1205 Leitchfield Road, Owensboro, KY 42303 · Daviess County · (270) 684-0464
145 certified beds, about 123 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1991
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 185236 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 8, 2026, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the Kentucky average is 2.9, the national average 9.2).
Of 23 health citations since August 2021, 4 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (4 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.59 hours per resident per day, against 3.95 across Kentucky and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.46 of those hours.
49.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Kentucky average 46.4%).
CMS links it to Simcha Hyman & Naftali Zanziper, an affiliated group of 79 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 23 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety which had the potential to affect all residents who consumed meals from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, facility document and policy review, the facility failed to report all alleged violations of abuse to the State Agencies (including the State Survey Agency (SSA) for 1 of 1 residents sampled for sexual abuse out of the total sample of 25 residents, (Resident (R)61).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to follow standard precautions to prevent the spread of infection. Appropriate infection prevention and control practices were not implemented during medication administration. Hand hygiene was not performed while administering medications to 2 of 5 residents, sampled for medication observation out of the total sampled 25 sampled residents, (Resident (R)46 and R75).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. Observation on 04/02/2025 at 8:45 AM, on the Dementia unit, revealed medication cups containing medications that had been pre-pulled for 3 residents. The cups were marked with the residents' names in black sharpie.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 26 sampled residents, Resident (R)1 and R97. 1. During observation of incontinence care for R97, provided by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)8 and CNA10, on 04/03/2025 at 10:14 AM, the CNAs removed the urine soaked sheets from the air mattress, used them to wipe the mattress and then threw the sheets on the floor while wearing gloves. The CNAs then failed to perform hand hygiene and don new gloves, but wore the same soiled gloves to provide incontinence care for the resident. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record reviews and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to protect residents from physical, sexual, and verbal abuse for five (5) (Residents #35, #8, #58, #54, and #87) of five (5) sampled residents reviewed for abuse by Resident #85 and Resident #6. Specifically, Resident #85 knocked down Resident #35 down on 08/21/2021, and knocked Resident #8 down on 08/22/2021, resulting in a femur fracture. Resident #6 had multiple episodes of verbal and physical aggression towards other residents. Resident #6 exposed himself/herself, sexually during an activity, to Resident #58 and Resident #87. Staff reported that when Resident #6 came into the common area, other residents left due to the resident's behaviors. Staff indicated they were fearful Resident #6 would hurt another resident. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to report abuse allegations and injuries of unknown origin to the State Survey Agency for six (6) (Residents #35, #8, #58, #54, #83, and #87) out of six (6) residents reviewed for abuse. Resident #6 had multiple occurrences of cursing, yelling, throwing things, threatening other residents, and publicly masturbating in front of other residents. These incidents were not reported. Resident #85 had physical or verbal altercations with other residents and the incidents were not reported. One of the physical altercations with Resident #85 caused Resident #8 to fall, and Resident #8 sustained a hip fracture. Resident #83 had injuries of unknown origin, including bruising and a hip fracture, that were not reported to the State Survey Agency. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to investigate abuse allegations for six (6) (Residents #35, #8, #58, #54, #87 and #83) out of six (6) residents reviewed for abuse by Resident #85 and Resident #6. Resident #6 had multiple occurrences of cursing, yelling, throwing things, threatening other residents, and publicly masturbating in front of other residents. These incidents were not investigated. Resident #85 had physical or verbal altercations with other residents and the incidents were not investigated. One of the physical altercations with Resident #85 caused Resident #8 to fall, and Resident #8 sustained a hip fracture. Resident #83 had injuries of unknown origin, including bruising and a hip fracture, that were not thoroughly investigated. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record reviews and reviews of the facility's policies, it was determined the facility failed to ensure each resident received the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychological well-being, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care. This deficient practice affected one (1) (Resident #6) of six (6) sampled residents reviewed for behaviors. Specifically, Resident #6 displayed behaviors directed toward other residents, and no new interventions were implemented to address behaviors. Resident #6 had multiple episodes of verbal and physical aggression towards other residents. Resident #6 exposed self sexually during an activity. Staff reported that when Resident #6 came into the common area, other residents left due to the resident's behaviors. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure there was a qualified food and nutrition director with appropriate competencies and skill sets to carry out food and nutrition services for all one hundred eleven (111) residents in the facility. The facility failed to ensure the Director for Food and Nutrition Services was a Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), a Certified Food Service Manager, had a national certification for food service management or had an Associates or higher degree in food service management.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the menus and recipes were followed in one (1) of one (1) facility kitchen with the potential to affect one hundred and eleven (111) residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility's policies, it was determined the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one (1) of one (1) kitchen and one (1) of two (2) nourishment refrigerators with the potential to affect all one hundred and eleven (111) residents. Staff failed to ensure cold foods were covered, expired foods were disposed of, the kitchen and equipment were cleaned, food was stored at the proper temperature, and food was prepared and held at the proper temperatures prior to meal service.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record reviews, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure an effective Quality Assurance (QA) program was in place. The facility's census was 111 residents. Staff failed to ensure the QA program put plans in place to correct past deficiencies, identify its' own deficiencies, and resolve those deficiencies.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record reviews, and the review of a facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to keep the indwelling catheter drainage bag off the floor for one (1) of four (4) sampled residents (Resident #67); and, failed to maintain social distancing in the main hallway and wear the face mask properly in three (3) locations within the building. The deficient practice occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic and had the potential to affect all residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure dignity for three (3) of three sampled residents (Residents #22, #83 and #67) reviewed for dignity. Resident #22 was observed not dressed or covered. Resident #83 and Resident #67 did not have a privacy bag for their urinary catheter drainage bags.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure one (1) of five (5) sampled residents (Resident #42) reviewed for hospitalizations received a bed-hold notice. Staff failed to ensure a bed-hold notice was provided to Resident #42 or the resident's representative prior to the hospitalization on 08/18/2021.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to implement fall care plan interventions for bed wedges for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #3)reviewed for falls. The facility failed to develop a care plan for physical behaviors for one (1) of six (6) residents reviewed for behaviors (Resident #85).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility's policies, it was determined the facility failed to provide nail care and failed to shave one (1) of four (4) dependent residents (Resident #46) from the sampled residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review it was determined the facility failed to complete weekly wound assessments for two (2) of two (2) sampled residents (Residents #7 and #25) reviewed for wound assessments and failed to follow physician's orders and utilize pressure reducing interventions for one (1) of two (2) sampled residents (Resident #7) reviewed for pressure ulcers.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure fall investigations were completed after a fall occurred for two (2) residents (Resident #83 and Resident #3) out of five (5) residents reviewed for falls.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to secure an indwelling urinary catheter to prevent trauma or accidental dislodgement for one (1) of four (4) sampled residents (Resident #67) with an indwelling urinary catheter.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure oxygen therapy was administered per the physician's orders for two (2) of three (3) residents with oxygen (Resident #27 and Resident #16).
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed ensure the medical record was complete, accurately documented, readily accessible and systemically organized for one (1) resident (Resident #101) out of five -seven (57) sampled residents. Review of Resident #101's medical record revealed the facility failed to accurately and completely document insulin administration and blood glucose monitoring.
9 fire safety citations on file: 5 on May 8, 2026, 4 on April 4, 2025.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Kentucky | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.59 | 3.95 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.46 | 0.79 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.36 | 3.49 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.67 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.45 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 49.1% | 46.4% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 61.1% | 41.8% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.75 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.68 on weekdays and 3.36 on weekends, 9% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.36 in April to June 2025 to 3.59 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.59 | 0.46 | 3.68 | 3.36 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 123 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.61 | 0.48 | 3.69 | 3.40 | 0.9% | 0 of 92 | 121 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.33 | 0.49 | 3.40 | 3.15 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 126 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.36 | 0.47 | 3.43 | 3.16 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 124 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Kentucky, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.85 | 0.71 | 4.04 | 3.40 | 3.2% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kentucky, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.45 | $17.38 to $21.21 | 23,410 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.07 | $26.10 to $31.29 | 8,570 |
| Registered nurses | $38.96 | $36.38 to $46.73 | 50,300 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Kentucky | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.4 | 13.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.5 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.9 | 3.9 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.7 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.7 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.0 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 20.3 | 16.1 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 21.3 | 24.2 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 22.1 | 13.7 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.5 | 1.9 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Chautauqua Health and Rehabilitation's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 51.5% · Kentucky: 38 better, 49 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 17 eligible stays.
10.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Kentucky: 0 better, 12 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 45 eligible stays.
7.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Kentucky: 0 better, 6 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 31 eligible stays.
33.3% this home
Median of homes: Kentucky49.5% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 21 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Kentucky0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 28 residents counted.
5.5% this home
Median of homes: Kentucky2.6% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 28 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Kentucky98.1% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 4 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: OWENSBORO KY OPCO LLC. CMS links this home to Simcha Hyman & Naftali Zanziper, a group of 79 nursing homes averaging 2.7 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vujanovic, Mick | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 07/01/2021 | |
| Vujanovic, Mick | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/01/2021 | |
| Clearview Healthcare Management Ky LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 07/01/2021 | |
| Groves, Kari | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/09/2026 | |
| Vujanovic, Mick | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2021 | |
| Clearview Healthcare Management Ky LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/17/2026 | |
| Groves, Kari | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/09/2026 | |
| Vujanovic, Mick | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/01/2021 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Kentucky. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.