Casas Adobes Post Acute Rehab Center
1919 West Medical Street, Tucson, AZ 85704 · Pima County · (520) 297-8311
230 certified beds, about 187 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1979
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 035070 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 22, 2026, inspectors cited 2 health deficiencies (the Arizona average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).
None of its 19 health citations since December 2022 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.97 hours per resident per day, against 3.98 across Arizona and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.46 of those hours.
50.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Arizona average 45.1%).
CMS links it to The Ensign Group, an affiliated group of 344 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 19 health citations on file.
May 22, 2026Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, interviews, and review of the facility's policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure the Ombudsman's office was notified of the discharge of four residents (#150, #211, #215, and #217). The sample size was four. The deficient practice could lead to lack of post-discharge care coordination for residents. Findings Include: - Regarding Resident #217: Resident #217 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included fracture of the right lower leg, difficulty in walking, and polyneuropathy. Resident #217 was discharged on February 20, 2026. A care plan, initiated on February 8, 2026, revealed a focus for discharge to home with interventions that included coordination with the resident and the resident's family for plan of care and discharge planning. [...]
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, observations, interviews, and review of the facility's policies, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 35 residents (Resident #1) received oxygen therapy in accordance with a current physician's order. The deficient practice placed Resident #1 at risk for unmonitored and potentially unnecessary medical treatment.
April 14, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, staff and resident interviews, review of facility documentation, and review of facility's policy and procedures, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by another resident for two of the four sampled residents (#2 and #3). The deficient practice could result in placing residents at risk for physical harm, injury and psychological distress. Findings Include: Regarding Resident #2: Resident #2 was admitted on [DATE], with a diagnosis that included metabolic encephalopathy, vascular dementia, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, cerebral infarction, hearing loss, and respiratory failure. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 03, indicating he was severely cognitively impaired. [...]
June 21, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that two residents did not abuse other residents. The deficient practice could result in residents being physically harmed. Findings Include: Past non-compliance was identified for this citation:In November 27, 2023 the facility conducted an in-service regarding behavioral care and charting that included implementation of a 24-hour report to monitor new behaviors, daily clinical meetings with discussion regarding new behaviors. In January 2024, the facility implemented new training in January 2024 training for all nursing staff and certified nursing assistants, using the Crisis Prevention Institute program training for all nursing staff and certified nursing assistants. On March 18, 2025, a nursing meeting was conducted on managing difficult behaviors and de-escalation. [...]
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, interviews, and facility policies, the facility failed to ensure that medications were administered as ordered by the physician for one resident (#10). The deficient practice could result medication errors and uncontrolled pain for the residentsFindings include:On March 28, 2024 the facility implemented a Quality Improvement Plan (QIP) regarding medications administered outside of parameters. The plan included inservice/education with the nursing team on medication administration, and weekly random review of the medication administration record to verify pain medications are administered per physician orders. The QIP was reviewed by the CQI committee on June 20, 2024, August 23, 2024, November 5, 2024, January 20, 2025, and May 25, 2025. [...]
June 14, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident and staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility policy, the facility failed to failed to prevent resident to resident abuse with resident #55 being the aggressor and #44 being the victim. The deficient practice could result in further abuse of residents at the facility.
April 12, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- E Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff and resident interviews, and a review of the facility's policy and procedures, the facility failed to protect the rights of five residents (#1, #4, #2, #5, and #3) to be free from abuse from other residents. The deficient practice could lead to further abuse and residents being placed in an unsafe environment.
March 28, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 5 citations
- E Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews, observation of current facility practice and review of the facility's policies, the facility failed to ensure controlled medications were provided and accounted for in accordance with professional standards for 4 residents (#52, #358, #27) The deficient practice could result in diversion of resident medication.
- D Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteRegarding Resident # 1 and # 460: -Resident # 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease, cognitive communication deficit, major depressive disorder, and unspecified psychosis. The care-plan initiated July 25, 2022 revealed interventions that included staff will assign seating away from other residents when agitated during meal times. A review of the quarterly MDS (minimum data set) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 2, indicating resident had severe cognitive impairment. A review of the electronic medical records revealed that on August 11, 2023 at 10:50 a.m., resident # 1 entered the dining room and saw resident #460 sitting in her favorite spot. Per the documentation, resident #1 asked resident #460 to move and as resident #460 was getting up, both residents started having a verbal altercation. [...]
- D Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, staff interviews, the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, and facility policies, the facility failed to develop and complete a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment within the required timeframe for one resident (#47). The deficient practice could result in delayed identification of potential risks and care needs of the resident.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff and resident interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (#124) was free from accident hazards. The deficient practice could result in resident not taking their needed medications as prescribed and other residents gaining access to and taking the medications.
- D Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#84) received safe monitoring of vital signs, to include weights. The deficient practice could result in the potential for complications and the resident not receiving appropriate care and treatment.
February 14, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- E Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility documentation, policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that five residents (#1, #3, #4, #5, #6) were free from abuse from other residents. The deficient practice could result in other residents being abused.
November 22, 2023Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (#99) was free from physical abuse by other residents. The deficient practice could result in further incidents of resident to resident abuse.
December 8, 2022Standard inspection · 5 citations
- E Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews and review of facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure weekly weights for one resident (#12) were completed as ordered by the physician. The deficient practice could result in resident not receiving the appropriate care and treatment they need.
- E Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews and facility documentation, the facility failed to ensure that ongoing assessment and monitoring for complications before and after dialysis was provided to one resident (#12). The deficient practice could result in resident not provided with treatment and care according to their assessed needs.
- E Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure the clinical record was accurate and complete for regarding an advanced directive one resident (#105). The sample size was 24. The deficient practice could result in residents' clinical record not being accurate and complete.
- D Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and review of policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure one of 5 sampled residents (#110) was informed of the risks and benefits of a psychotropic medication prior to its administration. The deficient practice could result in resident not fully informed of the risk and benefits of the use of a psychotropic drug.
- D Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide one resident (#84) consistent restorative nursing services according to the physician order. The deficient practice could decrease resident's ability to carry out the activities of daily living.
Fire safety inspections
6 fire safety citations on file: 2 on May 22, 2026, 4 on March 28, 2024.
Every fire safety citation6 citations
- E Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- D Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- E Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
- D Conduct risk assessment and an All-Hazards approach.
- D Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
- D Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Arizona | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.97 | 3.98 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.46 | 0.70 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.46 | 3.51 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.46 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.04 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 50.5% | 45.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 76.0% | 43.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.36 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.17 on weekdays and 3.46 on weekends, 17% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 6.3% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.12 in April to June 2025 to 3.97 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.97 | 0.46 | 4.17 | 3.46 | 6.3% | 0 of 90 | 187 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.85 | 0.40 | 4.02 | 3.41 | 5.8% | 0 of 92 | 185 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.01 | 0.45 | 4.16 | 3.62 | 7.4% | 0 of 92 | 170 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.12 | 0.46 | 4.30 | 3.64 | 6.8% | 0 of 91 | 160 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Arizona, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.87 | 0.63 | 4.05 | 3.43 | 3.3% | 0.5% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Arizona | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.3 | 10.7 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.2 | 2.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.2 | 12.8 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.4 | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 41.1 | 10.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 22.6 | 23.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 10.6 | 10.4 | 12.0 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: SENTINEL PEAK HEALTHCARE LLC. CMS links this home to The Ensign Group, a group of 344 nursing homes averaging 3.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bandera Healthcare LLC | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 02/25/2014 | |
| The Ensign Group Inc | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 09/25/2006 | |
| Eagar, Robert | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/15/2019 | |
| Frefer, Mosab | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 11/01/2023 | |
| Favorite Healthcare Staffing LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 05/01/2014 | |
| Nursa Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 05/01/2014 | |
| Onshift Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 05/01/2014 | |
| Prestige Health Staffing LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 05/01/2014 | |
| Burnam, Soon | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/25/2014 | |
| Eagar, Robert | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/15/2019 | |
| Frefer, Mosab | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2023 | |
| Keetch, Chad | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2011 | |
| Peterson, Forrest | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/18/2020 | |
| Port, Barry | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 03/20/2026 | |
| Ensign Services Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/01/2014 | |
| Montebella Health Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2022 | |
| Standard Bearer Healthcare Op, LP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2022 | |
| The Ensign Group Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2022 | |
| Eagar, Robert | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/15/2019 | |
| Frefer, Mosab | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/01/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on April 14, 2026: "Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on May 22, 2026: "Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on March 28, 2024: "Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on May 22, 2026: "Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.46 hours per resident per day, below the Arizona average of 3.51.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Life Care Center of Tucson Tucson, 0.6 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 30 citations
- La Canada Care Center Tucson, 2 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 15 citations
- Mountain View Care Center Tucson, 2.1 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 22 citations
- Brookdale Santa Catalina Tucson, 4.4 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 31 citations
- Catalina Post Acute and Rehabilitation Tucson, 5.5 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 23 citations
- Park Avenue Health and Rehabilitation Center Tucson, 5.8 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 23 citations
- Haven of Tucson Tucson, 7.3 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 20 citations
- Skilled Nursing Unit at Oro Valley Hospital Oro Valley, 7.5 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 9 citations
Arizona contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Arizona. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Arizona Department of Health Services, Long Term Care Facilities Licensing, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- State inspection reports: AZ Care Check, where Arizona publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Casas Adobes Post Acute Rehab Center's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Casas Adobes Post Acute Rehab Center 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Casas Adobes Post Acute Rehab Center get at its last inspection?
- 2 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on May 22, 2026. The Arizona average is 6.4.
- Has Casas Adobes Post Acute Rehab Center been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Casas Adobes Post Acute Rehab Center accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Casas Adobes Post Acute Rehab Center?
- CMS lists 20 owners and managers, and links the home to The Ensign Group. Legal business name: SENTINEL PEAK HEALTHCARE LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.