Hollymead
4101 Long Prairie Road, Flower Mound, TX 75028 · Denton County · (214) 285-3200
112 certified beds, about 95 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2014
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 676369 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 24, 2025, inspectors cited 10 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 34 health citations since February 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $9,110 in the last three years; the largest was $9,110, and the latest is dated January 2, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.42 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.43 of those hours.
45.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Cantex Continuing Care, an affiliated group of 37 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 34 health citations on file.
June 17, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to appropriately discharge for 1 (Resident #1) of 7 residents reviewed for transfer/discharge. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was not discharged home without Home Health services to assist with ongoing care needs. This failure could place residents at risk of being discharged inappropriately causing a disruption in their care and services and potential decline in health.
June 6, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- E Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of pests in two halls (Hall 600 and Hall 700) of three halls reviewed for pests. The facility failed to ensure Hall 600 and Hall 700 were free of millipedes. This failure could place residents at risk of insect-born illness and not having a home free of pests in which to live.
April 3, 2026Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- E Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to immediately consult with the resident's physician accident involving the resident which results in injury and has the potential for requiring physician intervention, and/or a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status (that is, a deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications) for 1 or 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for notification of physician of change of condition and falls. 1. The facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of Resident #1's fall on 04/02/2026. 2. The facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of Resident #1's pneumonia diagnosis when she was hospitalized on [DATE].3. [...]
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food items were not cross contaminated for 1 of 5 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure CNA A did not contaminate Resident #1's cookie when she picked up wrapped chocolate candies off the floor and put them on the plate with the unpackaged cookie. This failure could place residents at risk of consuming contaminated food items that could result in foodborne illness or foodborne intoxication.
April 24, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 10 citations
- E Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment and described the services that were to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 6 of 16 residents (Residents #67, #71, #36, #97, #401, #66) reviewed for care plans. 1. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan regarding Resident #71's attention deficit disorder diagnosis. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #36's comprehensive care plan included a plan of care for ADL dependence including fingernail care. 3. [...]
- E Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary services for residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 4 residents (Resident #2, Resident #36, Resident #27, Resident #16) of 15 residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Resident #2 had his nails cut and cleaned on 04/22/25. 2. Resident #36 had his nails trimmed on both hands on 04/22/25. 3. Resident #27 had her fingernails cleaned and trimmed on both hands on 4/22/25. 4. Resident #16 had her fingernails cleaned and trimmed on both hands on 4/22/25. This failure could place residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at risk for loss of dignity, risk for infections and a decreased quality of life.
- E Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or prevent further decrease in range of motion for one of three (Resident #2) reviewed for range of motion. The facility failed to implement interventions to prevent further decline of Resident #2's contracture to her left hand on 04/22/25. This failure could place residents at risk for decline in range of motion, decreased mobility, and worsening of contractures.
- E Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to ensure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, administering, and securing of medications for 3 medication carts (med aid cart hall400/500) of 4 medication carts reviewed for pharmacy services in that: The facility failed to ensure: 1- LVN D responsible for Nurses Cart Hall 300, removed medications in unsecure containers from the Nurses Cart. 2- LVN L responsible for Nurses Cart Hall 100, removed medications in unsecure containers from the Nurses Cart. 3- RN A responsible for Nurses Cart Hall 200, removed medications in unsecure containers from the Nurses Cart. [...]
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen. The facility failed to ensure food item in the facility walk-in freezer were covered. These failures could affect residents who received their meals from the facility's only kitchen, by placing them at risk for food-borne illness, and food contamination.
- D Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents had physician's orders for the residents' immediate care for 2 (Resident #402 & Resident #67) of 16 residents observed for physician orders for oxygen. 1. The facility failed to provide physician orders for Resident #402 when admitted to the facility with a need for oxygen and while resident was on 4L of oxygen via nasal cannula on 11/8/24. 2. The facility failed to obtain orders for colostomy care for Resident #67 on 3/10/25 These failures could place the residents at risk of not receiving necessary physician ordered care that could result in worsening conditions or decline in health.
- D Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the MDS assessment accurately reflected the resident status for 2 (Resident #71 and Resident #67) of 8 residents whose records were reviewed for assessment accuracy. 1. Resident #67's colostomy status was not coded on his 03/14/25 Quarterly MDS after readmission on [DATE]. 2. Resident #71's attention deficit hyperactivity disorder diagnosis was not listed on his 03/05/25 Quarterly MDS. This failure to ensure comprehensive and accurate assessments could affect residents by placing them at risk for inaccurate and incomplete MDS assessment which could result in residents not receiving correct care and services.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents receive adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for one (Resident #5) of two residents observed during a transfer. The Facility failed to ensure CNA K used a gait belt when transferring Resident #5 from her bed to the wheelchair on 04/22/2025. This failure could affect the residents by placing the residents at risk for falls, discomfort, pain, and/or injury.
- D Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for one of two residents (Resident #1) reviewed for catheter care. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA B provided catheter care and appropriate perineal care for Resident #1 when she failed to separate the labia and wash downward, failed to clean under the resident's skin folds and failed to clean around the suprapubic catheter (catheter that is inserted through the abdominal wall into the bladder) on 04/23/25. 2. The facility failed to ensure RN A maintained a sterile procedure while re-inserting Resident #1's suprapubic catheter on 04/23/25. This failure could place residents at risk for the development and/or worsening of urinary tract infections and skin breakdown.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 21 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #5) observed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure RN A used the required PPE for Resident #1, who was on enhanced barrier precautions due to her indwelling urinary catheter, while changing the indwelling urinary catheter on 04/23/25. 2. The facility failed to ensure CNA K changed her gloves and performed hand hygiene while providing incontinence care to Resident #5 on 04/22/25. These failures could place the residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of infection.
February 20, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications for 1 (Resident #1) of 2 residents reviewed for enteral nutrition. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's correct G-tube feeding was administered as ordered by the physician on 2/19/25. This deficient practice could affect residents who receive tube feedings by not receiving the appropriate nutrition and hydration.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of infection for 1 (Resident #1) of 2 residents observed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure LVN A donned the appropriate PPE (personal protective equipment) required for EBP (enhanced barrier precautions) during administering G-tube (external tube inserted in the stomach to provide nutrition and hydration) for Resident #1 who was on enhanced barriers precautions on 2/19/25. These failures could place residents at risk for infection and cross contamination of pathogens and illness.
January 2, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- G Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided to residents who required such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pain management. The facility failed to adequately assess and treat Resident #1's severe breakthrough pain. This failure could place residents at risk for unnecessary pain, discomfort and a decreased quality of life.
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat residents with respect and dignity for 1 of 4 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for dignity in that: The facility failed to ensure staff did not stand over Resident #1 while assisting the resident with her meal in her room on 11/13/2024. This failure could affect residents who require assistance with activities of daily living and place them at risk for psychosocial harm due to a diminished quality of life.
August 7, 2024Complaint inspection · 4 citations
- D Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary services for residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 1 (Resident #3) of 8 residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 had his fingernails cleaned and trimmed. This failure could place residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at risk for loss of dignity, risk for infections and a decreased quality of life.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 2 Residents (Resident #1) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's nasal cannula tubing was labeled or dated. This failure could place residents at risk of respiratory infections.
- D Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
Inspectors wroteThe facility failed to provide Resident #2 a divided plate to assist her with eating independently. This failure could affect residents who depended on assistive devices and infringe on the resident's dignity and feeding independence.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of infection for one of one resident (Resident #4) observed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure CNA D and CNA E performed hand hygiene while providing incontinence care to Resident # 4. This failure could place the residents at risk for infection.
April 30, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for medications. -The facility failed to have Resident #1's Hydromorphone (used to manage pain) available for administration, which caused the resident to miss two doses. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving their medication treatment(s) as ordered by the physician to receive the full therapeutic benefit.
March 21, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 5 citations
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen. 1. The facility failed to label and date food in the walk-in freezer. 2. The facility failed to date food stored in the walk-in refrigerator that should no longer be consumed. 3. Cook B failed to wear effective hair restraint while serving food. These failures could affect residents who received their meals from the facility's only kitchen, by placing them at risk for food-borne illness if consumed, and food contamination.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each Resident, consistent with Resident rights, that include measurable objectives and time frames to meet Residents' mental and psychosocial needs for 1 of 4 (Resident #51) residents reviewed for care plans. The facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to address Resident # 51's use of dietary preferences and food intolerance. This failure could place resident at risk of not having a plan developed to address care needs.
- D Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to assist residents in obtaining routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for one of 5 residents (Residents #29) reviewed for dental services. The facility failed to provide a timely dental service referral for Resident #29. This failure could place residents at risk of oral infection, dental pain, and diminished quality of life.
- D Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received food that accommodated their preferences for one (Resident #51) of four residents reviewed for dietary services. The facility failed to honor Resident #1's preferences which stated no pork, no fish, no eggs, and no lettuce. This failure could place residents at risk for not having their choices and food preferences accommodated, and a diminished quality of life.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for two (Resident #17, and Resident #63) of seven residents reviewed for infection control. - RN A failed to sanitize the blood pressure cuff between uses on Resident # 17 and Resident # 63. Theses failures could place residents at risk for infection and cross contamination.
February 27, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary services for residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had his fingernails cleaned and trimmed. This failure could place residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at risk for infections, and a decreased quality of life.
February 9, 2023Standard inspection · 5 citations
- E Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 4 of 4 residents (Resident #2, Resident #5, Resident #12, and Resident #31) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2, Resident #5, Resident #12, and Resident #31 had oxygen concentrator filters free of sediment and debris. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving proper delivery of oxygen, cross contamination, respiratory compromise and/or infection and residents not having their respiratory needs met.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of the facility's only kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure foods were dated and labeled in the refrigerator and dry storage rooms. 2. The facility failed to ensure expired foods were discarded. 3. The facility failed to ensure food in the food preparation area was covered. These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and other bacteria illnesses.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident right, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #12's Care Plan was comprehensively developed and implemented to meet the residents needs. This failure could place residents at risk of their needs not being met.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, which included both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #49) reviewed for Care Plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #49's Care Plan was reviewed quarterly. This failure could place residents at risk of their needs not being met.
- D Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for one of one residents (Residents #20) reviewed for urinary catheters. The facility failed to ensure Resident #20's urinary catheter bag was off the floor. These failures could place residents at risk of cross-contamination and infections.
Fire safety inspections
10 fire safety citations on file: 7 on March 21, 2024, 3 on February 9, 2023.
Every fire safety citation10 citations
- F Develop and maintain an Emergency Preparedness Program (EP).
- F Have a battery powered remote alarm panel in a location accessible by operating personnel.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- E Provide exit doors that are held open by devices that will automatically close on the activation of a fire alarm or smoke detector.
- E Have horizontal exits used in accordance with safety requirements.
- E Have properly spaced exits within rooms.
- E Install a fire alarm system that can be heard throughout the facility.
- F Establish staff and initial training requirements.
- E Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- E Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| January 2, 2025 | Fine | $9,110 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.42 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.43 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.18 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.64 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.35 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 45.0% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 33.3% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.57 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.52 on weekdays and 3.18 on weekends, 10% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.8% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.53 in April to June 2025 to 3.42 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.42 | 0.43 | 3.52 | 3.18 | 0.8% | 0 of 90 | 95 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.39 | 0.44 | 3.46 | 3.19 | 0.8% | 0 of 92 | 90 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.42 | 0.47 | 3.51 | 3.19 | 0.7% | 0 of 92 | 103 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.53 | 0.53 | 3.60 | 3.34 | 0.9% | 0 of 91 | 101 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.9 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.9 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.9 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.7 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 30.6 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 16.2 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.5 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.1 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: DALLAS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT. CMS links this home to Cantex Continuing Care, a group of 37 nursing homes averaging 3.1 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Castaneda, Edmundo | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/10/2022 | |
| Cerise, Frederick | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/24/2014 | |
| Hollymead Continuing Care Center Ltd. Co. | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 09/01/2019 | |
| Dean, Lisa | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/30/2024 | |
| Hollymead Continuing Care Center Ltd. Co. | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/31/2025 | |
| Dean, Lisa | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/30/2024 | |
| Lovett, Angela | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 12 problems in this area, most recently on April 24, 2025: "Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on April 24, 2025: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on April 3, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on April 24, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Cross Timbers Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center Flower Mound, 0.6 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 23 citations
- Rambling Oaks Courtyard Extensive Care Community Highland Village, 2.4 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 32 citations
- Lake Village Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Lewisville, 3.8 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 33 citations
- Vista Ridge Nursing & Rehabilitation Center Lewisville, 6.6 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 27 citations
- Avir at Grapevine Grapevine, 6.8 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 40 citations
- Denton Rehabilitation and Nursing Center Denton, 7.3 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 24 citations
- Grapevine Medical Lodge Grapevine, 7.6 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 8 citations
- Corinth Rehabilitation Suites on the Parkway Corinth, 7.7 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 48 citations
Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Resident advocate: Texas Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 800-252-2412. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is Hollymead's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Hollymead 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Hollymead get at its last inspection?
- 10 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 24, 2025. The Texas average is 9.4.
- Has Hollymead been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $9,110 in the last three years.
- Does Hollymead accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Hollymead?
- CMS lists 7 owners and managers, and links the home to Cantex Continuing Care. Legal business name: DALLAS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.