1045 West Street, Carthage, NY 13619 · Jefferson County · (315) 493-3220
90 certified beds, about 87 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1977
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 335579 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on September 26, 2024, inspectors cited 12 health deficiencies (the New York average is 8.1, the national average 9.2).
None of its 34 health citations since June 2021 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.25 hours per resident per day, against 3.63 across New York and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.33 of those hours.
68.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (New York average 40.3%).
CMS links it to Centers Health Care, an affiliated group of 36 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 34 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews (QIES Intake 3038191), the facility failed to ensure residents were provided food and drink that was palatable, flavorful, and at an appetizing temperature for two of two meals (lunch meal on 07/21/2026 and breakfast meal on 07/23/2026) and for three of nine anonymous residents present at the resident group meeting. Specifically, the 07/21/2026 and 07/23/2026 meal trays included hot foods served below 130 degrees Fahrenheit, cold foods served above 49 degrees Fahrenheit, and some foods were not palatable; and three anonymous residents at the resident group meeting stated the hot food was served cold and meals were not appetizing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews (iQIES Intake 2601518), the facility failed to ensure residents received care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers and promote healing of pressure ulcers for one of six residents (Resident #3) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #3's pressure ulcer treatment was not administered by Licensed Practical Nurse #23 as ordered, their pressure relieving boots were not implemented as planned, and their pressure reducing air mattress was not set at the appropriate weight.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews (iQIES Intake 2808135), the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained free of accident hazards for one of four residents (Resident #63) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #63 had a history of a fall from bed resulting in a lumbar spine fracture and their bed was observed not in the lowest position as planned.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00348460) surveys conducted 9/23/2024-9/26/2024, the facility did not ensure residents had the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 2 of 2 resident units (North and South units) reviewed. Specifically, the South unit common area had a stained carpet, four burned out lights, a broken light fixture, the unit shower was missing floor and wall tiles, and the dining room countertop was damaged; the North unit resident room [ROOM NUMBER] had a dirty floor mat that smelled of mildew and cobwebs on the wall.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 9/23/2024-9/26/2024, the facility did not ensure each resident received food and drink that was palatable, flavorful, and at an appetizing temperature for 3 of 3 meals (the 9/24/2024 lunch meal, the 9/25/2024 special Fall festival meal, and the 9/25/2024 lunch meal) reviewed; for 7 of 7 anonymous residents present at the Resident Council meeting; and for 2 additional residents interviewed (Residents #178 and #180). Specifically, the 9/24/2024 and 9/25/2024 lunch meals were not flavorful; the 9/25/2024 Fall festival meal was not served at palatable and appetizing temperatures; 7 of 7 anonymous residents at the Resident Council meeting stated the food was often not appetizing and served cold; and 2 residents (Resident #178 and #180) stated the food was not flavorful and was served cold.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 9/23/2024-9/26/2024, the facility did not ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 main kitchen. Specifically, in the main kitchen food was not maintained at proper temperatures, there was outdated food, and the dishwasher was not in proper working order.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview during the recertification survey conducted 9/23/2024-9/26/2024, the facility did not provide the appropriate liability and appeal notices to Medicare beneficiaries for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #72) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #72 remained in the facility after discontinuation of Medicare Part A services and the facility did not provide the resident with a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services-10055) for Medicare Part A as required.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 9/23/2024-9/26/2024, the facility did not ensure the discharge needs of each resident were identified and resulted in the development of a discharge plan for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #54) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #54 expressed the intention to be discharged to an assisted living facility and was not assisted with discharge planning or updated on the status of their discharge plan.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00348460 and NY00345485) surveys conducted 9/23/2024-9/26/2024, the facility did not ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 2 of 7 residents (Resident #15 and #43) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #43 was not assisted with removing unwanted facial hair, and Resident #15 had unkept hair and unclean and untrimmed fingernails.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 9/23/2024-9/26/2024, the facility did not ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's choices for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #178) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #178's urinary catheter (tube that drains urine) drainage bag was observed above the level of the bladder.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 9/23/2024-9/26/2024, the facility did not ensure residents with pressure ulcers received the necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standard of practice, to promote wound healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing for 2 of 2 residents (Residents #66 and #369) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #66 developed three facility acquired pressure ulcers, one vascular wound (caused by poor blood circulation) and had a low loss air mattress (specialty mattress used to relieve pressure and provide airflow) that was not accurately set to the resident's weight, and the resident was not turned and repositioned as care planned. Resident #379 had a foot wound and did not have their foot offloaded as planned.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews, during the recertification survey conducted 9/23/2024-9/26/2024, the facility did not ensure residents with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to prevent further decrease in range of motion for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #7 and #15) reviewed. Specifically, Residents #15 and #7 resting palm (hand) guards were not applied appropriately as recommended by occupational therapy for hand and finger contractures (shortening of muscle or tendons preventing normal movement).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00321293 and NY00321801) surveys conducted 9/23/2024-9/26/2024, the facility did not ensure each resident received adequate supervision for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for falls. Specifically, Resident #1 was transferred without the use of a lift device as planned. The facility policy, Therapy Services, created 10/12/2021, documented therapy services would conduct a comprehensive patient centered evaluation which included the development of a plan of care with appropriate interventions to reach specified resident goals. The facility policy, Lift-Full Body Mechanical Lift, last reviewed 8/20/2023, documented at a minimum, two trained staff members were needed to safely move a resident with a floor based full body mechanical lift. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 9/23/2024-9/26/2024, the facility did not ensure that residents who required dialysis services (filtration of blood when the kidneys do not work) received such services consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #17) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #17 received hemodialysis treatments at a community-based dialysis center and did not have on-going assessments and oversight before and after dialysis treatments. Additionally, staff documented the resident had an arteriovenous fistula (surgical connection between an artery and a vein often used for dialysis access) which the resident did not have.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 9/23/2024-9/26/2024, the facility did not ensure each resident received and the facility provided food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #383) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #383 had a physician order for a nectar thick consistency for all liquids and was served thin liquids.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview during the abbreviated survey (NY00312672), the facility did not provide and document sufficient preparation and orientation to residents to ensure safe and orderly transfer or discharge from the facility for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #6) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #6 was discharged without a documented discharge plan. Additionally, there were recommendations for equipment and post-discharge services there were not established by the facility prior to discharge.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview during the abbreviated survey (NY00328705) the facility did not provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public for 1 of 2 nursing units (South Unit) reviewed. Specifically, the heat stopped working on the South Unit on 11/22/2023 and was not restored until 11/24/2023. During the time the heat was not functional, there was no documented evidence the facility routinely monitored and addressed cold air temperatures and no documented evidence a consistent plan was implemented to ensure resident comfort was maintained.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview during the abbreviated survey (NY00328705) the facility did not operate and provide services in compliance with Federal, State, and Local Laws and Professional Standards for 1 of 2 nursing units (South Unit) reviewed. Specifically, the heat stopped working on the South Unit on 11/22/2023 and was not restored until 11/24/2023 and the facility did not report the outage to the New York State Department of Health (NYS DOH) as required.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 3/12/23-3/16/23, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 33 of 50 resident rooms (rooms 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 208, 209, 211, 215, 216, 218, 219, 221, 222, 223, and 228) and for 3 resident common areas (north unit shower room, smoke door near resident room [ROOM NUMBER], and the corridor between the main kitchen access door and the dining room). Specifically, there were unclean and/or damaged floors and walls in 33 resident rooms, and in 3 common areas.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00271814, NY00301775, and NY00288954) surveys conducted 3/12/23-3/16/23, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 2 of 18 residents (Residents #6 and 73) reviewed and an additional 7 residents (Residents #14, 18, 19, 25, 29, 37, and 58) observed. Specifically, Resident #73 was not assisted with incontinence care, was not provided oral care, and was not provided a shower as scheduled; Resident #6 was not assisted with placement of their dentures for eating; and Residents #14, 18, 19, 25, 29, 37, and 58 were observed in bed wearing hospital gowns during the lunch meal.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00288954) surveys conducted 3/12/23-3/16/23 the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 3 of 10 residents (Residents #6, 19, and 73) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Specifically, Residents #6, 19, and 73 did not have their ADL needs addressed timely. During a confidential group meeting (resident council) residents stated they had to wait 3-4 hours in the morning for assistance with ADLs. This was a result of insufficient staff to care for all 88 residents in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 3/12/23-3/16/23, the facility failed to ensure each resident received and the facility provided food and drink that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 3 of 3 meals reviewed (3/13/23, 3/14/23, and 3/15/23 lunch meal trays). Specifically, lunch meals test trays on 3/13/23, 3/14/23, and 3/15/23 were not served at palatable and appetizing temperatures.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview during the recertification survey conducted 3/12/23-3/16/23, the facility failed to ensure they were adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relayed the call directly to a staff member for 16 of 50 resident rooms (rooms 101, 105, 106, 108, 110, 113, 119, 121, 207, 214, 221, 223, 224, 225, 226, and 227); and for 13 of 28 residents (Resident #11, 14, 17, 19, 25, 30, 36, 37, 41, 58, 69, 236, and 387) reviewed. Specifically, resident rooms 101, 105, 106, 108, 110, 113, 119, 121, 207, 214, 221, 223, 224, 225, 226, and 227 call bells were not properly installed and/or not long enough for resident use; and Residents #11, 14, 17, 19, 25, 30, 36, 37, 41, 58, 69, 236, and 387 were observed with call bells that were not in reach.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification survey conducted 3/12/23-3/16/23, the facility failed to ensure the right to reside and receive services with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #385) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #385 was observed on multiple occasions lying in a bed that was too short for their height with both of their heels pressed up against the footboard of the bed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview during the recertification survey conducted 3/12/23-3/16/23, the facility failed to post in a place readily accessible to residents, family members, and to legal representatives of residents, the results of the most recent survey of the facility conducted by Federal or State surveyors and any plan of correction with respect to the facility. Specifically, the survey results and plan of correction for the most recent Life Safety Code Federal survey conducted on 6/24/21 were not available for examination.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00283545 and NY00271814) conducted 3/12/23-3/16/23, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible and residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 2 of 5 residents (Residents #11 and 25) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #11 had a physician order for nectar thick liquids and aspiration (inhaling food/fluid into lungs) precautions and was observed with thin liquids at their bedside and was not supervised during meals; Resident #29 was on aspiration precautions with altered diet consistency and was observed eating unsupervised in bed in their room and required assistance of 2 for transfers and was observed being transferred by one.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 3/12/23 - 3/16/23 the facility failed to provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets their daily nutritional and special dietary needs for 2 of 2 meals observed. Specifically, Resident #19 was not provided with a nutritional supplement for 2 lunch meals as planned.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00275626, NY00275702, and NY00276385) conducted on 6/22/21-6/24/21, the facility did not ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming for 3 of 8 residents (Residents #7, 39, and 329) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #7 was not assisted with dressing, oral hygiene, and eye wear cleaning. Resident #329 was not assisted with nail care and Resident #39 was not provided with facial grooming or nail care.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00276793) conducted on 6/22/21-6/24/21, the facility did not ensure physician orders for the resident's immediate care were in place on admission for 1 of 7 (Resident #279) residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #279 arrived to the facility from the hospital and did not have admission orders, including medication and dietary orders, obtained and implemented timely after admission.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview during the recertification survey conducted on 6/22/21-6/24/21, the facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical nursing, mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #329) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #329 was at low risk for skin impairments, developed a reddened area, was not reassessed, and pressure injury prevention interventions were not re-evaluated.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview during the recertification survey conducted on 6/22-6/24/21, the facility did not ensure a resident with limited range of motion (ROM) received appropriate services, equipment, and assistance to maintain or improve mobility with the maximum practicable independence unless a reduction in mobility was demonstrably unavoidable for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #52) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #52 was provided rehabilitation and gained the ability to walk, and the facility did not ensure a plan was implemented to maintain the resident's mobility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00275702) conducted on 6/22/21-6/24/21, the facility did not ensure a resident with an indwelling catheter received the necessary services and treatment for catheter use for 1 of 2 (Resident #63) residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #63 did not have an order in place for a catheter, the resident's catheter leaked frequently and the leaking was not addressed timely by the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted on 6/22/21-6/24/21, the facility did not provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance to ensure that the resident can use the assistive devices when consuming meals and snacks for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #329) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #329's adaptive cup(s) were not provided at meals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview during the recertification survey conducted on 6/22/21-6/24/21, the facility did not maintain medical records on each resident that were complete and accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 1 of 23 residents (Resident #39) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #39's plan of care documented to provide an edema glove to the resident's left hand, the glove was no longer required, was not removed from the plan of care, and staff continued to document the glove was provided when it was unavailable for use.
30 fire safety citations on file: 17 on September 26, 2024, 9 on March 16, 2023, 4 on June 24, 2021.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | New York | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.25 | 3.63 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.33 | 0.71 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.41 | 3.18 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.88 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.04 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 68.6% | 40.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 55.6% | 39.8% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.97 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.59 on weekdays and 2.41 on weekends, 33% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.35 in April to June 2025 to 3.25 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.25 | 0.33 | 3.59 | 2.41 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 87 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.55 | 0.31 | 3.81 | 2.89 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 85 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.39 | 0.23 | 3.71 | 2.58 | 0.0% | 2 of 92 | 85 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.35 | 0.24 | 3.61 | 2.71 | 0.0% | 2 of 91 | 86 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| New York, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.55 | 0.68 | 3.72 | 3.13 | 9.8% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Trains nurse aides: this home runs a state-approved CNA program for its own hires (state list: NYS DOH Nurse Aide Training Programs (nursing homes), as of October 1, 2026). A nursing home cannot charge aides it employs, or has offered a job, for state-approved training (42 CFR 483.152(c)). See Carthage Center for Rehabilitaiton and Nursing CNA training on CareerFunded, our sister site for career training.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| New York, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $23.36 | $21.04 to $24.99 | 87,990 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $32.30 | $29.52 to $37.00 | 39,400 |
| Registered nurses | $52.62 | $45.60 to $62.34 | 205,810 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | New York | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.6 | 14.1 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.6 | 12.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.9 | 6.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.3 | 13.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 20.7 | 20.6 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 18.8 | 9.6 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.2 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 4.0 | 1.4 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Carthage Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (50.1% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
50.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · New York: 101 better, 157 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 115 eligible stays.
10.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · New York: 12 better, 5 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 115 eligible stays.
6.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · New York: 7 better, 21 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 74 eligible stays.
60.2% this home
Median of homes: New York60.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 93 residents counted.
2.0% this home
Median of homes: New York0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 146 residents counted.
1.2% this home
Median of homes: New York2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 146 residents counted.
98.3% this home
Median of homes: New York98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 57 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: CLR CARTHAGE LLC. CMS links this home to Centers Health Care, a group of 36 nursing homes averaging 2.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abramchik, Amir | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 06/01/2022 | |
| Goldman, Nathan | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Hendrix, Heidi | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Lantzitsky, Aharon | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Rozenberg, Kenneth | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Klinger, Barry | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/05/2022 | |
| Rogowski, Jerzy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/01/2021 | |
| Abramchik, Amir | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2017 | |
| Klinger, Barry | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/05/2022 | |
| Rogowski, Jerzy | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/01/2021 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
Licensed assisted living homes in the same town or within 5 miles, each with its New York inspection record.
These are the official offices in New York. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.