Find a nursing home

Home / Arizona / Phoenix

Haven of Phoenix

4202 North 20th Avenue, Phoenix, AZ 85015 · Maricopa County · (602) 264-3824

114 certified beds, about 107 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1985

CMS abuse icon: cited for abuse in a recent inspection Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
2 of 5
Staffing
3 of 5
Quality measures
5 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 035107 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on May 6, 2026, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Arizona average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).

Of 20 health citations since September 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.

CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,278 in the last three years; the largest was $8,278, and the latest is dated December 16, 2025.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.23 hours per resident per day, against 3.98 across Arizona and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.53 of those hours.

37.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Arizona average 45.1%).

CMS links it to Haven Health, an affiliated group of 20 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 20 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
1G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
14D
5E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
May 6, 2026Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 7 citations
  1. E
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 5, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on a review of records, observation, interviews, policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that two residents (#122 and #163) were not abused by another resident (#121 and #60) out of 11 sampled residents. The Universe was 99. The deficient practice could lead to physical and psychosocial harm to residents. Regarding the altercation between Resident #121 and Resident #122-Regarding #121, (Alleged Perpetrator) Resident #121 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included encephalopathy, anxiety, and bipolar disorder. A Physical Aggression incident report dated April 27, 2026, at 5:35 p.m., revealed that a Nurse was notified of an incident involving Resident #121 (alleged perpetrator) and #122 (alleged victim), who shared a room. [...]
  2. E
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 5, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that medications were administered as ordered for two of five sampled residents (Resident #32 and #56). The deficient practice could result in resident's pain not being controlled. Regarding Resident #32: Resident #32 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis that included schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type; bipolar disorder; major depressive disorder; and anxiety disorder. A care plan focus dated February 24, 2025, revealed Resident #32 had polyneuropathy pain. Interventions included that the staff were to anticipate his need for pain relief and respond as soon as possible. A physician's order dated October 8, 2025, revealed Resident #32 is to take one 325 mg tablet of oxycodone-acetaminophen every 5 hours as needed for pain levels of 6 to 10. [...]
  3. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 5, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of the clinical records, staff interviews, review of the Blood Glucose Monitoring System User's Guide, and review of the facility's policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure that staff conducted proper hand sanitizing during a meal service and infection control procedures were performed after a point of care testing for blood sugar check, for one resident (#164) to help prevent a transmission of infections according to acceptable clinical standards of practice. The census was 99. The deficient practice could result in the spread of infectious diseases to other residents and could place the residents at risk for infection.
  4. D
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    F644 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 5, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on the review of the clinical records, staff interviews, and from the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System, the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), the facility failed to ensure the PASARR (pre-admission screening and resident review) was updated appropriately and accurately submitted, when applicable, for one resident (#32). The census was 99. The deficient practice could result in residents' medically related social and emotional needs not being met. The census was 99.
  5. D
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    F697 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 5, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided to one resident (#137) consistent with professional standards of practice, and the resident's comprehensive person-centered care plan. The deficient practice could place the resident's health at risk by not adequately treating the resident's pain.
  6. D
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    F732 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 5, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interviews, and policy documentation, the facility failed to ensure that the daily nurse staffing information posted included all data requirements. The deficient practice could result in residents and visitors not being informed of accurate and current staffing information.
  7. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 5, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that medications were not left at the bedside for one (#56) of 29 sampled residents. The deficient practice could result in harm to the residents, and/or visitors who have access to medications.
December 16, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. G
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 11, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on documentation, staff and resident interviews, and review of the facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure the safety of one resident (#5) by not properly securing the resident and failing to maintain a safe speed during transport. The deficient practice could result in residents being physically injured.
January 24, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 4 citations
  1. E
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    F680 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 21, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on personnel file review, staff interviews, and facility documentation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the activities program was directed by a qualified professional. This deficient practice could have resulted in the activities provided not meeting the assessed needs of the residents. Findings Include: A review of the personnel file for the role of activity manager (AD/Staff #111) was conducted on May 21, 2024. However, the review did not reveal evidence that staff #111 possessed the qualifications required for the role of activities director. An interview was conducted on January 23, 2025, at 9:38 A.M. with staff #111, Activities Director. Staff #111 stated that she had been working at the facility as an Activities Director for several years. [...]
  2. D
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 21, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, facility documents, staff interviews, and policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (#395) was free from neglect, by failing to ensure the resident was administered care and services to meet his needs. The deficient practice could result in residents not being provided the necessary services.
  3. D
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    F645 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 21, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of 21 sampled residents (#82) had a referral for a Level II PASRR (pre-admission screening and resident review). The deficient practice could result in the resident not receiving specialized services needed.
  4. D
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 21, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on documentation, staff interviews, and the facility policy and process, the facility failed to ensure that care was provided according to professional standards and that the resident's basic needs are being met for one resident (#42). The deficient practice could result in residents not being provided the care needed to maintain or improve health. Resident #42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included spinal stenosis, cystitis, major depressive disorder, and multiple myeloma not having achieved remission. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Section I revealed the resident had an active diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. [...]
September 13, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 16, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on documentation, staff interviews, and the facility policy and process, the facility failed to ensure that care was provided according to professional standards and that the resident's basic needs are being met for one resident (#10). The deficient practice could result in residents not being provided the care needed to maintain or improve health.
August 20, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    F610 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 1, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on documentation, staff interviews and the facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the state survey agency and failed to complete and submit a 5-day written investigation timely. The deficient practice could result in residents not being protected and being abused.
  2. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 1, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interviews, and the facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure residents (#26, #25, and #3) were provided with the appropriate level of supervision. The deficient practice could result in the personal space of residents not being respected.
September 8, 2023Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 5 citations
  1. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 17, 2023
    Inspectors wroteThe facility failed to ensure food was properly stored, prepared, handled and served according to professional standards. Based on observations, staff interviews, and the facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that food was properly stored. The deficient practice could result in a loss of freshness, freezer burn, taste, and loss of nutritive value.
  2. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 17, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident do not sustain preventable accidents including falls resulting in major injury. Failure to ensure this resulted increased morbidity and mortality.
  3. D
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    F804 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 17, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, facility recipes, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the nutritive value of puree food. The deficient practice could result in residents receiving food with altered nutritive value.
  4. D
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    F813 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 17, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, and the facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that food brought by visitors and family was properly stored. The deficient practice could result in a loss of freshness, freezer burn, taste, and loss of nutritive value.
  5. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 17, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, and review of policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that infection control standards were maintained regarding hand hygiene and donning gloves by an LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse/staff #74) during medication administration. The deficient practice could result in the spread of infection to residents.

Fire safety inspections

11 fire safety citations on file: 4 on May 6, 2026, 2 on January 24, 2025, 5 on September 8, 2023.

Every fire safety citation11 citations
  1. F
    Conduct testing and exercise requirements.
    E 39 · May 6, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Install emergency lighting that can last at least 1 1/2 hours.
    K 291 · May 6, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. F
    To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
    K 761 · May 6, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. F
    Ensure that testing and maintenance of electrical equipment is performed.
    K 921 · May 6, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. E
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · January 24, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. E
    Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
    K 372 · January 24, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. E
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · September 8, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. E
    Ensure that testing and maintenance of electrical equipment is performed.
    K 921 · September 8, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. D
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · September 8, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  10. D
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · September 8, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  11. D
    To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
    K 761 · September 8, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
December 16, 2025Fine $8,278

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeArizonaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.233.983.86
Registered nurses0.530.700.69
All nursing staff on weekends2.843.513.42
Nurse aides1.93
Licensed practical nurses0.77
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)37.4%45.1%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover41.7%43.6%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.66 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.38 on weekdays and 2.84 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.22 in April to June 2025 to 3.23 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.230.533.382.84 0.0%0 of 90107
Oct to Dec 20253.280.513.462.83 0.0%0 of 92108
Jul to Sep 20253.270.423.452.83 0.0%0 of 92109
Apr to Jun 20253.220.393.402.76 0.0%0 of 91110
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Arizona, Jan to Mar 20263.870.634.053.433.3%0.5% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeArizonaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.010.713.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.50.80.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.21.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.22.13.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.11.21.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.712.814.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.94.44.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.410.715.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
31.123.723.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
10.610.412.0

Owners and operators

Legal business name: HAVEN OF PHOENIX LLC. CMS links this home to Haven Health, a group of 20 nursing homes averaging 2.8 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Seastrand, JasonDirect ownership interestIndividual06/01/2016
West, ChristianDirect ownership interestIndividual06/01/2016
Haven Health Properties LLC5% or greater mortgage interestOrganization06/01/2016
Haven Phoenix Real Estate LLC5% or greater mortgage interestOrganization06/01/2016
Health Group Management LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization11/25/2024
Ahmed, BahaledinOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/01/2016
Fragoso, LindsayOperational/managerial controlIndividual05/10/2021
Gandhi, HemangOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2023
Greiner, RussellOperational/managerial controlIndividual08/16/2023
Koker, ShellyOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/05/2026
Seastrand, JasonOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/01/2016
West, ChristianOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/01/2016
Haven Health Properties LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization11/25/2024
Haven Phoenix Real Estate LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization11/26/2024
Health Group Management LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization11/25/2024
Ahmed, BahaledinAdp of the SNFIndividual06/01/2016
Fragoso, LindsayAdp of the SNFIndividual05/10/2021
Gandhi, HemangAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2023
Greiner, RussellAdp of the SNFIndividual08/16/2023
Koker, ShellyAdp of the SNFIndividual01/05/2026
Robertson, BrettAdp of the SNFIndividual12/18/2024
Samuelian, RobertAdp of the SNFIndividual12/18/2024
Samuelian, SpencerAdp of the SNFIndividual12/18/2024
Samuelian, StephenAdp of the SNFIndividual12/18/2024
Seastrand, JasonAdp of the SNFIndividual06/01/2016
West, ChristianAdp of the SNFIndividual06/01/2016

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on May 6, 2026: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
  2. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on May 6, 2026: "Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed."
  3. How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on May 6, 2026: "Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody."
  4. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on September 8, 2023: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.84 hours per resident per day, below the Arizona average of 3.51.

Other nursing homes nearby

Arizona contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Arizona. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Haven of Phoenix's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Haven of Phoenix 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Haven of Phoenix get at its last inspection?
6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on May 6, 2026. The Arizona average is 6.4.
Has Haven of Phoenix been fined?
Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,278 in the last three years.
Does Haven of Phoenix accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Haven of Phoenix?
CMS lists 26 owners and managers, and links the home to Haven Health. Legal business name: HAVEN OF PHOENIX LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection