Find a nursing home

Home / Oklahoma / Idabel

Hill Nursing Home, Inc.

808 Northwest M L King Avenue, Idabel, OK 74745 · McCurtain County · (580) 286-5398

51 certified beds, about 36 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1995

Last standard inspection more than 2 years ago Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
1 of 5
Health inspections
1 of 5
Staffing
3 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 375234 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on July 3, 2024, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Oklahoma average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).

Of 19 health citations since April 2022, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (2 immediate jeopardy).

CMS lists 1 fine totaling $69,420 in the last three years; the largest was $69,420, and the latest is dated November 14, 2024.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.45 hours per resident per day, against 3.79 across Oklahoma and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.38 of those hours.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 19 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
1K
1L
Actual harm
1G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
12D
3E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
November 14, 2024Complaint inspection · 3 citations
  1. G
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 25, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for one (#1) of three sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The deficient practice resulted in skin tears to the resident's wrists. The administrator identified five allegations of abuse in the last six months.
  2. E
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    F607 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 25, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement their written abuse policies and procedures for one (#1) of two sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The administrator identified five allegations of abuse in the last six months.
  3. E
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 25, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse within the two hour required timeframe to the Oklahoma State Department of Health for one (#1) of three sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The administrator identified five allegations of abuse in the last six months.
July 3, 2024Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. F
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    F803 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 18, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure menus were: a. prepared in advance, b. followed, and c. reviewed by the facility's dietitian or other qualified nutrition professional for the residents. The administrator identified 38 residents who ate meals prepared by the kitchen and two resident who received nutrition via feeding tube.
  2. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 18, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served in a safe and sanitary manner for the residents. The administrator identified 38 residents who ate meals prepared by the kitchen and two resident who received nutrition via feeding tube.
  3. D
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    F697 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 30, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received proper pain management for one (#31) of one sampled resident who was reviewed for an injury of unknown origin. The administrator identified 40 residents who resided in the facility.
  4. D
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 30, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the medical record was accurate for one (#31) of one sampled resident who was reviewed for an injury of unknown origin. The administrator identified 40 residents who resided in the facility.
  5. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 20, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facilty failed to impliment their policy regarding monitoring and measures to prevent the growth of Legionella bacteria for the facility. The administrator identified 40 residents who resided in the facility.
  6. D
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    F883 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 10, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facilty failed to provide documentation regarding offering or given the pneumococcal vaccine for three (#5, 8, and #24) of five residents reviewed for immunizations. The administrator identified 40 residents who resided in the facility.
May 30, 2023Standard inspection · 7 citations
  1. L
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    F607 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 25, 2023
    Inspectors wroteOn 05/12/23 at 3:30 p.m., an Immediate Jeopardy situation was determined to be in existence related to the facility failing to ensure background screenings were completed for 45 of 66 employees. On 05/12/23 at 3:50 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health verified the existence of the Immediate Jeopardy situation. On 05/12/23 at 4:00 p.m., the administrator was notified of the IJ situation. On 05/12/23 at 6:00 p.m., an acceptable plan of removal was submitted to the Oklahoma State Department of Health. The plan of removal documented: Preparation and/or completion of this plan do not constitute admission or agreement by the provider that immediate jeopardy exists. This response is also not to be construed of fault by the facility, its employees, agents or other individuals who draft or may be discussed in this response and immediate jeopardy removal plan. [...]
  2. K
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 25, 2023
    Inspectors wroteOn 05/10/23 at 11:45 a.m., an Immediate Jeopardy situation was determined to be in existence related to the facility failing to ensure residents were served hot liquids at a safe temperature to prevent injury or harm. On 05/10/23 at 11:55 a.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health verified the existence of the Immediate Jeopardy situation. On 05/10/23 at 12:00 p.m., the Administrator was notified of the IJ situation. On 05/10/23 at 4:00 p.m., an acceptable plan of removal was submitted to the Oklahoma State Department of Health. The plan of removal documented: Preparation and/or completion of this plan do not constitute admission or agreement by the provider that immediate jeopardy exists. This response is also not to be construed of fault by the facility, its employees, agents or other individuals who draft or may be discussed in this response and immediate jeopardy removal plan. [...]
  3. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 25, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a care plan for a resident with burns from drinking hot liquid for one (#22) of two sampled residents who had burns from hot liquids. The DON identified 32 residents who drank hot liquids.
  4. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 25, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to revise a care plan with interventions to prevent falls for one (#11) of one sampled resident reviewed for falls. The DON identified 25 residents who had falls since October 2022.
  5. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 25, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of out of parameter blood sugars and failed to obtain a physician's order to hold insulin for one (#1) of one sampled resident on insulin. The DON identified five residents on insulin.
  6. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 25, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were obtained for oxygen therapy and oxygen tubing was changed and labeled for one (#6) of one sampled resident reviewed for oxygen therapy. The DON identified four residents who were on oxygen therapy.
  7. D
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 25, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure puree diets were prepared in a sanitary manner. The Dietary Manager (DM) identified two of two sampled residents who received a pureed diet.
April 14, 2022Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. D
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    F800 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 28, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure pasteurized eggs served to residents were fully cooked for one (#7) of one sampled resident served over easy eggs. The administrator identified 29 residents received food from the kitchen.
  2. D
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    F887 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 28, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure policies were in place to track vaccination status for six (CNA #11, medical director, nurse practitioner, pharmacist, dietician, and the quality assurance consultant) of 62 employees. The HRA identified 62 staff were employed at the facility.
  3. D
    Ensure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
    F888 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 28, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure: A. documentation of staff vaccination status for one, (CNA #11), of 62 facility employees reviewed and five (medical director, nurse practitioner, pharmacist, dietician, and the quality assurance consultant) of five individuals who provided services. B. the development and implementation of COVID-19 vaccination policies and procedures for staff. The HRA identified 62 staff were employed at the facility and five personnel provided services under contract.

Fire safety inspections

7 fire safety citations on file: 4 on May 30, 2023, 3 on April 14, 2022.

Every fire safety citation7 citations
  1. F
    Develop and maintain an Emergency Preparedness Program (EP).
    E 4 · May 30, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. E
    Install emergency lighting that can last at least 1 1/2 hours.
    K 291 · May 30, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. E
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · May 30, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. C
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · May 30, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. F
    Develop and maintain an Emergency Preparedness Program (EP).
    E 4 · April 14, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. E
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · April 14, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. E
    Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
    K 923 · April 14, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
November 14, 2024Fine $69,420

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeOklahomaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.453.793.86
Registered nurses0.380.340.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.643.443.42
Nurse aides3.28
Licensed practical nurses0.78
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)not reported55.5%45.8%
Registered nurse turnovernot reported53.6%42.9%
Administrators who leftnot reported

CMS expects 3.25 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.78 on weekdays and 3.64 on weekends, 24% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.59 in April to June 2025 to 4.45 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.450.384.783.64 0.0%3 of 9036
Oct to Dec 20255.050.405.264.49 0.0%0 of 9236
Jul to Sep 20255.160.415.364.66 0.0%0 of 9235
Apr to Jun 20254.590.384.824.01 0.0%0 of 9139
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Oklahoma, Jan to Mar 20263.790.323.943.422.2%1.6% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Oklahoma

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Oklahoma, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$17.27$15.82 to $18.3919,410
LPNs and LVNs$28.04$24.06 to $29.8411,540
Registered nurses$39.87$37.19 to $47.5538,270
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Hill Nursing Home, Inc.. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeOklahomaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
11.513.613.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.90.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.92.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.94.73.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
8.613.714.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.04.74.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
17.417.515.4
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
0.92.31.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
5.23.01.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Hill Nursing Home, Inc.'s Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

US median of homes 51.5% · Oklahoma: 24 better, 16 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 10 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

10.2% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Oklahoma: 1 better, 9 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 33 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

US median of homes 7.1% · Oklahoma: 0 better, 4 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 13 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Oklahoma54.3% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 9 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Oklahoma0.7% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 17 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Oklahoma2.4% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 17 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Oklahoma100.0% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 2 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: HILL NURSING HOME, INC..

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Hill, Gladys5% or greater direct ownership interestIndividual12/01/2008
Rogers, AnneW-2 managing employeeIndividual08/01/1998
Hill, GladysCorporate directorIndividual12/01/2008
Hill, GladysOperational/managerial controlIndividual12/01/2008

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on November 14, 2024: "Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody."
  2. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on July 3, 2024: "Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident."
  3. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on July 3, 2024: "Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services."
  4. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on July 3, 2024: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."

Other nursing homes nearby

Oklahoma contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Oklahoma. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Hill Nursing Home, Inc.'s Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Hill Nursing Home, Inc. 1 out of 5 stars overall, with 1 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Hill Nursing Home, Inc. get at its last inspection?
6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on July 3, 2024. The Oklahoma average is 6.4.
Has Hill Nursing Home, Inc. been fined?
Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $69,420 in the last three years.
Does Hill Nursing Home, Inc. accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Hill Nursing Home, Inc.?
CMS lists 4 owners and managers. Legal business name: HILL NURSING HOME, INC..

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection