Find a nursing home

Home / Texas / Granbury

Granbury Rehab & Nursing

2124 Paluxy Hwy, Granbury, TX 76048 · Hood County · (817) 279-7600

95 certified beds, about 78 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1991

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
2 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
1 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 455929 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on December 2, 2025, inspectors cited 10 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).

None of its 21 health citations since June 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.03 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.52 of those hours.

52.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).

CMS links it to Creative Solutions in Healthcare, an affiliated group of 149 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 21 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
7D
10E
3F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
1C
June 25, 2026Complaint inspection · 3 citations
  1. D
    Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
    F728 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 5, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility must not use any individual working in the facility as a nurse aide for more than four months on a full-time basis unless that individual has completed a training and competency evaluation program for 1 of 4 (NA C) non-certified nurse aides reviewed. The facility failed to ensure full-time NA C was certified within four months of the date of hire. This failure placed residents at risk of receiving inappropriate care from an individual whose skill level was not known.
  2. D
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    F759 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 5, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents were free of a med error rate of 5% or greater for 2 (Resident #7) of 25 medication pass opportunities reviewed for medication administration. The facility failed to ensure the medication error rate (8%) was less than 5% for Resident #7. This failure placed residents at risk of incorrect doses of medications and optimal therapeutic response.
  3. C
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    F732 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, widespread · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 5, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to post nurse staffing information that included the resident census for 70 days of 70 days reviewed for required postings. The facility failed to update the daily nurse staffing required posting in a prominent location of the facility since April 16, 2026. This failure could place all residents, their families, and facility visitors at risk of not having access to information regarding staffing data and the facility census.
June 2, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. E
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 30, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that were complete and accurately documented for 2 (Resident #2 and Resident #4) of 6 residents reviewed for administration.1. The facility failed to provide care as ordered to Resident #1's left lower leg wound on 06/01/2026.2. The facility failed to document Resident #2's72 hours surveillance, and notifications of the physician and representative in the chart following a fall on 5/27/2026. 3. The facility failed to document Resident #4's fall in nurses notes, 72 hours surveillance, and notifications of the physician and representative in the chart following a fall on 05/26/2026.4. The facility failed to document Resident #4 72 hours surveillance, and notifications of the physician and representative in the chart following a fall on 04/27/2026. [...]
December 2, 2025Standard inspection · 10 citations
  1. F
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    F803 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 3, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to make sure that its menus are followed and document any substitutions made to the menus on 4 of 4 halls reviewed for food and nutrition services. The facility failed to ensure residents who ate from the kitchen received all food items according to the menu or an approved alternative during lunch meal on 9/15/2025. This failure could place residents that eat out of the kitchen at risk of poor intake, chemical imbalance and/or weight loss.
  2. E
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    F565 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 3, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to consider the views of the resident or family group and act promptly upon the grievances and recommendations of such groups concerning issues of resident care and life in the facility or to demonstrate their response and rationale for such response for 9 of 9 confidential resident council members reviewed for resident/group response. The facility failed to provide a verbal or written response to the Resident Council addressing the grievances reported from their meetings on February 2025, March 2025, and August 2025 which included issues with nursing services, dietary services, and housekeeping services. These failures could place residents at risk of unresolved grievances, a decreased sense of self-worth, and a decline in quality of life. [...]
  3. E
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 3, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to include in the care plan services that will be provided to the resident for 3 (Resident #9, Resident #54, and Resident #72) of 22 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #9's comprehensive care plan had resident specific care needs for pressure ulcer.2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #54's comprehensive care plan had interventions care needs and interventions for dialysis.3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #72's comprehensive care plan had appropriate interventions for current transfer and sleeping status.4. The facility failed to ensure Resident #72's comprehensive care plan had correct code status and interventions to match her orders and wishes. [...]
  4. E
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    F680 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 3, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a qualified professional directs the activities program for 1 of 1 activity director (AD) reviewed for qualifications. The facility failed to ensure the AD, hired on July 17, 2024, was a qualified therapeutic recreation specialist or an activities professional that met state licensing requirements. This failure could place residents at risk for reduced quality of life due to lack of activities that were individualized to match the skills, abilities, and interests/preferences of each resident.
  5. E
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    F809 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 3, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide food prepared and served on time for 1 of 1 dining room and 4 (A, B, C, and D) of 4 halls. The facility failed to ensure that 1 of 1 lunch observed on 9/15/2025 was served at the posted mealtime 11:45 a.m. This failure could affect all residents who received meals served from the facility's only kitchen by placing residents at risk for unplanned weight loss, side effects from medication given without food, and diminished quality of life.
  6. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 3, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to make sure that all persons in food service meet local, state, and federal requirements for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed. 1. The facility failed to ensure holding temperatures were taken on food served during lunch service on 9/15/2025.2. The facility failed to ensure pureed kielbasa sausage, pureed greens beans, and pureed macaroni salad were heated to appropriate temperature after mechanically altering the food on 9/15/2025 during lunch service. 3. [...]
  7. D
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    F607 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 3, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow their written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property 2 of 15 employees (RN J and DM) reviewed for employability. The facility failed to ensure the record of the initial EMR/NAR check was completed and maintained for DM hired on 7/1/2025 per facility policy. The facility failed to ensure the initial EMR check was completed and maintained for the DM hired on 06/2/2025 per facility policy. These findings placed residents at risk of receiving care by someone that was unemployable.
  8. D
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    F655 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 3, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility did not develop a baseline care plan, or comprehensive care plan with necessary information within 48 hours of the resident's admission for 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #54) of 24 residents reviewed for care plan completion. The facility failed to complete a new baseline care plan for Resident #1 upon admission. This failure could place residents who were newly admitted at risk for not receiving necessary care and services or having important care needs identified. Resident #1Review of Resident #1's Face Sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male initially admitted on [DATE] with a recent admission date of 09/10/2025. Resident #1's medical diagnoses of Pneumonia, acute respiratory failure, depression, cognitive communication deficit and anemia. [...]
  9. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 3, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a medication cart not being used was secured for 1 of 4 medication carts (Cart Hall D). The facility failed to ensure Cart Hall D was not left unlocked and unsecured while unattended. These failures could place all residents at risk of harm or decline in health due to lack of potency of supplies, medications/biologicals or misappropriation of medications, or drug diversions.
  10. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 3, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection control program 2 of 2 (CNA-E and CNA-I) staff observed during incontinent care. The facility failed to ensure CNA E, and CNA I performed proper peri-care (incontinent care) and proper hand hygiene during peri-care for Resident #91. These failures placed residents of the facility at risk of infections from improper incontinent care and hand hygiene while performing incontinent care.
August 1, 2024Standard inspection · 4 citations
  1. F
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    F576 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 30, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents' right to receive their mail for seven of seven (confidential) residents interviewed regarding personal mail. The facility failed to distribute mail to residents on Saturdays. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving mail in a timely manner and could result in a decline in resident's psychosocial well-being and quality of life.
  2. E
    Post a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
    F575 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 30, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to post the HHSC complaint number and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency concerning any suspected violation of a state or federal regulation, including but not limited to resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property in the entire facility observed for required postings reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure the required posting of a HHSC complaint number and statement about how a resident may file a complaint with the State Survey agency. This failure placed residents at risk of being unaware of who and how to contact the State Survey Agency and their right to file a complaint with the State Service Agency concerning any suspected violation of state or federal regulation.
  3. E
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    F806 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 30, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received food that accommodated their preferences for seven residents in confidential group interview reviewed for food preferences. The facility failed to accommodate the residents' preference of spreading peanut butter on the peanut butter/jelly sandwich when served. This failure could place residents at risk for not having their choices and food preferences accommodated, possible weight loss and a diminished quality of life.
  4. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 30, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen observed for kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure the fryer with grease was covered and cleaned when not in use. 2. The facility failed to ensure sugar container was sealed. The sugar and four containers in dry storage were not free from white powder on top. 3. Dietary Aide B failed to practice proper hand hygiene during lunch meal preparation on 07/31/24. 4. The facility failed to ensure icing container, chicken broth and beef broth containers were free of crumbs and particles. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination and food-borne illness.
June 14, 2023Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 7, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed, in that: The facility failed to ensure open items in the freezer, refrigerator, and dry food storage were dated and labeled and free from expired foods. These failures could place residents at risk for food borne illness and cross-contamination.
  2. E
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 14, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 3 of 18 Residents (Resident # 15, Resident # 23, and Resident #20) reviewed for accuracy of assessments, in that: 1. The facility failed to update Resident #15's MDS when the resident had not had COVID since 02/01/2023 or sepsis since 11/01/2022. 2. The facility failed to update Resident #23's MDS when the resident had not had COVID since 01/23/2023. 3. The facility failed to update Resident #20's MDS when the resident had not had pneumonia since 03/11/2023. These failures place residents at risk of inaccurate assessments and not receiving appropriate care according to their current status.
  3. D
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    F655 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 14, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care for 1 of 2 (Resident #131) reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility failed to develop a baseline careplan that included the needs of Resident #131's foley catheter. This failure placed residents that admitted to the facility with a foley catheter of having their needs met.

Fire safety inspections

7 fire safety citations on file: 7 on August 1, 2024.

Every fire safety citation7 citations
  1. F
    Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
    K 741 · August 1, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. E
    Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
    K 211 · August 1, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. E
    Have restrictions on the use of flammable curtains.
    K 751 · August 1, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. D
    Provide exit doors that are held open by devices that will automatically close on the activation of a fire alarm or smoke detector.
    K 223 · August 1, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. D
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · August 1, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. D
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · August 1, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. D
    Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
    K 355 · August 1, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeTexasUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.033.393.86
Registered nurses0.520.430.69
All nursing staff on weekends2.592.983.42
Nurse aides1.64
Licensed practical nurses0.88
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)52.8%55.3%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover53.8%54.6%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.97 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.21 on weekdays and 2.59 on weekends, 19% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.13 in April to June 2025 to 3.03 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.030.523.212.59 0.0%0 of 9078
Oct to Dec 20253.020.623.212.55 0.0%0 of 9283
Jul to Sep 20253.100.633.302.58 0.0%0 of 9281
Apr to Jun 20253.130.573.292.74 0.0%0 of 9184
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Texas, Jan to Mar 20263.330.403.502.932.2%0.7% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Nurse aide training here: a state-approved CNA program is listed at this home's address and phone number (state list: HHSC Approved NATCEP Providers, as of October 6, 2026). A nursing home cannot charge aides it employs, or has offered a job, for state-approved training (42 CFR 483.152(c)). See Avir at Paluxy CNA training on CareerFunded, our sister site for career training.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Texas

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Texas, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$18.03$16.97 to $20.7188,680
LPNs and LVNs$29.92$27.46 to $32.8957,560
Registered nurses$46.14$38.06 to $50.53271,380
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Granbury Rehab & Nursing. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeTexasUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
17.115.813.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.30.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.40.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.13.33.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.71.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
18.414.014.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.23.84.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.69.615.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
24.425.723.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
12.512.312.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.32.21.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.12.11.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Granbury Rehab & Nursing's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (49.7% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

49.7% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Texas: 116 better, 50 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 112 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

9.0% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Texas: 0 better, 9 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 119 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

8.0% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Texas: 4 better, 11 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 66 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

53.8% this home

Median of homes: Texas57.3% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 80 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Texas0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 103 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Texas1.3% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 103 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Texas98.5% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 16 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: CORYELL COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AUTHORITY. CMS links this home to Creative Solutions in Healthcare, a group of 149 nursing homes averaging 2.1 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Byrom, DavidW-2 managing employeeIndividual09/01/2014
Byrom, DavidCorporate directorIndividual09/01/2014
Byrom, DavidCorporate officerIndividual09/01/2014
Advanced Hcs LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization10/01/2014
Coryell County Memorial Hospital AuthorityOperational/managerial controlOrganization09/01/2014
Byrom, DavidOperational/managerial controlIndividual09/01/2014
Lichtschein, TeddyOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/01/2021
Meisner, MichaelOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/01/2021
Scheiner, EliezerOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/01/2021

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on December 2, 2025: "Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident."
  2. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on June 2, 2026: "Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards."
  3. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on December 2, 2025: "Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility."
  4. How many nurses and aides work each shift, nights and weekends included?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on June 25, 2026: "Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.59 hours per resident per day, below the Texas average of 2.98.

Other nursing homes nearby

Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Granbury Rehab & Nursing's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Granbury Rehab & Nursing 2 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 1 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Granbury Rehab & Nursing get at its last inspection?
10 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on December 2, 2025. The Texas average is 9.4.
Has Granbury Rehab & Nursing been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Granbury Rehab & Nursing accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Granbury Rehab & Nursing?
CMS lists 9 owners and managers, and links the home to Creative Solutions in Healthcare. Legal business name: CORYELL COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AUTHORITY.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection