2304 C R 3000 N, Gifford, IL 61847 · Champaign County · (217) 568-7362
89 certified beds, about 85 residents a day · Non profit - Other · Medicare and Medicaid since 1992
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 145708 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on September 24, 2025, inspectors cited 13 health deficiencies (the Illinois average is 12.6, the national average 9.2).
Of 50 health citations since September 2023, 8 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $150,053 in the last three years; the largest was $76,700, and the latest is dated April 22, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.08 hours per resident per day, against 3.45 across Illinois and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.76 of those hours.
53.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Illinois average 44.5%).
CMS links it to Heritage Operations Group, an affiliated group of 9 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 50 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to report an allegation of physical abuse from a staff member to one (R8) resident to the State Agency and failed to report an allegation of resident (R6) to resident (R9) verbal abuse to the Abuse Coordinator out of five residents reviewed for Abuse in a sample list of nine residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to complete a thorough investigations for allegations of abuse for three (R5, R6, R8) residents out of five residents reviewed for Abuse in a sample list of nine residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to be free from verbal abuse for one (R9) resident by another resident (R6) out of five residents reviewed for Abuse in a sample list of nine residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a safe transfer for one (R8) resident causing a bruise out of five residents reviewed for Abuse in a sample list of nine residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide timely incontinence care and failed to prevent cross contamination during incontinence care for one (R2) resident out of three residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) in a sample list of nine residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for two (R4 and R6) of three residents reviewed for resident-to-resident physical contact on a sample list of three residents. The facility failed to assess, care plan, and implement effective interventions following repeated altercations. This failure resulted in a physical injury (skin tear) to R6, with actual harm.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate behavioral health services were provided for two (R4 and R6) of three residents reviewed for behavioral concerns, when the facility failed to implement effective behavioral health interventions, failed to provide coordinated behavioral health services, and failed to ensure adequate assessment and communication regarding psychotropic medication management. These failures resulted in continued unsafe behaviors and a resident-to-resident physical altercation that caused actual harm (skin tear) to R6. Findings Include:Facility has no Policy on Behavioral ServicesReview of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed R4 had diagnoses including Frontotemporal Neurocognitive Disorder, Dementia with Agitation, Mood Disorder, and Anxiety Disorder. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure physician-ordered direction and care planning for an indwelling urinary catheter and failed to maintain an accurate and updated care plan reflecting the resident's current clinical condition and skin integrity needs. This deficient practice affected one resident (R1) of three residents on sampled list reviewed. Findings Include: R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1's diagnoses include Malignant Neoplasm of the Colon, Malignant Neoplasm of the Breast, Chronic Diastolic Heart Failure, Hypertension, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Kidney Failure, Neuromuscular Dysfunction of the Bladder, Generalized Weakness, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy, and is receiving hospice/palliative care services. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pain medication was administered as ordered for one (R6) of three residents reviewed for medication administration in the sample of 23.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent a fall for one resident (R1) of three residents reviewed for falls in a sample list of three residents. This failure caused R1 to fall sustaining an acute nasal Fracture and a laceration to (R1's) nose requiring five sutures to close. Findings Include:R1's Care Plan updated 10/14/25 includes the following diagnoses: Osteoarthritis, Heart Disease, Lumbar Disc Displacement, Anxiety, Vertigo, Repeated Falls, Glaucoma, Type II Diabetes, Difficulty in Walking, and Psychotic Disturbance with Hallucinations. R1 Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] document R1 as being at high risk for falls and having a recent history of falls. R1 has current physician's orders for the following narcotics and psychotropic medications: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to dignity while dining for R20, and by staff talking on cell phones during resident care for R8, R43, and R58. These failures affected four out of 29 residents (R20, R8, R43, and R58) reviewed for dignified care on the sample list of 31.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to choose their own wake -up time. This failure affected four of 29 residents (R8, R43, R58 and R74) reviewed for resident rights on the sample list of 31.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure care plans were comprehensive to include medications, diagnoses, behaviors, accidents/injuries, and incontinence for three of 18 residents (R6, R8, R45) reviewed for care plans in the sample list of 31. The facility's Care Plan policy dated November 2017 documents A Comprehensive person-centered care plan shall be developed and implemented to meet the resident's preferences and goals, and address the resident's medical, physical, mental and psychosocial needs, while honoring resident rights to choice. This care plan shall include goals, measurable objectives, and interventions to meet identified resident needs. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility repeatedly failed to follow a physician order to discontinue the administration of a medication, for one of five residents (R69) reviewed for unnecessary medications on the sample list of 31.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow pharmacy instruction for the safe administration of physician ordered medication, for two of eight residents (R66 and R78) reviewed during medication observation. These failures resulted in three errors out of 29 opportunities for a 10.39 percent medication administration error rate.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to respond to a resident grievance in a timely manner, for one of four residents (R58) reviewed for grievances in the group meeting, on the sample list of 31.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin to the administrator and the state survey agency for one of one resident (R6) reviewed for abuse in the sample list of 31.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to investigate an injury of unknown origin for one of one resident (R6) reviewed for abuse in the sample list of 31.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to revise a care plan with fall interventions for one of 18 residents (R4) reviewed for care plans in the sample list of 31.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent cross-contamination during catheter care for one of two residents (R53) reviewed for urinary catheter care on the sample list of 31. Findings Include:R53's Medical Diagnoses List dated May 20, 2025 documents R53 is diagnosed with Infection and inflammatory reactions due to indwelling urethral catheter and Retention of urine. R53's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R53 has severe cognitive impairment, uses a wheelchair, is always incontinent of bowel, and is dependent on staff for toileting, hygiene, and transfers. R53's Care Plan dated 7/29/25 documents R53 has an indwelling Foley catheter. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to monitor and record weights and meal intakes for one of three residents (R45) reviewed for weight loss in the sample list of 31.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to change the oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle for one (R63) of three residents reviewed for respiratory care on the sample list of 31.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to accurately transcribe hospital discharge orders resulting in a significant medication error for one of five residents (R6) reviewed for unnecessary medications in the sample list of 31.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan for elopement risk and the use of a departure alert system. This failure affects two (R1 and R3) of three residents reviewed for supervision in the sample list of three.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to provide one staff assistance to prevent a fall for one (R1) of three residents reviewed for accidents in the sample list of five.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to supervise a resident after providing the resident with a hot beverage. This failure affects one (R504) is one of three residents reviewed for supervision in the sample of 3. This failure resulted in R504 spilling hot liquid on R504's lap sustaining redness and 6 blistered areas to R504's bilateral upper extremities requiring subsequent treatment for 3days. Findings Include: R504's Facility Census documents R504 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has the following medical diagnoses: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide targeted interventions to prevent skin breakdown, failed to assess, evaluate and document resident skin on a regular basis, and failed to obtain appropriate treatment orders for pressure ulcers for two (R20, R58) of five residents reviewed for pressure ulcers from a total sample list of 44 residents. These failures resulted in one resident (R20) developing a new, unstagable, deep tissue injury and a second resident (R58) developing seven, new stage two pressure wounds.
Inspectors wroteFailures at this level require more than one deficient practice statement. A. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to monitor a resident (R22), with Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), after administering oral medication. This failure affects one resident (R22) of 7 residents reviewed for medication administration in the sample list of 44. R22 experienced a choking episode when staff had left R22's room after oral medication administration. Upon staff hearing R22's coughing, staff returned to R22's room and performed the Heimlich Maneuver to expel the tablet from R22. B. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to thoroughly investigate falls and document falls in the resident's medical record for one (R17) of nine residents reviewed for accidents in the sample list of 44.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to develop, implement, measure, act on or analyze a performance improvement program project in the last twelve months. This failure has the potential to affect all 85 residents who reside in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to store, handle, and launder linens that were potentially exposed to scabies. This failure has the potential to affect all 85 residents who reside in the facility. The facility also failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions for two (R4, R39) of six residents reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions from a total sample list of 44 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to administer medications timely and according to physician's orders and manufacturer's instructions for four (R17, R61, R42, R4) of seven residents reviewed for medication administration in the sample list of 44. These failures resulted in eight medication errors out of 25 opportunities, a 32% medication error rate.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain resident's furniture in a clean manner for two of 24 residents (R74, R61) reviewed for clean, comfortable, homelike environment in the sample list of 44.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from restraint by not having a Physician's Order, a signed consent form for a restraint and to complete restraint reduction attempts. This affects one of one resident(R74) reviewed for restraints in the sample list of 44.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement hearing devices and develop a care plan for hearing loss for one (R39) of one resident reviewed for communication in the sample list of 44.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to check and record gastric residual volume to verify gastrostomy tube placement, and administer and record water flushes and enteral feeding amounts for one (R39) of one resident reviewed for gastrostomy tube in the sample of 44.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to label, store, and change oxygen and nebulizer tubing for three (R17, R39, R84) of three residents reviewed for respiratory care in the sample of 44.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement infection control measures to prevent the spread of COVID-19 (Human Coronavirus Infection) by failing to stock isolation carts with N95 masks, ensure isolation signage was posted, and ensure staff discarded personal protective equipment (PPE) upon leaving COVID-19 positive resident rooms. The facility also failed to complete COVID-19 symptom monitoring for residents having COVID-19. These failures affect five (R1, R2, R4, R5, R6) of six residents reviewed for infection control in the sample list of eight.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident (R2) was not subjected to physical abuse by (R1). R2 is one of 4 residents reviewed for abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to prevent misappropriation of medications for five (R1, R2, R3, R4 and R5) of five residents reviewed for misappropriation of medications from a total sample list of five residents reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to follow their abuse policy by employing a nurse with a history of disciplinary action on their license. This failure affects five (R1, R2, R3, R4 and R5) of five residents reviewed for abuse on the sample of five residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to dispose of narcotics as directed by their policy. This failure has the potential to affect one (R1) of five residents reviewed for medication disposal on the sample list of five.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide effective pain control and positioning aids for R50. The facility also failed to follow physician orders for R44. R44 and R50 are two of two hospice residents reviewed from a total sample list of 36. These failures resulted in R50 experiencing uncontrolled pain by grimacing, moaning, and closing her eyes while wound treatments were performed on a stage three and an unstageable wound.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to identify significant weight loss, prevent significant weight loss, develop/implement a care plan including interventions for weight loss, implement nutritional interventions/recommendations, timely implement physician's orders, and report significant weight loss to the physician and registered dietitian for two of five residents (R45, R83) reviewed for nutrition in the sample list of 36. These failures resulted in R45 experiencing a severe weight loss of 13.73 % (percent) in four months.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure quarterly Quality Assurance (QA) meetings included all required committee members. This failure affects all 81 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to timely administer pneumococcal vaccines to ensure residents are up to date with pneumococcal vaccinations for five (R52, R12, R44, R64, R45) of seven residents reviewed for immunizations in the sample list of 36.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to assess two of two residents (R47, R58) reviewed for safe self-administration of medication in the sample list of 36. Findings Include: The facility's policy Self-Administration of medications reviewed 12/05 states if the resident wishes to self-medicate, the interdisciplinary team (IDT) must assess the resident's cognitive, physical, and visual abilities. 1.) On 9/12/23 at 9:50AM, R47 was in bed finishing breakfast. There was a pill cup with several pills on the bed side table. R47 dumped the pills in R47's mouth and swallowed them with water. R47 stated the nurse leaves my pills here so I can take them after I eat. On 9/12/23 at 10:00AM V6 (Registered Nurse/RN) stated I left (R47's) medication so (R47) could take it after (R47) was finished eating. I thought I could just keep an eye on (R47) from the hall. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to complete pressure ulcer risk assessments, routinely assess pressure ulcers, update a care plan to include a pressure ulcer and new pressure relieving interventions, and ensure a pressure ulcer was covered with a dressing for resident's wounds. This failure affects three of seven residents (R61, R10, R77) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample list of 36.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to complete fall investigations, develop, and implement fall interventions for one of three residents (R77) reviewed for falls in the sample list of 36.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to secure R24's catheter and failed to provide R24 with hygienic perineal care during catheter care and failed to prevent R77's catheter from dragging on the floor for two of two (R24, R77) residents reviewed for catheter care and urinary tract infections from a total sample list of 36.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain a gastrostomy (G-tube) site in a clean sanitary manner for one resident (R38) of one resident reviewed for gastrostomy tubes in a sample list of 36. Findings Include: The facility's policy Enteral/ Tube Feeding Policy dated 2/26/15 states Routine care such as cleansing the healed insertion site and provision of oral hygiene may be performed by non-licensed staff under the supervision of licensed staff following facility procedure. This policy also states, To discourage the transmission of infection, residents receiving tube feedings will receive daily hygiene and skin care to site utilized for feeding. R38's Current physician's orders includes an order to Monitor stoma for cleanliness. Clean as needed. [...]
6 fire safety citations on file: 1 on October 23, 2024, 1 on September 13, 2023, 4 on August 19, 2022.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| April 22, 2026 | Fine | $76,700 |
| April 22, 2026 | Payment Denial | 23 days from May 19, 2026 |
| October 23, 2024 | Fine | $73,353 |
| October 23, 2024 | Payment Denial | 42 days from November 21, 2024 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Illinois | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.08 | 3.45 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.81 | 3.07 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.00 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.32 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 53.6% | 44.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 60.0% | 41.8% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.03 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.19 on weekdays and 2.81 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 16.7% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.28 in April to June 2025 to 3.08 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.08 | 0.76 | 3.19 | 2.81 | 16.7% | 0 of 90 | 85 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.28 | 0.87 | 3.40 | 2.98 | 20.0% | 0 of 92 | 81 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.15 | 0.69 | 3.23 | 2.95 | 20.4% | 0 of 92 | 83 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.28 | 0.58 | 3.38 | 3.06 | 14.4% | 0 of 91 | 83 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Illinois, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.26 | 0.65 | 3.40 | 2.92 | 5.4% | 0.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Illinois, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.10 | $18.95 to $23.26 | 68,640 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $36.06 | $30.57 to $38.25 | 17,440 |
| Registered nurses | $46.15 | $38.47 to $50.94 | 138,910 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Illinois | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 26.3 | 13.4 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.7 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.3 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 2.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 25.3 | 14.3 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.4 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.7 | 21.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 18.7 | 26.1 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.6 | 13.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.3 | 2.0 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.5 | 2.2 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Country Health's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (50.9% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
50.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Illinois: 106 better, 85 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 54 eligible stays.
10.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Illinois: 2 better, 14 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 83 eligible stays.
6.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Illinois: 3 better, 10 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 41 eligible stays.
22.9% this home
Median of homes: Illinois50.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 35 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Illinois0.3% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 45 residents counted.
5.6% this home
Median of homes: Illinois1.5% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 45 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Illinois100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 11 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: COUNTRY HEALTH, INC.. CMS links this home to Heritage Operations Group, a group of 9 nursing homes averaging 2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Country Health, Inc. | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 10/13/2016 | |
| Dorsey, Jamie | Corporate director | Individual | 02/25/2022 | |
| Flessner, Mary | Corporate director | Individual | 02/25/2022 | |
| Harris, Jackie | Corporate director | Individual | 02/25/2022 | |
| Hethke, Celia | Corporate director | Individual | 02/24/2022 | |
| McDowell, Catherine | Corporate director | Individual | 05/01/2023 | |
| Osterbur, Deanna | Corporate director | Individual | 10/13/2016 | |
| Osterbur, Rod | Corporate director | Individual | 10/13/2016 | |
| Ray, Darrin | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Roseman, Koleen | Corporate director | Individual | 02/25/2022 | |
| Voudrie, Candice | Corporate director | Individual | 07/06/2025 | |
| Curry, Daniel | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/07/2022 | |
| Heritage Operations Group, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 10/13/2016 | |
| Hart, Benjamin | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/05/2014 | |
| Heritage Operations Group, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/02/2025 | |
| Ray, Darrin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/30/2025 | |
| Voudrie, Candice | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/30/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Illinois. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.