Find a nursing home

Home / Washington / Colville

Buena Vista Healthcare

151 Buena Vista Drive, Colville, WA 99114 · Stevens County · (509) 684-4539

40 certified beds, about 35 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1989

Part of a continuing care retirement community Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
5 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 505329 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on June 13, 2026, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the Washington average is 15.8, the national average 9.2).

Of 24 health citations since April 2024, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.

CMS lists 1 fine totaling $13,104 in the last three years; the largest was $13,104, and the latest is dated April 12, 2024.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.28 hours per resident per day, against 4.36 across Washington and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.80 of those hours.

43.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Washington average 45.1%).

CMS links it to Evergreen Healthcare Group, an affiliated group of 43 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 24 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
3G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
17D
4E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
June 13, 2026Standard inspection · 7 citations
  1. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 15, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain 1 of 1 ice machines (Ice Machine 1) in a sanitary manner. This failure placed the residents at risk of consuming contaminated ice and foodborne illness.
  2. D
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    F552 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 15, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain consent for psychotropic medications (medications that affect the mind, mood, and emotions) prior to administration of the first dose, for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 2), reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed the resident at risk of not being fully informed of the risks and benefits of medications and making a fully informed choice about their medical care.
  3. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 15, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop care-planned goals and interventions related to peripheral edema (swelling of the lower legs, ankles and feet due to fluid buildup caused by poor circulation, heart, liver, or kidney conditions or certain medications) for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Residents 5 and 44) reviewed. This failure placed the residents at risk for possible worsening health conditions and decreased quality of life.
  4. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 15, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the bowel protocol for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 2) reviewed for constipation. This failure put the residents at risk of discomfort and health consequences.
  5. D
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 15, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement resident specific interventions to prevent pressure ulcer/injuries for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 2) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This failure placed residents at risk for development of pressure ulcers, medical complications, and unmet care needs.
  6. D
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    F690 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 15, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a urinary catheter system (a tube inserted into the bladder that drained urine into a collection bag) was maintained in a clean manner for 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident 22) reviewed. This failure placed the resident at risk for infection and injury if the collection bag and tubing were damaged.
  7. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 15, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive plan to prevent the growth of water-borne viruses and bacteria such as Legionella (bacteria that caused a potentially fatal form of pneumonia when water mist or vapor that contained the bacteria was inhaled) for the Water Management Plans reviewed. This failure placed residents at risk of illness and decreased quality of life.
February 14, 2025Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. E
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    F583 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 7, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the immediate environment of 5 of 6 sampled residents (Residents 18, 16, 24, 3, and 21) reviewed for environment, was free from visible clinical information prior to assessing if it violated the resident's privacy.
  2. D
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    F622 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 7, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify what information was conveyed to the hospital at the time of transfer for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Residents 16 and 24) reviewed for hospitalizations. This failure placed the residents at risk for a disruptive and ineffective transition from the facility to the hospital setting.
  3. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 7, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop the care plans for 2 of 12 sampled residents (Residents 16 and 24) whose care plans were reviewed. This failure placed the residents at risk for inadequate care and a diminished quality of life.
  4. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 7, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide grooming for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 35), reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). This failure placed the resident at risk for poor personal hygiene and a diminished quality of life.
  5. D
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    F685 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 7, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to coordinate hearing services for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident 24) reviewed for communication. This failure placed the resident at risk for unmet needs and a diminished quality of life.
  6. D
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 7, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when staff were observed serving food without using appropriate hand hygiene for 1 of 3 dining observations. Staff were also observed carrying cups with bare hands touching the rims of drinking surfaces. This failure increased the resident's risk for food borne illness.
April 12, 2024Standard inspection · 11 citations
  1. G
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 10, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent pressure ulcer/injuries for 1 of 3 sampled residents (8). Resident 8 experienced harm when they developed avoidable pressure ulcers. This failure placed other residents at risk for development of pressure ulcers, medical complications, and unmet care needs.
  2. G
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 10, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to consistently implement effective preventative measures for falls, by evaluating the effectiveness of current interventions and the need for increased supervision for 4 of 4 sampled residents (Residents 31, 33, 36, and 51), reviewed for accidents. Resident 51 experienced harm when they sustained a hip fracture requiring hospital treatment and Resident 36 experienced a pattern of frequent falls. These failures placed residents at risk for repeat falls, major injury, and diminished quality of life.
  3. G
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    F692 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 10, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record reviewthe facility failed to provide cueing and meal assistance, monitor for significant weight loss, and risk of skin integrity for nutrition for 1 of 1 sampled residents (29). The resident experienced harm when they had an unplanned severe weight loss, nutritional decline, and breakdown of skin integrity with wound development. This failure placed other residents at risk for unplanned weight loss, medical complications, and unmet care needs. Findings icluded . <Resident 29> Review of the 03/25/2024 significant change assessment, showed Resident 29 had diagnoses which included stroke, anemia, and ataxia (impaired coordination). [...]
  4. E
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 10, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to implement bowel management protocol when indicated for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 26 and 31), reviewed for constipation. In addition, the facility failed to monitor and implement interventions for edema (swelling) management for 1 of 3 sampled residents (31), reviewed for edema. These failures placed residents at risk for complications, worsening conditions, and diminished quality of life.
  5. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 10, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff followed enhanced barrier precautions, cleaned mechanical lifts after usage, and performed hand hygiene when indicated during the meal service and wound care. These failures placed residents at risk of transmission of communicable diseases and/or healthcare associated diseases, and diminished quality of life.
  6. D
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    F554 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 10, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assess and care plan for safe self-medication administration for 1of 1 sampled residents (Resident 28), reviewed for medication administration. This failure placed residents at risk of medication errors, adverse side effects, and diminished quality of life.
  7. D
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    F558 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 10, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide assistive cups as care planned for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 17) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL's). This failure placed the resident at risk for continued swallowing difficulties and decreased fluid intake.
  8. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 10, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nail care was provided for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 17 and 29) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Specifically, two residents used their fingers to help scoop food onto their eating utensils and to pick up food from their plates and their nails had dark matter under them. This failure placed the residents at risk of contracting bacterial and diarrheal illnesses.
  9. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 10, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen delivery equipment was maintained in a clean manner for 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident 26) reviewed for respiratory care. These failures placed the residents at risk for respiratory complications and infection.
  10. D
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    F801 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 10, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff had the proper qualifications. Failure to ensure the dietary manager had the proper certification placed all residents at risk for nutritional deficits, unmet nutritional needs, and diminshed quality of life.
  11. D
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 10, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain appropriate dishwasher temperatures, date and dispose of expired foods and failed to prepare food in a sanitary manner. These failures placed the residents at risk for food borne illnesses and decreased quality of life.

Fire safety inspections

17 fire safety citations on file: 5 on June 13, 2026, 6 on February 14, 2025, 6 on April 12, 2024.

Every fire safety citation17 citations
  1. F
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · June 13, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · June 13, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. F
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · June 13, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. F
    Ensure that testing and maintenance of electrical equipment is performed.
    K 921 · June 13, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. D
    Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
    K 511 · June 13, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. F
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · February 14, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. F
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · February 14, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. F
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · February 14, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. F
    Provide a written emergency evacuation plan.
    K 711 · February 14, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  10. F
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · February 14, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  11. D
    Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
    K 920 · February 14, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  12. F
    Conduct testing and exercise requirements.
    E 39 · April 12, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  13. F
    Install emergency lighting that can last at least 1 1/2 hours.
    K 291 · April 12, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  14. F
    Have properly located and lighted "Exit" signs.
    K 293 · April 12, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  15. F
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · April 12, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  16. F
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · April 12, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  17. D
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · April 12, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
April 12, 2024Fine $13,104

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeWashingtonUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.284.363.86
Registered nurses0.800.940.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.773.803.42
Nurse aides2.75
Licensed practical nurses0.73
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)43.5%45.1%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover42.9%45.4%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.45 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.48 on weekdays and 3.77 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.16 in April to June 2025 to 4.28 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.280.804.483.77 0.0%0 of 9035
Oct to Dec 20254.260.674.403.90 0.0%0 of 9235
Jul to Sep 20254.090.744.283.62 0.0%0 of 9234
Apr to Jun 20254.160.824.373.61 0.0%0 of 9135
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Washington, Jan to Mar 20264.210.904.443.663.7%0.1% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.

Official wage estimates for Washington

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Washington, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$23.65$22.59 to $27.8530,270
LPNs and LVNs$39.98$36.98 to $45.186,780
Registered nurses$59.71$49.57 to $64.5469,260
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeWashingtonUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
16.814.213.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.00.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.11.61.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.92.63.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.71.31.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
28.217.214.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
13.44.34.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
9.015.115.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
10.519.923.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
20.113.412.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
0.51.31.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.41.51.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Buena Vista Healthcare's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (52.8% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

52.8% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Washington: 71 better, 16 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 131 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

8.9% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Washington: 7 better, 0 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 117 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

5.6% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Washington: 4 better, 0 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 74 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

42.0% this home

Median of homes: Washington61.4% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 81 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

2.1% this home

Median of homes: Washington0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 93 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

1.3% this home

Median of homes: Washington1.4% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 93 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

100.0% this home

Median of homes: Washington98.3% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 58 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: BUENA VISTA SNF OPERATIONS, LLC. CMS links this home to Evergreen Healthcare Group, a group of 43 nursing homes averaging 2.4 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Curry, DanielleManaging control - governing bodyIndividual08/31/2023
Odenthal, JasonManaging control - governing bodyIndividual08/31/2023
Curry, DanielleCorporate directorIndividual08/31/2023
Odenthal, JasonCorporate directorIndividual08/31/2023
Spielman, ShimonCorporate officerIndividual08/31/2023
Yenowitz, YitzchokCorporate officerIndividual08/31/2023
Buena Vista SNF Operations, LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization08/31/2023
Couve Financial Services LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization08/31/2023
Couve Healthcare Consulting LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization08/31/2023
Pnw 12 Opco Management LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization08/31/2023
Pnw 12 SNF Consulting LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization08/31/2023
Arnold, ReneeOperational/managerial controlIndividual08/31/2023
Artzis, SamuelOperational/managerial controlIndividual08/31/2023
Curry, DanielleOperational/managerial controlIndividual08/31/2023
Luu, TysonOperational/managerial controlIndividual08/31/2023
Odenthal, JasonOperational/managerial controlIndividual08/31/2023
Spielman, ShimonOperational/managerial controlIndividual08/31/2023
Yenowitz, YitzchokOperational/managerial controlIndividual08/31/2023
Buena Vista SNF Operations, LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization03/28/2025
Couve Financial Services LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization03/24/2025
Couve Healthcare Consulting LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization03/28/2025
Pnw 12 Opco Management LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization03/28/2025
Pnw 12 SNF Consulting LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization03/28/2025
Arnold, ReneeAdp of the SNFIndividual08/31/2023
Artzis, SamuelAdp of the SNFIndividual08/31/2023
Curry, DanielleAdp of the SNFIndividual08/31/2023
Luu, TysonAdp of the SNFIndividual08/31/2023
Odenthal, JasonAdp of the SNFIndividual08/31/2023
Spielman, ShimonAdp of the SNFIndividual08/31/2023
Yenowitz, YitzchokAdp of the SNFIndividual08/31/2023

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 11 problems in this area, most recently on June 13, 2026: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
  2. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on June 13, 2026: "Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments."
  3. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on June 13, 2026: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
  4. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on June 13, 2026: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.77 hours per resident per day, below the Washington average of 3.80.

Other nursing homes nearby

Washington contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Washington. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Buena Vista Healthcare's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Buena Vista Healthcare 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 5 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Buena Vista Healthcare get at its last inspection?
7 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on June 13, 2026. The Washington average is 15.8.
Has Buena Vista Healthcare been fined?
Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $13,104 in the last three years.
Does Buena Vista Healthcare accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Buena Vista Healthcare?
CMS lists 30 owners and managers, and links the home to Evergreen Healthcare Group. Legal business name: BUENA VISTA SNF OPERATIONS, LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection