Home / New Mexico / Roswell
1601 South Main Street, Roswell, NM 88203 · Chaves County · (575) 623-6008
118 certified beds, about 93 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1998
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 325086 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on December 18, 2025, inspectors cited 15 health deficiencies (the New Mexico average is 17.9, the national average 9.2).
Of 54 health citations since July 2023, 5 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (4 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 3 fines totaling $99,368 in the last three years; the largest was $41,861, and the latest is dated September 10, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.18 hours per resident per day, against 3.54 across New Mexico and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.37 of those hours.
51.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (New Mexico average 53.3%).
CMS links it to Opco Skilled Management, an affiliated group of 68 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 54 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to complete a physician ordered referral to an orthopedic specialist for post fall follow up care for 1 (R #1) of 3 (R #1, R #2, and R #3) residents reviewed. This deficient practice could result in a delay in evaluation and treatment for possible injuries.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent misappropriation of resident money when a payment app account was used by a staff member for 1 (R #1) of 4 (R #1, R #2, R #3 and R #4) residents reviewed for exploitation (the fact of making use of a situation to gain unfair advantage for oneself). This deficient practice is likely to cause residents to feel unsafe, and experience anger and frustration.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to post nurse staffing data daily at the beginning of the shift that included the following: 1. Facility name. 2. The current date. 3. The total number and the actual hours worked by the following categories of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift: -Registered nurses. -Licensed practical nurses. -Certified nurse aides. -Resident census. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 96 residents as identified by the census provided by the Admissions Coordinator (Admit) on 12/14/25 and could likely result in residents and visitors not having the staffing information readily available.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure safe medication storage practices by not ensuring the medical supply storage rooms were kept free of expired medications. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 96 residents as identified by the census provided by the Administrator on 12/14/25. If the facility does not ensure safe storage practices, then residents are at risk for adverse effects due to improper storage.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to conduct regular inspections of all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails as part of a regular maintenance program to identify areas of possible entrapment 13 (R #2, R #4, R #5, R #6, R #10, R #12, R #13, R #19, R #54, R #55, R #63, R #84, and R #88) of 13 (R #2, R #4, R #5, R #6, R #10, R #12, R #13, R #19, R #54, R #55, R #63, R #84, and R #88). This deficient practice could likely result in serious injury or death if residents become trapped between the mattress, side rail, footboard and headboard.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents did not receive psychotropic medications (group of drugs that affect behavior, mood, thoughts, or perception) unless the medication was medically necessary for 2 (R #2 and R #4) of 3 (R #2, R #4 and R #54) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, when staff failed to: 1. Ensure psychotropic medications were necessary to treat a specific condition as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record for R #2 and R #4, 2. Ensure as needed psychotropic medications are limited to only 14 days or indicate the duration of the as needed (PRN) order for R #2. These deficient practices could likely lead to adverse drug effects and poor patient outcomes.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to create an accurate and complete baseline care plan (minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident immediately upon their admission to the facility) within 48 hours of admission for 4 (R #7, R #15, R #79, R #106) of 6 (R #7, R #8, R #15, R #35, R #79, and R #106) residents reviewed for care plans. This deficient practice could likely result in residents not receiving the appropriate care and may place residents at risk of an adverse event (undesirable experience, preventable or non-preventable, that caused harm to a resident because of medical care or lack of medical care) or worsening of current condition after admission.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff revised the care plan for 4 (R #2, R #5, R #54, and R #55) of 4 (R #2, R #5, R #54, and R #55) residents reviewed when staff failed to:Revise care plans for R #2 and R #55 for the use of bed rails,Revise care plan for R #5's dependence on staff for bed mobility,Revise care plan to include interventions for bed rail usage for R #54. These deficient practices are likely to result in residents' care and needs not being addressed if care plans are not updated.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for risk of entrapment (state of being stuck or caught on bed rail) in bed rails for 13 (R #2, R #4, R #5, R #6, R #10, R #12, R #13, R #19, R #54, R #55, R #63, R #84, and R #88) of 13 (R #2, R #4, R #5, R #6, R #10, R #12, R #13, R #19, R #54, R #55, R #63, R #84, and R #88) residents reviewed for accidents. This deficient practice has the potential to cause serious injury by becoming trapped between the mattress and bed rail.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen (plan to manage a person's medication) was free from unnecessary drugs by ensuring indication of use is based on the residents' current diagnosis for 3 (R #2, R #4, and R #54) of 3(R #2, R #4, and R #54) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice could likely lead to adverse drug effects and poor patient outcomes.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to complete the following:1. Maintain the ice and water machine in a manner to prevent contamination and foodborne pathogens (a bacterium, virus, or other microorganism that can cause disease), 2. Properly store food items by tracking when to discard, labeling and covering perishable foods, and dating all foods stored in refrigerator, freezer, or pantry.3. Maintain the kitchen environment in a clean and sanitary manner. 4. Temperature tracking sheet on the outside of the refrigerator was dated November 2025. 5. Ensuring food served to residents was sanitary. These failures have the potential to result in cross contamination, the growth of foodborne pathogens, and foodborne illnesses.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain proper infection prevention measures for 3(R #6, R #54, and R #98) of 3(R #6, R #54, and R #98) residents reviewed by not: Ensuring Enhanced Barrier Protection (EBP) signage is visibly posted outside resident's room when precautions are in place. Ensuring Personal Protective Equipment is available (PPE) is available,Ensuring EBP signage was posted properly. Infection Control Signs and PPER #6C. Record review of R #6's admission record revealed R #6 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. D. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided activities according to their preference for 1 (R #4) of 1 (R #4) resident reviewed for activities of daily living. This deficient practice is likely to result in the residents' personal choices not being honored and loss of dignity.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's current advance directive (a document which provides an individual's wishes for emergency and lifesaving care) and the resident's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed the same resident wishes for 3 (R #9, R #79, and R #84) of 6 (R #9, R #10, R #63, R #67, R #79, and R #84) residents reviewed for advance directives. This deficient practice is likely to cause confusion and delay potentially lifesaving procedures.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to create an accurate baseline care plan (minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident immediately upon their admission to the facility) within 48 hours of admission for 4 (R #7, R #15, R #79, R #106) of 6 (R #7, R #8, R #15, R #35, R #79, and R #106) residents reviewed for care plans. This deficient practice could likely result in residents not receiving the appropriate care and may place residents at risk of an adverse event (undesirable experience, preventable or non-preventable, that caused harm to a resident because of medical care or lack of medical care) or worsening of current condition after admission.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate did not exceed 5 percent (%) when staff performed four medication errors out of 32 opportunities for 1 (R #106) of 6 (R #15, R #35, R #41, R #79, R #101, and R #106) residents reviewed during medication administration. This resulted in a medication error rate of 12.5%. This deficient practice could likely result in the residents receiving incorrect medication, not receiving the desired therapeutic effect, and exposing the residents to a higher risk of side effects.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure call lights in the residents' rooms were within reach of the residents while in the room for 1 (R #5) of 5 (R #2, R #5, R #54, R #88 and R #98) residents reviewed for call lights. This deficient practice could likely result in residents being unable to notify staff when they need assistance.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL; activities related to personal care such as bathing, showering, dressing, walking, toileting, and eating) assistance for baths or showers for 3 (R #1, R #2, and R #3) of 3 (R #1, R #2, and R #3) residents reviewed for ADL care. This deficient practice is likely to affect the dignity and health of the residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to report a suicide attempt where a potential for serious bodily injury can occur within 24 hours to the State Agency (SA) for 1 (R #2) of 1 (R #2) resident reviewed for abuse. If the facility fails to report these incidents to the State Agency, then the State Agency cannot ensure the residents' safety is protected.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews the facility failed to ensure residents have ready and reasonable access to their money. This deficient practice could likely affect all 95 residents who reside at the facility. If the facility is not ensuring residents have access to their money, then residents are likely to feel undignified and unworthy.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents are able to receive mail on Saturdays for all 95 residents residing at the facility. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents not receiving timely communication which could result in feelings of isolation.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide documentation confirming on Nurse Aide (NA) #1, employed by the facility, had completed a Nurse Aide Training and Competency Evaluation Program (NATCEP) or a Competency Evaluation Program (CEP) within four months of being employed at the facility. This deficient practice is likely to affect all 95 residents residing in the facility. Residents are likely to experience substandard care because of the use of untrained or unqualified aides providing direct care to residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and observation, the facility failed: 1. Ensure meals were attractive when served to residents. 2. Ensure foods were palatable (pleasant to taste) and to the resident's satisfaction. 3. Ensure cold and hot foods were served at the appropriate temperatures to prevent scalding and burning. 4. Ensure foods were served timely to each resident and those sharing tables. These deficient practices have the potential to affect all 95 residents' ability to eat and enjoy meals, may decrease their quality of life, and could likely lose weight.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the nutritional needs and preferences were met for all 95 residents listed on the facility census provided by the Administrator on 09/16/24 by not having an alternative meal available for residents. If the facility is not providing an alternative meal or offering an alternate meal menu to residents, then residents are likely to experience weight loss, frustration, and depression.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to store and serve food under sanitary conditions by not ensuring: 1. Kitchen was clean and sanitary. 2. Food items labeled and dated 3. Refrigeration unit was clean. 5. Food storage and handling. 6. Maintenance of kitchen equipment and plumbing These deficient practices are likely to affect all 95 residents listed on the resident census list provided by the Administrator on 09/16/24 and could likely lead to foodborne illnesses in residents if food is not being stored properly, safe food handling practices are not adhered to and sanitation of equipment preparation areas are not cleaned appropriately.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to participate in the care planning process for 3 (R #24, R #30, and R #96) of 5 (R #24, R #30, R #90, R #96, and R #294) residents reviewed for care plans. If the facility fails to ensure resident's participation in the care planning process, then residents are likely to feel unimportant and uninformed.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to promote residents' choices for 2 (R #28 and R#96) of 2 (R #28 and #96) residents reviewed for choices when staff failed to: 1. Announce themselves prior to entering R #28's room. 2. Accommodate R #96's choice to have her oxygen tube attached to the rail of her bed. These deficient practices are likely to result in the resident's needs, choices and preferences not being honored.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, the facility failed to ensure the grievances identified by the Resident Council (RC) were resolved and the resolutions communicated back to the RC committee. This deficient practice could likely affect all 95 residents who reside at the facility. If the staff is not ensuring RC grievances are responded to and resolutions are communicated back to the RC group, then residents are likely to feel that their concerns do not matter, and do not have any influence over changing issues identified by residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete an accurate comprehensive assessment for 2 (R #22 and R #75) of 2 (R #22 and R #75) residents reviewed for assessments. This deficient practice is likely to result in residents not receiving an accurate assessment which could result in the residents receiving less than optimal care and treatment.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities designed to meet the interests for 4 (R #22, R #24, R #30, and R #90) of 6 (R #22, R #24, R #30, R #90, R #242, and R #294) residents reviewed for activities by not providing meaningful individualized activities based upon residents' interests. If residents are not provided or encouraged to attend/participate in activities that meets their interests, then they are likely to experience an increase in boredom, isolation, and depression.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received proper treatment to maintain vision for 1 (R #24) of 2 (R #24 and R #106) residnets reviewed for vision. This deficient practice could likely result in residents losing some independence if they cannot see, and compromising their quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was 5% or less when six medication errors occurred out of 43 opportunities, which resulted in an error rate of 13.95% for 4 (R #19, R #24, R #55, and R #76) of 7 (R #19, R #24, R #38, R #41, R #55, R #62, and R #76) residents observed during medication administration. This deficient practice could likely result in the residents receiving the incorrect medication, not receiving the desired therapeutic effect, and exposing the resident to a higher risk of side effects.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free of a significant medication error by not administering medications as ordered for 1 (R #55) of 1 (R #55) resident reviewed for administration of insulin (hormone produced in the pancreas which regulates the amount of glucose in the blood). This deficient practice could likely have severe negative effects on the resident, such as hypoglycemia (too little sugar in the blood) and lead to symptoms of trouble talking, confusion, loss of consciousness, seizures, or death.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents obtained routine dental care for 3 (R #22, R #24 and R #75) of 3 (R #22, R #24 and R #75) residents reviewed for dental services. This failure is likely to result in the resident experiencing pain, embarrassment over condition of teeth, and potential weight loss.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, the facility failed to administer medications in a manner to prevent cross contamination for 3 (R #19, R #24, and R #76) of 7 (R #19, R #24, R #38, R #41, R # 55, R #62, and R #76) residents. The failure has the potential to cause residents to be exposed to pathogens (organisms that can cause disease) and increased risk of infection.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review the facility failed to ensure the medical records contained documentation that each resident received, or staff offered the pneumococcal (a bacteria that can cause pneumonia infection of the respiratory tract) or influenza (flu) vaccines for 1 (R #74) of 6 (R #2, R #17, R #22, R #39, R #74, and R #75) residents reviewed for immunizations. If residents are not vaccinated as appropriate against pneumonia and influenza, they have a higher likelihood of contracting that illness and spreading it to other 95 residents on the census list provided by Administrator (ADM) on 09/16/24 and staff in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) received the required in-service training of 12 hours per year for 1 (CNA #1) of 2 (CNA #1 and CNA #2) CNAs reviewed for required in-service training. This deficient practice is likely to result in the CNAs not receiving the necessary training to meet the care needs of the residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to promote care with dignity and respect for 4 (R #3, R #44, R #56, and R #70) of 6 (R #3, R #12, R #44, R #56, R #64, and R #70) residents reviewed during a random dining observation when the facility failed to serve lunch at the same time to all the residents who sat at the same dining table. This deficient practice could likely result in residents feeling frustrated and disappointed.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to prevent an accident for 1 (R #1) of 3 (R #1, R #2, and R #3) residents reviewed for falls when: 1. R #1 sustained (14) falls in a 6.5 month period. 2. The facility did not implement adequate interventions to prevent falls 3. Neurochecks for unwitnessed falls and falls in which the resident hit her head were incomplete per policy. 4. One- to-one staffing was assigned to R #1, however staff were assigned other duties and R #1 had 3 falls during the time she was ordered to have one-to-one staffing in which she sustained injury to her head. These deficient practices likely resulted in R #1 sustaining multiple acute subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding between the space between the brain and tissue covering the brain) and passing away (6) days after her last fall at the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure all treatment carts were locked while unattended. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 94 people residing in the facility by allowing unauthorized persons access to their medical supplies and personal health information.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure grievances (complaints over something believed to be wrong or unfair) were acted upon for 3 (R #3, R #6, and R #12) of 3 (R #3, R #6, and R #12) residents reviewed for grievances. This deficient practice could likely result in residents feeling unimportant and unsatisfied with the results of the grievance process.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents' ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs) was maintained for 2 (R #10 and R #11) of 4 (R #1, R #4, R #10 and R #11) residents reviewed for restorative therapy (Restorative services refers to nursing interventions that promote the resident ' s ability to adapt and adjust to living as independently and safely as possible). If the facility does not ensure that residents receive restorative services, then the residents are likely to experience a decrease in their ability to walk, transfer, and do other activities of daily living.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility staff failed to report incidents of alleged abuse for 2 (R #1 and R #2) of 2 (R #1 and R #2) residents sampled. If the staff failed to report allegations of abuse to the facility administration then corrective measures may not be acted on, and the facility would be unable to assure residents are free from abuse and neglect.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation regarding allegations of sexual abuse for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) residents that CNA #1 worked with. This failure could likely lead to other residents' being sexully abused.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to prevent staff to resident sexual abuse and to protect other residents from ongoing sexual behaviors for 2 (R #1 & R #2) of 2 (R #1 and R #2) residents reviewed for abuse. This deficient practice likely resulted in psychosocial distress (unpleasant emotions associated with a highly stressful situation) for the residents who were subject to this behavior.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice when staff did not routinely check the blood sugar levels of residents with diabetes for 4 (R #'s 1, 2, 3, and 4) of 4 (R #'s 1, 2, 3, and 4) residents reviewed for diabetes mellitus [DM; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff revised and updated the care plan for 1 (R #5) of 1 (R #5) residents reviewed for care plans when staff failed to add R #5's behavior to refuse diabetic management practices (insulin and blood sugar level checks). This deficient practice is likely to result in residents' care and needs not being addressed if care plans are not updated.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to post Nurse Staffing Information in an accurate manner and at the beginning of each shift, This deficient practice could likely prevent the 71 residents on the facility census list provided by the Administrator on 06/25/23, and any visitors to have access to accurate daily staffing information.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide an alternate meal menu for residents that preferred not to eat the meal served on the menu. By failing to post an alternate meal, all 71 residents listed on the census provided by the Administrator, may not be aware that they have choices. This deficient practice could lead to residents having less than optimal nutritional health outcomes, and suffer unwanted weight loss.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was labeled and dated in the refrigerators and dry storage areas. This deficient practice could affect the 71 residents, as listed on the facility census provided by the Administrator on 06/25/23, that receive food or meals from the kitchen. If the facility does not ensure food storage is conducted using proper procedures, residents have the potential to receive food that is expired, or potentially exposed to food contamination resulting in foodborne illness.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure trash/garbage cans were closed and in good repair. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 71 residents, as listed on the facility census provided by the Administrator on 06/25/23, by attracting insects, rodents and animals to the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the consultant pharmacist reviewed each resident's drug regimen for irregularities on a monthly basis for 5 (R #15, 34, 44, 48 and 172) of 5 (R #15, 34, 44, 48 and 172) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. If the facility fails to conduct monthly reviews, there is potential for residents to experience unnecessary drug interactions and potentially adverse side effects.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that 1 (R #18) of 1 (R #18) resident reviewed for falls was free from accidents and hazards by not providing the necessary equipment. This deficient practice could likely result in injuries and/or hospitalizations.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. This deficient practice could affect all 71 residents, as identified on the facility census list provided by the Administrator on 06/25/23, if the residents cannot maintain their highest achievable status of health, mobility, and mental functioning.
17 fire safety citations on file: 5 on September 20, 2024, 2 on July 7, 2023, 10 on August 10, 2022.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| September 10, 2024 | Fine | $36,895 |
| March 13, 2024 | Fine | $41,861 |
| December 22, 2023 | Fine | $20,612 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | New Mexico | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.18 | 3.54 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.37 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.84 | 3.10 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.01 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.79 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 51.3% | 53.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 63.6% | 53.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.55 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.32 on weekdays and 2.84 on weekends, 14% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.95 in April to June 2025 to 3.18 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.18 | 0.37 | 3.32 | 2.84 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 93 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.21 | 0.33 | 3.38 | 2.79 | 0.4% | 0 of 92 | 98 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.05 | 0.32 | 3.22 | 2.62 | 0.5% | 0 of 92 | 100 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 2.95 | 0.35 | 3.08 | 2.62 | 0.1% | 0 of 91 | 97 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| New Mexico, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.52 | 0.60 | 3.69 | 3.10 | 14.2% | 1.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Mexico, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.94 | $17.94 to $21.83 | 4,750 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $28.52 | $18.93 to $35.14 | 2,460 |
| Registered nurses | $45.36 | $38.92 to $49.40 | 17,980 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | New Mexico | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.4 | 11.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.2 | 3.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.0 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.1 | 11.7 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.7 | 5.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.7 | 14.5 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 24.2 | 22.0 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 22.7 | 15.7 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Casa Maria Healthcare's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (51.0% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
51.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · New Mexico: 15 better, 4 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 187 eligible stays.
16.3% this home
Worse than the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · New Mexico: 0 better, 2 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 195 eligible stays.
7.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · New Mexico: 0 better, 0 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 136 eligible stays.
72.3% this home
Median of homes: New Mexico66.5% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 119 residents counted.
0.6% this home
Median of homes: New Mexico0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 160 residents counted.
1.7% this home
Median of homes: New Mexico2.5% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 159 residents counted.
78.4% this home
Median of homes: New Mexico97.2% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 51 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: CASA MARIA HEALTHCARE LLC. CMS links this home to Opco Skilled Management, a group of 68 nursing homes averaging 2.3 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Casa Healthcare, LLC | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 03/21/2023 | |
| Caliber Advisors LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 03/01/2023 | |
| First Sweetzer Holdings LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 03/01/2023 | |
| Hatteras Investments LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 03/01/2023 | |
| Garetz, David | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/01/2023 | |
| Casa Healthcare, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 03/21/2023 | |
| Garetz, David | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2023 | |
| Gurwitz, Solomon | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 07/17/2025 | |
| Hagins, Elizabeth | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 07/17/2025 | |
| Kaplan, Esther | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 07/17/2025 | |
| Kaplan, Mosha | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 07/17/2025 | |
| Mindle, Adam | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 07/17/2025 | |
| Sternshein, Jennifer | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 04/01/2025 | |
| Unger, Jeffrey | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 07/17/2025 | |
| Zimmerman, Caroline | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 04/01/2025 | |
| 1601 S Main Street Nm, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/01/2023 | |
| Continuum Rehab Group LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/01/2023 | |
| Hallmark Advisors, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/01/2023 | |
| Hansen Hunter LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2024 | |
| Opco Ca Skilled Mgmt Inc. | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/01/2023 | |
| Opco Nm Skilled Mgmt, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/01/2023 | |
| The Wright Group Consulting, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2024 | |
| Wilshire Health Realty, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/01/2023 | |
| Browning, Ron | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/17/2024 | |
| Stolarczyk, Lisa | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/01/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in New Mexico. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.