11007 Radcliff Drive, Allendale, MI 49401 · Ottawa County · (616) 895-6688
60 certified beds, about 50 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1986
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 235450 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on February 12, 2026, inspectors cited 11 health deficiencies (the Michigan average is 9.9, the national average 9.2).
Of 34 health citations since December 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.67 hours per resident per day, against 3.99 across Michigan and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.89 of those hours.
51.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Michigan average 44.1%).
CMS links it to Atrium Centers, an affiliated group of 26 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 34 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake #3006042Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have safeguards and systems in place to ensure the proper storage, dispensing, administering, and reconciliation of controlled substances for 1 resident (Resident #3), reviewed for pharmacy services.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intakes # 2801558 and 2807946Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care following professional standards of practice and facility policy to prevent the development and/or worsening of pressure injuries for 3 of 5 residents (Resident #100, #42, and #41) reviewed for pressure injury prevention and management, resulting in a stage IV sacral decubitus ulcer with exposed bone and presumed osteomyelitis for R100.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement ordered safety precautions for two (Resident #43 and Resident #41) of three residents reviewed for accidents, resulting in Resident #43 eating meals unsupervised, choking and aspirating, and requiring emergency medical attention and hospitalization.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain best practices in the food service area resulting in the potential to spread food borne illness to all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings Include:During an observation beginning on 2/9/2026 at 8:30 AM, the door to the kitchen at the facility was observed open from a dining room. No staff were present in the kitchen at this time. Hair nets were not present at the entrance of the kitchen above a handwashing sink. Dirty dishes and scraps of food were noted on a two-shelf cart and on a dining room table outside the kitchen. During the initial kitchen tour starting on 2/9/2026 the following were observed:The microwave oven was opened and dried food debris were noted within the microwave and on the inside of the microwave door. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician ordered parameters for one resident (Resident #42) and failed to follow professional standards and facility policy for narcotic accounting for one resident (Resident #50) of four residents reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to secure three of four medication carts and properly store a medication pass supplement.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to utilize enhanced barrier precautions for 2 residents (R13 and R27), perform appropriate hand hygiene during care for one resident (R27), and provide a cleanable wheelchair for one resident (R20), of 3 residents reviewed for infection control.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain general cleanliness and repair of the facility, resulting in an increased potential for contamination and a possible decrease in satisfaction of living for residents. Findings Include:On 02/09/26 at 12:40PM, the following was observed in the spa shower room across from room [ROOM NUMBER]: (a) a bag of soiled linens laid on the floor, (b) fecal matter was smeared on the blue shower chair, and (c) fecal matter sat on one of the shower chair legs. On 02/10/2026 at 2:25PM, observed particle board shelving in the janitor closet next to the housekeeping office had peeling laminate, swelling of particleboard and a mold-like in appearance growth on the exposed particleboard. At time of observation Maintenance Director (MD) S indicated he was unaware of shelving damage. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an effective way to communicate for 1(R52) of one resident reviewed for communication.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and record review, the facility failed to provide routine hand hygiene for two (Resident #43 and Resident #2) of three residents reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and proper positioning was maintained for one (Resident #43) of three residents reviewed for quality of care.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure it received, acted upon and maintained, a record of a pharmacy report after a pharmacist Medication Regimen Review (MRR) for one resident (R1) out of 5 residents reviewed for high-risk medications. Findings Include:Review of a facility Face Sheet reflected R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes, bipolar disorder, atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), seizure disorder, high blood pressure, weakness and anemia (too few red blood cells). Review of a Pharmacist Drug Regimen Review dated 1/20/2026 reflected the pharmacist had recommendations based on the review as evidenced by a notation Please take the following action described below. The space below the request for action Please take the following actions: See report. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement antibiotic use protocols for two (Resident #43 and Resident #19) of four residents reviewed for antibiotic stewardship.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer and document the administration of controlled substances for 4 residents (Resident #39, #25, #50 and #24), reviewed for medication administration, resulting in medication errors and inaccurate documentation of controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to keep the 100-hall medication refrigerator in the safe temperature storage range, resulting in the potential for medication to became ineffective.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate treatment and services to maintain and carry out communication for 1 of 8 residents (R25) reviewed for activities of daily living, resulting in R25 feeling frustrated and isolated.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake #: MI00148539 Based on observations, interview and record review the facility failed to assess residents with new medical conditions in a timely manner, accurately assess pain and address pain in a timely manner, follow physician orders for wound treatment for 3 Residents of 3 Residents sampled (R20, R36, and R57), resulting in delay of physician notification of culture results and wound treatment, and uncontrolled pain.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow and implement policies and procedures for hospice care and implement communication, coordination of cares and services, and have complete hospice medical records readily available for one (R41) of 3 residents reviewed for hospice services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to properly clean 1 Resident's (R20) BiPap (breathing machine) for 1 Resident reviewed for respiratory equipment.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake M100144670. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to operationalize policies and procedures to ensure controlled substances are continuously and accurately accounted for between staff rotations, involving 4 of the 4 controlled substance logs in the facility, resulting in the potential for medication diversion.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Properly date mark and discard food product; 2. Properly store food product; 3. Ensure cleaning of food and non-food contact surfaces; 4. Ensure proper working order of dish machine. These conditions resulted in an increased risk of contaminated foods and an increased risk of food borne illness that affected 51 residents who consume food from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a clean, safe, and comfortable environment for one resident on the 200 hall and all resident's on the 100 hall that use the spa room shower and utilize the 100 hall dining area.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake M100145189. This citation has 2 deficient practice statements. Statement A Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all medications and supplements were available/provided timely, had compatible administration times, and blood sugars were checked and acted upon for diabetic residents, and physicians were notified of unavailable medications/supplements as ordered for 5 Residents (R8, R15, R16, R17, R18) of 5 residents reviewed for medication administration and nursing services, of a total of 18 residents, resulting in residents not receiving ordered medications, supplements, and glucose monitoring per physician orders.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement fall prevention safety measures for 4 of 6 residents (Resident #19, Resident #11, Resident #3, and Resident #20) reviewed for accidents/hazards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 resident (Resident 14) out of 5 residents reviewed for quality care had access to hydration according to the care plan.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake M100144670 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate positioning for tube feeding and tube feeding supplies are stored properly for best infection control practices for 1 Resident (R15), of 1 resident reviewed for tube feedings.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to fully implement a policy regarding use and storage of resident foods brought in from outside sources. This deficient practice resulted in unknown discard dates and potentially hazardous foods being held passed their discard date, increasing the risk of contamination and food borne illness among residents who store food in resident refrigerators. Findings Include: During the initial tour of the kitchen, at 9:55 AM on 12/5/23, it was observed that resident food product was stored on a shelf in the kitchen's walk in cooler. When asked about where resident food product is stored, Dietary Supervisor (DS) I stated that it should be stored in the therapy refrigerator and no resident food should be stored in kitchen spaces. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain proper infection control practices in two resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER] and R2's room), resulting in the potential for cross-contamination and the spread of illness and disease.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide feeding assistance, monitor food intake, update care plans and follow care plans for 4 Residents (R27, R31, R33 and R250) of 15 residents reviewed, resulting in Residents R27, R31, R33 and R250 experiencing inconsistent assistance with meals, lack of intake monitoring, fluctuations in weights, and R250 experiencing low blood sugar levels that required emergency treatment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation the facility failed to discard expired tube feeding supplements. These conditions resulted in an increased risk for contaminated foods and an increased risk of food borne illness for individuals who are prescribed these specific supplements.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure monthly pharmacy drug regimen review recommendations were reviewed by the physician and/or acted upon in a timely manner for 1 of 5 residents reviewed (R23), resulting in the potential for the physician not knowing of a pharmacy recommendation, the potential for a delay in implementing a pharmacy recommendation, and the potential for adverse effects from medications that the pharmacy identified as potential medication issues.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than five percent (5%) for 2 of 7 residents (R2 and R25) observed during the medication administration task, resulting in a medication error rate of 11.11% (3 of 27 error opportunities) and the potential for adverse effects from residents not receiving accurate doses of their medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to label medications and maintain cleanliness in 1 of 2 medication carts (100 Hall Medication Cart) inspected, resulting in an unclean medication cart, the potential for residents to receive medication from another resident's inhaler and/or diskus, the potential for cross-contamination from the sharing of inhalers and/or diskus', and the potential for cross-contamination from medication spillage.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain confidentiality of medical records and/or accurate medical records for 3 of 29 sampled residents (R2, R20, and R26), resulting in inaccurate medical records and the potential for providers not having an accurate picture of the resident's stay at the facility, the potential for a lack of resident confidentiality, and the potential for confidential resident information being disclosed to unauthorized individuals.
16 fire safety citations on file: 5 on February 12, 2026, 6 on January 10, 2025, 5 on December 7, 2023.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Michigan | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.67 | 3.99 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.89 | 0.78 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.25 | 3.50 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.03 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.74 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 51.5% | 44.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 60.0% | 39.2% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.45 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.84 on weekdays and 3.25 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 8.5% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.49 in April to June 2025 to 3.67 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.67 | 0.89 | 3.84 | 3.25 | 8.5% | 0 of 90 | 50 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.55 | 0.78 | 3.70 | 3.15 | 7.3% | 0 of 92 | 54 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.69 | 0.91 | 3.81 | 3.39 | 7.1% | 0 of 92 | 54 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.49 | 0.87 | 3.63 | 3.15 | 4.2% | 0 of 91 | 55 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Michigan, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.95 | 0.70 | 4.14 | 3.45 | 3.3% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $19.03 | $18.35 to $21.59 | 43,290 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.47 | $29.83 to $35.52 | 10,880 |
| Registered nurses | $45.34 | $39.46 to $49.74 | 104,950 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Michigan | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.3 | 10.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.6 | 3.0 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.2 | 12.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.9 | 5.1 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.4 | 14.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 21.6 | 24.0 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 8.7 | 11.7 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Allendale Nursing and Rehabilitation Community's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (48.7% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
48.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Michigan: 89 better, 22 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 55 eligible stays.
10.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Michigan: 0 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 51 eligible stays.
9.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Michigan: 1 better, 1 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 37 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Michigan57.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 17 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Michigan0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 25 residents counted.
5.8% this home
Median of homes: Michigan1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 25 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Michigan99.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 11 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: ATRIUM ALLENDALE, INC.. CMS links this home to Atrium Centers, a group of 26 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atrium Centers, LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 10/01/2007 | |
| Bailey, Essel | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 01/02/2018 | |
| Finney, Donald | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 08/22/2012 | |
| Bailey, Essel | Corporate director | Individual | 10/01/2007 | |
| Finney, Donald | Corporate director | Individual | 08/22/2012 | |
| Albright Ross, Susan | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/02/2018 | |
| Ferkany, James | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/01/2018 | |
| Atrium Centers Management LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 10/01/2007 | |
| Lockhart, Dennis | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2018 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Michigan. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.