Find a nursing home

Home / New York / Albany

Daughters of Sarah Nursing Center

180 Washington Ave Ext, Albany, NY 12203 · Albany County · (518) 456-7831

210 certified beds, about 204 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1976

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
3 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 335465 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on September 9, 2024, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the New York average is 8.1, the national average 9.2).

None of its 13 health citations since May 2019 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.50 hours per resident per day, against 3.63 across New York and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.35 of those hours.

42.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (New York average 40.3%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 13 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
9D
4E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
May 29, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    F580 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 24, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews conducted during a survey, the facility failed to immediately notify the resident's legal representative of a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status, for one (1) out of three (3) residents reviewed for notification of changes. Specifically, when Resident #1 experienced a vasovagal episode (a sudden, temporary drop in heart rate and blood pressure that reduces blood flow to the brain, leading to brief fainting) and episodes of vomiting on 05/14/2026, Family Member #2 was not notified.
September 9, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 4 citations
  1. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 20, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record reviews conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure treatment with respect, dignity, and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for 3 (Resident #'s 33, 86 and 197) of 35 residents reviewed for dignity. Specifically, (a.) Resident #33 stated Certified Nurse Aide #3's tone of voice was rude, they felt rushed during care and requested Certified Nurse Aide #3 not to be assigned to them as caregiver; (b.) Resident #86 stated they waited a long time for care and then the care was rushed; (c.) Resident #197 stated Certified Nurse Aide #3 was argumentative and used inappropriate language. This is evidenced by: [...]
  2. D
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    F561 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 20, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not promoted and facilitated the residents right to self-determination through support of resident choice. Specifically, the facility did not provide accommodations for heating of food brought to residents from outside the facility. This was evident for Resident #5. This is evidenced by: Facility's policy titled, Resident Personal Food and dated 11/2021, documented resident personal food (food not provided by facility) should be ready to eat, requiring little or no preparation. Food requiring refrigeration may be stored in the unit kitchenette refrigerator or personal refrigerator provided by resident/resident representative. Resident personal food could not require re-heating. [...]
  3. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 20, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored in accordance with professional standards of practice. Specifically, (a.) opened medications had no open and/or expiration dates; (b.) pre-poured medication cup was noted in medication cart (c.); medication refrigerator temperature was outside of therapeutic range; and (d.) non-medication items were stored in medication cart for 2 (Green and Purple unit medication carts) of 3 medication carts reviewed and 3 (Green, Red, and Purple) of 3 medication storage rooms reviewed. This is evidenced by: The facility's Medication Administration Guidelines, last reviewed 2/2024, Section III. [...]
  4. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 20, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure infection prevention control practices were followed to help prevent the spread, development, and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the staff did not put on and take off personal protective equipment correctly when entering and exiting the room of a COVID-19 positive resident. This was evident for 1 of 5 resident units observed. This is evidenced by: The Centers for Disease Control document titled Sequence for Putting on Personal Protective equipment (PPE) stated the correct sequence for putting on personal protective equipment was gown, mask or respirator, goggles, or face shield, then gloves. The document stated the correct sequence for removing personal protective equipment was gloves, goggles or face shield, gown, and then mask or respirator. [...]
October 2, 2023Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 20, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (Case #NY00260768), the facility did not ensure that each resident was treated with respect and dignity for 1 (Resident #4) of 4 residents reviewed. Specifically, the facility did not ensure Resident #4 was treated with respect and dignity on 7/17/2020, when the resident had wandered onto the Blue unit and was escorted inappropriately by the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 back to the Gold unit. LPN #3 forcefully grabbed the resident from behind and dragged them towards the Gold unit. This is evidenced by: Refer to F684 Resident #4: Resident #4 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of dementia with behavioral disturbance, recurrent major depressive disorder, and unsteadiness on feet. The MDS dated [DATE], documented the resident had severe cognitive impairment. [...]
  2. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 17, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (Case #s NY00310437 and NY00260768), the facility did not ensure each resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive care plan (CCP) for 2 (Resident #s 2 and 4) of 4 residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #2 was assessed upon admission with having 3 surgical wounds and a total of 8 staples, following repair of a left hip fracture (a break that occurs in the upper part of the thigh bone). The CCP did not document the location, number of surgical wounds, and the number of staples in the wounds. The facility did not ensure all staples were removed on 12/23/2022, as ordered by the Orthopedic provider. On 1/9/2023, the resident was discharged to another facility. The receiving facility assessed the resident with having 4 staples in their left hip. [...]
October 18, 2021Standard inspection · 4 citations
  1. E
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    F813 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 30, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure the policy regarding foods brought to residents is in accordance with adopted regulations. Specifically, the policy does not include a procedure to ensure all residents have the necessary assistance in accessing and consuming food brought to them by visitors. This is evidenced is as follows. Record review of the facility policy for food brought in by visitors was reviewed on 10/12/2021. This policy did not include a procedure to assist residents that are unable on their own to access and consume food brought to them by visitors. The Director of Nursing stated in an interview on 10/13/2021 at 1:05 PM, that the policy for food brought to residents does not include guidelines on how staff dependent residents will access and consume food brought to them. [...]
  2. E
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    F814 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 30, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview during the recertification survey, the facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. Specifically, the trash compactor was not clean and the area around the compactor was not maintained. This is evidenced as follows. The trash compactor was inspected on 10/12/2021 at 9:30 AM, revealing that the trash compactor, the area under the trash compactor, the walls in the trash compactor access room, and the trash compactor access portal were heavily soiled with a black build-up. The Director of Building Services stated in an interview on 10/01/2020 at 2:45 PM, that the facility will develop a regular cleaning schedule for the trash compactor with the Director of Dining Services. [...]
  3. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 30, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview during a recertification survey on 10/12/2021, the facility did not ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 2 (Resident #'s 45 and 55) of 33 residents reviewed. Specifically: For Resident #45, the facility did not ensure that an assessment was made following the loss of the resident's lower denture, regarding whether the resident was able to eat and maintain adequate nutrition, whether the resident needed a dietary alteration in the consistency of their diet to accommodate the loss of the denture and did not identify or address the decrease in the percentages of meals eaten and the progressive weight loss (31.2 pounds) from the time period the resident's lower denture was missing on 8/6/2021 through 9/15/2021; [...]
  4. D
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    F790 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 30, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility did not promptly, within 3 days, refer residents with lost or damaged dentures for dental services. Specifically, for one (Resident #45) of one resident reviewed for dental services, the facility did not ensure a referral to a dentist was made within 3 days when facilty staff noted Resident #45's lower denture was missing. This is evidenced by: Resident #45: Resident #45 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses of cellulitis of the left lower extremity, hypertension, and lymphedema. The Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool) dated 8/5/2021, documented the resident's cognition was intact, was able to make self understood and able to understand others. [...]
May 24, 2019Standard inspection · 2 citations
  1. E
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 22, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interview, during a recertification survey the facility did not ensure that comprehensive person-centered care plans were developed and implemented for each resident consistent with the resident rights set forth that include measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for four (4) (Residents #'s 29, 92, 145 and #173) of thirty-five (35) residents reviewed. Specifically; [...]
  2. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 22, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview during the recertification survey, the facility did not maintain an infection control program to prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection for three (3) (Resident #'s 12, 174 and #299) of 7 residents reviewed. Specifically; for Resident #174, the facility did not ensure standard precautions were maintained during a dressing change to the resident's non-pressure ulcer, for Resident #12, the facility did not ensure standard precautions were maintained during a dressing change to the 3 pressure ulcers on the resident's upper and lower left hip, and for Resident #299, the facility did not ensure the resident's oxygen tubing was kept off the floor. This is evidenced by: Resident #12: This resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of vascular dementia, dysphagia, and muscle wasting atrophy. [...]

Fire safety inspections

6 fire safety citations on file: 1 on September 9, 2024, 2 on October 18, 2021, 3 on May 24, 2019.

Every fire safety citation6 citations
  1. E
    Have exits that are accessible at all times.
    K 271 · September 9, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. E
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · October 18, 2021 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. E
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · October 18, 2021 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. E
    Establish policies and procedures for volunteers.
    E 24 · May 24, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. E
    Have a battery powered remote alarm panel in a location accessible by operating personnel.
    K 916 · May 24, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. E
    Ensure that testing and maintenance of electrical equipment is performed.
    K 921 · May 24, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeNew YorkUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.503.633.86
Registered nurses0.350.710.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.153.183.42
Nurse aides2.08
Licensed practical nurses1.07
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)42.3%40.3%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover30.4%39.8%42.9%
Administrators who left1

CMS expects 3.33 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.64 on weekdays and 3.15 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 1.5% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.77 in April to June 2025 to 3.50 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.500.353.643.15 1.5%0 of 90204
Oct to Dec 20253.550.373.683.24 0.0%0 of 92201
Jul to Sep 20253.770.423.903.43 0.0%0 of 92200
Apr to Jun 20253.770.393.933.38 0.0%0 of 91199
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
New York, Jan to Mar 20263.550.683.723.139.8%0.1% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Trains nurse aides: this home runs a state-approved CNA program for its own hires (state list: NYS DOH Nurse Aide Training Programs (nursing homes), as of October 1, 2026). A nursing home cannot charge aides it employs, or has offered a job, for state-approved training (42 CFR 483.152(c)). See Daughters of Sarah Nursing Center CNA training on CareerFunded, our sister site for career training.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for New York

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
New York, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$23.36$21.04 to $24.9987,990
LPNs and LVNs$32.30$29.52 to $37.0039,400
Registered nurses$52.62$45.60 to $62.34205,810
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Daughters of Sarah Nursing Center. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeNew YorkUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
14.914.113.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.10.50.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.91.31.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.13.13.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.21.21.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
15.212.514.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.66.54.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
13.513.715.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
19.520.623.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
7.69.612.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.31.71.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
0.51.41.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Daughters of Sarah Nursing Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it worse than the national rate (39.1% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

39.1% this home

Worse than the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · New York: 101 better, 157 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 389 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

10.1% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · New York: 12 better, 5 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 366 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

6.6% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · New York: 7 better, 21 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 228 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

59.2% this home

Median of homes: New York60.6% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 169 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.0% this home

Median of homes: New York0.6% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 202 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

4.2% this home

Median of homes: New York2.0% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 202 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

100.0% this home

Median of homes: New York98.5% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 60 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: DAUGHTERS OF SARAH NURSING CENTER INC.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Brodsky, LilithManaging control - governing bodyIndividual06/19/2023
Grossman, JeffreyManaging control - governing bodyIndividual06/18/2007
Huz, JonathanManaging control - governing bodyIndividual06/17/2024
Jacobs, EdwardManaging control - governing bodyIndividual06/15/2015
Kaback, LeeManaging control - governing bodyIndividual06/20/2022
Kadish, DavidManaging control - governing bodyIndividual06/21/2021
Levy, StephenManaging control - governing bodyIndividual06/17/2019
Magidson, BeverlyManaging control - governing bodyIndividual06/21/2021
Mozer, PaulManaging control - governing bodyIndividual06/20/2022
Pollack, BarryManaging control - governing bodyIndividual06/20/2022
Reich, HerbertManaging control - governing bodyIndividual06/16/2025
Salmon, DelManaging control - governing bodyIndividual06/19/2023
Shrager, StevenManaging control - governing bodyIndividual06/16/2025
Sokol, RebekahManaging control - governing bodyIndividual06/17/2024
Zackon, IraManaging control - governing bodyIndividual06/21/2021
Weisblatt, SamuelCorporate directorIndividual07/07/2025
Mulson, AnneCorporate officerIndividual10/02/2000
Marrello, LisaOperational/managerial controlIndividual08/09/2019
Mirza, AliOperational/managerial controlIndividual04/02/2018
Mulson, AnneOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/02/2000
Regan, MichaelOperational/managerial controlIndividual03/30/1987
Smith, SamanthaOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/02/2022
Stryker, MarcyOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/12/2021
Yorker, RuthOperational/managerial controlIndividual09/16/2024
Bonadio & Co LLPAdp of the SNFOrganization01/01/2025
Select Rehabilitation, LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization02/12/2025
Brodsky, LilithAdp of the SNFIndividual06/19/2023
Grossman, JeffreyAdp of the SNFIndividual06/18/2007
Huz, JonathanAdp of the SNFIndividual06/17/2024
Jacobs, EdwardAdp of the SNFIndividual06/15/2015
Kaback, LeeAdp of the SNFIndividual06/20/2022
Kadish, DavidAdp of the SNFIndividual06/21/2021
Levy, StephenAdp of the SNFIndividual06/17/2019
Magidson, BeverlyAdp of the SNFIndividual06/21/2021
Marrello, LisaAdp of the SNFIndividual08/09/2019
Mirza, AliAdp of the SNFIndividual04/02/2018
Mozer, PaulAdp of the SNFIndividual06/20/2022
Mulson, AnneAdp of the SNFIndividual10/02/2000
Pollack, BarryAdp of the SNFIndividual06/20/2022
Regan, MichaelAdp of the SNFIndividual03/30/1987
Reich, HerbertAdp of the SNFIndividual06/16/2025
Salmon, DelAdp of the SNFIndividual06/19/2023
Shrager, StevenAdp of the SNFIndividual06/16/2025
Smith, SamanthaAdp of the SNFIndividual06/01/2022
Sokol, RebekahAdp of the SNFIndividual06/17/2024
Stryker, MarcyAdp of the SNFIndividual07/12/2021
Weisblatt, SamuelAdp of the SNFIndividual07/07/2025
Yorker, RuthAdp of the SNFIndividual09/16/2024
Zackon, IraAdp of the SNFIndividual06/21/2021

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on May 29, 2026: "Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident."
  2. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on October 2, 2023: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
  3. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on September 9, 2024: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  4. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on October 18, 2021: "Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.15 hours per resident per day, below the New York average of 3.18.
  6. How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

Assisted living in Albany

Licensed assisted living homes in the same town or within 5 miles, each with its New York inspection record.

Assisted living in New York

New York contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in New York. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Daughters of Sarah Nursing Center's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Daughters of Sarah Nursing Center 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Daughters of Sarah Nursing Center get at its last inspection?
4 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on September 9, 2024. The New York average is 8.1.
Has Daughters of Sarah Nursing Center been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Daughters of Sarah Nursing Center accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Daughters of Sarah Nursing Center?
CMS lists 49 owners and managers. Legal business name: DAUGHTERS OF SARAH NURSING CENTER INC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection