Find a nursing home

Home / Arizona / Tucson

Haven of Tucson

3705 North Swan Road, Tucson, AZ 85718 · Pima County · (520) 299-7088

118 certified beds, about 102 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1988

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
1 of 5
Quality measures
5 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 035165 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on April 21, 2026, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Arizona average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).

Of 20 health citations since March 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.07 hours per resident per day, against 3.98 across Arizona and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.73 of those hours.

48.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Arizona average 45.1%).

CMS links it to Haven Health, an affiliated group of 20 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 20 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
2G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
16D
2E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
April 21, 2026Standard inspection · 4 citations
  1. E
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    F558 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 10, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on facility observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure that one shower room was maintained in a clean and safe condition in accordance with professional standards of practice. This deficient practice had the potential to affect residents by failing to provide a clean, safe, and homelike environment. The sample was 1 of 1 and the census was 121. Findings Include:Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including heart failure, hypertension, Type II Diabetes Mellitus, respiratory failure, and other comorbid conditions. Resident #15 was one of the residents on the Heritage 200 hallway who had recently received a tracheostomy due to respiratory failure. [...]
  2. D
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    F645 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 10, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, interviews, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure one resident was referred for a level II Pre-admission Screening and Record Review (PASRR). The universe was 21. The deficient practice could result in residents not receiving the appropriate level of care needed to achieve their highest and practicable wellbeing.
  3. D
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 10, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, observations, interviews, and review of the facility's policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure one resident, #4, was monitored and assessed for changes in her condition. The universe was 21. The deficient practice could lead to residents having an adverse health event as a result of not being monitored adequately.
  4. D
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    F726 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 10, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on personnel file review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA/Staff#98) maintained current Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) and First Aid certification. The facility also failed to follow its policy requiring one Registered Nurse (RN/Staff#90) to remain in non-probationary status. The deficient practice could place residents at risk for delayed or ineffective emergency response and for receiving care that does not meet accepted standards of care.
December 1, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 30, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility documentation, and policy review, the facility failed to implement its policy to ensure that an allegation of neglect for 1 (Resident #1) out of 5 residents was reported to all applicable state agencies. The deficient practice could result in further allegations of neglect not being reported.
  2. D
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    F610 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 30, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility documentation, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of neglect for 1 (Resident #1) out of 5 residents was investigated. The deficient practice could result in further neglect of residents and appropriate corrective actions not being taken.
August 12, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. G
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 3, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure physician-ordered laboratory and intravenous treatment was administered as ordered; and failed to ensure the physician was notified of a critical laboratory result for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#22). This deficient practice resulted in the resident not receiving the prescribed and appropriate treatment needed, resulting in further decline.
December 20, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 7 citations
  1. D
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    F604 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 7, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that monitoring and evaluation of physical restraints are completed for the continued use of physical restraints for one resident (Resident #62). The deficient practice could lead to increased isolation and/or other psychosocial harm.
  2. D
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 7, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards were met during medication administration. The deficient practice could result in the spread of infection and undesirable medication- induced harm. The facility census was 106, and there were 22 sampled residents.
  3. D
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    F685 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 7, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, review of clinical records, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#46) received assistance to maintain hearing ability. This deficient practice can result in in-effective communication. Findings Include, Resident # 46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of a right pelvic fracture, atrial fibrillation, anticoagulant therapy, anxiety, depression, and lack of coordination. The resident's inventory dated November 27, 2024 failed to list hearing aids under the resident's personal property. The resident's order dated November 27, 2024 revealed the resident could be seen by an audiologist. The care plan dated November 27, 2024 with the download date of December 16, 2024, revealed no focus, goals, or interventions for resident's hearing. [...]
  4. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 7, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (#149) was not discharged with an unnecessary device. this deficient practice could result in infection and increased risks of death. Resident #149 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of urinary tract infection, Klebsiella pneumoniae and type 2 diabetes. This resident was discharged to an assisted living facility on February 6, 2024. A care plan initiated on January 16, 2024 included that the resident was on Antibiotic Therapy including Meropenem for a urinary tract infection. Interventions included to observe for possible infection every shift. [...]
  5. D
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    F692 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 7, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, interviews, facility documentation and policy, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (#74) was weighed on admission. This deficient practice can impact the nutritional and hydration needs of the residents.
  6. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 7, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were disposed of according to accepted professional standards. The deficient practice of erroneous medication disposal may result in undesirable medication- induced harm. The facility census was 106, and there were 22 sampled residents.
  7. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 7, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection control practices were followed during medication administration. The deficient practice could result in spread of infection. The facility census was 106, and there were 22 sampled residents.
September 3, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 2, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, review of records and facility policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that medical records were documented accurately and in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for one resident (#1) regarding fall risk assessments. The deficient practice could result in inaccurate documentation of the residents medical history and needs.
  2. D
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 2, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, review of records and review of policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that physician orders were in place for fall preventative measures, regarding fall mats for one resident (#1). The deficient practice could result in non-ordered services being provided for residents.
March 2, 2023Standard inspection · 4 citations
  1. G
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    F690 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 10, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on resident and staff interviews, clinical record review, and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#127) received care and services to restore and/or maintain continence. The sample size was 18. The deficient practice could adversely impact the resident's dignity and result in bowel and bladder continence not being maintained.
  2. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 10, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews, and the facility's policies and procedures, the facility failed to conduct an ongoing review for antibiotic stewardship as required by Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) guidelines, and failed to review clinical signs and symptoms and laboratory reports to determine if antibiotics are indicated. The deficient practice could have the potential for residents to have adverse effects due to the lack of protocols and monitoring.
  3. D
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 10, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, interviews, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure that medications were available as ordered for one resident (#2). The deficient practice could result in not receiving medications that are physician ordered and necessary.
  4. D
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    F806 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 10, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews, observation, facility documentation and policies and procedures, the facility failed to provide food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences for two residents (#125, #126).

Fire safety inspections

1 fire safety citation on file: 1 on March 2, 2023.

Every fire safety citation1 citation
  1. D
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · March 2, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeArizonaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.073.983.86
Registered nurses0.730.700.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.603.513.42
Nurse aides2.12
Licensed practical nurses1.22
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)48.0%45.1%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover50.0%43.6%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 6.59 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.25 on weekdays and 3.60 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.16 in April to June 2025 to 4.07 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.070.734.253.60 0.0%0 of 90102
Oct to Dec 20254.140.774.293.75 0.0%0 of 9297
Jul to Sep 20254.310.864.443.97 0.0%0 of 9299
Apr to Jun 20254.160.904.273.88 4.8%0 of 9194
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Arizona, Jan to Mar 20263.870.634.053.433.3%0.5% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeArizonaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.210.713.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.80.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.71.21.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.32.13.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.61.21.6
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
8.04.44.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
16.210.715.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
24.423.723.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
7.710.412.0

Owners and operators

Legal business name: HAVEN OF TUCSON LLC. CMS links this home to Haven Health, a group of 20 nursing homes averaging 2.8 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Robertson, BrettIndirect ownership interestIndividual11/01/2015
Samuelian, RobertIndirect ownership interestIndividual11/01/2015
Samuelian, SpencerIndirect ownership interestIndividual11/01/2015
Samuelian, StephenIndirect ownership interestIndividual11/01/2015
Seastrand, JasonIndirect ownership interestIndividual11/01/2015
West, ChristianIndirect ownership interestIndividual11/01/2015
Haven Health Properties LLC5% or greater mortgage interestOrganization11/01/2015
Haven Tucson Real Estate LLC5% or greater mortgage interestOrganization11/01/2015
Health Group Management LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization11/21/2024
Espinosa, StephanieOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/14/2024
Fragoso, LindsayOperational/managerial controlIndividual05/10/2021
Jatoi, MansoorOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/15/2023
Miles, AndrewOperational/managerial controlIndividual03/01/2023
Muir, MarkOperational/managerial controlIndividual11/01/2015
Natrajan, SunilOperational/managerial controlIndividual04/10/2021
Robertson, BrettOperational/managerial controlIndividual11/01/2015
Samuelian, RobertOperational/managerial controlIndividual11/01/2015
Samuelian, SpencerOperational/managerial controlIndividual11/01/2015
Samuelian, StephenOperational/managerial controlIndividual11/01/2015
Seastrand, JasonOperational/managerial controlIndividual11/01/2015
St. Jacques, LaurieOperational/managerial controlIndividual03/25/2024
West, ChristianOperational/managerial controlIndividual11/01/2015
Haven Health Properties LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization11/26/2024
Haven Tucson Real Estate LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization11/26/2024
Health Group Management LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization11/21/2024
Espinosa, StephanieAdp of the SNFIndividual10/14/2024
Fragoso, LindsayAdp of the SNFIndividual05/10/2021
Jatoi, MansoorAdp of the SNFIndividual07/15/2023
Miles, AndrewAdp of the SNFIndividual03/01/2023
Muir, MarkAdp of the SNFIndividual11/01/2015
Natrajan, SunilAdp of the SNFIndividual04/10/2021
Robertson, BrettAdp of the SNFIndividual11/01/2015
Samuelian, RobertAdp of the SNFIndividual11/01/2015
Samuelian, SpencerAdp of the SNFIndividual11/01/2015
Samuelian, StephenAdp of the SNFIndividual11/01/2015
Seastrand, JasonAdp of the SNFIndividual11/01/2015
St. Jacques, LaurieAdp of the SNFIndividual03/25/2024
West, ChristianAdp of the SNFIndividual11/01/2015

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on April 21, 2026: "Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing."
  2. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on April 21, 2026: "PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities"
  3. How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on December 1, 2025: "Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities."
  4. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on December 20, 2024: "Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs."

Other nursing homes nearby

Arizona contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Arizona. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Haven of Tucson's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Haven of Tucson 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 1 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Haven of Tucson get at its last inspection?
4 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 21, 2026. The Arizona average is 6.4.
Has Haven of Tucson been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Haven of Tucson accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Haven of Tucson?
CMS lists 38 owners and managers, and links the home to Haven Health. Legal business name: HAVEN OF TUCSON LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection