Find a nursing home

Home / Massachusetts / Methuen

Cedar View Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center

480 Jackson Street, Methuen, MA 01844 · Essex County · (978) 686-3906

106 certified beds, about 94 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1989

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
5 of 5
Staffing
2 of 5
Quality measures
5 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 225333 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on January 14, 2026, inspectors cited 0 health deficiencies (the Massachusetts average is 6.8, the national average 9.2).

None of its 9 health citations since February 2024 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.66 hours per resident per day, against 3.86 across Massachusetts and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.35 of those hours.

30.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Massachusetts average 38.2%).

CMS links it to Marquis Health Services, an affiliated group of 90 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 9 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
6D
2E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
1B
0C
January 14, 2026Standard inspection · 0 citations
January 24, 2025Standard inspection · 5 citations
  1. E
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    F690 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 5, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure for 3 out of 3 sampled residents (#49, #23 and #65), out of 6 applicable residents, in a total sample of 21 residents, that professional standards of practice were provided for the treatment related to urinary catheter output. Specifically, for Resident #49, #23 and #65 the facility failed to implement the physician's order to measure each resident's urinary output.
  2. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 5, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one Resident (#85) out of a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically, for Resident #85 the facility failed to develop a fall risk care plan.
  3. D
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    F825 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 5, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure for one Resident (#146), out of a total sample of 21 residents that a physical therapy evaluation was completed timely.
  4. D
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 5, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure accuracy of the medical record for one Resident (#24) out of a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically: For Resident #24 the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation for a hand roll. Resident #24 was admitted to the facility in November 2016 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non dominant side. Review of Resident #24's Minimum Data set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/24/24, indicated the Resident scored a 13 out of a total possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status indicating he/she was cognitively intact. The MDS further indicated impairment on one side to the upper extremity. [...]
  5. B
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 5, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed for one Resident (#22), out of a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically, for Resident #22 the MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #22 had a gradual dose reduction (GDR) of his/her antipsychotic medication administered on a routine basis dated 11/11/24. Review of the physician's orders failed to indicate a GDR was implemented therefore the MDS assessment failed to be accurate.
February 21, 2024Standard inspection · 4 citations
  1. E
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 5, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff stored drugs and biologicals in accordance with State and Federal laws. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1.) ensure treatment carts were locked and secured on two of two units, 2.) ensure medications were stored in locked compartments on one of two nursing units, 3.) ensure the medication cart keys were not left unattended on one of four medication carts, and 4.) ensure one of two medication storage rooms were locked when unattended.
  2. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 5, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, policy review, record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure a resident who required respiratory care (continuous oxygen) received care consistent with professional standard of practice for one Resident (#344) out of a total sample of 20 Residents. Specifically, for Resident #344, nursing administered continuous oxygen without a physician's order.
  3. D
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    F758 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 5, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a PRN (as needed) psychotropic medication was limited to 14 days and the physician's order included the duration for the PRN order, for one Resident (#27) out of a total sample of 20 residents.
  4. D
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    F825 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 5, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure specialized rehabilitative services were provided timely for one Resident (#30), out a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, for Resident #30 when on 11/2/23 his/her diet was downgraded while waiting on the fabrication of dentures, the facility failed to ensure Speech Language Pathology (SLP) screened/assessed Resident #30 after he/she received the new dentures on 12/19/23, resulting in Resident #30 not being screened/assessed for 63 days after he/she received new dentures.

Fire safety inspections

9 fire safety citations on file: 5 on January 14, 2026, 4 on January 24, 2025.

Every fire safety citation9 citations
  1. F
    Conduct testing and exercise requirements.
    E 39 · January 14, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
    K 211 · January 14, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. F
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · January 14, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. F
    Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
    K 372 · January 14, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. F
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · January 14, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. F
    Have properly located and lighted "Exit" signs.
    K 293 · January 24, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. F
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · January 24, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. F
    Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
    K 372 · January 24, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. E
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · January 24, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeMassachusettsUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.663.863.86
Registered nurses0.350.650.69
All nursing staff on weekends2.973.483.42
Nurse aides2.23
Licensed practical nurses1.08
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)30.1%38.2%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover55.6%42.6%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 4.44 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.94 on weekdays and 2.97 on weekends, 25% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 2.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.48 in April to June 2025 to 3.66 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.660.353.942.97 2.4%0 of 9094
Oct to Dec 20253.660.363.923.00 0.7%0 of 9293
Jul to Sep 20253.580.443.832.94 3.1%1 of 9293
Apr to Jun 20253.480.353.702.95 0.5%0 of 9191
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Massachusetts, Jan to Mar 20263.790.613.943.415.0%0.4% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeMassachusettsUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
10.516.413.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.40.80.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.51.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.93.53.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.81.41.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.115.414.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.74.24.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
11.121.415.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
24.425.723.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
9.011.912.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.31.91.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
0.81.51.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: CEDAR VIEW OPERATOR LLC. CMS links this home to Marquis Health Services, a group of 90 nursing homes averaging 3.1 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Yr 2013 Investment Tr Ua 032520135% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization23%09/01/2016
Cibc Bank USA5% or greater mortgage interestOrganization09/01/2016
Cibc Bank USA5% or greater security interestOrganization09/01/2016
Crowley, JeffreyManaging control - governing bodyIndividual09/01/2016
Harman, DinaManaging control - governing bodyIndividual09/01/2016
Viroja, YogeshManaging control - governing bodyIndividual09/01/2016
Libbey, TaraCorporate directorIndividual12/27/2021
Posen, MindeeCorporate officerIndividual09/01/2016
Marquis Limited LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization09/01/2016
Reliant Pro Rehab LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization09/01/2016
Libbey, TaraOperational/managerial controlIndividual12/27/2021
Someswarananthan, JanarthananOperational/managerial controlIndividual09/01/2016
Flagler, OsherIndividual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNFIndividual03/27/2025
Kahanow, AvivaIndividual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNFIndividual03/27/2025
Kohn, SeanIndividual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNFIndividual03/27/2025
Kohn, SoraIndividual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNFIndividual03/27/2025
Rokeach, FraideIndividual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNFIndividual03/27/2025
Rokowsky, YitzchokIndividual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNFIndividual03/27/2025
Cedar View Property LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization09/01/2016
Clinical Care Consultants LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization09/01/2016
Marquis Limited LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization04/24/2025
Reliant Pro Rehab LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization04/24/2025
Crowley, JeffreyAdp of the SNFIndividual09/01/2016
Harman, DinaAdp of the SNFIndividual09/01/2016
Libbey, TaraAdp of the SNFIndividual12/27/2021
Posen, MindeeAdp of the SNFIndividual09/01/2016
Someswarananthan, JanarthananAdp of the SNFIndividual09/01/2016
Viroja, YogeshAdp of the SNFIndividual09/01/2016

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on January 24, 2025: "Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections."
  2. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on January 24, 2025: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
  3. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on February 21, 2024: "Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs."
  4. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.97 hours per resident per day, below the Massachusetts average of 3.48.

Other nursing homes nearby

Common questions

What is Cedar View Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Cedar View Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 5 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Cedar View Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center get at its last inspection?
0 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on January 14, 2026. The Massachusetts average is 6.8.
Has Cedar View Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Cedar View Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Cedar View Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center?
CMS lists 28 owners and managers, and links the home to Marquis Health Services. Legal business name: CEDAR VIEW OPERATOR LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection