Find a nursing home

Home / Kansas / Garnett

Anderson County Hospital Ltcu

421 S Maple Street, Garnett, KS 66032 · Anderson County · (785) 204-4016

36 certified beds, about 30 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicaid since 1991

Inside a hospital Certified for Medicaid
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 17E577 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on February 13, 2025, inspectors cited 9 health deficiencies (the Kansas average is 9.5, the national average 9.2).

Of 16 health citations since September 2021, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.94 hours per resident per day, against 4.07 across Kansas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.01 of those hours.

44.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Kansas average 48.1%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 16 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
1J
0K
0L
Actual harm
1G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
8D
6E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
February 13, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 9 citations
  1. E
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    F679 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 25, 2025
    Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 27 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide direct, interactive activities based on resident preferences for the residents on weekends. This deficient practice placed the affected residents at risk for decreased psychosocial well-being, boredom, and isolation. Findings Included: - A review of the facility's Activity Calendars for December 2024, January 2025, and February 2025 was completed. The calendars revealed religious services provided at 09:00 AM and 03:15 PM for Saturdays but lacked staff-led activities. The calendars revealed a devotional group was held at 09:00 AM on Sundays. The calendar revealed the residents were provided music and coloring pages on Sundays but lacked staff-led activity groups. [...]
  2. E
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 25, 2025
    Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 27 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with two reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to secure 15 pressurized medical oxygen tanks in a safe, locked area, and out of reach of the nine cognitively impaired independently mobile residents. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for preventable accidents and injuries. Findings Included: - On 02/11/25 at 07:20 AM, an inspection of the facility's oxygen storage room revealed that the door was not secured. An inspection of the room revealed 15 full supplemental oxygen cylinders in the storage rack. The door closed and locked upon exit. On 02/13/25 at 08:22 AM the facility identified it had nine cognitively impaired independently mobile residents. [...]
  3. E
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    F756 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 25, 2025
    Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 27 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) recommendations were acknowledged and/or acted upon for Resident (R) 2, R20, and R25. The facility failed to ensure the CP identified and reported the non-approved indication for R10's antipsychotic (a class of medications used to treat major mental conditions that cause a break from reality) medication. These deficient practices placed the residents at risk for unnecessary medication use and physical complications.
  4. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 25, 2025
    Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 27 residents. The facility identified four residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP - infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms that employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care). Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to implement adequate hand hygiene. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for infectious diseases.
  5. D
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    F623 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 25, 2025
    Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 27 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with two residents sampled for discharge. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a written notice of transfer as soon as practicable to Resident (R) 13 and their representative. This deficient practice had the risk of miscommunication between the facility and resident/family and possible missed opportunities for healthcare service for R13. Findings Included: [...]
  6. D
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    F625 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 25, 2025
    Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 27 residents. The sample included 12 residents with two residents sampled for discharge. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a bed hold with the required information to Resident (R) 13 or their family representative when R13 transferred to the hospital. This deficient practice placed R13 at risk for impaired ability to return to the facility or his same room.
  7. D
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    F744 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 25, 2025
    Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 27 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with one reviewed for dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, and confusion) care. Based on interviews, record reviews, and observations, the facility failed to provide dementia-related care services for Resident (R) 10 to promote the resident's highest practicable level of well-being. This deficient practice placed R10 at risk for decreased quality of life, isolation, and impaired dignity. Findings Included: [...]
  8. D
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    F758 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 25, 2025
    Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 27 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a gradual dose reduction (GDR) was attempted or documented as contraindicated by the physician with a supporting rationale for risk versus benefit for Resident (R) 20 and R25's antipsychotic (a class of medications used to treat major mental conditions that cause a break from reality) medication. The facility also failed to ensure R10's antipsychotic medication had a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) approved indication or the required risk versus benefit physician documentation. These deficient practices placed these residents at risk for unnecessary medications and adverse side effects.
  9. D
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    F849 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 25, 2025
    Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 27 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with two residents reviewed for hospice. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a coordinated plan of care, which coordinated care and services provided by the facility with the care and services provided by hospice, was developed and available for Resident (R) 22. This placed the resident at risk for inappropriate end-of-life care. Finding Included: [...]
February 13, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. J
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 25 residents. The sample included one resident reviewed for elopement. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent the elopement (when a cognitively impaired resident leaves the facility without the knowledge or supervision of staff) of cognitively impaired Resident (R)1, who had a history of falls. On 01/30/24, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M heard the facility doorbell ring and used her access badge to let the visitor out of the facility but failed to ensure only the visitor exited. R1 followed the visitor out and exited the facility unsupervised on 01/30/24 at 10:26 AM. [...]
January 23, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. G
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 23 residents. The sample included three residents identified as at risk for falls. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)1 received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent a serious injury accident. On 11/14/23 at approximately 08:14 AM during an assisted transfer, staff failed to ensure R1's wheelchair brakes were locked. R1 slid to the floor, complained of right hip pain, and was transferred to a local hospital for evaluation and treatment. An x-ray revealed R1 sustained a proximal right femur (long bone in the leg and closer to the hip joint) fracture. R1 was subsequently transferred to a metropolitan hospital for an orthopedic (medical specialty specializing in bones) consult and surgical repair of the hip fracture. [...]
April 5, 2023Standard inspection · 0 citations
September 21, 2021Standard inspection · 5 citations
  1. E
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 27, 2021
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 20 residents and identified 12 of those residents with controlled medications stored in the medication cart. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to perform an accurate system for the count of the number of controlled medications (medications that can cause physical and mental dependence) in the medication cart, increasing the risk for diversion of the medications.
  2. E
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    F883 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 27, 2021
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 20 residents with 12 selected for review, including five residents reviewed for influenza vaccinations. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide consent forms to allow the resident or the resident's representative the opportunity to refuse the influenza immunization for the five residents, Resident (R)1, R5, R8, R11, and R19.
  3. D
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    F688 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 27, 2021
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 20 residents. The sample contained 12 residents, with one resident reviewed for limited range of motion. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide interventions to promote maintenance of range of motion and prevent decline in the right hand, for the one sampled resident, Resident (R) 8.
  4. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 27, 2021
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 20 residents. The sample contained 12 residents, with two residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe mobility to prevent accidents when the facility failed to provide foot pedals to the wheelchair, while transporting one of the two sampled residents, dependent Resident (R) 9.
  5. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 27, 2021
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 20 residents with twelve selected for review, including one Resident (R)5, reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to change R5's oxygen tubing in a timely manner. This practice increased the risk of Resident (R)5 developing a respiratory infection.

Fire safety inspections

11 fire safety citations on file: 3 on February 13, 2025, 4 on April 5, 2023, 4 on September 21, 2021.

Every fire safety citation11 citations
  1. F
    Include a process for Emergency Preparedness collaboration.
    E 9 · February 13, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. E
    Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
    K 211 · February 13, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. E
    Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
    K 222 · February 13, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. F
    List the names and contact information of those in the facility.
    E 30 · April 5, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. F
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · April 5, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. F
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · April 5, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. F
    Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
    K 521 · April 5, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. F
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · September 21, 2021 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. F
    Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
    K 355 · September 21, 2021 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  10. F
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · September 21, 2021 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  11. F
    Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
    K 923 · September 21, 2021 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeKansasUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.944.073.86
Registered nurses1.010.710.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.213.603.42
Nurse aides2.53
Licensed practical nurses0.40
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)44.7%48.1%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover25.0%42.0%42.9%
Administrators who leftnot reported

CMS expects 2.67 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.23 on weekdays and 3.21 on weekends, 24% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.09 in April to June 2025 to 3.94 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.941.014.233.21 0.0%0 of 9030
Oct to Dec 20253.761.074.003.12 0.0%0 of 9230
Jul to Sep 20253.891.064.073.43 0.0%0 of 9230
Apr to Jun 20254.091.094.273.64 0.0%0 of 9129
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Kansas, Jan to Mar 20264.010.674.193.564.8%0.6% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Kansas

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Kansas, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$18.27$17.41 to $21.2424,610
LPNs and LVNs$29.69$27.05 to $33.407,530
Registered nurses$38.14$35.24 to $45.5333,800
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Anderson County Hospital Ltcu. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeKansasUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
17.817.913.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.60.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.72.91.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.74.33.2
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
9.116.214.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.04.44.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
22.318.115.4
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.01.81.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.82.11.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Anderson County Hospital Ltcu's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

CMS reports none of these results for this home: This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: Legal Business Name Not Available.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Ownership data not available

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 8 problems in this area, most recently on February 13, 2025: "Provide activities to meet all resident's needs."
  2. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on February 13, 2025: "Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures."
  3. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on February 13, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  4. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on February 13, 2025: "Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.21 hours per resident per day, below the Kansas average of 3.60.

Other nursing homes nearby

Common questions

What is Anderson County Hospital Ltcu's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Anderson County Hospital Ltcu 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Anderson County Hospital Ltcu get at its last inspection?
9 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on February 13, 2025. The Kansas average is 9.5.
Has Anderson County Hospital Ltcu been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Anderson County Hospital Ltcu accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Anderson County Hospital Ltcu?
CMS lists 1 owner or manager. Legal business name: Legal Business Name Not Available.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection