Home / Louisiana / Baton Rouge
10748 Joor Road, Baton Rouge, LA 70818 · E. Baton Rouge County · (225) 416-6006
170 certified beds, about 164 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1996
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 195382 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on March 25, 2026, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Louisiana average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 27 health citations since November 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $26,790 in the last three years; the largest was $26,790, and the latest is dated March 21, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.29 hours per resident per day, against 3.76 across Louisiana and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.20 of those hours.
49.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Louisiana average 47.6%).
CMS links it to Plantation Management Company, an affiliated group of 16 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 27 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received their dietary supplements with each meal for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition. Resident #1Review of Resident #1's Clinical Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Quadriplegia, Unspecified Level of Spinal Cord Injury, and Unspecified Protein-Calorie Malnutrition. Review of Resident #1's most recent MDS with an ARD of 03/22/2026, revealed a BIMS of 5, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #1's current Physician Orders revealed the following, in part:Start date 03/16/2026- Magic cup with meals. Review of Resident #1's most recent Registered Dietician Assessment Summary revealed, in part, the following:Current Diet Order: NAS (No Added Salt) diet. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. There were 166 residents in the facility who ate food from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to implement a resident's person centered plan of care for 1 (#114) of 7 sampled residents reviewed. The facility failed to ensure Resident #114's shrinker sock was applied to his right below the knee amputation (BKA) as identified in his plan of care. Review of Resident #114's Clinical Record revealed he admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included Acquired Absence of Right Leg Below Knee. Review of Resident #114's Annual MDS with ARD of 02/04/2026 revealed a BIMS of 06, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #114's current Physician's Orders revealed the following, in part:Shrinker sock to be applied to right BKA anytime prosthetic leg and silicone liner with screw is removed. On 03/23/2026 at 9:45 a.m., an observation and interview was conducted with Resident #114. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out ADLs received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 1 (#59) of 3 residents reviewed for ADL's. The facility failed to shampoo Resident #59's hair.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident. The facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered for 1 (#162) of 7 residents reviewed for medication administration.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of infection for 1 (#135) of 4 residents reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure staff wore proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while providing care to a resident who was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). Review of the facility's policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions Policy & Procedure dated 04/2024, revealed the following, in part: Procedure:1. EBP are indicated for residents with any of the following: b. Indwelling medical devices even if the resident is not known to be infected or colonized with and MDRO. ii. Indwelling medical device examples include urinary catheters4. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to ensure staff with facial hair wore a beard restraint while preparing to serve food. This deficient practice had the potential to affect any of the 155 residents who received food from the facility's kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment was completed within 14 days of a resident admitted to hospice for 1 (#136) of 3 (#76, #136, and #159) sampled residents who received hospice services.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure MDS assessments accurately reflected the residents' status by failing to ensure: 1. Discharge dispositions were accurately coded for 1 (#161) of 4 (#159, #161, #312, and #412) discharged resident records reviewed; and 2. Hospice services were accurately coded for 1 (#136) of 3 (#76, #136 and #159) residents reviewed who received hospice services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 2 (Cart A and Cart B) of 3 (Cart A, Cart B, and Cart C) medication carts observed. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Insulin vials were labeled with the date opened and discarded 28 days after the date opened; and 2. Medications were discarded by their expiration date.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the development and transmission of infection by failing to ensure staff donned proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) when performing high-contact resident care for 1 (#18) of 8 (#18, #28, #33, #55, #67, #136, #154 and #362) residents reviewed on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). This deficient practice had the potential to affect any of the 33 residents residing in the facility who had Enhanced Barrier Precautions implemented.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing data was posted in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors. This deficient practice had the potential to affect any of the 157 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure alleged violations involving verbal abuse were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made to the administrator and to the state survey agency for 1 (#8) of 4 (#4, #6, #7, and #8) residents reviewed for abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed and transmitted timely for 1 (#1) of a total of 16 sampled residents reviewed for Resident Assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure services were provided to meet quality professional standards. The facility failed to ensure physicians orders were obtained and clarified upon readmission from the hospital for 2 (#64, and #500) of 4 (#49, #64, #149, and #500) residents reviewed for hospitalizations. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation on 03/16/2024 at 9:00 p.m., when Resident #500 returned to the facility without hospital discharge orders. Resident #500 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] with symptoms including facial edema, tongue swelling, disoriented, and difficulty breathing. The hospital diagnoses was anaphylactic allergic reaction to Amiodarone. The facility failed to obtain records and orders from the hospital upon readmission on [DATE] and Amiodarone 200 mg BID remained on the eMAR. On 03/18/2024 at 8:00 a. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to initiate and resolve grievances voiced for 1 (#114) of 34 sampled residents reviewed for grievances.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out ADLs received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 2 (#64, #113) of 4 (#64, #80, #113 and #116) residents reviewed for ADL's. The facility failed to trim fingernails for Resident #64 and #113.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out ADLs received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 2 (#64, #113) of 4 (#64, #80, #113 and #116) residents reviewed for ADL's. The facility failed to trim fingernails for Resident #64 and #113.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 2 (Cart A and Cart B) of 3 (Cart A, Cart B, and Cart C) medication carts observed. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Insulin pens were labeled with the date opened; 2. Insulin pens were discarded 28 days after the date opened; and 3. Insulin pens were labeled with resident identification.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This had the potential to effect 158 residents who were served from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to complete quarterly assessments for 1 (#130) of 42 residents reviewed for resident assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services for the provision of respiratory care in accordance with professional standards of practice. The facility failed to ensure the oxygen tubing and humidification bottles were properly labeled for 2 (#500 and #601) of 3 (#54, #500, and #601) residents reviewed for oxygen therapy.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were available for administration as ordered by the physician for 1 (#3) of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records in accordance with acceptable standards of practice. The facility failed to ensure S1LPN and S2LPN accurately documented administration of a controlled substance medication for 1 (#3) of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) residents reviewed with controlled substances.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from physical and/or verbal abuse from Resident #3 for 1 (#R2) of 6 (#1, #2, #3, #R1, #R2,#R3) residents reviewed for abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure alleged incidents of abuse were reported to the state survey agency immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the incident, for 1 (#R2) of 6 (#1, #2, #3, #R1, #R2, #R3) residents reviewed for abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received adequate supervision to prevent an accident for 1 (#3) of 4 (#1, #2, #3, and #R1) residents reviewed for supervision. The facility failed to ensure S7CNA did not leave Resident #3 in the whirlpool tub unsupervised.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| March 21, 2024 | Fine | $26,790 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Louisiana | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.29 | 3.76 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.20 | 0.31 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.85 | 3.21 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.06 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.02 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 49.3% | 47.6% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 20.0% | 41.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.97 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.47 on weekdays and 2.85 on weekends, 18% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.33 in April to June 2025 to 3.29 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.29 | 0.20 | 3.47 | 2.85 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 164 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.32 | 0.18 | 3.48 | 2.91 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 165 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.45 | 0.16 | 3.62 | 3.04 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 163 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.33 | 0.14 | 3.51 | 2.89 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 165 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Louisiana, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.26 | 3.86 | 3.10 | 3.6% | 0.9% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Louisiana, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $14.67 | $13.97 to $16.87 | 20,690 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $27.63 | $23.87 to $29.43 | 17,600 |
| Registered nurses | $38.57 | $33.19 to $45.00 | 48,970 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Louisiana | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 21.6 | 17.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 2.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.4 | 3.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.2 | 3.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 27.1 | 17.9 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.9 | 5.6 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.0 | 22.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 35.6 | 28.0 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 15.2 | 14.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.9 | 2.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.8 | 2.7 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Central Guest House Healthcare & Rehabilitation Ce's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (54.6% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
54.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Louisiana: 16 better, 33 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 50 eligible stays.
10.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Louisiana: 0 better, 3 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 68 eligible stays.
7.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Louisiana: 1 better, 7 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 44 eligible stays.
50.0% this home
Median of homes: Louisiana50.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 24 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Louisiana1.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 45 residents counted.
1.7% this home
Median of homes: Louisiana2.8% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 45 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Louisiana100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 7 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: STERLING PLACE, LLC. CMS links this home to Plantation Management Company, a group of 16 nursing homes averaging 1.7 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qsst Trust for Gene Oliver Quirk III | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 15% | 12/31/2012 |
| Qsst Trust for Marshall Todd Quirk | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 15% | 12/31/2012 |
| Qsst Trust for Scott Holden Quirk | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 15% | 12/31/2012 |
| Quirk, Cynthia | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 28% | 12/31/2012 |
| Quirk, Gene | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 28% | 12/31/2012 |
| Delatte, Kimberly | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/31/2012 | |
| Quirk, Gene | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/31/2012 | |
| Quirk, Scott | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/01/2005 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Louisiana. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.