37 South Ellis Street, Camilla, GA 31730 · Mitchell County · (229) 336-8377
156 certified beds, about 136 residents a day · Government - County · Medicare and Medicaid since 1979
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 115266 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 16, 2025, inspectors cited 17 health deficiencies (the Georgia average is 5, the national average 9.2).
Of 39 health citations since July 2021, 4 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (2 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $17,345 in the last three years; the largest was $10,845, and the latest is dated February 11, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.16 hours per resident per day, against 3.56 across Georgia and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.68 of those hours.
48.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Georgia average 46.0%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 39 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Prohibition Policy and Procedures and Identifying Sexual Abuse and Capacity to Consent, Facility B failed to ensure one of three Residents (R) (R1) was protected from sexual assault by R2. Specifically, R2 was found in R1's room sitting next to her bed. R1 was naked from the waist down with blood noted to her vaginal area and R2 was later found to have blood on his right middle finger. Subsequently, R1 was sent to the hospital after the sexual assault by R2 resulting in a one-centimeter laceration to her left vaginal wall. The facility's failure to ensure protection from the sexual assault had the potential to result in physical, mental, or psychosocial harm. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility's policy titled Resident Rights, Standards of Performance Nursing Home Administrator (PPNH), and Standards of Performance Director of Nursing (PPNH), Facility B failed to ensure one of three Residents (R) (R1) was protected from sexual assault by R2. Specifically, Administration failed ensure R1 maintain an environment free from abuse in a manner that efficiently maintained the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for the resident. The facility's failure to ensure protection from the sexual assault had the potential to result in physical, mental, or psychosocial harm. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 12/29/2025 at 5:00 pm and was determined to have existed on 11/29/2025 at appropriately 6:09 pm. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility's policy titled Falls and Falls Risk Management, Facility A failed to ensure four of four Residents (R) (R1, R2, R3, R4) reviewed for falls had fall risk assessments, 3 (three)-day post fall follow-up, and/or neurological checks completed to prevent the risks and minimize complications from falls.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, record review and review of the facility's policy titled Perineal Care, Facility A failed to ensure one of four Residents (R) (R8) with pressure ulcers was provided perineal care in a sanitary manner to prevent cross contamination of loose stool to a clean area. This deficient practice had the potential to place the resident at risk for infection.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review, and review of the facilities' policy titled Administering Medications, Facility B failed to ensure that one of three nurses (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) FF) observed during medication administration observation did not pre-set medications in labeled cups for one hall of four halls (100-Hall) resulting in medication error rate of 55.56%.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and review of the facilities' policy titled Storage of Medications, Facility A failed to ensure one of one medication storage room did not have expired over the counter (OTC) medications on the shelf and failed to ensure two of two medication carts (Long Hall and the Short Hall) did not have expired medications. In addition, Facility B failed to ensure one of two medication storage rooms (located on Bluebird hall) did not have expired medication on the shelf and failed to ensure one of four medication carts (100-Hall) did not have expired medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, Facility B failed to ensure kitchen staff thoroughly cleaned and air-dried pans prior to storage. This failure had the potential to increase the risk of foodborne illness and had the potential to affect residents in one of two buildings (Facility B) who received dietary services. Facility failed to ensure that soap was dispensing into the dishwasher after replacing the dish detergent. These failures had the potential to affect all residents in building B, who consumed food from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and policy review, Facility A failed to ensure garbage was properly disposed of and contained which would affect all the residents and staff in one of two buildings (building B).
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and review of facility policy, Facility B failed to maintain a Legionella Water Management Program. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, Facility B failed to maintain staff documentation of current COVID-19 vaccination status. This failure had the potential to affect all 132 residents in the facility and all staff.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, review of Center for Disease Control (CDC) guidance and policy review, the facility failed to monitor and evaluate antibiotic usage for five of seven residents (Resident (R) 117, R100, R47, R119 and R95) reviewed for antibiotic usage out of 31 sampled residents. This failure had the potential to affect residents in the facility safety related to antibiotic usage.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were informed of the risk versus the benefits of psychotropic medication use prior to being administered psychoactive medications for two of five (Resident (R) 79, and R38) reviewed for unnecessary medications out of 31 sampled residents. This failures placed the residents at risk for receiving unnecessary medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, Facility B failed to ensure residents were informed in advance of their right to attend and participate in their care plan conference for two of four residents reviewed for care planning (Resident (R) 28 and R79) out of 31 sampled residents. This failure placed the residents at risk for their care plans not being person centered.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and facility policy review, Facility A failed to obtain the CMS-10055 (Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services) Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN) and CMS-10123 Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) for one of five residents (Resident (R) 136) when Part A Medicare services ended. This failure prevented R136 or responsible party from appealing the decision of the facility and/or making an informed decision related to the cost of continued therapy services.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record reviews, and review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, Facility A failed to provide a timely quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment data submission for one (Resident (R)78) of one resident reviewed for MDS over 120 days old out of a total sample of 31 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, Facility B failed to develop care plans related to bed rail use for two of four residents reviewed for care planning (Resident (R) 28 and R75) out of 31 sampled residents. This failure placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs and increased risks of accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, Facility B failed to review and revise residents' care plans for one of four residents review for care planning (Resident (R) 50). R50's care plan was not revised to reflect his current status. This failure placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, Facility B failed to ensure residents who were dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs) received showers for one of two residents (Resident (R) 28) reviewed for ADLs out of 31 sampled residents. This failure placed the resident at risk for an undignified quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and policy review, Facility A failed to ensure one of four residents (Resident (R) 73) reviewed for pressure ulcers out of a sample of 31 residents did not develop facility acquired pressure ulcers. This failure to not identify a pressure ulcer until it was a Stage II had the potential to escalate to a higher level causing the resident pain and discomfort.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, Facility A failed to monitor a resident's bathroom door protector to ensure it did not injure the resident until the door was replaced for one of seven residents reviewed for accidents out of 31 sampled residents (Resident (R) 64). This failure had the potential to cause injury to the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, Facility B failed to assess residents for the use of bed rails, review the risks and benefits of bed rail use and obtain informed consent prior to the installation of bed rails for two of seven residents (Resident (R) 28 and R75) reviewed for accidents and hazards out of 31 sampled residents. These failures placed the residents at risk for injury and restraint.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, review of facility policy, and review of manufacturer's pharmaceutical recommendations, Facility B failed to ensure a medication error rate below five percent. During medication administration for three (Resident (R)10, R51, R108) in the medication administration observation. These failures caused three medication errors out of 25 opportunities for error, or a medication error rate of 12%. These failures had the potential to increase or decrease the effectiveness of these medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and facility policy review, Facility A failed to document a resident's decline, death, and disposition of one of one resident (Resident (R) 141) reviewed for facility death out of a total sample of 31 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, record review, and a review of the facility's policy titled, Care planning- IDT, Facility A failed to follow residents' baseline care plans directing staff to medicate residents for pain related to wound care for one of three residents (R#402) who received wound care. Actual harm was identified on 5/10/23 when the Wound Care Nurse (WCN) failed to assess and administer medication to R#402 prior to providing wound care treatment, which resulted in pain.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, interview, and review of facility policy Pain Assessment and Management, Facility A failed to stop and address verbal and facial expressions of pain during wound care for one of three residents (R) (R#402) observed for wound care resulting in harm. Actual harm was identified on 5/10/23 when the Wound Care Nurse (WCN) failed to assess and administer pain medication to R#402 prior to providing wound care treatment, which resulted in pain during the treatment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and review of the policy titled Sanitation and Infection Prevention/Control, facility A failed to discard expired food in the walk-in refrigerator and walk-in freezer; label and date opened food items in the walk-in refrigerator and dry storage area; store cooking grease in proper container; ensure serving pans and bowls were stacked and stored dry; maintain an updated cleaning log; maintain the cleanliness of the icemaker; ensure the floors and walls in the walk-in refrigerator, dry storage and kitchen area were kept clean; and repair damaged ceiling in the dry storage area. The deficient practices had the potential to adversely affect 41of 44 residents who received oral diets.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Administering Medications, facility A failed to ensure that one of three medication carts (Long Hall medication cart) and the treatment cart was locked and secured when the cart was out of view of the nurse. Specifically, the facility A failed to ensure the treatment cart and the medication cart on the Long Hall medication cart was locked and medications secured when not in use for two of three carts.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, interviews, and review of the policy titled Self Administration of Medication, Facility A failed to ensure one resident (R) (R#110) of 51 sampled residents, was assessed to safely self-administer medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, interviews, and review of policy titled Dressing Change Policy, the facility failed to ensure quality of care and services in accordance with professional standards related to not receiving physician orders for treatment/wound care for one of one resident (R#65) with a cancer lesion on her right wrist. The sample size was 51.
Inspectors wrote3. During the tour of Facility B on 7/27/2021 at 12:00 p.m. and 7/28/2021 at 11:30 a.m. the following was observed: In room [ROOM NUMBER] an oxygen tank filter had a large amount of dust build up. The dust buildup was found at the back of oxygen tank and had a brownish gray color. The resident of room [ROOM NUMBER] was currently using the oxygen tank when the dust buildup was observed. In room [ROOM NUMBER] the cream-colored blinds had brown and black spots embedded into them. In room [ROOM NUMBER] the cream-colored blinds had brown and black spots embedded into them. In room [ROOM NUMBER] the cream-colored blinds had brown and black spots embedded into them. In room [ROOM NUMBER] the cream-colored blinds had brown and black spots embedded into them. In room [ROOM NUMBER] there were two ceiling vents with black and brown spots. During the tour on 7/29/2021 at 8:34 a.m. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observations, and review of policy titled Foods Brought by Family/Visitors and Food and Supply Storage, facility A failed to discard expired items, failed to label and date items in the refrigerator and freezer of the resident food pantry, and failed to monitor freezer temperatures for the freezer in the resident food pantry. This deficient practice affected one of one resident food pantry for facility A.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, the facility (Facility A) failed to ensure that privacy curtains provided full visual privacy for a total of 11 of 21 resident shared bedrooms (rooms: 2, 3, 5,8, 9,14, 16, 26, 27, 28, and 29).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, staff interviews, Facility A failed to maintain dignity by ensuring a dignity bag was provided for one of two residents (R) #113) who had an indwelling foley catheter. The facility sample size was 27 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, and staff interview, the facility policy titled Care Plans-Baseline, facility failed to develop a person-centered baseline care plan which included Transmission Based Precautions (TBP) interventions for one of four newly admitted residents (R) #182) at facility A.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, Facility A failed to develop a care plan for one resident (R) R#71) related to use of a knee immobilizer and skin assessments and failed to implement a care plan for one resident, R#90, related to a nutritional supplement. The sample size was 27.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interview facility A failed to ensure that physician orders were followed related to Magic cup being served at each meal, for one of 10 residents, (R) R#90), with an order for Magic cup.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, staff interviews, and the facility policy titled Catheter Care, Urinary the facility (Facility A) failed to ensure that the urinary drainage for R#113 was positioned lower than the level of the bladder to prevent unobstructed urine flow and tension for one resident (R#113). The sample size was 27 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, staff interview, and the facility policy Storage of Medication, facility A failed to ensure disposal of expired medications and supplies by appropriate expiration dates on one of the two medication carts and one of the one medication storage unit room. The facility census was 137 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and staff interviews, and review of the Department of Public Health Interim Guidance for Long-Term Care (LTC) Facilities Admitting Residents from a Hospital the facility (Facility A) failed to ensure that the door to the room, for one of one unvaccinated resident (R#182) on Transmission Based Precautions for MRSA (Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus) and as a newly admitted resident was kept closed at all times. In addition, the facility failed sanitize one of three Hoyer lifts between resident use and failed to use separate gauze or cloths during wound care.
6 fire safety citations on file: 2 on May 16, 2025, 2 on May 11, 2023, 2 on July 30, 2021.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| February 11, 2025 | Fine | $6,500 |
| February 11, 2025 | Fine | $10,845 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Georgia | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.16 | 3.56 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.68 | 0.50 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.78 | 3.10 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.62 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.86 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 48.7% | 46.0% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 35.0% | 44.5% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.31 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.31 on weekdays and 2.78 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.59 in April to June 2025 to 3.16 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.16 | 0.68 | 3.31 | 2.78 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 136 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.17 | 0.62 | 3.32 | 2.81 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 138 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.18 | 0.63 | 3.29 | 2.88 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 139 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.59 | 0.68 | 3.74 | 3.22 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 135 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Georgia, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.50 | 0.46 | 3.68 | 3.03 | 3.3% | 0.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Georgia, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.12 | $17.06 to $20.66 | 43,440 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.82 | $25.43 to $33.99 | 21,060 |
| Registered nurses | $44.98 | $38.02 to $51.12 | 100,950 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Georgia | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 16.8 | 15.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.2 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 19.7 | 2.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.2 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.8 | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.8 | 15.2 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.7 | 5.6 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 24.9 | 19.9 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 23.9 | 25.0 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 11.2 | 11.6 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.7 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Archbold Living Camilla's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 51.5% · Georgia: 49 better, 27 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 24 eligible stays.
9.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Georgia: 2 better, 17 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 43 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Georgia: 0 better, 8 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 19 eligible stays.
54.0% this home
Median of homes: Georgia46.9% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 37 residents counted.
4.3% this home
Median of homes: Georgia0.4% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 46 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Georgia2.2% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 46 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Georgia97.4% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 9 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: HOSPITAL AUTHORITY OF MITCHELL COUNTY.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubendall, Stephen | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 10/01/2009 | |
| Bramblett, Karen | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Carnline, Joe | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Cason, Ashley | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Craven, Darcy | Corporate director | Individual | 10/01/2021 | |
| Dawson, Marvin | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Griffith, Sina | Corporate director | Individual | 10/01/2021 | |
| Hamil, William | Corporate director | Individual | 01/28/2023 | |
| Nesmith, Jason | Corporate director | Individual | 10/01/2021 | |
| Porter, Jami | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Santoro, Jacquelyn | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Simmons, Josh | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Stone, Henry | Corporate director | Individual | 10/01/2021 | |
| Szwarc, Brian | Corporate director | Individual | 10/01/2021 | |
| Wentworth, Craig | Corporate director | Individual | 10/01/2021 | |
| Burnette, Jason | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/01/2025 | |
| Collins, Andrea | Corporate officer | Individual | 02/25/2025 | |
| Daniels, Christopher | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/01/2025 | |
| Gardner, Libby | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/05/2022 | |
| Hembree, Gregory | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/05/2016 | |
| Pearce, Carla | Corporate officer | Individual | 10/01/2021 | |
| Ward, Timothy | Corporate officer | Individual | 02/25/2025 | |
| Womack, James | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/19/2020 | |
| John D Archbold Memorial Hospital Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 10/01/1990 | |
| Barrett, Patricia | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/16/1991 | |
| John D Archbold Memorial Hospital Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/01/1990 | |
| Gardner, Libby | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/05/2022 | |
| Rubendall, Stephen | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/10/2025 | |
| Womack, James | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/01/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Georgia. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.