1301 W Maitland Blvd, Maitland, FL 32751 · Orange County · (407) 645-3990
39 certified beds, about 26 residents a day · For profit - Individual · Medicare and Medicaid since 1995
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 105886 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on July 18, 2025, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Florida average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).
Of 37 health citations since September 2023, 7 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (3 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 4 fines totaling $197,672 in the last three years; the largest was $93,400, and the latest is dated December 19, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.83 hours per resident per day, against 3.82 across Florida and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.78 of those hours.
59.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Florida average 41.4%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 37 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to refund any and all monies due to the resident's representative within 30 days of the resident's date of death /discharge from the facility for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for discharge, of a total sample of 3 residents, (#1).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect by not providing necessary care and services for a totally dependent resident and failed to assess, recognize and intervene for changes in condition for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for neglect, out of a total sample of 15 residents, (#2). This failure contributed to the resident being found unresponsive and exhibiting physical signs consistent with having been deceased for some time prior to discovery. On [DATE] just after midnight, resident #2 was found unresponsive and staff initiated cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The resident was transferred to the hospital by Emergency Medical Services (EMS). The EMS and hospital records noted resident #2 was very rigid with stiff extremities and core body temperature of 90.7 degrees Fahrenheit. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and interview, the facility failed to investigate allegation of neglect to ensure staff recognized change in resident condition and provided timely interventions for 1 out of 15 residents reviewed for advanced directives, (#2). On [DATE] after midnight, resident #2 was found unresponsive and staff initiated CPR. The resident was transferred to the hospital by Emergency Medical Services (EMS). The EMS and hospital records noted resident #2 was very rigid with stiff extremities and core body temperature of 90.7 degrees Fahrenheit. The records indicated the resident displayed signs and symptoms of rigor mortis indicating the resident had been deceased for some time, before staff had identified the resident to be unresponsive and initiated CPR. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with the resident's care plan, the resident's choice and as per professional standards of practice for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for quality of care, out of a total sample of 15 residents, (#2). This failure contributed to the resident being found unresponsive and exhibiting physical signs consistent with having been deceased for some time prior to discovery. On [DATE] just after midnight, resident #2 was found unresponsive and staff initiated cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The resident was transferred to the hospital by Emergency Medical Services (EMS). The EMS and hospital records noted resident #2 was very rigid with stiff extremities and core body temperature of 90.7 degrees Fahrenheit. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) meeting when allegations of neglect and concerns were identified related to the death of resident #2.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all staff adhered to ethical practices and professional standards by providing inconsistent and misleading statements related to a resident's death in the facility, failed to provide high-level personnel oversight to ensure adherence to ethical standards, and failed to develop effective lines of communication to encourage immediate reporting of violations without fear of retaliation. These failures contributed to the inadequate investigation of resident #2's death.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility neglected to identify and implement appropriate fall prevention interventions for a resident with a high risk for falls who also received a combination of high-risk medications, resulting in the resident experiencing a fall with injury. This failure resulted in actual harm to 1 of 4 residents reviewed for Quality of Care, (#1).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement appropriate interventions to include provision of adequate supervision to mitigate the prevention of fall with injury for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for Quality of Care, (#1). The facility's failure to increase supervision for a resident with a history of repeated falls who also received high-risk medications resulted in actual harm.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI)/Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) program by not identifying and addressing repeated deficiencies and by not ensuring complete monitoring documentation for corrective action plans. The deficient practice resulted in a pattern of unresolved quality concerns and had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents by not ensuring consistent monitoring and follow-up of identified problems.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Director of Nursing (DON) adhered to ethical expectations and professional standards by backdating evaluations with incorrect documentation; lacked evidence of education or competency training for the role, and readily available employee program access.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain accurate and complete medical records for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for Quality of Care, (#1). Specifically, the Director of Nursing (DON) incorrectly documented and backdated resident records, resulting in inaccurate information in the clinical record and the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator inaccurately recorded fall histories. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents by compromising the accuracy and integrity of resident medical information used to make care decisions.
Inspectors wroteThe facility failed to ensure food was served to residents was palatable and served at appetizing temperatures for 2 of the approximately 18 residents who received meal trays from the satellite kitchen and ate in their room, of a total sample of 26 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the binding arbitration agreement explicitly granted the resident or their representative the right to rescind the agreement within 30 calendar days of signing it, failed to include that the signer was allowed to communicate with federal, state, or local officials, health department employees, and a representative Ombudsman, and failed to include evidence that the signer acknowledged they understood the agreement for 9 of 9 residents who signed binding arbitration agreements, of a total sample of 26 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assessment & Assurance (QAA) / Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee conducted performance improvement activities to ensure prior improvement measures were sustained.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a system for tracking and monitoring infections for 3 out of 5 residents, (#13, #22, #35) reviewed for transmission-based precautions; and failed to identify and implement a system to prevent the spread of communicable diseases by not encouraging and providing hand hygiene for 16 of 16 residents reviewed for dining at the facility, of a total sample of 26 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the appropriate notices of financial liability for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Beneficiary Protection Notification, of a total sample of 26 residents, (#06 and #09).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to make transportation arrangements for a resident to a specialty medical care appointment, for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for transportation, of a total sample of 26 residents, (#8).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility neglected to provide necessary care and services to prevent falls and a fall-related injury and ensure appropriate post-fall monitoring and evaluation, for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for fall risk, of a total sample of 8 residents, (#4); and failed to maintain effective processes to educate staff and offer adequate supervision to meet the needs of all residents at risk for falls. The facility's failure to appropriately monitor residents with cognitive and/or physical impairments resulted in actual harm for resident #4, and placed all residents who required increased supervision at risk for injury. Resident #4, a physically and cognitively impaired resident, received blood thinner medication and had a history of repeated falls. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent falls and fall-related injury for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for fall risk, of a total sample of 8 residents, (#4). The facility's failure to appropriately monitor residents with cognitive and/or physical impairments resulted in actual harm for resident #4, and placed all residents who required increased supervision at risk for injury. Resident #4, a physically and cognitively impaired resident, received blood thinner medication and had a history of repeated falls. On 12/22/24, the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) assigned to supervise residents in the fall prevention program in the activity room left the residents unattended, and resident #4 fell from her wheelchair to the floor. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain sufficient staff to provide adequate supervision and meet care needs to ensure the safety and well-being, according to the plans of care, for all residents of the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to promptly notify the physician of an unwitnessed fall for a resident at high risk for bleeding, for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for fall risk, of a total sample of 8 residents, (#4).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement its abuse and neglect prohibition policy and procedures related to conducting a thorough investigation of a fall with injury to rule out neglect, determine if reporting was necessary, and ensure the safety of 1 of 4 residents reviewed for fall risk, of a total sample of 8 residents, (#4).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate assistance with activities of living (ADL) care related to fingernail care, oral care, and dressing for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for ADL care, of a total sample of 8 residents, (#1, #2, and #5).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable access to the use of a telephone and internet, including a place in the facility where calls could be made in private for 3 residents sampled for resident rights, of a total sample of 31 residents, (#1, #2, and #3).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure dry food items in the main pantry were properly stored by keeping track of expiration dates to prevent food-borne illnesses and failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment in the unit refrigerator where resident's foods and bedtime snacks were kept. This noncompliance had the ability to affect 30 of 30 residents in the facility, who were able to eat.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to request a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level I Screen with a new mental disorder diagnosis for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for PASARR, of a total sample of 30 residents, (#24, and #14).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to request a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) level I and level II evaluation for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for PASARR, of a total sample of 30 residents, (#25). Review of the medical record revealed resident #25 was admitted on [DATE] from the hospital. Her diagnoses included vascular dementia, Alzheimer's disease, major depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder. Resident #25's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 7/31/24 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety disorder and psychotic disorder (other than schizophrenia) and she received antipsychotic and antidepressant medications. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain physician orders before administering oxygen therapy, and failed to maintain oxygen flow rates as ordered by the physician for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care, of a total sample of 30 residents, (#12 & #29).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to change gloves and perform hand hygiene, before moving from a contaminated-body site to a clean-body site during wound care, consistent with professional standards of practice, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pressure ulcers, of a total sample of 30 residents, (#25).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote the right to self-administer medication for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for medication administration, out of a total sample of 4 residents, (#3).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor the right to choose the type and frequency of baths for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs), out of a total sample of 4 residents, (#3).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions to ensure the optimal nutritional status for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for assisted nutrition and hydration via tube feeding, out of a total sample of 4 residents, (#1).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to ensure the accuracy of acquisition and administration of anti-seizure medication for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for medication administration, out of a total sample of 4 resident, (#1).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received prescribed enteral formula feedings via gastrostomy tube as ordered for 1 of 25 residents, (#26).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to distribute and serve food under sanitary conditions.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the binding arbitration agreement explicitly granted the resident or their representative the right to rescind the contract within 30 calendar days of signing it for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for arbitration agreements, (#35, #236 and #535).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to have measures in place to prevent the growth of Legionella and other waterborne pathogens to ensure the health and safety of all 37 residents residing in the facility.
8 fire safety citations on file: 5 on March 26, 2026, 1 on September 19, 2024, 2 on September 28, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| December 19, 2025 | Fine | $93,400 |
| October 16, 2025 | Fine | $8,360 |
| October 16, 2025 | Fine | $8,360 |
| January 23, 2025 | Fine | $87,552 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Florida | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.83 | 3.82 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.36 | 3.49 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.41 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.64 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 59.0% | 41.4% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 88.9% | 46.0% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 3.67 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.02 on weekdays and 3.36 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.29 in April to June 2025 to 3.83 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.83 | 0.78 | 4.02 | 3.36 | 0.0% | 2 of 90 | 26 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.42 | 0.78 | 4.49 | 4.25 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 28 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.82 | 0.81 | 3.89 | 3.63 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 29 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.29 | 1.01 | 3.68 | 2.30 | 0.0% | 1 of 91 | 30 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Florida, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.76 | 0.70 | 3.90 | 3.44 | 1.1% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Florida, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $17.33 to $20.34 | 96,960 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.70 | $28.14 to $31.11 | 38,620 |
| Registered nurses | $40.48 | $37.82 to $48.64 | 229,940 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Florida | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.0 | 8.7 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.8 | 0.7 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.8 | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 16.3 | 8.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 22.6 | 26.1 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 13.1 | 9.1 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Ansley Cove Healthcare and Rehabilitation's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (64.2% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
64.2% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Florida: 169 better, 109 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 95 eligible stays.
12.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Florida: 2 better, 35 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 109 eligible stays.
9.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Florida: 6 better, 21 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 53 eligible stays.
48.4% this home
Median of homes: Florida55.1% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 31 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Florida0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 43 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Florida1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 43 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Florida97.7% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 11 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: ANSLEY COVE HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION LLC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barr, Dylan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/23/2024 | |
| Garrard, Louis | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/15/2024 | |
| Smith, Alvis | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/03/2025 | |
| Ansley Cove Healthcare and Rehabilitation LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/23/2024 | |
| Mainstay Healthcare Maintland LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/23/2024 | |
| Barr, Dylan | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/23/2024 | |
| Garrard, Louis | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/15/2024 | |
| Selznick, Steven | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/23/2024 | |
| Smith, Alvis | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/03/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Florida. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.