320 Albany Street, Dayton, OH 45417 · Montgomery County · (937) 496-6200
68 certified beds, about 59 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1998
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 366157 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 1, 2025, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).
None of its 23 health citations since September 2019 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.38 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.81 of those hours.
62.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).
CMS links it to Saber Healthcare Group, an affiliated group of 126 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 23 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff and resident interviews, observations, review of a facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI), review of a video, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain an environment free from pests. This affected two (#60 and #19) of the three residents reviewed for the environment. The facility census was 58.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure portion sizes were served as planned. This had the potential to affect 57 of 63 residents in the facility. The facility identified six residents (#167, #54, #62, #48, #49, and #43) who did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 63.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the steam table was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect 57 of 63 residents in the facility. The facility identified six residents (#167, #54, #62, #48, #49, and #43) who did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 63.
Inspectors wroteBased on the review of Resident Council meeting minutes, resident interview, and staff interviews, the facility failed to document and follow up on resident concerns from the resident council meetings. This affected 10 out of 10 members of Resident council who regularly attended the meetings and had the potential to affect all residents residing at the facility. The facility census is 63.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, resident interview, family interview, review of the facility's self-reported incident (SRI), staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was conducted on abuse and misappropriation allegations. This affected three (#38, #117, and #12) of three residents reviewed for abuse and misappropriation. The facility census was 63.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observations, staff interviews and policy review. The facility failed to provide nail care for one (#167) dependent resident of two sampled for activities of daily living. The facility census was 63.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, hospital record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure falls were thoroughly and timely investigated. This affected two (#46 and #66) of four residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 63.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents are observed taking medications and medications were not left with residents. This affected one (#31) of 21 residents observed in the sample. The census was 63.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were followed and also failed to ensure staff sanitized hands after providing care to a resident and delivering meal trays. This affected three Residents (#19, #54, and #55) observed during dining. The census was 63.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the medical record, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to adequately monitor weights and implement appropriate interventions in a timely manner. This affected one Resident (#64) of the three resident reviewed for significant weight changes. The facility census was 60.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the medical record and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were available and administered per physician orders. This affected one Resident (#65) of the three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 60.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, staff interview and review of manufacturer instructions, the facility failed to ensure staff primed an insulin pen prior to insulin administration resulting in a significant medication error. This affected one (#22) of six residents observed for medication administration. Facility census was 58.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff and resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to timely report an alleged misappropriation of resident funds to the Administrator and the state agency. This affected one resident (#26) out of one reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 47.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, review of the Self-Reported Incident (SRI), review of the facility investigation, and policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an alleged resident to resident abuse. This affected two residents (#18 and #33) out of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 47.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide a written discharge notice to a resident and resident representative timely. This affected one resident (#38) of one reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 47.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a bed hold notice was timely provided to a resident and resident representative upon discharge to the hospital. This affected one resident (#38) of one reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 47.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received their medications as ordered. This affected one resident (#33) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 47. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #33 revealed admission date of 03/23/21. Diagnoses included acute respiratory failure, protein-calorie malnutrition, iron deficiency anemia cerebellar atoxia disease and anoxic brain damage. Review of the physician orders dated August 2022 revealed Resident #33 was ordered the following medications: Atenolol tablet 100 milligrams (mg) one tablet two times a day for hypertension (HTN). Amlodipine Besylate tablet 10 mg one tablet daily for HTN. Both medications for hypertension had parameters to follow. Gabapentin 300 mg one capsule three times a day for muscle pain. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, interview, review of the pureed recipes, review of the pureed food resource guide, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure pureed foods were made according to a recipe and were the correct consistency. This affected one resident (#05) out of one resident who received a pureed diet. The facility identified no other residents received a pureed diet in the facility. The facility census was 47.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, facility staff interview and Resident Assessment Manual review, the facility failed to timely complete a significant change assessment. This affected one Resident (#27) of one reviewed for timely completion of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. The facility census was 50.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observations, and staff interview, the facility failed to implement the use of adaptive devices as care planned for positioning. This affected one Resident (#31) of one resident reviewed for positioning. The facility census was 50.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #17) of five sampled residents' blood sugars, were monitored and reported in accordance to physician orders. The facility identified 14 residents with orders for insulin and blood sugar tests out of a facility census of 50 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident record review and staff interview; the facility failed to obtain physician ordered laboratory tests. This affected one (#1) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. The census was 50.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, facility staff interview, and hospice contract review, the facility failed to collaborate in the development of a comprehensive plan of care and maintain the most recent hospice plan of care in the facility. Additionally the facility failed to designate a staff member who was responsible for working with hospice to coordinate care to the resident by both providers. This affected one Resident (#27) of one resident reviewed for hospice services. The facility census was 50.
14 fire safety citations on file: 4 on May 1, 2025, 6 on September 1, 2022, 4 on September 26, 2019.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.38 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.81 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.68 | 3.28 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.24 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.33 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 62.1% | 48.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 58.3% | 43.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.16 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.66 on weekdays and 3.68 on weekends, 21% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 7.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.50 in April to June 2025 to 4.38 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.38 | 0.81 | 4.66 | 3.68 | 7.0% | 0 of 90 | 59 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.33 | 0.74 | 4.60 | 3.66 | 4.6% | 0 of 92 | 55 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.32 | 0.68 | 4.56 | 3.71 | 3.9% | 0 of 92 | 60 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.50 | 0.74 | 4.78 | 3.82 | 6.8% | 0 of 91 | 61 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.60 | 3.80 | 3.24 | 4.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.76 | $17.93 to $21.44 | 63,280 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.78 | $27.34 to $31.68 | 39,900 |
| Registered nurses | $39.67 | $38.08 to $47.61 | 143,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.9 | 5.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.0 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.6 | 6.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.8 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.2 | 8.8 | 15.4 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Dunbar Health & Rehab Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (55.8% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
55.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Ohio: 147 better, 20 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 28 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 10.7% · Ohio: 3 better, 7 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 21 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Ohio: 1 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 11 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Ohio55.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 8 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 21 residents counted.
7.1% this home
Median of homes: Ohio1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 21 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Ohio100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 1 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: DAYTON HEALTH & REHAB CENTER LLC. CMS links this home to Saber Healthcare Group, a group of 126 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albany Street Property LLC | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 09/30/2016 | |
| Volpe, Benjamin | Corporate director | Individual | 03/01/2019 | |
| Weisberg, William | Corporate director | Individual | 03/01/2019 | |
| Nicoluzakis, Gregory | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/01/2019 | |
| Volpe, Benjamin | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/01/2019 | |
| Weisberg, William | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/01/2019 | |
| Saber Governance LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 09/01/2019 | |
| Shg Management LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 09/01/2019 | |
| Bower, Thomas | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/23/2025 | |
| Schaerer, Brittany | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/06/2023 | |
| Weisberg, William | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 02/02/2026 | |
| Albany Street Property LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/30/2016 | |
| Citrin Cooperman Advisors LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/01/2015 | |
| Saber Governance LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2019 | |
| Saber Healthcare Group LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/01/2015 | |
| Shg Boa LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/16/2026 | |
| Shg Management LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2019 | |
| Shg Mt, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/16/2026 | |
| Bower, Thomas | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/23/2025 | |
| Hunter, Robert | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/01/2019 | |
| Nicoluzakis, Gregory | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/01/2019 | |
| Schaerer, Brittany | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/06/2023 | |
| Volpe, Benjamin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/01/2019 | |
| Weisberg, William | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/01/2015 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.