Find a nursing home

Home / Texas / Granbury

Harbor Lakes Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

1300 2nd St., Granbury, TX 76048 · Hood County · (817) 408-3800

142 certified beds, about 93 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2008

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
5 of 5
Staffing
2 of 5
Quality measures
5 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 676185 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on September 11, 2025, inspectors cited 1 health deficiency (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).

None of its 16 health citations since June 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.30 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.39 of those hours.

38.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).

CMS links it to Hmg Healthcare, an affiliated group of 31 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 16 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
9D
5E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
1B
0C
September 11, 2025Standard inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 22, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain pharmacy services procedures that ensure accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals for 1 of 5 (Resident #114) residents reviewed for medication administration in that: The facility did not accurately reconcile medication orders for Resident #114. This failure could place residents at risk for improper medication administration.
August 15, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 9 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 9, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed, in that: The facility failed to ensure kitchen staff followed proper hand hygiene during meal preparations. This failure could place residents that eat out of the kitchen at risk for food borne illness and cross-contamination.
  2. E
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 9, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to review and revise resident's comprehensive care plans by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment for 3 (Resident #9, Resident #15, and Resident #75) of 20 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. 1. The facility failed to ensure the interdisciplinary team reviewed and revised the plan of care quarterly for Residents #9 between 11/22/2023 & 06/19/2024. 2. The facility failed to ensure the interdisciplinary team updated the care plan after Resident #9's foley catheter was ordered on 07/16/2024. 3. The facility failed to ensure the interdisciplinary team reviewed and revised the plan of care quarterly for Resident #15 between 11/08/2023 & 07/17/2024. 4. The facility failed to ensure the interdisciplinary team updated care plan after Resident #15 hit another resident on 07/23/2024. 5. [...]
  3. E
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    F804 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 9, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received food that is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 1 of 1 lunch meal tested for nutritive value, flavor, and appearance: The facility failed to provide palatable food served at an appetizing temperature as evidenced by a sample tray tested on [DATE]. This failure could affect the residents who ate food from the facility's kitchen by placing them at risk of poor food intake and/or dissatisfaction of the meals served.
  4. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 9, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for staff members (CMA H, LVN A, CNA J, & CNA K) observed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure CMA H performed hand hygiene prior to putting on gloves and after taking off gloves during incontinent care. 2. The facility failed to ensure LVN A sanitized the blood pressure cuff in between using it on different residents. 3. The facility failed to ensure CNA J performed hand hygiene after taking off gloves. 4. The facility failed to ensure CNA J did not reuse disposable incontinent wipes during incontinent care. 4. [...]
  5. D
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    F602 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 9, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to be free from misappropriation of resident property for 1 of 16 residents (Resident #11), reviewed for drug diversion. The facility failed to prevent the misappropriation of an unknown number of Resident #11's Oxycodone tablets (Controlled Substance requiring double lock and count every shift on 08/03/2024 from the medication cart that was never found. This failure could place residents at risk of misappropriation, and could result in increased pain, and poor quality of life.
  6. D
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    F655 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 9, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of a resident's admission that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care plan and provide a summary of their baseline care plan to residents for 2 (Resident #81 and Resident #291) of 20 residents reviewed for care plan completion. 1. The facility failed to complete Resident #81's baseline care plan within the required 48-hour timeframe. 2. The facility failed to provide Resident #81 & Resident #291 a summary of their baseline care plan after completion. This failure could place residents who were newly admitted at risk for not receiving necessary care and services or having important care needs identified.
  7. D
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    F759 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 9, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five percent (%) or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 16% based on 4 errors out of 25 opportunities, which involved 1 of 5 residents (Resident #67) reviewed for medication errors. 1. The facility failed to ensure LVN A administered the correct dose of Tylenol (given for pain) to Resident #67 according to physician orders. 2. LVN A failed to administer famotidine (given for GERD), multivitamin, and magnesium oxide to Resident #67 according to physician orders. These failures could place residents at risk of inadequate therapeutic outcomes.
  8. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 9, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals were properly secured for 1 of 9 (CMA Medication cart Hall 400) medication carts reviewed for proper medication storage. The facility failed to store Resident #16's Tramadol (Controlled Substance requiring double lock and count every shift) properly, when 2 pills were left in a medication cup in the top drawer of a medication cart, not labeled and not double locked on 08/13/2024. These failures could place residents at risk of having access to unauthorized medications and/or lead to possible harm, drug overdose, or drug diversions.
  9. B
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    F802 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 9, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies, skills set and accreditations to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service department for 1 of 4 dietary staff (DA-D) reviewed for dietary support personnel. The facility failed to ensure that dietary staff (DA-D) serving in kitchen were working with a current Food Handler Certificate. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their nutritional needs met and food borne illnesses due to lack of dietary staff training.
July 3, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 2, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practice, that were complete and accurate for 1 of 8(Resident #5) residents reviewed for resident records. The facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed and documented for Resident #5. This failure could place residents at risk of having errors with their care and treatment.
June 29, 2023Standard inspection · 5 citations
  1. E
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 30, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to have an established system in place for accurate reconciliation for 4 (Hall 100, 200, 300 and 400) of 4 halls that had residents with orders for controlled substances. Licensed Staff were not signing Controlled Drugs Count Record when Controlled Drugs were reconciled at change of shift according to facility policy The facility failed to monitor expiration dates on the over-the-counter medication. These failures could affect residents by placing them at risk of drug diversion and receiving medication that will not provide the same result.
  2. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 30, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for professional standards for food service safety in that: The following were observed: -1 dented 105 oz. can of peaches found in same rack as other cans. -1 unlabeled container of green beans was found in refrigerator. -1 partly covered container of tuna salad was found in the refrigerator. -1 partly covered tray of watermelon was found in the walk-in refrigerator. -Missing refrigerator temperature entry for 6/26/23. These failures could place residents at risk of food-borne illness.
  3. D
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    F640 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 30, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to transmit MDS data within 14 days after the facility completed a resident's MDS assessment for 1 (Resident #58) of 19 residents reviewed for timely electronic transmission of MDS data to the CMS System. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #58's completed quarterly MDS for 04/25/2023 was transmitted within the timeframe required by CMS. This failure could put residents at risk of state and federal monitors having inadequate information about the care residents require and receive.
  4. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 30, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that each resident received an accurate assessment, that reflects the resident's status at the time of the assessment for 1 (Resident #41) out of 1 resident reviewed in accordance with professional standards. The facility failed to document MDS assessment that accurately reflected the resident's current status for Resident #41. This failure could affect the resident by placing them at risk of not receiving adequate care due to the assessment not reflecting the resident's status at the time of the assessment.
  5. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 30, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 2 (Resident #41 and Resident #50) of 19 residents reviewed for comprehensive person-centered care plans. The facility failed to ensure the person-centered comprehensive care plan for Resident #41 accurately reflect the resident's current status. The facility failed to have a care plan for pain for Resident #50. These failures could place residents at risk of decreased quality of life due to pain control needs not being met and increased risk of skin-related issues due to not having their positioning needs met.

Fire safety inspections

7 fire safety citations on file: 7 on September 11, 2025.

Every fire safety citation7 citations
  1. F
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · September 11, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. E
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · September 11, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. E
    Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
    K 355 · September 11, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. E
    Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
    K 372 · September 11, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. E
    Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
    K 511 · September 11, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. E
    Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
    K 923 · September 11, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. D
    Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
    K 222 · September 11, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeTexasUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.303.393.86
Registered nurses0.390.430.69
All nursing staff on weekends2.872.983.42
Nurse aides1.95
Licensed practical nurses0.96
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)38.5%55.3%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover33.3%54.6%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.74 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.47 on weekdays and 2.87 on weekends, 17% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.23 in April to June 2025 to 3.30 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.300.393.472.87 0.0%0 of 9093
Oct to Dec 20253.370.403.532.96 0.0%0 of 9291
Jul to Sep 20253.560.403.753.08 0.0%0 of 9291
Apr to Jun 20253.230.373.402.82 0.0%0 of 9191
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Texas, Jan to Mar 20263.330.403.502.932.2%0.7% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.

Official wage estimates for Texas

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Texas, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$18.03$16.97 to $20.7188,680
LPNs and LVNs$29.92$27.46 to $32.8957,560
Registered nurses$46.14$38.06 to $50.53271,380
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeTexasUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.615.813.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.30.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
6.83.33.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.21.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.714.014.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.43.84.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.99.615.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
23.325.723.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
10.212.312.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.22.21.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.62.11.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Harbor Lakes Nursing and Rehabilitation Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (65.3% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

65.3% this home

Better than the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Texas: 116 better, 50 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 201 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

10.3% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Texas: 0 better, 9 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 229 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

6.8% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Texas: 4 better, 11 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 135 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

51.2% this home

Median of homes: Texas57.3% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 121 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

1.4% this home

Median of homes: Texas0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 148 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

2.2% this home

Median of homes: Texas1.3% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 148 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Texas98.5% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 6 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: WINNIE-STOWELL HOSPITAL DISTRICT. CMS links this home to Hmg Healthcare, a group of 31 nursing homes averaging 3.2 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Stramecki, AnthonyCorporate directorIndividual11/06/2016
Cibc Bank USAOperational/managerial controlOrganization04/01/2021
Hmg Park Manor of Harbor Lakes LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization10/01/2021
Balsamo, KrystalOperational/managerial controlIndividual04/01/2021
Crosby, CalvinOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/24/2024
Culp, RolandOperational/managerial controlIndividual04/01/2021
Daspit, LaurenceOperational/managerial controlIndividual04/01/2021
Dohn, WilliamOperational/managerial controlIndividual04/01/2021
Dyer, BrittneyOperational/managerial controlIndividual09/26/2022
Harrison, DeonOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/11/2023
Murrell, EdwardOperational/managerial controlIndividual04/01/2018
Pico, AnaOperational/managerial controlIndividual04/01/2021
Prince, DerekOperational/managerial controlIndividual04/01/2021
Reinarz, ChristianOperational/managerial controlIndividual04/01/2021
Rollo, JefferyOperational/managerial controlIndividual04/01/2021
Stramecki, AnthonyOperational/managerial controlIndividual04/01/2021
Vratis, KaceyOperational/managerial controlIndividual04/01/2021
Way, GeorgeOperational/managerial controlIndividual04/01/2021
Cibc Bank USAAdp of the SNFOrganization04/01/2021
Hmg Services LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization04/01/2021
Zions BancorporationAdp of the SNFOrganization04/01/2021
Balsamo, KrystalAdp of the SNFIndividual04/01/2021
Crosby, CalvinAdp of the SNFIndividual01/24/2024
Culp, RolandAdp of the SNFIndividual04/01/2021
Daspit, LaurenceAdp of the SNFIndividual04/01/2021
Dohn, WilliamAdp of the SNFIndividual04/01/2021
Dyer, BrittneyAdp of the SNFIndividual09/26/2022
Harrison, DeonAdp of the SNFIndividual10/11/2023
Pico, AnaAdp of the SNFIndividual04/01/2021
Prince, DerekAdp of the SNFIndividual04/01/2021
Reinarz, ChristianAdp of the SNFIndividual04/01/2021
Stanbridge, NormaAdp of the SNFIndividual04/01/2021

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on August 15, 2024: "Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals."
  2. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on September 11, 2025: "Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist."
  3. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on August 15, 2024: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
  4. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on August 15, 2024: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.87 hours per resident per day, below the Texas average of 2.98.

Other nursing homes nearby

Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Harbor Lakes Nursing and Rehabilitation Center's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Harbor Lakes Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 5 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Harbor Lakes Nursing and Rehabilitation Center get at its last inspection?
1 health deficiency at the standard inspection on September 11, 2025. The Texas average is 9.4.
Has Harbor Lakes Nursing and Rehabilitation Center been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Harbor Lakes Nursing and Rehabilitation Center accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Harbor Lakes Nursing and Rehabilitation Center?
CMS lists 32 owners and managers, and links the home to Hmg Healthcare. Legal business name: WINNIE-STOWELL HOSPITAL DISTRICT.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection