2450 North Central Avenue, Chicago, IL 60639 · Cook County · (773) 889-1333
245 certified beds, about 199 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1989
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 145648 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on August 9, 2024, inspectors cited 9 health deficiencies (the Illinois average is 12.6, the national average 9.2).
Of 47 health citations since June 2022, 4 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 4 fines totaling $234,441 in the last three years; the largest was $148,190, and the latest is dated July 6, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.24 hours per resident per day, against 3.45 across Illinois and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.35 of those hours.
46.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Illinois average 44.5%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 47 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent and protect residents from resident-to-resident physical and verbal abuse. This failure affects two (R1, R5) residents out of five residents reviewed for abuse in a sample of five. As a result of this failure, R2 verbally threatened R1 and R5 on separate occasions, and R2 physically hit R1 on 06/28/2026 resulting in R1 sustaining a head laceration, multiple contusions, and closed fracture of nasal bone.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to report and investigate abuse allegations for two (R1, R5) of five residents reviewed for abuse in a sample of five. As a result of this failure, R2 verbally threatened R1 and R5 on separate occasions, and R2 physically hit R1 on 06/28/2026 resulting in R1 sustaining a head laceration, multiple contusions, and closed fracture of nasal bone.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to (a) ensure one resident (R16) was free from abuse from a staff member; (b) failed to ensure that a resident (R2) was free from abuse from another resident. This failure resulted in R16 enduring psychosocial abuse and harm; R2 being confronted by another resident (R14) who had a box cutter in their possession, resulting in R2 leaving the facility against medical advice (A.M.A).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate and clean linen for residents in the facility. This failure has the potential to affect all 209 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to a.) ensure a resident (R5) freedom of movement outside the facility by placing the resident on restricted pass privilege for no legitimate reason, b.) ensure Social Services department met regularly with one resident (R4), and c.) ensure proper staff, resident, and representative communication by not ensuring that all facility staff wear an identification badge. This failure has the potential to affect all 159 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to report to the State Agency a suspicion of abuse involving one (R16) of three residents in a sample of 17 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure an adequate supply of clean towels and linens. Also, that the towels and linens are in good condition and available for resident care. This failure has the potential to affect all 52 of the residents residing on the 2nd floor.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to prevent resident to resident physical assault for two (R10, and R11) out of four residents reviewed for abuse. This failure resulted to R10 sustaining a skin abrasion. Findings Include:R10's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Brief Interview Score (14) indicates R10 is cognitively intact. R10's Electronic Health Record/EHR shows she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and she is [AGE] years old. On 12/24/25 at 1:07 PM, R10 reported to surveyor that as she was coming out of the dining room after eating dinner, she cannot remember the date or time R11 hit her as he was walking into the dining room. R10 used her hand to indicate that R11 hit her with a closed fist on the left side of her face. She stated R11 hit her on purpose, and it hurt when he hit her. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to report resident to resident physical abuse to the State Agency for two (R10, R11) out of four residents reviewed for abuse. Findings Include:On 12/24/25 at 1:07 PM, R10 reported to a fellow surveyor that she was hit in the face by R11 as R11 was walking into the dining room. R10 used her hand to indicate that R11 hit her with a closed fist on the left side of her face. R10 stated she went to the nursing station to report it because she was bleeding on the left side of her face. R10's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicates R10 is cognitively intact. R10's skin evaluation dated 12/20/25 indicates skin abrasion left side of face close to the chin (1.5x1.0x0.1). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow their policy to investigate and prevent further allegation of abuse. This failure affects one (R2) out of three residents reviewed for abuse. Findings Include: On 12/23/25 at 2:58 PM, via telephone, R2 stated that V21 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) was verbally abusive to her because she said that R2 cannot clean her own a** and she will get to R2 when she is able. R2 cannot remember the date/time and there was no witness. R2 also stated that V22 (Restorative Aide) played mental games with her by showing up to provide restorative therapy and often came to her when she is doing something else. On 12/23/25 at 3:58 PM, Surveyor informed V1 (Administrator) that R2 has allegation of verbal abuse against V21, and mental abuse against V22, she stated she has no report against V21 and V22 by R2, but she will follow up. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to administer medication as prescribed by the physician. This failure affects two (R2, R4) out of five residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings Include: R2's Electronic Health Record/EHR shows she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], she is [AGE] years old with a Brief Mental Status/BIMs score of 15. R2 has diagnoses not limited to Glaucoma, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. R4's Electronic Health Record/EHR shows he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], he is [AGE] years old with a Brief Mental Status/BIMs score of 15. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to treat a resident's personal belongings with respect. This failure affects one (R1) resident out of four residents reviewed for resident rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent verbal abuse by a staff member for one resident (R1) and physical abuse by residents for three residents (R3, R5, R7) reviewed for abuse, in a total sample of eight.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their fall clinical protocol for one (R1) resident out of four residents reviewed for falls in a total sample of five residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the dignity of one resident (R2) during incontinence care out of three residents reviewed for resident rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide timely nail trimming and care for one resident (R1) in the sample of three residents (R1, R2, R3) when reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to implement fall prevention interventions for high fall risk residents; failed to supervise high fall risk residents; and failed to perform quarterly fall risk assessments which affected two residents (R2 and R3) in the sample of three residents when reviewed for improper nursing care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to properly monitor and supervise a resident (R1) with known risk of elopement. This failure resulted in R1 eloping from the facility [DATE]. R1 was found deceased in an abandoned building one month later by South Suburban police on [DATE]. This was identified as an Immediate Jeopardy began on [DATE]. On [DATE] at 11:36am, V1 (Administrator) was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy. The facility presented an abatement removal plan on [DATE] at 6:57pm and was not approved. The facility submitted a revised abatement plan and was approved on [DATE] at 12:36pm.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and review of records, facility failed to follow proper sanitation and food handling practices to prevent the outbreak of foodborne illness for all the residents in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and review of records the facility failed to ensure urinary catheter bag of 1 resident (R478) maintains in sterile position not in contact on the floor as per policy. The facility failed to ensure linens that are being folded do not touch the floor and to maintain clean and sanitary condition of blower equipment that circulates air in the clean linen room per their policy. The facility failed to document in their infection prevention policies and procedures that review date done at least annually. These failures have the following effects: Potential to affect 1 resident (R478) prevention of urinary tract infection (UTI) to reoccur. Potential to contaminate and affect all 180 residents that uses linens in the facility. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow professional standards of medication administration documentation after administration of medication to prevent medication errors for 19 of 19 (R4, R7, R8, R32, R50, R59, R65, R67, R82, R83, R91, R92, R101, R109, R126, R137, R142, R167, and R172) residents reviewed for medication pass. This failure affected 19 residents whose medications were not documented in a timely manner.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure controlled substances were counted and documented, at the beginning and end of each shift for 2 out of 16 shifts. This failure has the potential to affect 45 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to a.) ensure medications were locked and secured while unattended and b.) remove and discard expired house stock medication in three of six medication carts reviewed for medication labeling and storage. These failures have the potential to affect 40 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: On 08/06/2024 at 1:55PM, surveyor located on the second floor of the facility. V13 (Licensed Practical Nurse) observed leaving medication cart (identified as medication cart #2) unlocked and unattended. V13 states that residents can potentially get access to the medications if the cart is left unlocked and unattended. V13 states there is potential for the residents to overdose, or residents can self-administer another resident's medication and it would be a medication error. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to refer two (R14, R33) of eight residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder to the appropriate state-designated authority for review in a sample of 35.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide toenail care for two (R1, R143) residents reviewed for ADL (activities of daily living) care in a total sample of 35 residents reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and records review, the facility failed to address behaviors which could endanger one (R92) health of eight residents reviewed in a sample of 35.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of records and interview the facility failed to determine, offer and document 2 residents (R481, R157) immunization (influenza and pneumococcal) status as per policy. Failed to review policy and procedure related to immunizations. These failures have the potential to affect 2 residents (R481, R157) in minimizing the risk of acquiring, transmitting, or complications from influenza or Pneumococcal pneumonia.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to use standard precautions and perform proper hand washing/hand hygiene while providing incontinence care to residents to prevent spread of infection or cross contamination. These failures could potentially affect 11 residents assigned to V4 as of census dated 7/21/24.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure incontinence care was provided in a timely manner for 2 (R1 and R2) residents who needed assistance with toileting. This failure affected 2 (R1 and R2) residents reviewed for improper nursing care in a sample of 4.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their call light protocol to ensure residents always have accessibility to the call light for 6 [R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6,] of residents reviewed for call lights. Findings Include: R1 clinical record indicates in part; R1 was admitted with the following medical diagnoses of primary osteoarthritis, right shoulder, anxiety disorder, bilateral primary osteoarthritis of knee, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, chronic embolism and thrombosis of unspecified vein, and obesity. R1's Minimum data set [MDS] indicates the following: section [C] dated 3/8/24- R1's cognition score [13] indicates R1 is cognitively intact, section [GG] dated 3/8/24- R1 is dependent (Staff does all the effort, resident does none of the effort to complete the activity, two or more helpers is required to complete the task. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy to ensure maintenance of skin integrity related to incontinence and failed to immediately report skin alterations that are identified to the nurse for further assessment. The facility also failed to address skin alterations in resident's plan of care. These failures could potentially affect 1 (R2) of 3 residents reviewed for improper nursing care.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy to ensure that documentation of medication administration is recorded on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and includes initials of the licensed nurse who administered the medication. This failure could potentially affect 3 (R2, R3, R4) residents reviewed for medication administration.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff doffed potentially contaminated gloves prior to handling clean linens and failed to ensure staff clothing was not touching dirty and clean linens to prevent the spread of infectious microorganisms. These failures have the potential to affect all 197 residents in the facility.
Inspectors wroteA. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the circuit breaker boxes were locked, and failed to ensure the padlocks used to lock the circuit breaker boxes were functioning to provide a safe environment to the residents. This failure has the potential to affect all 197 residents who reside in the facility. B. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the drying machines lint screens were free of lint debris build-up. This failure has the potential to affect all 197 residents who reside in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to perform nurse shift to shift counts of controlled substances which has the potential to affect 55 residents residing on the second floor when reviewed for medication labeling and storage.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store an oral antibiotic medication with a pharmacy label; failed to lock medication cabinets storing emergency medications; failed to maintain an emergency medication box with a seal; and failed to store an emergency intravenous fluids (IV) medication box that was not expired. These failures have the potential to affect all 55 residents residing on the 2nd floor when reviewed for medication labeling and storage.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to document the code status for one resident (R59) in the electronic and paper chart. This failure has the potential to affect one resident (R59) out of a sample size of 54.
Inspectors wroteBased upon observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Low Air Loss Mattress was implemented according to manufacturer recommendations for two (R22, R398) residents reviewed for prevention and treatment of pressure injury/ulcer in the sample of 54 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a written consent was obtained for a psychotropic medication prior to its administration. This failure affects one resident (R60) in the sample of 54 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow policy related to the following: label and date food stored in bins, follow first-in-first out on cans on the shelves and removed dented can products out of Dry Storage Room; Failed to cover, label and date onions, carrots, cabbages, and lettuce in walk-in cooler; Failed to discard expired dairy product inside walk-in cooler; Failed to date multiple bread to determine when it still good for consumption; Failed to maintain dishwasher on working condition. These failures have the potential to affect 190 residents in the facility who is receiving an oral diet.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain garbage disposal contained in designated containers. Leaving trash or garbage overflowing on the floor and other areas of the Garbage Room. These failures have the potential to affect 190 residents in the facility who is receiving an oral diet.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to follow Influenza and Pneumococcal Immunization policy related to determining and providing education for 6 out of 8 residents for Influenza Vaccination (R442, R191, R441, R192, R178, and R11) and 6 out 8 for Pneumococcal Vaccination (R191, R441, R192, R178, R177 and R11) reviewed for Influenza and Pneumococcal Immunization. These failures have the potential to affect 6 out of 8 residents for Influenza Vaccination (R442, R191, R441, R192, R178, and R11) and 6 out 8 for Pneumococcal Vaccination (R191, R441, R192, R178, R177 and R11) to have opportunity to receive benefits of Influenza and Pneumococcal Vaccinations.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to Covid-19 Vaccination policy related to determining and providing education for 4 out of 8 residents (R191, R441, R192 and R178) reviewed for Covid-19 Immunization. These failures have the potential to affect 4 residents (R191, R441, R192 and R178) to have opportunity to receive benefits of Covid-19 Vaccination.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, facility failed to follow their call light policy to ensure call lights are placed within reach for w residents (R106, R119) reviewed for call lights in a final sample of 35.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow Fall Prevention Policy related to supervision and/or assistance and maintaining environment free of clutter to 1 of 1 resident (R81) for a total sample of 35 residents reviewed. These failures have the potential to affect 1 resident (R81) recurrent of fall.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure for Controlled Substances labelling and storage for 3 residents (R37, R100, R121) receiving medications from 1 of 2 medication carts reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, facility failed to follow their policy to accurately test 3 newly admitted residents (R441, R191, and R178) for COVID-19 in a sample of 5.
2 fire safety citations on file: 2 on August 9, 2024.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| July 6, 2026 | Fine | $148,190 |
| May 29, 2026 | Fine | $42,700 |
| May 29, 2026 | Payment Denial | 2 days from June 28, 2026 |
| August 1, 2025 | Fine | $26,750 |
| September 20, 2024 | Fine | $16,801 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Illinois | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 2.24 | 3.45 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.35 | 0.72 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.07 | 3.07 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.39 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.49 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 46.5% | 44.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 46.7% | 41.8% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 4.79 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 2.31 on weekdays and 2.07 on weekends, 10% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 9.7% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.39 in April to June 2025 to 2.24 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 2.24 | 0.35 | 2.31 | 2.07 | 9.7% | 0 of 90 | 199 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 2.27 | 0.33 | 2.31 | 2.17 | 14.0% | 0 of 92 | 194 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 2.31 | 0.36 | 2.38 | 2.16 | 13.4% | 0 of 92 | 186 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 2.39 | 0.39 | 2.43 | 2.30 | 12.0% | 0 of 91 | 180 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Illinois, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.26 | 0.65 | 3.40 | 2.92 | 5.4% | 0.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Illinois, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.10 | $18.95 to $23.26 | 68,640 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $36.06 | $30.57 to $38.25 | 17,440 |
| Registered nurses | $46.15 | $38.47 to $50.94 | 138,910 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Illinois | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.2 | 13.4 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.1 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.7 | 2.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.1 | 14.3 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.1 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 38.5 | 26.1 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 8.6 | 13.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.6 | 2.0 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.8 | 2.2 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Central Nursing Home's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it worse than the national rate (31.1% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
31.1% this home
Worse than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Illinois: 106 better, 85 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 37 eligible stays.
10.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Illinois: 2 better, 14 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 78 eligible stays.
7.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Illinois: 3 better, 10 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 56 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Illinois50.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 13 residents counted.
4.3% this home
Median of homes: Illinois0.3% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 23 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Illinois1.5% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 23 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Illinois100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 1 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: CENTRAL NURSING HOME LLC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joseph Mermelstein Family Trust | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 45% | 05/01/2018 |
| Marvin Mermelstein Family Trust | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 45% | 05/01/2018 |
| Mermelstein, Joseph | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 5% | 05/01/2015 |
| Ten Chicago LLC | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 05/01/2018 | |
| Capital One Na | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 04/21/2015 | |
| Mermelstein, Marvin | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 05/01/2015 | |
| Hickman, Doreen | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/24/2025 | |
| Mermelstein, Marvin | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2015 | |
| Ryabov, Yakov | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2018 | |
| Mermelstein, Marvin | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2015 | |
| Joseph Mermelstein Family Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/01/2018 | |
| Marvin Mermelstein Family Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/01/2018 | |
| Hickman, Doreen | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/24/2025 | |
| Mermelstein, Marvin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2015 | |
| Ryabov, Yakov | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2018 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Illinois. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.