Find a nursing home

Home / Oklahoma / Davis

Burford Manor

505 South 7th Street, Davis, OK 73030 · Murray County · (580) 369-2653

73 certified beds, about 47 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1998

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
2 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
1 of 5
CMS note: This facility reported a high number of days without a registered nurse onsite.
Quality measures
2 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 375325 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on November 1, 2024, inspectors cited 1 health deficiency (the Oklahoma average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).

Of 11 health citations since December 2021, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).

CMS lists 1 fine totaling $10,358 in the last three years; the largest was $10,358, and the latest is dated July 16, 2024.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.80 hours per resident per day, against 3.79 across Oklahoma and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.37 of those hours.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 11 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
1J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
2D
7E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
July 21, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. E
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    F584 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Not yet corrected
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and record review, the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance to maintain a sanitary and comfortable facility for: a. 1 (North hall shower room) of 2 sampled shower rooms; andb. 1 (North hall carpet) of 3 sampled halls reviewed for a homelike environment. The DON identified 16 residents were located on North hall.
July 3, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. J
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 31, 2025
    Inspectors wroteOn 07/02/25 at 2:10 p.m., the OSDH was notified and verified the existence of an IJ situation related to the facility's failure to provide supervision and interventions to prevent elopement from the facility. Resident #1 had a history of eloping and left the facility unattended. Resident #1 crossed a busy, four-lane street and was located on the side of a highway approximately one mile from the facility. On 07/02/25 at 5:10 p.m., the DON was notified of the IJ and provided the IJ template. On 07/03/25 at 11:55 a.m., an acceptable plan of removal was approved by the OSDH. The plan of removal, read in part, [NAME] Manor, 7-2-25, Plan of RemovalResident [Resident #1] not currently in the building. Currently 46 residents in the facility. Nurses have completed wandering assessments on all 46 residents in house and have identified no additional wander risks. [...]
  2. D
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 31, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to protect a resident from physical and verbal abuse by a staff member for 1 (#3) of 3 residents sampled for abuse. The director of nursing reported 46 residents resided in the facility.
November 1, 2024Standard inspection · 1 citation
  1. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 2, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to use enhanced barrier precautions for two (#13 and #25) of two sampled residents identified with the need for enhanced barrier precautions.
July 16, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. F
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    F584 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 16, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain housekeeping and maintenance services to maintain a sanitary and safe environment for 47 of 47 residents who reside in the facility. Census:
  2. E
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    F580 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 9, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the resident's representative of a change of condition for one (#2) of three sampled residents reviewed for notifications related to changes of condition. The DON reported 47 residents resided in the facility.
August 17, 2023Standard inspection · 2 citations
  1. E
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    F582 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 20, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide residents with beneficiary notices for three (#155, 156, and #157) of three sampled residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. The facility identified six residents discharged from Medicare covered part A stay with benefit days remaining in the previous six months.
  2. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 20, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen floor and ice machine equipment. The facility failed to: a. maintain a floor which could be sanitized and cleaned appropriately, b. maintain the ice machine in a sanitary manner, and; c. ensure a covered container for trash was available. The Administrator reported all 52 residents were served foods and beverages from the kitchen.
December 2, 2021Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. E
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 2, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision to prevent an elopement for one (#23) of two residents reviewed for elopement risk. The director of nurses reported three residents wandered throughout the facility and were at risk for elopement.
  2. E
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    F725 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 2, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staff to ensure call lights were answered in a timely manner. The administrator reported 47 residents lived in the facility.
  3. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 2, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to complete a comprehensive care plan for one (#38) of 19 residents reviewed. The administrator reported 47 residents lived in the facility.

Fire safety inspections

8 fire safety citations on file: 4 on November 1, 2024, 2 on August 17, 2023, 2 on December 2, 2021.

Every fire safety citation8 citations
  1. F
    Conduct risk assessment and an All-Hazards approach.
    E 6 · November 1, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Have a fire alarm with audible and visual signals that transmits the alarm automatically to notify emergency forces in event of fire.
    K 343 · November 1, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. F
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · November 1, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. E
    Have power receptacles that are properly grounded.
    K 912 · November 1, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. E
    Have properly located and lighted "Exit" signs.
    K 293 · August 17, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. E
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · August 17, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. F
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · December 2, 2021 · deficient, provider has
  8. E
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · December 2, 2021 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
July 16, 2024Fine $10,358
July 16, 2024Payment Denial 8 days from August 8, 2024

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeOklahomaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.803.793.86
Registered nurses0.370.340.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.003.443.42
Nurse aides2.52
Licensed practical nurses0.92
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)not reported55.5%45.8%
Registered nurse turnovernot reported53.6%42.9%
Administrators who leftnot reported

CMS expects 2.85 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.13 on weekdays and 3.00 on weekends, 27% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.16 in April to June 2025 to 3.80 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.800.374.133.00 0.0%4 of 9047
Oct to Dec 20253.900.354.143.27 0.0%0 of 9247
Apr to Jun 20254.160.574.453.45 0.0%2 of 9147
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Oklahoma, Jan to Mar 20263.790.323.943.422.2%1.6% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeOklahomaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
11.013.613.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.11.90.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.32.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.54.73.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.31.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
9.013.714.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.24.74.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
30.217.515.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
33.727.323.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
19.316.612.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.82.31.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
4.93.01.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: DAVIS HEALTH AND REHABILITATION, LLC.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Daves, William5% or greater direct ownership interestIndividual50%09/03/2007
Daves, CaseyW-2 managing employeeIndividual04/01/2017
Daves, CaseyCorporate officerIndividual04/01/2017

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on July 21, 2026: "Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely."
  2. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on July 3, 2025: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
  3. How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on July 3, 2025: "Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody."
  4. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on November 1, 2024: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.00 hours per resident per day, below the Oklahoma average of 3.44.

Other nursing homes nearby

Oklahoma contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Oklahoma. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Burford Manor's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Burford Manor 2 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 1 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Burford Manor get at its last inspection?
1 health deficiency at the standard inspection on November 1, 2024. The Oklahoma average is 6.4.
Has Burford Manor been fined?
Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $10,358 in the last three years.
Does Burford Manor accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Burford Manor?
CMS lists 3 owners and managers. Legal business name: DAVIS HEALTH AND REHABILITATION, LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection