Anoka Rehabilitation and Living Center
3000 4th Avenue, Anoka, MN 55303 · Anoka County · (763) 528-6400
120 certified beds, about 114 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1976
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 245205 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on August 21, 2025, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the Minnesota average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).
Of 32 health citations since May 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $24,297 in the last three years; the largest was $24,297, and the latest is dated March 26, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.11 hours per resident per day, against 4.19 across Minnesota and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.19 of those hours.
36.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Minnesota average 42.2%).
CMS links it to Volunteers of America Senior Living, an affiliated group of 6 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 32 health citations on file.
November 13, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to identify, treat, monitor, and manage 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for pain to the extent possible in accordance with R1's care plan, goals, and preferences. R1 stated pain and was observed having pain. R1 had available morphine sulfate every two hours as needed (PRN), which was not administered to him for his breakthrough pain.
August 21, 2025Standard inspection · 3 citations
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure services were provided in a dignified manner to promote quality of life during incontinence care for 1 of 1 resident (R10) reviewed for dignity
- D Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a psychotropic medication ordered as needed (PRN) was limited to 14-days or extended to a specific date with supporting rationale provided by the medical provider for 1 of 2 residents (R2) reviewed for psychotropic medication use.
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain a complete, accurately documented and, readily accessible medical record in accordance with accepted professional standards of practice for 3 of 5 residents (R25, R9, R2) reviewed for advanced directives documentation. This deficient practice gave staff access to inaccurate information.
January 22, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- F Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) was worn to prevent the spread of infection for for 2 of 2 residents (R8, R9) observed for COVID-19 transmission based precautions (TBP) and for 1 of 2 residents (R10) observed for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP), (an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities). This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 112 residents who resided in the facility. Findings Include: [...]
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to maintain proper holding food temperatures for 18 of 19 residents observed to receive the noon meal on the Reflections unit. Further, the facility failed to maintain the ice machine in a sanitary manner to prevent potential food-borne illness for 39 residents who currently received ice from the ice machine in the Transitional care unit and Cardiac care unit area, and 36 residents who currently received ice from the ice machine in the Riverbend and cornerstone unit area.
December 17, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to include a resident discharge summary that included a reconciliation of all pre-discharge medications with resident's post-discharge medication (both prescribed and over-the-counter) at discharge for seven of ten residents (R1, R2, R5, R6, R7, R9, and R12). R1 received R2's Mirtazapine (a medication to treat depression) at discharge.
October 3, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 unit ice and water dispensers for resident use were maintained in a clean and sanitary manner on the Cornerstone unit kitchenette. In addition, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 unit refrigerators were maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. This had the potential to effect 60 residents served by the Cornerstone unit kitchenette.
July 18, 2024Standard inspection · 12 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure food was properly stored, labeled, dated, and failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen to reduce and/or prevent the risk of food borne illness this practice had the potential to affect all 112 residents, staff and guests who consumed foods from the facility kitchen.
- E Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents were comprehensively assessed for self-administration of medications for 5 of 5 residents (R3, R14, R74, R36, and R95), reviewed and observed for self-administration of medications.
- E Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to complete care conferences for 5 of 7 residents (R14, R16, R24, R29 and R69) reviewed for care planning.
- E Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure 4 of 5 residents (R24, R56, R80, and R102) were offered, educated and/or provided the pneumococcal vaccination series as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), who were reviewed for immunizations.
- D Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
Inspectors wroteBased on document review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN-CMS-10055) was provided to 1 of 3 residents (R86) reviewed for beneficiary notification.
- D Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure a written notification of transfer was sent to the office of the Ombudsman for long term care for 2 of 2 residents (R106, R107) with the potential to affect all residents transferred to the hospital.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and document review the facility failed to complete neurological assessments following falls for 1 of 1 resident (R85) who had unwitnessed falls.
- D Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure coordination of dialysis care for 1 of 1 resident (R14) who required dialysis (treatment to filter blood when kidneys are no longer able).
- D Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to assure the use of PRN (as needed) psychotropic medications (a drug which affects mood/behavior) were limited to 14 days, or had a physician specified, time limited order for 2 of 2 residents (R74 and R85) reviewed for Hospice.
- D Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to assist in obtaining routine dental services for 1 of 1 resident (R56) reviewed for dental services.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were used for 1 of 3 residents (36) reviewed for infection control.
- C Post nurse staffing information every day.
Inspectors wroteBased on document review and interviews the facility failed to ensure the required staffing information was posted daily. This had the potential to affect all 112 residents residing in the facility and their visitors who may wish to view the information.
April 22, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure assessed and/or care-planned interventions for pressure ulcer care were implemented for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for heel pressure ulcers, who were at risk for additional, and/or worsened, pressure ulcers.
March 26, 2024Complaint inspection · 4 citations
- G Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure comprehensive assessments were consistently completed, provide and implement interventions to prevent recurrent pressure ulcers (PU) for 1 of 1 residents (R13) who had a history of facility acquired stage 3 pressure ulcers. The facility's failures resulted in actual harm when R13 developed a recurrent pressure ulcer to the right heel.
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a dignified living experience was maintained for 2 of 3 residents (R1 and R13) reviewed for dignity.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement the toileting care plan for 1 of 2 residents (R13) reviewed for toileting.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to use mechanical standing lifts in accordance with manufacturer recommendations for 2 of 3 residents (R1, R13) reviewed for accidents. Additionally, failed to ensure the wander-guard system was operational to prevent elopement for 3 of 4 residents (R9, R14, R12) reviewed for elopement.
May 18, 2023Standard inspection · 7 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure foods stored in the refrigerator were labeled and dated when opened. These failures had the potential to affect all 109 residents in the facility who consumed food from the kitchen.
- D Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for 2 of 2 Residents (R41 and R73) reviewed for nutrition. The facility failed to obtain and document weights for both residents according to the physician's orders.
- D Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two of two residents (Resident (R)53 and R73) who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene out of a total sample of 50 residents. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care for 2 of 2 residents (R53 and R73) reviewed for dependant for assistance with activities of daily living (ADL).
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was maintained and stored appropriately for 1 of 1 residents (R53) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility's deficient practice increased the resident's risk of respiratory complications.
- D Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure staff had competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents. There were no continuing on-going education credits since 02/02/22 or competency evaluations available for review for 1 of 5 employees (registered nurse (RN-B)) reviewed for training competencies.
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled medications, for 1 of 4 nursing units. This failure prohibits the prompt identification of loss or potential diversion of controlled medications.
- D Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent. A total of 14 errors were made during medication administration for 2 of 5 residents (R40 and R77) observed for medication administration. The facility's medication error rate was 56%.
Fire safety inspections
6 fire safety citations on file: 1 on August 21, 2025, 1 on July 18, 2024, 4 on May 18, 2023.
Every fire safety citation6 citations
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- F Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- F Implement emergency and standby power systems.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- C Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| March 26, 2024 | Fine | $24,297 |
| March 26, 2024 | Payment Denial | 5 days from April 27, 2024 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Minnesota | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.11 | 4.19 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.19 | 1.06 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.71 | 3.71 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.05 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.87 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 36.8% | 42.2% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 20.0% | 38.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 3.29 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.27 on weekdays and 3.71 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 3.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.35 in April to June 2025 to 4.11 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.11 | 1.19 | 4.27 | 3.71 | 3.0% | 0 of 90 | 114 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.20 | 1.23 | 4.36 | 3.78 | 4.9% | 0 of 92 | 114 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.29 | 1.23 | 4.47 | 3.82 | 7.0% | 0 of 92 | 107 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.35 | 1.23 | 4.56 | 3.82 | 4.4% | 0 of 91 | 109 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Minnesota, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.19 | 1.05 | 4.38 | 3.73 | 5.2% | 0.8% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Minnesota | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.7 | 18.2 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.9 | 4.0 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 1.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 16.0 | 20.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.9 | 5.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.6 | 17.1 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 29.6 | 23.5 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 10.3 | 14.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.1 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.2 | 1.9 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: THE HOMESTEAD AT ANOKA INC. CMS links this home to Volunteers of America Senior Living, a group of 6 nursing homes averaging 3.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arnold, Patti | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2016 | |
| Bloom, Shawn | Corporate director | Individual | 11/01/2012 | |
| Erickson, Karen | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| Hackett, Karen | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| Knapp, Keith | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2016 | |
| Mullen, Beth | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2020 | |
| Perkins, Derrick | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2019 | |
| Peterson, Jeanne | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2017 | |
| Rase, Nancy | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2016 | |
| Sheridan, Patrick | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2023 | |
| Vigee, Voris | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| Budzynski, Joseph | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/02/2012 | |
| Gavin, Nancy | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/01/2012 | |
| King, Michael | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/01/2012 | |
| Nutz, Faith | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/01/2018 | |
| Lee, James | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2021 | |
| Robinson, Ann | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/03/2020 | |
| Schmitz, Zachary | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/02/2024 | |
| Soczynski, Paul | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Volunteers of America National Services | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/10/2025 | |
| Gavin, Nancy | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/11/2011 | |
| Lee, James | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/05/2025 | |
| Nutz, Faith | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2018 | |
| Robinson, Ann | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/03/2020 | |
| Schmitz, Zachary | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/02/2024 | |
| Soczynski, Paul | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/01/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 9 problems in this area, most recently on November 13, 2025: "Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on August 21, 2025: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on August 21, 2025: "Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on January 22, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 2 administrators who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- The Estates at Twin Rivers LLC Anoka, 1 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 41 citations
- Park River Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center Ll Coon Rapids, 5.9 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 42 citations
- The Villas at Osseo LLC Osseo, 6.6 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 48 citations
- Saint Therese at Oxbow Lake Brooklyn Park, 7.1 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 30 citations
- Maranatha Care Center Brooklyn Center, 9.2 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 16 citations
- Woodlake Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center Crystal, 10.7 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 25 citations
- Guardian Angels Care Center Elk River, 10.8 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 18 citations
- The Estates at Fridley LLC Fridley, 10.9 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 34 citations
Minnesota contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Minnesota. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- State inspection reports: MDH Nursing and Boarding Care Home Survey and Complaint Inspection Findings, where Minnesota publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Anoka Rehabilitation and Living Center's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Anoka Rehabilitation and Living Center 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Anoka Rehabilitation and Living Center get at its last inspection?
- 3 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on August 21, 2025. The Minnesota average is 7.1.
- Has Anoka Rehabilitation and Living Center been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $24,297 in the last three years.
- Does Anoka Rehabilitation and Living Center accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Anoka Rehabilitation and Living Center?
- CMS lists 26 owners and managers, and links the home to Volunteers of America Senior Living. Legal business name: THE HOMESTEAD AT ANOKA INC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.