Find a nursing home

Home / Mississippi / Brandon

Community Place

116 Lake Vista Place, Brandon, MS 39047 · Rankin County · (601) 355-0617

60 certified beds, about 55 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2002

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
2 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 255285 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on May 21, 2026, inspectors cited 1 health deficiency (the Mississippi average is 6.8, the national average 9.2).

None of its 14 health citations since August 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.77 hours per resident per day, against 4.18 across Mississippi and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.79 of those hours.

44.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Mississippi average 45.7%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 14 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
12D
1E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
May 21, 2026Standard inspection · 1 citation
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 19, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to properly store frozen foods in the freeze for one (1) of four (4) survey days, as evidenced by, unsealed bags in the freezer. This has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Findings Include:Record review of the facility's policy Storage of Frozen Food with a review date of 11/23 revealed The facility ensures the quality and safety of frozen food through accepted storage practices .8. Opened boxes with liners should be closed and sealed tightly with packing tape or twists ties .On 05/18/2026 at 10:15 AM, during the initial tour of the kitchen with the Dietary Manager (DM), nine (9) food items in the freezer were found to not be properly stored. The following items were observed: 1. Red [NAME] sausage in a plastic bag - bag was not sealed. 2. [...]
January 16, 2025Standard inspection · 10 citations
  1. E
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    F578 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 14, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure advance directives were completed and readily available on the charts for seven (7) of twenty-three (23) residents reviewed for advance directives. (Residents #1, 28, 29, 30, 31, 34, and 43)
  2. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 14, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to a dignified existence related to a urinary catheter drainage bag that did not have a privacy covering for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for catheters. (Resident #16)
  3. D
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    F558 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 14, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to accommodate the needs and preferences of residents who required adaptive equipment to take a shower for (1) of (23) sampled residents. Resident #1. Findings Include: A review of the facility policy, Resident Rights,, undated, revealed, Policy Statement .Policy Interpretation and Implementation. 1. Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the residents right to .h. be supported by the facility in exercising his or her rights . On 1/14/25 at 10:38 AM, during an interview with Resident #1, he revealed that he would like to take a shower from time to time. He indicated that he was told there is no shower chair available for him, so he has to rely on bed baths. [...]
  4. D
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    F604 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 14, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from a physical restraint imposed for staff convenience related to fall prevention for one (1) of 23 sampled residents. Resident #52.
  5. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 14, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide nail care to a diabetic resident requiring nail care by a Registered Nurse (RN) for one (1) of 23 residents whose nails were observed. Resident #31.
  6. D
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    F690 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 14, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to prevent possible complications related to a resident with an indwelling suprapubic catheter, as evidenced by the catheter drainage bag coming into direct contact with the floor for one (1) of 1 resident reviewed with a catheter.
  7. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 14, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent possible complications related to the storage of a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) mask, for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for respiratory.
  8. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 14, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications and a medication cart were locked and secured for one (1) of three (3) medication carts observed.
  9. D
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    F838 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 14, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and the Facility Assessment review, the facility failed to ensure all required elements were included in the Facility Assessment, including specific staffing needs by shift, a plan for recruitment and retention of staff, and contingency planning that do not require activation of the facility's emergency plan for three (3) of (3) days of survey. Findings Included: A record review of the facility's Facility Hierarchy (Facility Assessment), signed 7/1/2024, revealed the Plan for average daily schedule of direct care staff to meets in 24-hour period was three (3) Registered Nurses (RNs), seven (7) Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs), and 17 Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs). The assessment did not indicate specific staffing needs for each shift, based on changes to its resident population. [...]
  10. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 14, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene when a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) did not wash her hands or change her gloves during Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) care for one (1) of (1) resident reviewed for care. Resident #22.
August 17, 2023Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 2, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, record reviews and facility policy review the facility failed to implement the comprehensive care plan related to a resident's food preferences for one (1) of 19 sampled residents.
  2. D
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 2, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, record reviews, and facility statement review, the facility failed to ensure an enteral feeding pump was operated by licensed staff for one (1) of two (2) residents observed with Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube feedings. Resident # 43.
  3. D
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    F800 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 2, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to support the nutritional well-being for a resident while respecting an individual's right to make choices about his or her diet for one (1) of 19 residents sampled.

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeMississippiUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.774.183.86
Registered nurses0.790.640.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.473.503.42
Nurse aides2.52
Licensed practical nurses1.47
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)44.2%45.7%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover11.1%38.5%42.9%
Administrators who leftnot reported

CMS expects 3.34 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.30 on weekdays and 3.47 on weekends, 35% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 7.5% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.28 in April to June 2025 to 4.77 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.770.795.303.47 7.5%1 of 9055
Oct to Dec 20255.290.775.873.81 3.3%0 of 9254
Jul to Sep 20255.310.755.963.68 2.9%0 of 9257
Apr to Jun 20255.280.735.913.71 1.9%0 of 9156
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Mississippi, Jan to Mar 20264.090.604.353.446.2%0.1% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeMississippiUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
24.120.513.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.21.40.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.52.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.03.13.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.02.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
21.019.614.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
7.46.34.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
17.721.715.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
18.627.723.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
13.415.512.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.52.41.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.92.91.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: COMMUNITY PLACE.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Hill, CharlesW-2 managing employeeIndividual03/16/2016
Morris, CharlesCorporate directorIndividual08/12/2009
Morris, CharlesCorporate officerIndividual08/12/2009
Shelton, RebeccaCorporate officerIndividual01/01/2016
Community PlaceOperational/managerial controlOrganization12/29/2020

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on January 16, 2025: "Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive."
  2. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on January 16, 2025: "Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable."
  3. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on May 21, 2026: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
  4. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on August 17, 2023: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.47 hours per resident per day, below the Mississippi average of 3.50.

Other nursing homes nearby

Mississippi contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Mississippi. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Community Place's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Community Place 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Community Place get at its last inspection?
1 health deficiency at the standard inspection on May 21, 2026. The Mississippi average is 6.8.
Has Community Place been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Community Place accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Community Place?
CMS lists 5 owners and managers. Legal business name: COMMUNITY PLACE.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection