Home / Minnesota / Coon Rapids
Park River Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center Ll
9899 Avocet Street Northwest, Coon Rapids, MN 55433 · Anoka County · (763) 757-2320
98 certified beds, about 79 residents a day · For profit - Individual · Medicare and Medicaid since 1987
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 245448 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 27, 2026, inspectors cited 18 health deficiencies (the Minnesota average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).
Of 42 health citations since March 2024, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (2 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $163,141 in the last three years; the largest was $163,141, and the latest is dated April 27, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.58 hours per resident per day, against 4.19 across Minnesota and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.73 of those hours.
41.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Minnesota average 42.2%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 42 health citations on file.
July 24, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation, and document review the facility failed to ensure a therapeutic mechanically altered hydration plan was provided and maintained for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for change in condition.
April 27, 2026Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 18 citations
- J Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents receiving dialysis services were provided appropriate care and services, including failure to establish and implement an effective communication system with the dialysis center, failure to monitor and assess vascular access sites, failure to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), failure to monitor fluid restrictions, assess vital signs per physician orders, and failure to ensure sterile technique and follow physician direction for central venous catheter (CVC) care, for 2 of 2 residents (R16, R12) reviewed for dialysis services. These failures resulted in Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) for R16, as the facility's practices placed the resident at likelihood for serious harm, including infection, sepsis, and complications related to uncontrolled bleeding. [...]
- J Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection control program, failed to have a system for preventing, identifying, reporting, investigating, and controlling infections that occurred in the facility. The facility failed to identify a potential respiratory illness outbreak with 5 residents (R38, R24, R43, R78, and R28) showing signs of illness between 4/15/26 and 4/24/26, the facility failed to assess, monitor, and document their symptoms, conduct any outbreak testing, or place on transmission-based precautions (TBP) to prevent the spread to others. In addition, the facility failed to identify the need for and implement enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for 2 of 2 residents (R16 and R29) reviewed who required EBP. The facility's system failure had the potential affect all 85 residents who currently resided in the facility. [...]
- F Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to implement an ongoing antibiotic stewardship program for the facility which had the potential to affect all 85 residents the facility, as well as the potential to impact staff and visitors.
- F Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the criteria for Infection Preventionist was met with current certification and ongoing education, which had the potential to affect all 85 residents, visitors and staff.
- E Give residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the most up to date Nursing Home Resident [NAME] of Rights (RBOR) was provided to each resident residing in the facility and displayed for residents, visitors and staff to review. This had the potential to affect 63 of 85 residents currently residing in the facility as well as all staff and visitors.
- E Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications, including failure to ensure PRN psychotropic medications had appropriate stop dates, failure to attempt and document gradual dose reductions (GDRs), failure to obtain and monitor laboratory testing as indicated, and failure to monitor for adverse consequences, for 4 of 8 residents (R11, R23, R27, and R29) reviewed for unnecessary medications.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure food inventory purchased and stored were rotated and utilized before the expiration dates. This had the potential to affect 82 out of 85 residents, and any visitors / staff who obtained meals from the facilities food services.
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to implement interventions to maintain dignity for 1 of 2 residents (R11) reviewed for dignity.
- D Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were permitted to make choices regarding self-administration of medications and that physician orders and care processes reflected the residents' current abilities or choices, for 3 of 3 residents (R27, R48 and R43) reviewed for self-administration of medications.
- D Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure required information was provided to the resident or resident representative regarding bed-hold rights at the time of transfer to the hospital, including failure to discuss and document bed-hold options for a private pay resident, for 1 of 2 residents (R27) reviewed for transfer and discharge.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive, person-centered care plans to include Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for residents who met criteria for 2 of 4 residents (R2, R9) reviewed for infection control and care planning.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to maintain an updated care plan for 1 of 2 residents (R11) reviewed for range of motion.
- D Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide assistance with personal cares, for 2 of 2 residents (R23 and R98) reviewed for assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs-including placement of hearing aids, set up for eating, and personal grooming including shaving) for dependent residents.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice and physician orders, including failure to apply compression stockings as ordered and failure to ensure accurate documentation of care provided, for 2 of 2 residents (R27 and R46) reviewed for quality of care. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure proper positioning in her wheelchair for 1 of 1 residents (R23) observed leaning over in their wheelchair.
- D Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to consistently provide assistance to complete range of motion (ROM) as outlined in plan of care for 1 of 2 residents (R11) reviewed for range of motion.
- D Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the recommendations from the monthly medication regimen review (MRR) conducted by the consultant pharmacist were reviewed and acted upon in a timely manner, in accordance with professional standards of practice, for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (R9 and R65).
- D Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance with professional standards of practice, including failure to follow physician orders to monitor blood pressure and pulse parameters prior to administration of a beta-blocker medication, for 1 of 1 resident (R16) reviewed for unnecessary medications.
- D Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure recommended influenza, pneumococcal, and Covid-19 vaccinations, as outlined by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), were offered and/or provided in a timely manner to reduce the risk of severe disease for 2 of 5 residents (R16 and R19) reviewed for immunizations.
June 12, 2025Standard inspection · 17 citations
- E Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide supervision during mealtimes for 3 out of 3 residents (R21, R62 and R375) reviewed for dining.
- E Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain safe storage of medications when medication carts were left unlocked and unattended for 1 of 1 medication cart located on the west unit.
- D Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to honor a resident's right to make choices about aspects of care related to the method of blood glucose monitoring for 1 of 1 residents (R61) reviewed for diabetic care.
- D Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure an electric recliner was not used in a manner to restrain resident for 1 of 1 resident (R375) reviewed for restraints.
- D Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the order of as-needed (PRN) psychotropic medication was limited to 14-days or extended to a specific date with supporting rationale provided by the medical provider for 2 of 5 residents (R65 and R60) reviewed for unnecessary medication use.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the care plan included management and monitoring of urinary catheter for 1 of 2 residents (R375) reviewed for catheter use.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to revise the care plan to include non-pressure wounds for 1 of 1 residents (R27) in the sample whose care plan was reviewed.
- D Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADLs) for 2 of 3 resident (R3 and R375) who were dependent on staff for assistance with ADL's.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to provide routine assistance to properly position a who was dining in bed to promote comfort and ease in eating for 1 of 1 residents (R37) reviewed for positioning. In addition, the facility failed to consistently assess and monitor a wound for 1 of 1 residents (R27) reviewed for wound care. Further, the facility failed to monitor blood pressures and pulse for 1 of 1 residents (R19) who had parameters for medication administration.
- D Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure developed pressure ulcers were comprehensively assessed and monitored to ensure healing and prevent complications for 1 of 1 residents (R3) reviewed for pressure ulcer care.
- D Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure catheter care was provided in a manner to prevent potential urinary tract infection (UTI) for 1 of 1 resident (R3) reviewed for catheters.
- D Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure post-dialysis assessment and monitoring was completed for 1 of 1 resident (R19) reviewed for dialysis.
- D Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacist consultant recommendations were acted upon for 1 of 5 residents (R65). In addition, the facility failed to ensure consulting pharmacist identified irregularities in the monthly drug regimen reviews for 3 of 5 residents (R65, R25 and R60) reviewed for unnecessary medications.
- D Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure antipsychotic medications were appropriately monitored in accordance with the standard-of-care laboratory testing to help reduce the risk of medication side effects for 1 of 5 residents (R25) reviewed for unnecessary medication use. R25's annual minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R25 was cognitively intact and was totally dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). R25 had diagnoses of bipolar disorder, adult failure to thrive, anxiety, major depression, hyperlipidemia, spinal stenosis, bradycardia, and myocarditis. [...]
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to consistently implement hand hygiene following glove use for 1 of 1 residents (R36) observed for personal cares. In addition, facility failed to ensure proper personal protective equipment (PPE) was used when providing cares for 1 of 1 resident (R3) reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP).
- D Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to consistently place the call light within reach for 1 of 1 residents (R10), who was reviewed for call light use.
- C Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure both recertification survey results, as well as additional complaint investigations, were available for review. This had the potential to affect all 77 residents residing in the facility, as well as family, visitors, and staff.
March 21, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- G Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents (R1) remained free of an avoidable accident and injury. This resulted in actual harm when R1 sustained a comminuted distal humeral shaft fracture (upper arm, near the elbow) when R1 was transferred with assistance of one staff and fell into her wheelchair.
March 13, 2024Standard inspection · 5 citations
- F Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review the facility failed to clarify with the resident and/or the resident's representative their current advance directive when there was conflicting documentation in the record for 1 of 24 residents (R328) reviewed for advance directives. This has the potential to affect all residents.
- E Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure consulting pharmacist identified irregularities in the monthly drug regimen reviews for 4 of 5 residents (R4, R25, R35, and R69) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This has the potential to affect all residents taking psychotropic medications.
- E Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure monitoring for potential cardiovascular and neurological adverse consequences, and obtaining informed consent with use of psychotropic medications for 4 of 5 residents (R4, R25, R35, and R69) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This has the potential to affect all resident on psychotropic medications.
- E Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 4 of 5 residents (R29, R33, R35 and R69) reviewed for immunizations were offered and/or provided the pneumococcal vaccine series as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to help reduce the risk of associated infection(s).
- D Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure initial and ongoing assessment of physical device equipment restricting independent movement for 1 of 1 resident (R35) reviewed for appropriate use of a reclining wheelchair. This has the potential to effect all residents that utilize reclining equipment.
Fire safety inspections
5 fire safety citations on file: 3 on April 27, 2026, 2 on June 12, 2025.
Every fire safety citation5 citations
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- E Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.
- D Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- D Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- D Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| April 27, 2026 | Fine | $163,141 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Minnesota | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.58 | 4.19 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.73 | 1.06 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.32 | 3.71 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.77 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.08 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 41.7% | 42.2% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 27.8% | 38.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.63 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.68 on weekdays and 4.32 on weekends, 8% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.22 in April to June 2025 to 4.58 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.58 | 0.73 | 4.68 | 4.32 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 79 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.46 | 0.70 | 4.58 | 4.16 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 83 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.89 | 0.75 | 5.04 | 4.49 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 79 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 5.22 | 0.83 | 5.38 | 4.83 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 77 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Minnesota, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.19 | 1.05 | 4.38 | 3.73 | 5.2% | 0.8% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Minnesota | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.9 | 18.2 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 1.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.6 | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.3 | 4.0 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.2 | 1.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 24.2 | 20.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.3 | 5.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 22.9 | 17.1 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 22.3 | 23.5 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 8.6 | 14.8 | 12.0 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: NORTH CITIES HEALTH CARE, INC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chies, Michael | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 33% | 01/01/2017 |
| Chies, Steven | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 33% | 01/01/2017 |
| Chies, Timothy | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 33% | 01/01/2017 |
| Chies, Steven | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 11/23/2009 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 12 problems in this area, most recently on July 24, 2026: "Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on April 27, 2026: "Give residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on April 27, 2026: "Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on April 27, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Saint Therese at Oxbow Lake Brooklyn Park, 3.5 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 30 citations
- The Villas at Osseo LLC Osseo, 5.2 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 48 citations
- Maranatha Care Center Brooklyn Center, 5.3 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 16 citations
- The Estates at Fridley LLC Fridley, 5.5 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 34 citations
- The Estates at Twin Rivers LLC Anoka, 5.7 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 41 citations
- Anoka Rehabilitation and Living Center Anoka, 5.9 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 32 citations
- Benedictine Health Center Innsbruck New Brighton, 6.7 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 44 citations
- Victory Health and Rehabilitation Center Minneapolis, 7.3 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 25 citations
Minnesota contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Minnesota. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- State inspection reports: MDH Nursing and Boarding Care Home Survey and Complaint Inspection Findings, where Minnesota publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Park River Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center Ll's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Park River Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center Ll 2 out of 5 stars overall, with 1 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Park River Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center Ll get at its last inspection?
- 18 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 27, 2026. The Minnesota average is 7.1.
- Has Park River Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center Ll been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $163,141 in the last three years.
- Does Park River Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center Ll accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Park River Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center Ll?
- CMS lists 4 owners and managers. Legal business name: NORTH CITIES HEALTH CARE, INC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.