10098 Big Bear Creek Rd, Lucasville, OH 45648 · Scioto County · (740) 259-5536
96 certified beds, about 89 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1982
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 365585 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 16, 2026, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).
None of its 20 health citations since July 2022 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.09 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.33 of those hours.
36.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).
CMS links it to Aom Healthcare, an affiliated group of 20 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 20 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide adequate notice for Medicare A benefits being cut for skilled services. This affected three (#98, #99 and #100) of three residents reviewed for Beneficiary Notices and termination of services without providing the right to appeal. The facility census was 92.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately complete a level one Pre-admission Screening/Resident Review (PASARR) and did not list mood disorder or mental disorder on the serious mental illness section to be reviewed for a level two. This affected one resident (#32) of three reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 92.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, medical record reviews, and review of information from the National Institute of Health, the facility failed to ensure a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC)/intravenous (IV) access had a baseline plan of care and line maintenance orders upon admission for Resident #16. This affected one resident (#16) of one for intravenous medication therapy. The facility census was 92. Review of the medical record for Resident #16, revealed an admission date of 03/28/26. Diagnoses included but were not limited to acute and subacute infective endocarditis, psychoactive substance abuse and muscle weakness. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident was cognitively intact. The resident was assessed to have an intravenous (IV) access and receiving IV antibiotic medication. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, observations, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer assessment and treatment was completed timely for Resident #97. The facility also failed to ensure air mattresses were on proper functional settings for Resident # 52 and #97 as well as not being in the plan of care and ordered for proper functional settings for Resident #32. This affected 3 residents (#32, #52, and #97) of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcer care. The facility census was 92.1. Review of the medical record for Resident #97, revealed an admission date of 04/09/26. Diagnoses included but were not limited to spina bifida with hydrocephalus, paraplegia, muscle weakness, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, and gastrostomy status. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and review of the facility policy the facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for residents when appropriate. This affected 11 facility-identified (Residents #13, #23, #29, #39, #43, #54, #60, #70, #77, #92, #337) who were appropriate for EBP and had to potential to affect all of the residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 90.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were addressed by the physician in a timely manner. This affected four (Residents #32, #43, #77, and #78) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 90 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure interventions to prevent skin breakdown were implemented as appropriate. This affected one (Resident #45) of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 90.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to timely assess, treat and report increased pain to the physician. This affected one (Resident #65) of one residents reviewed for pain. The facility census was 90 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure appropriate indications for prescribing antibiotic medications to residents. This affected three (Residents #28, #50 and #62) of three residents reviewed for antibiotic stewardship. The facility census was 90 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, employee interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure staff wore appropriate personal protective equipment in resident areas to prevent the potential spread of COVID-19. This had the potential to affect all 82 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: Observation on 06/26/22 at 9:00 A.M. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #145 answered the front door of the facility and instructed the survey team who to speak to for direction. Observation on 06/26/22 at 9:02 A.M. Registered Nurse (RN) #200 was standing next to a medication cart without a mask, googles or face shield, and an unknown resident in a wheelchair was propelling away the medication cart. Interview on 06/26/22 at 9:03 A.M. with RN #200 verified she was not wearing a mask or googles. RN #200 stated she arrived at the facility at 7:45 A.M. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review revealed the facility failed to provide therapeutic diet and supplements as ordered for Resident's #21, #34, #70, and #72. This affected four (Resident's #21, #34, #70, #72) of six residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 82.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure safe storage of medicated creams. This had the potential to affect six (Resident's #8, #12, #30, #35, #65, and #232) who were identified by the facility as being cognitively impaired and ambulatory and resided on the unlocked E, R, and S halls of the facility. The facility census was 82.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure one resident's (Resident #132) indwelling urinary catheter collection bag was covered. This affected one of three residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 82.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to provide adequate assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) to a resident who was dependent on staff for assistance. This affected one (Resident #5) of the six residents reviewed for ADL. The facility census was 82.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record reviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure appropriate administration of physician ordered medications. This affected two (Resident's #43 and #57) of the 82 residents who were administered their medications by facility staff. The facility census was 82.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interviews the facility failed to provide appropriate supervision and implement appropriate fall interventions for residents who were a fall risk. This affected two (Resident #133 and Resident #60) of two residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 82.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, medical record review, and policy review the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing and humidifier bottles were labeled and dated for Resident's #34 and #69 and failed to ensure Resident #34's humidifier bottle was filled. This effected two (Resident's #34 and #69) of two residents reviewed for oxygen. The facility census was 82.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and policy review the facility failed to provide Resident's #35, #54, and #132 their diets as ordered. This affected three (Resident's #35, #54, and #132) of 81 residents who consumed food from the kitchen, the facility identified one (Resident #133) who consumed nothing by mouth. The facility census was 82.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and policy review the facility failed to keep an accurate electronic medical record for Resident #23 and Resident #34. This affected two (Resident's #23 and #34) of 29 resident records reviewed. The facility census was 82.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interviews the facility failed to provide a safe and functional environment with many of the walls in disrepair following previous work completed on the flooring throughout the building. This affected all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 82.
10 fire safety citations on file: 5 on April 16, 2026, 2 on May 9, 2024, 3 on July 5, 2022.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.09 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.33 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.85 | 3.28 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.77 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.99 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 36.8% | 48.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 16.7% | 43.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.97 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.19 on weekdays and 2.85 on weekends, 11% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 7.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.15 in April to June 2025 to 3.09 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.09 | 0.33 | 3.19 | 2.85 | 7.1% | 0 of 90 | 89 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.09 | 0.34 | 3.22 | 2.78 | 9.4% | 0 of 92 | 87 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 2.95 | 0.34 | 3.04 | 2.72 | 3.4% | 1 of 92 | 88 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.15 | 0.32 | 3.28 | 2.81 | 4.6% | 0 of 91 | 85 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.60 | 3.80 | 3.24 | 4.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Trains nurse aides: this home runs a state-approved CNA program (state list: ODH Nurse Aide Training Program Locations, as of October 8, 2026). A nursing home cannot charge aides it employs, or has offered a job, for state-approved training (42 CFR 483.152(c)). See Edgewood Manor of Lucasville I CNA training on CareerFunded, our sister site for career training.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.76 | $17.93 to $21.44 | 63,280 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.78 | $27.34 to $31.68 | 39,900 |
| Registered nurses | $39.67 | $38.08 to $47.61 | 143,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 5.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.7 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.0 | 6.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.6 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.2 | 8.8 | 15.4 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.9 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Edgewood Manor of Lucasville I's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 51.5% · Ohio: 147 better, 20 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 11 eligible stays.
11.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Ohio: 3 better, 7 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 27 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Ohio: 1 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 18 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Ohio55.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 15 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 21 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 21 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Ohio100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 4 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: EDGEWOOD MANOR OF LUCASVILLE I LLC. CMS links this home to Aom Healthcare, a group of 20 nursing homes averaging 2.8 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serenity Equity Holdings LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 16% | 09/18/2017 |
| Zw Aom Re LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 16% | 09/18/2017 |
| Goldstein, Jeffery | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 21% | 01/15/2024 |
| Sherman, Alexander | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 17% | 01/15/2024 |
| Horowitz, Zaleman | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 7% | 09/18/2017 |
| Wagschal, Zalman | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 16% | 09/18/2017 |
| Weinberger, David | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 5% | 09/18/2017 |
| Barr, Thomas | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 09/18/2017 | |
| Goldstein, Jeffery | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/18/2017 | |
| Sherman, Alexander | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/18/2017 | |
| Sherman, Samuel | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/18/2017 | |
| Aom Healthcare LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 09/18/2018 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.