Find a nursing home

Home / Idaho / Rupert

Countryside Care & Rehabilitation

1224 Eighth Street, Rupert, ID 83350 · Minidoka County · (208) 434-0232

36 certified beds, about 28 residents a day · Government - County · Medicare and Medicaid since 1976

Inside a hospital Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
2 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 135064 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on September 10, 2025, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the Idaho average is 10.3, the national average 9.2).

None of its 19 health citations since January 2020 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.66 hours per resident per day, against 4.04 across Idaho and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.94 of those hours.

97.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Idaho average 50.3%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 19 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
12D
2E
4F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
1C
September 10, 2025Standard inspection · 8 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, policy review, and review of the Idaho Food Code, the facility failed to ensure staff wore beard nets in the kitchen and appropriately stored, distributed, and labeled foods. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who received meals prepared in the facility's kitchen. This placed residents at risk for potential contamination and use of spoiled foods, and adverse health outcomes including food-borne illnesses.
  2. F
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    F814 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, Department of Health and Welfare - Idaho Administrative rules, and U.S. Food and Drug Administration 2022 Food Code review, the facility failed to ensure garbage cans were properly closed with lids to minimize attracting pests and rodents into the kitchen. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents and staff in the facility. This placed residents and staff at risk of potential food contamination from bugs and rodents that may enter the kitchen due to the open garbage containers.
  3. D
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    F578 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, State Operations Manual Appendix PP-Guidance to Surveyors for Long Term Care Facilities, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents and their representatives received assistance to exercise their right to formulate an Advance Directive. This was true for 1 of 12 Residents (Resident #3) whose records were reviewed for Advance Directive. This deficient practice created the potential for harm or adverse outcomes if residents' wishes were not followed or documented regarding their advance care planning.
  4. D
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    F582 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide the Advance Beneficiary Notice (CMS-10055 form) for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) whose medical records were reviewed for beneficiary protection notification. This deficient practice had the potential to cause financial harm or distress for residents when they were not informed of their potential liability for payment when their Medicare Part A benefits ended.
  5. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on facility standing orders, record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to follow facility bowel care standing order of delivering specific medications when residents do not have BM within 24, 48, and 72 hours for 4 of 7 Residents (#1, #18, #24, and #26) who records were reviewed for bowel and bladder care. This failed practice created the potential for residents to experience discomfort when medications were not administered according to the physician's order.
  6. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, policy review, record review, and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide respiratory services as ordered by the physician. This was true for 4 of 5 residents (#4, #13, #19, and #26) whose records were reviewed for respiratory services. This failure created the potential for residents to experience respiratory related infections, increased fatigue, and low oxygen levels.
  7. D
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    F700 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on policy review, record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that prior to the placement of bed rails, alternatives to bed rails were attempted and how the alternatives failed to meet the resident's assessed needs. This was true for 4 of 6 residents (#6, #7, #8, and #32) reviewed for bed rails. This failure created the potential for harm due to the risk for injury, entrapment and/or death.
  8. D
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure controlled medications were tracked and kept secure from potential theft and/or diversion. This was true for 1 of 1 medication cart reviewed. This failure created the potential for undetected misuse and/or diversion of controlled medications and had the potential to affect all residents who received controlled medication in the facility.
September 19, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 4 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 14, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to properly sanitize the thermometer used to take temperatures of the food. These failures had the potential to increase the risk of foodborne illnesses and infection for all residents receiving food from the facility kitchen.
  2. D
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    F610 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 14, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an injury of unknown origin for one resident (Residents (R)20) out of two residents reviewed for abuse out of a total sample of 14 residents. This failure created the potential for residents to be, or to continue to be, abused/neglected.
  3. D
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 14, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations, interviews, and review of the National Institute of Health (NIH) guidance, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of care were met for one resident (Residents (R)14) of one resident observed receiving medication through a gastrostomy (G) tube out of a total sample of 14 residents. This failure created the potential for R14 to have unwanted complications related to administration of her medication.
  4. D
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    F700 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 14, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident (R) 14) of seven residents reviewed for accidents had been assessed for the use of side rails, had risk and benefits discussed with her representative, and/or obtained informed consent for the use of side rails out of a total sample of 14 residents This failure created the potential for the resident to experience negative effects/risks associated with the use of the rails unnecessarily.
January 24, 2020Standard inspection · 7 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 28, 2020
    Inspectors wroteBased on policy review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure measures were in place to prevent possible cross-contamination of dirty to clean areas in the kitchen. This had the potential to affect the 39 residents residing in the facility who consumed food prepared by the facility. This failure created the potential for contamination if residents contracted food-borne illnesses.
  2. E
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    F578 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 28, 2020
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident records included an Advance Directive. This was true for 4 of 12 residents (#5, #9, #10, #25) whose records were reviewed for Advance Directives. This failed practice created the potential for harm if residents' wishes regarding end of life or emergent care were not honored if they became unable to make their wishes known.
  3. E
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    F758 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 28, 2020
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, record review, and policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure as needed psychotropic medications had a physician evaluation or documented rationale when the medication order extended beyond 14 days, and documentation of consent from the resident before administering the psychotropic medications. This was true for 4 of 6 residents (#3, #10, #12, and #139) who were reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice created the potential for harm if residents experienced adverse effects from unnecessary psychotropic medications.
  4. D
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    F625 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 28, 2020
    Inspectors wroteBased on policy review, record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a bed hold notice was provided to residents and their representatives upon transfer to the hospital. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #12) who was reviewed for transfer. This deficient practice created the potential for harm if residents and their representatives were not informed of the residents' rights to return to their former bed/room at the facility within a specified time.
  5. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 28, 2020
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, policy review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure professional standards were met for bowel care. This was true for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #8) who were reviewed for bowel and bladder incontinence. This failed practice had the potential to place residents at risk for fecal impaction when orders were not followed regarding bowel management.
  6. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 28, 2020
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to securely store controlled medications. This was true for 1 of 2 medication rooms, observed during the inspection of the medication storage areas. This failed practice created the potential for harm if the controlled medication was diverted or contaminated.
  7. C
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    F732 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 28, 2020
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, policy review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the nurse staffing information was posted daily per shift in a clear and easy to understand format. This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility and their representatives, visitors, and others who wanted to know the facility's staffing levels.

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeIdahoUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)5.664.043.86
Registered nurses0.940.860.69
All nursing staff on weekends5.053.493.42
Nurse aides3.97
Licensed practical nurses0.76
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)97.9%50.3%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover87.5%40.9%42.9%
Administrators who left1

CMS expects 3.65 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.91 on weekdays and 5.05 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 6.29 in April to June 2025 to 5.66 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20265.660.945.915.05 0.0%0 of 9028
Oct to Dec 20256.170.946.445.47 0.0%0 of 9225
Jul to Sep 20256.040.816.265.46 0.0%1 of 9226
Apr to Jun 20256.290.746.625.45 0.0%8 of 9126
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Idaho, Jan to Mar 20263.900.804.113.374.9%0.2% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Idaho

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Idaho, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$18.58$17.45 to $22.237,910
LPNs and LVNs$30.67$28.04 to $35.601,880
Registered nurses$44.45$38.90 to $49.1916,880
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Countryside Care & Rehabilitation. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeIdahoUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
29.315.613.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
8.61.20.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.12.01.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
8.43.03.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
22.816.114.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.33.24.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
18.720.115.4

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Countryside Care & Rehabilitation's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

CMS reports none of these results for this home: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: MINIDOKA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
County of Minidoka5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%07/01/1978
Bailey, JoshuaCorporate directorIndividual10/01/2025
Bean, BeckyCorporate directorIndividual11/03/2025
Kapple, NathanCorporate directorIndividual10/01/2025
Miller, RhettCorporate directorIndividual10/01/2025
Molina, DavidCorporate directorIndividual10/01/2025
Percell, JustinCorporate directorIndividual10/01/2025
Poteet, FeliciaCorporate directorIndividual10/01/2025
Legel, TomCorporate officerIndividual12/01/2025
Blanchard, LaceyOperational/managerial controlIndividual02/01/2025
Steel, TysonOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2025
County of MinidokaAdp of the SNFOrganization07/01/1969
Blanchard, LaceyAdp of the SNFIndividual02/01/2025
Steel, TysonAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2025

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on September 10, 2025: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
  2. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on September 10, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
  3. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on September 10, 2025: "Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive."
  4. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on September 10, 2025: "Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist."
  5. How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

Idaho contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Idaho. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Countryside Care & Rehabilitation's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Countryside Care & Rehabilitation 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Countryside Care & Rehabilitation get at its last inspection?
8 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on September 10, 2025. The Idaho average is 10.3.
Has Countryside Care & Rehabilitation been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Countryside Care & Rehabilitation accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Countryside Care & Rehabilitation?
CMS lists 14 owners and managers. Legal business name: MINIDOKA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection