1880 East Van Buren Street, Phoenix, AZ 85006 · Maricopa County · (602) 253-4570
120 certified beds, about 114 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 2016
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 035290 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on November 13, 2025, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the Arizona average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).
None of its 37 health citations since December 2022 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.31 hours per resident per day, against 3.98 across Arizona and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.44 of those hours.
41.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Arizona average 45.1%).
CMS links it to Haven Health, an affiliated group of 20 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 37 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on closed record review, interviews, and review of the facility's policies and procedures, the facility failed to provide discharge information to the Resident's Representative (RR) in a language she understood for one of 2 sampled residents (Resident #4) regarding resident's rights. The deficient practice could result in the RR not understanding the resident's post-discharge care needs and instructions, potentially leading to unmet care needs following discharge.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, staff interviews, facility documentation, and review of facility policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision to prevent elopement for one (#21) of three sampled residents. The deficient practice could result in avoidable accidents, injury, or harm to residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of the clinical record, staff interviews, and policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that residents were treated with dignity and respect during meal service for four out of six residents observed receiving dining assistance (Residents #10, #61, #72, and #107). The universe was 106, and the sample size was 22. This deficient practice could potentially affect all residents needing meal assistance by diminishing their sense of dignity and personhood.-Regarding Resident #10Resident #10 was admitted on [DATE], with the diagnosis that included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, tracheostomy status, quadriplegia, C1-C4 incomplete, hypertensive heart disease without heart failure, generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, recurrent adjustment disorder, unspecified, and schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of the clinical record, staff interviews, and a review of policies and procedures, the facility failed to maintain and make accessible complete medical records necessary to investigate the cases of 7 residents reviewed (Resident #137, #138, #139, #140, #141, #142, and #144). The universe was 106, and the sample size was 22. The deficient practice prevented a thorough investigation and posed a potential risk to the current quality and safety of resident care.-Regarding Resident #137Resident #137 was admitted on [DATE], with a diagnosis that included osteomyelitis, pressure ulcer of the right lower back, unspecified stage, and central cord syndrome at C4, subs. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, indicating that Resident #137's cognition had been intact. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, review of clinical record, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was reported to mandated entities within 2 hours for one resident (#100). The deficient practice could lead to a delay in the investigation of an allegation of abuse leading to continued harm of a resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, interviews, facility documentation and policy, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#145) received glaucoma medication according to admission orders. The deficient practice could lead to an increase in eye pressure, causing potentially worsening vision.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, staff and resident interviews, facility documentation and policy reviews, the facility failed to implement their written abuse policies and procedure for two residents (#1, #2). The deficient practice could place resident at risk for further abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff and resident interviews, facility documentation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that an allegation of abuse for two resident (#1, #2) was reported to the State Agencies in a timely manner. The deficient practice could place residents at risk for further abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff and resident interviews, facility documentation and policy review, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of abuse in a timely manner for two residents (#1, #2). The deficient practice could place residents at risk for further abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, staff interviews, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to maintain accurate documentation surrounding the death of two residents (#2 and #6). The sample size was 3. The deficient practice can result in inadequate records being kept regarding the extent of a resident's death in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, interviews, and review of the facility policies, the facility failed to ensure that the care plan for one resident (#22) was updated according to the resident's preferences following a five-day investigation of a complaint. The deficient practice could result in suboptimal care planning to meet the resident's preferences.
Inspectors wroteBased on closed record review, staff interviews, review of facility documentation and policy, and the State Agency (SA) complaint tracking system, the facility failed to ensure a safe and appropriate transfer of one resident (#1). The deficient practice could result in residents not receiving appropriate care and services during the transition of care.
Inspectors wroteBased on documentation, staff interviews, and the facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to provide and ongoing program of activities designed to meet the interest and the physical, mental, and psychological well-being of two residents (#48 and #37). The deficient practice could result in a decline in physical and social skills.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews, and the facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure pain medications were administered as ordered for one resident (#68). The deficient practice could result in resident receiving unnecessary medication and overmedicated.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, and the facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that food items that were unsafe for resident consumption were discarded; and, the facility failed to ensure a clean and sanitary environment was maintained in the kitchen. The facility census was 98. The deficient practice could result in a potential for food borne illness and resident safety.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews, review of facility documentation, and policy, the facility failed to ensure that the electronic health record for resident #48 was complete and accurately documented. The sample size was 20. The deficient practice could result in incomplete and/or inaccurate clinical records.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, and review of facility documentation and policies, the facility failed to ensure that the QAA (quality assessment and assurance) committee developed and implemented action plans on identified problem related to PRN (as needed) pain medication administration.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, staff interviews, facility documentation, policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure that one resident's (#48) communication deficit was appropriately care planned and implemented. The deficient practice could result in a plan of care that did not meet the resident's needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, clinical record review, family and staff interviews, and facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to provide care and services related to communication for one resident (#48) assessed with communication/language deficit. The deficient practice could result in residents not maintaining their communication abilities.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews, and review of policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure assistance with meals was provided to one resident (#48). The sample size was 20. The deficient practice could result in resident not receiving adequate nutrition.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interviews, and the facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to provide documentation of nursing and non-nursing staff working hours. The deficient practice could result in a lack of sufficient staffing and impact the residents' treatment and care.
Inspectors wroteBased on documentation, staff interviews, and the facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that a registered nurse (RN) worked at least 8 consecutive hours per day.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure dental needs were met for one sampled resident (#14). The deficient practice could result in residents not receiving care and services for oral/dental conditions.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and policy review the facility failed to ensure a resident's (#48) food was served warm and palatable. The sample size was 20. The deficient practice has the potential for residents to refuse meals and or potentially impact the resident's nutritional intake as well as weight.
Inspectors wroteBased on documentation, staff interviews, and facility policies the facility failed to ensure that staff were trained in communication skills needed to communicate with one resident (#48). The deficient practice could result in staff not understanding the medical and care needs of the residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that medications were administered as ordered by the physician for one resident (#400). The deficient practice could result in residents not receiving prescribed doses of medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, facility documents, and resident records, the facility failed to ensure there was adequate oxygen for 6 residents. The sample size was 6. This deficiency could result in significant harm to the residents.
Inspectors wrote-Resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included intracranial injury with loss of consciousness, personal history of traumatic brain injury, restlessness and agitation, and anxiety disorder. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was not assessed, but the assessment indicated the resident was severely impaired for daily decision making. The order summary included an order dated October 10, 2022 for lorazepam (an antianxiety medication) 1 milligram (mg) tablet via Gastrostomy tube (G-tube) every 6 hours as needed for anxiety. This order did not include a stop date. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on facility documentation, interviews, policy, and Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidance, the facility failed to ensure the Infection Preventionist (IP) had completed infection control training. The deficient practice could lead to unqualified staff acting as the IP and improper infection prevention practices within the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, clinical record review, interviews, and policy, the facility failed to ensure one resident's (#255) dignity was maintained by failing to ensure the resident's catheter bag was covered. The deficient practice could result in residents not being treated with respect and dignity.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, clinical record review, interviews, policy and manufacturer guidelines, the facility failed to ensure medication orders met one resident's needs (#255) according to professional standards of care and the facility failed to ensure glucometers were disinfected properly. The deficient practice could result in unmet resident needs and improperly disinfected glucometers.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to provide timely continence care for one resident (#2). The deficient practice could affect residents' self-esteem and cause skin breakdown.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, clinical record review, interviews, and policy, the facility failed to provide respiratory care and treatment as ordered by the physician for one resident (#255). The deficient practice could result in unmet respiratory needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, clinical record reviews, review of medlineplus.gov, and policy, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was not 5% or greater by failing to administer a medication as ordered for one of five sampled residents (#51) and by crushing a medication tablet that was not supposed to be crushed for one resident (#47). The medication error rate was 8%. The deficient practice could result in additional medication errors.
Inspectors wroteBased on personnel file reviews, staff interviews, and policy, the facility failed to provide evidence that 3 of 10 sampled staff (#182, #176, and #45) were provided resident rights training. The deficient practice could result in residents not being afforded their rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on personnel file reviews, interviews, and policy, the facility failed to provide evidence that 3 of 10 sampled staff (#182, #176, and #45) were provided training on abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, and dementia management. The deficient practice could result in staff not being educated to protect residents from abuse and to provide the appropriate services to residents with dementia.
Inspectors wroteBased on personnel file reviews, staff interviews, and policy, the facility failed to provide evidence that 3 of 10 sampled staff (#182, #176, and #45) were provided training on infection control. The deficient practice could result in the spread of infection.
29 fire safety citations on file: 1 on November 13, 2025, 1 on May 6, 2024, 27 on December 15, 2022.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Arizona | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.31 | 3.98 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.44 | 0.70 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.99 | 3.51 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.35 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.52 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 41.1% | 45.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 45.0% | 43.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 6.10 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.44 on weekdays and 3.99 on weekends, 10% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.62 in April to June 2025 to 4.31 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.31 | 0.44 | 4.44 | 3.99 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 114 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.31 | 0.51 | 4.44 | 3.98 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 111 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.62 | 0.61 | 4.80 | 4.17 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 108 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.62 | 0.61 | 4.83 | 4.09 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 113 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Arizona, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.87 | 0.63 | 4.05 | 3.43 | 3.3% | 0.5% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arizona, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $21.53 | $18.43 to $22.42 | 20,320 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $37.05 | $32.10 to $39.36 | 6,530 |
| Registered nurses | $47.84 | $39.33 to $52.20 | 73,150 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Arizona | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 10.7 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 2.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 12.8 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.0 | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.0 | 10.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 17.7 | 23.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 15.3 | 10.4 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Haven Health Sky Harbor, LLC's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (56.0% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
56.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Arizona: 74 better, 1 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 52 eligible stays.
10.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Arizona: 4 better, 1 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 57 eligible stays.
7.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Arizona: 6 better, 1 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 51 eligible stays.
73.2% this home
Median of homes: Arizona69.9% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 82 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Arizona0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 144 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Arizona0.6% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 144 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: Arizona95.1% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 23 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: HAVEN HEALTH SKY HARBOR LLC. CMS links this home to Haven Health, a group of 20 nursing homes averaging 2.8 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samuelian, Spencer | Direct ownership interest | Individual | 08/01/2023 | |
| Seastrand, Jason | Direct ownership interest | Individual | 08/01/2023 | |
| Haven Health Properties LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 8% | 08/01/2023 |
| Health Group Management LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 8% | 08/01/2023 |
| Espinosa, Stephanie | Corporate officer | Individual | 10/14/2024 | |
| Fragoso, Lindsay | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/01/2023 | |
| Seastrand, Jason | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/01/2023 | |
| Health Group Management LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 08/01/2023 | |
| Brady, Mitchell | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/14/2025 | |
| Espinosa, Stephanie | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/14/2024 | |
| Fragoso, Lindsay | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2023 | |
| Greiner, Russell | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/16/2023 | |
| Knight, Tashay | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/14/2025 | |
| Nasser, Mohammad | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/13/2025 | |
| Robertson, Brett | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2023 | |
| Samuelian, Robert | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2023 | |
| Samuelian, Spencer | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/14/2025 | |
| Samuelian, Stephen | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2023 | |
| Seastrand, Jason | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2023 | |
| West, Christian | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2023 | |
| Haven Health Properties LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/22/2025 | |
| Haven Sky Harbor Real Estate LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/22/2025 | |
| Health Group Management LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/22/2025 | |
| Brady, Mitchell | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/14/2025 | |
| Espinosa, Stephanie | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/14/2024 | |
| Fragoso, Lindsay | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2023 | |
| Greiner, Russell | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/16/2023 | |
| Knight, Tashay | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/14/2025 | |
| Nasser, Mohammad | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/13/2025 | |
| Robertson, Brett | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2023 | |
| Samuelian, Robert | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2023 | |
| Samuelian, Spencer | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/22/2025 | |
| Samuelian, Stephen | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2023 | |
| Seastrand, Jason | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2023 | |
| West, Christian | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Arizona. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.