewed for urinary catheters or UTIs. This placed residents at risk for unnecessary antibiotic usage and drug resistant infections.
June 16, 2023Standard inspection · 11 citations
- E Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide advance directive information, or follow up with or assist residents or resident representatives with formulation of an advanced directive for 4 of 7 sampled residents (#s 2, 3, 34 and 40) reviewed for advanced directives. This placed residents at risk for end of life choices not being honored.
- E Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing to meet the needs of residents for 2 of 3 halls reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident snacks were removed after discharge and/or labeled for 1 of 1 unit refrigerator (East Hall). This placed residents at risk for decreased quality of food.
- D Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide written grievance communications and resolutions regarding care and treatment concerns for 1 or 4 sampled residents (#256) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for unresolved concerns and grievances.
- D Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to protect residents' right to be free from verbal, and physical abuse for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#35) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to revise care plan interventions for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#2) reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions. This placed residents at risk for medical complications.
- D Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to complete discharge summaries including a recapitulation of stay and a final summary of residents' status upon discharge for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#53) reviewed for discharge. This placed residents at risk for unsafe discharges.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure treatments were provided for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#257) reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions. This placed residents at risk for adverse medical conditions.
- D Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to address RD recommendations for 2 of 7 sampled residents (#s 9 and 40) reviewed for unnecessary medications and nutrition. This placed residents at risk for weight loss.
- D Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident food preferences were honored for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#23) reviewed for food preferences. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs.
- D Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determine the facility failed to provide adaptive eating equipment for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#2) reviewed for position and mobility. This placed residents at risk for loss of dining independence.
Fire safety inspections
4 fire safety citations on file: 4 on September 27, 2024.
Every fire safety citation4 citations
- F Install a fire alarm system that can be heard throughout the facility.
- F Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- D To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| September 27, 2024 | Fine | $62,868 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Oregon | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.76 | 5.03 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.11 | 4.51 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 3.11 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.89 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 58.7% | 47.4% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 54.5% | 51.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.99 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.02 on weekdays and 4.11 on weekends, 18% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.96 in April to June 2025 to 4.76 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.76 | 0.75 | 5.02 | 4.11 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 59 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 5.02 | 0.85 | 5.28 | 4.36 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 59 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 5.19 | 0.72 | 5.48 | 4.46 | 5.5% | 0 of 92 | 58 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.96 | 0.68 | 5.23 | 4.29 | 11.5% | 1 of 91 | 58 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Oregon, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.91 | 0.64 | 5.12 | 4.40 | 6.2% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Oregon | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 17.0 | 14.9 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 2.4 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.7 | 20.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.6 | 5.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.4 | 13.9 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 27.0 | 21.4 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 29.1 | 16.1 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.8 | 1.5 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.1 | 2.4 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC.. CMS links this home to Life Care Centers of America, a group of 194 nursing homes averaging 3.4 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Butner, Nancy | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 09/16/2018 | |
| Fray, September | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 04/29/2024 | |
| Shader, Robin | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 09/22/2022 | |
| Fletcher, Todd | Corporate director | Individual | 05/01/2021 | |
| Lay, Lisa | Corporate director | Individual | 04/24/2017 | |
| Preston, Forrest | Corporate director | Individual | 01/06/1976 | |
| Swanker, Richard | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Ziegler, James | Corporate director | Individual | 09/18/2001 | |
| Cross, Cindy | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/21/1994 | |
| Fletcher, Todd | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/02/2020 | |
| Henry, Terry | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/16/1999 | |
| Lay, Lisa | Corporate officer | Individual | 02/09/2018 | |
| Preston, Forrest | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/06/1976 | |
| Swanker, Richard | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/01/2011 | |
| Thurmond, Joan | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/22/2000 | |
| Ziegler, James | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/16/1999 | |
| Life Care Centers of America, Inc. | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 10/01/1979 | |
| Butner, Nancy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/16/2018 | |
| Fletcher, Todd | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2021 | |
| Fray, September | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/29/2024 | |
| Gerber, Robert | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/01/2010 | |
| Lay, Lisa | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/24/2017 | |
| Preston, Aubrey | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/27/2024 | |
| Preston, Forrest | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/06/1976 | |
| Shader, Robin | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/22/2022 | |
| Swanker, Richard | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Ziegler, James | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/18/2001 | |
| Fray, September | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/24/2025 | |
| Gerber, Robert | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/07/2025 | |
| Preston, Forrest | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/31/2002 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 12 problems in this area, most recently on December 19, 2025: "Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 11 problems in this area, most recently on April 16, 2026: "Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge."
- How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on April 16, 2026: "Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on December 19, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 4.11 hours per resident per day, below the Oregon average of 4.51.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Avamere Rehabilitation of Coos Bay Coos Bay, 1.5 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 45 citations
- Aidan Senior Living at Reedsport Reedsport, 22.4 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 34 citations
- Myrtle Point Rehabilitation & Care Myrtle Point, 22.5 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 71 citations
Oregon contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Oregon. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Oregon Department of Human Services, Nursing Facility Licensing, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Oregon Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman, (800) 522-2602. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Oregon Licensed Long-Term Care Settings Search, where Oregon publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Life Care Center of Coos Bay's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Life Care Center of Coos Bay 2 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Life Care Center of Coos Bay get at its last inspection?
- 9 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on December 19, 2025. The Oregon average is 9.2.
- Has Life Care Center of Coos Bay been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $62,868 in the last three years.
- Does Life Care Center of Coos Bay accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Life Care Center of Coos Bay?
- CMS lists 30 owners and managers, and links the home to Life Care Centers of America. Legal business name: LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC..
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.