Cherokee Rose Nursing & Rehabilitation
203 East Gibbs Boulevard, Glen Rose, TX 76043 · Somervell County · (254) 897-7361
102 certified beds, about 51 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1992
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 675008 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on March 26, 2026, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
None of its 18 health citations since September 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.20 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.29 of those hours.
CMS links it to Creative Solutions in Healthcare, an affiliated group of 149 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 18 health citations on file.
March 26, 2026Standard inspection · 5 citations
- E Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide a private meeting space to conduct group meetings without continued interruptions by facility staff for 13 of 48 confidential residents who were reviewed for resident council. The facility failed to provide a private area for confidential resident group meetings. This failure placed all residents who participated in a resident council of not having the right to voice their concerns without staff being present or overhearing their concerns.
- E Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 (Resident #13) of 12 residents reviewed for medications. The facility failed to hold Lisinopril (medication to lower blood pressure) per parameters stated in physicians' orders for a total of 6 doses in March 2026 for Resident #13. The facility failed to hold Diltiazem (medication to lower blood pressure) per parameters stated in physicians' orders for a total of 22 doses in March 2026 for Resident #13. The failures placed the residents at risk of harm or not receiving desired outcomes from medications not administered according to physician's orders and manufacturer's specifications. [...]
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to properly prepare and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed. The facility failed to ensure foods were heated to a temperature of 165 degrees F after mechanically altering the pureed food and held at least 15 seconds when food temperature was below 140 degrees F during the lunch meal observed on 03/24/2026. The facility failed to ensure foods were heated to a temperature of 165 degrees F after mechanically altering the mechanical soft BBQ chicken during the lunch meal observed on 03/24/2026. These failures could place residents that eat out of the kitchen at risk for food borne illnesses.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents, who needed respiratory care, were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for on 2 (Resident #13 and Resident #20) of 12 residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #13's nebulizer (used to receive medications by breathing in mist through the mouth) for breathing treatment was properly stored when not in use on 03/24/2026. The facility failed to ensure Resident #20's nebulizer for breathing treatment was properly stored when not in use on 03/24/2026. These failures could place residents at risk for respiratory infection and not having their respiratory needs met.
- D Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed for 1 of 1 (Resident #19) resident who received a pureed meal reviewed. The facility failed to ensure residents receiving a pureed texture diet were provided with Honey Kissed Roll according to the menu, including a roll during the lunch meal observed on 03/24/2026. This failure could place residents that eat food from the kitchen at risk of poor intake, chemical imbalance and/or weight loss.
August 6, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess residents for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation and/or review the risks and benefits of bed rails with the resident or resident representative and obtain informed consent prior to installation of 1 of 4 (Resident # 3) reviewed for the use of bed rails. The facility failed to ensure that a bed rail assessment and bed rail consent was completed for Resident # 3 or Resident # 3's family representative. This failure could have placed residents at increased risks for entrapment in bed rails and for lack of informed consent regarding the risks associated with use of bed rails.
December 13, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 8 citations
- E Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences for 3 of 19 (Resident #8, Resident # 21, and Resident #37) residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #8, Resident #21, and Resident #37 call lights were within reach. This failure could place residents at risk of a diminished quality of life and lead to a loss of self-esteem and isolation.
- E Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, for 1 of 6 (C Hall) Medication Carts and 1 of 1 medication room. 1. The facility failed to ensure C Hall medication cart keys were not kept on unattended cart in binder labeled Narcotic Book C Hall. 2. The facility failed to ensure that all medications stored in C Hall medication cart were properly stored/labeled. These failures placed all residents at risk of harm or decline in health due to lack of potency of medications/biologicals or misappropriation of medications.
- E Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the menus met the nutritional needs of residents in accordance with established guidelines and were followed for 1 of 1 meal (lunch meal on 12/10/2024) reviewed for menus being followed. The facility did not prepare or serve the posted items included on the menu as recommended by the licensed dietician. This failure could affect all residents who ate the food prepared for the lunch meal on 12/10/2024, by placing them at risk of not receiving adequate nutritive value and calorie intake needed to promote and maintain good health.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for service safety, in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure staff practiced appropriate hand hygiene during meal prep. 2. The facility failed to label open food items with date opened food in the refrigerator and freezer. 3. The facility failed to ensure staff appropriately cleaned and sanitized the thermometer prior to testing food temperatures. These failures could place residents at risk of food borne illness and cross contamination.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections reviewed for 2 of 4 halls (B Hall & C Hall) reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure staff (CNA B) wore appropriate PPE providing direct care services for Resident #46 (on B Hall) who was placed on Transmission Based Precautions due to having contracted COVID-19. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #46 wore appropriate PPE when being transported to shower room on B Hall. 3. The facility failed to ensure LVN C performed hand hygiene when obtaining blood sample for glucose reading (on C Hall). [...]
- D Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a residents significant change in physical or mental condition was determined for 1 of 19 residents (Residents #47) reviewed for significant change. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 47 had a Significant Change Assessment completed after his admission to hospice. This failure could contribute to providing an inaccurate assessment of resident's most current medical condition and could lead to failure to not provide necessary care.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan based on assessed needs with the ability to be evaluated or quantified to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 (Resident #47) of 19 residents reviewed for comprehensive person-centered care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #47's comprehensive care plan addressed Resident #47 being on hospice. This failure could affect the residents by placing them at risk for not receiving care and services to attain or maintain the residents highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, that were complete and accurate for 1 (Resident #47) of 19 residents reviewed for resident records. The facility failed to ensure Resident #47's clinical record included an order to admit to hospice. The order was only located in the hospice records. This failure could place residents at risk of having errors in care and treatment.
October 25, 2023Standard inspection · 3 citations
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #31) reviewed for accidents and supervision. The CNA and NA failed to lock the Hoyer lift (a patient lift used by caregivers to safely transfer patients) during a transfer of Resident #31. This failure could place residents at risk of injuries.
- D Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure CNA's and NA's were able to demonstrate appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for 2 of 2 (CNA, NA) staff reviewed for Hoyer Lift transfers. The facility failed to ensure the CNA and NA had competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents' needs. This failure could place residents requiring incontinent care at risk for the spread of infections, skin breakdown, and decreased quality of life.
- D Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed. The facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary storage of food and food dispensers that were accessible to residents. These failures could place residents that eat out of the kitchen at risk for food borne illnesses.
September 22, 2023Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections reviewed for 4 of 6 staff (CNA A, HA B, HA C and RN D) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure staff (CNA A, HA B, HA C and RN D) wore appropriate PPE to include N-95 mask, gown, gloves, and eye protection while providing direct care services to residents on Aerosol Contact Precautions (set of measures to protect against the transmission of respiratory infections that can spread through the air) These deficient practices could affect residents that reside in the facility and placed them at risk of infection.
Fire safety inspections
10 fire safety citations on file: 6 on March 26, 2026, 3 on December 13, 2024, 1 on October 25, 2023.
Every fire safety citation10 citations
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
- E Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
- E Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- E Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- E Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- F Implement emergency and standby power systems.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- E Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- F Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.20 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.29 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.56 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.96 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.96 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | not reported | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 3.53 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.46 on weekdays and 2.56 on weekends, 26% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.35 in April to June 2025 to 3.20 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.20 | 0.29 | 3.46 | 2.56 | 0.0% | 1 of 90 | 51 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.21 | 0.27 | 3.38 | 2.76 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 50 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 2.91 | 0.30 | 3.09 | 2.43 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 54 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.35 | 0.35 | 3.59 | 2.77 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 48 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.6 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.5 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.6 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.6 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 44.6 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 32.0 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: GLEN ROSE I ENTERPRISES LLC. CMS links this home to Creative Solutions in Healthcare, a group of 149 nursing homes averaging 2.1 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Huggins, Linda | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 11/01/2011 | |
| Creative Solutions in Healthcare Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 11/01/2011 | |
| Blake, Gary | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2011 | |
| Blake, Malisa | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2011 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on March 26, 2026: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on March 26, 2026: "Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on December 13, 2024: "Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition"
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on March 26, 2026: "Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.56 hours per resident per day, below the Texas average of 2.98.
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 2 administrators who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Glen Rose Nursing and Rehab Center Glen Rose, 0.5 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 20 citations
- Granbury Rehab & Nursing Granbury, 13.6 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 21 citations
- Harbor Lakes Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Granbury, 13.9 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 16 citations
- Granbury Care Center Granbury, 14.6 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 38 citations
- Avir at Granbury Granbury, 15.2 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 36 citations
- Ridgeview Rehabilitation and Skilled Nursing Cleburne, 19.4 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 20 citations
- Heritage Trails Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Cleburne, 21.3 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 12 citations
- The Hilltop on Main Meridian, 21.3 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 15 citations
Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Resident advocate: Texas Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 800-252-2412. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is Cherokee Rose Nursing & Rehabilitation's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Cherokee Rose Nursing & Rehabilitation 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 1 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Cherokee Rose Nursing & Rehabilitation get at its last inspection?
- 5 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on March 26, 2026. The Texas average is 9.4.
- Has Cherokee Rose Nursing & Rehabilitation been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Cherokee Rose Nursing & Rehabilitation accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Cherokee Rose Nursing & Rehabilitation?
- CMS lists 4 owners and managers, and links the home to Creative Solutions in Healthcare. Legal business name: GLEN ROSE I ENTERPRISES LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.