What is Landmark of Lake Charles's Medicare star rating?

CMS rates Landmark of Lake Charles 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 1 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).

How many deficiencies did Landmark of Lake Charles get at its last inspection?

6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on September 10, 2025. The Louisiana average is 6.4.

Has Landmark of Lake Charles been fined?

CMS lists no fines in the last three years.

Does Landmark of Lake Charles accept Medicaid?

It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.

Who owns Landmark of Lake Charles?

CMS lists 41 owners and managers, and links the home to The Beebe Family. Legal business name: LAKE CHARLES PROPERTIES LLC.

Landmark of Lake Charles: Inspections, Staffing & Ratings

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on September 10, 2025, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Louisiana average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).

None of its 16 health citations since October 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.08 hours per resident per day, against 3.76 across Louisiana and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.40 of those hours.

58.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Louisiana average 47.6%).

CMS links it to The Beebe Family, an affiliated group of 48 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

310/23

409/24

307/25

609/25

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 16 health citations on file.

Severity

Isolated

Pattern

Widespread

Immediate jeopardy

Actual harm

Potential for more than minimal harm

11D

Potential for minimal harm

September 10, 2025Standard inspection · 6 citations

E

Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 10, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 88 residents who ate out of the kitchen. The facility's census was 97.
D

Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.

F628 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 10, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to notify the State's Long-Term Care Ombudsman of emergency transfers in writing for 1 (#24) of 2 (#24 and #102) sampled residents reviewed for transfer and discharge requirements.
D

Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 10, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) was completed accurately for 2 (#25 and #27) out of 42 sampled residents. The deficient practice had the potential to affect a total census of 97 residents.
D

Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.

F644 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 10, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to refer a resident with a diagnosed mental disorder to the appropriate state-designated authority for Level II PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) evaluation and determination for 1 ( #24) of 3 (#3, #6 and #24) residents investigated for PASARR in a final sample of 42 residents.
D

Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 10, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to develop a person- centered care plan for 2 (#25 and #27)) out of 42 sampled residents. The deficient practice had the potential to affect a total census of 97 residents.
D

Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 10, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent development and transmission of disease and infection as evidence by: failing to ensure glucometer machines were cleaned and disinfected per the facility's policy and manufacturer's guidelines. This deficient practice occurred during 1 of 2 observations of glucose monitoring during medication pass.

July 1, 2025Complaint inspection · 3 citations

E

Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.

F644 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 12, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to refer a resident with a diagnosed mental disorder to the appropriate state-designated authority for Level II PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) evaluation and determination for 2 ( #2, #3) of 6 (#1, #2, #3, #R1, #R2, #R3) residents investigated for PASARR in a final sample of 6 residents.
E

Hire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.

F850 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 12, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure it employed a qualified social worker (SW) on a full-time basis. The facility had 130 licensed beds.
D

Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 12, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1(#1) of 6 (#1, #2, #3, #R1, #R2, #R3) sampled residents.

September 25, 2024Standard inspection · 4 citations

E

Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 11, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on observations, and interview, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service, and ensure sanitary conditions were maintained in the kitchen as evidenced by: 1. a thick layer of debris on the deep fryer cooking oil collection area; 2. expired foods from the kitchen walk in cooler, and dry storage area; 3. opened food items not labeled with the date and time; and 4. sticky residue with food debris on the cart used to bring food items from one part of the kitchen to another. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 87 residents who consumed food from the kitchen.
D

Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 11, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately code the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Hospice care for 1 (Resident #83) out of 29 sampled residents.
D

Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.

F644 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 11, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to refer a resident with a diagnosed mental disorder to the appropriate state-designated authority for Level II PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) evaluation and determination for 1 ( #19) of 1 (#19) residents investigated for PASARR in a final sample of 29 residents.
D

Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.

F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 11, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services that is in accordance with professional standards of practice as evidenced by failing to ensure the resident's oxygen equipment was stored properly for 1 (#77) out of 2 (#77, #84) residents reviewed for respiratory care, with the potential to effect 14 residents receiving oxygen therapy.

October 25, 2023Standard inspection · 3 citations

E

Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

F584 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 17, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the residents had a safe, clean, comfortable homelike environment by failing to maintain a clean environment in resident bathrooms for 5 (Resident #35, Resident #61, Resident #74, Resident #91, Resident #93) out of 37 sampled residents. This deficient practice had the potential to affect a total census of 103.
D

Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 17, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately code the resident's MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment for 1 (#104) out of 37 sampled residents. This deficient practice had the potential to affect a census of 103.
D

Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.

F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 17, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards for 1 (#76) of 37 sampled residents. This deficient practice was evident when facility staff failed to ensure respiratory suction equipment was properly stored for Resident #76.

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

Measure	This home	Louisiana	United States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)	4.08	3.76	3.86
Registered nurses	0.40	0.31	0.69
All nursing staff on weekends	3.25	3.21	3.42
Nurse aides	2.68
Licensed practical nurses	0.99
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)	58.6%	47.6%	45.8%
Registered nurse turnover	25.0%	41.6%	42.9%
Administrators who left	0

CMS expects 3.24 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.42 on weekdays and 3.25 on weekends, 26% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.2% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.11 in April to June 2025 to 4.08 in January to March 2026.

Quarter	All nursing staff	Registered nurses	Weekdays	Weekends	Contract staff share	Days with no RN hours	Residents a day
Jan to Mar 2026	4.08	0.40	4.42	3.25	0.2%	0 of 90	100
Oct to Dec 2025	4.03	0.31	4.36	3.19	0.3%	0 of 92	104
Jul to Sep 2025	4.32	0.36	4.69	3.38	0.3%	0 of 92	95
Apr to Jun 2025	4.11	0.34	4.46	3.21	0.1%	0 of 91	96
United States, Jan to Mar 2026	3.75	0.62	3.92	3.33	5.3%	0.5% of days
Louisiana, Jan to Mar 2026	3.64	0.26	3.86	3.10	3.6%	0.9% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Louisiana

Job	Median	Middle half	Employed
Louisiana, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$14.67	$13.97 to $16.87	20,690
LPNs and LVNs	$27.63	$23.87 to $29.43	17,600
Registered nurses	$38.57	$33.19 to $45.00	48,970
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$20.67	$17.91 to $22.55	534,270
LPNs and LVNs	$33.86	$30.05 to $37.40	188,210
Registered nurses	$41.11	$37.85 to $47.68	142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

Measure	This home	Louisiana	US
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	23.0	17.8	13.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	1.0	1.2	0.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	2.0	2.1	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	7.2	3.5	3.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	8.7	3.1	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	21.0	17.9	14.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	3.4	5.6	4.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	28.5	22.7	15.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	41.3	28.0	23.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	28.3	14.8	12.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	3.4	2.6	1.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	5.4	2.7	1.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Landmark of Lake Charles's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (47.5% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

47.5% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Louisiana: 16 better, 33 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 34 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

11.4% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Louisiana: 0 better, 3 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 86 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

6.3% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Louisiana: 1 better, 7 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 41 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

61.5% this home

Median of homes: Louisiana50.0% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 52 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

4.5% this home

Median of homes: Louisiana1.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 88 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

8.4% this home

Median of homes: Louisiana2.8% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 88 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

95.2% this home

Median of homes: Louisiana100.0% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 21 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: LAKE CHARLES PROPERTIES LLC. CMS links this home to The Beebe Family, a group of 48 nursing homes averaging 2.8 stars overall.

Name	Role	Type	Share	Since
David & Felicia Stallard Child Tr	5% or greater direct ownership interest	Organization	5%	09/01/2009
Elton Glynn Beebe Jr. & Nancy Doty Beebe Irrv Tr Ua	5% or greater direct ownership interest	Organization	5%	09/01/2009
Gerard and Alison Danos Childrens Tr	5% or greater direct ownership interest	Organization		09/01/2009
Joseph & Alison Sadler Children Tr	5% or greater direct ownership interest	Organization		09/01/2009
Medico LLC	5% or greater direct ownership interest	Organization	85%	09/01/2009
Elton Glynn Beebe Jr. & Nancy Doty Beebe Irrv Tr Ua	5% or greater indirect ownership interest	Organization	5%	01/01/2010
Parkinson, Toni	Managing control - governing body	Individual		07/01/2011
Parkinson, Toni	Corporate officer	Individual		11/15/2015
Account Management Services Inc	Operational/managerial control	Organization		01/01/2010
Administrative Systems Inc	Operational/managerial control	Organization		01/01/2010
Medico LLC	Operational/managerial control	Organization		01/01/2009
Pathway Management of Louisiana LLC	Operational/managerial control	Organization		01/01/2013
Providence Care LLC	Operational/managerial control	Organization		09/01/2009
Provider Professional Services Inc	Operational/managerial control	Organization		01/01/2010
Tristar Rehab Inc	Operational/managerial control	Organization		01/01/2024
Beebe, Bobby	Operational/managerial control	Individual		01/01/2013
Beebe, Elton	Operational/managerial control	Individual		09/01/2009
Johnson, Veronica	Operational/managerial control	Individual		05/09/2022
Lafuria, Mark	Operational/managerial control	Individual		10/03/2023
Parkinson, Toni	Operational/managerial control	Individual		01/01/2010
Pugh, William	Operational/managerial control	Individual		01/02/2017
Stallard, David	Operational/managerial control	Individual		09/01/2009
Account Management Services Inc	Adp of the SNF	Organization		01/01/2010
Administrative Systems Inc	Adp of the SNF	Organization		01/01/2010
Alisons 2016 Fam Tr No 2	Adp of the SNF	Organization		01/01/2025
Aria Care Management LLC	Adp of the SNF	Organization		08/01/2022
Beebe 2013 Childrens Tr Ng	Adp of the SNF	Organization		01/01/2025
Felicias 2016 Fam Tr No 2	Adp of the SNF	Organization		01/01/2025
Louisiana Extended Care Centers LLC	Adp of the SNF	Organization		01/01/2025
LTC Him Consulting Inc	Adp of the SNF	Organization		04/01/2007
Oak Park Healthcare Properties LLC	Adp of the SNF	Organization		01/01/2025
Pharmaceutical Consulting Services of America LLC	Adp of the SNF	Organization		12/31/2010
Providence Care LLC	Adp of the SNF	Organization		09/01/2009
Provider Professional Services Inc	Adp of the SNF	Organization		01/01/2010
Qsst Tr for Alison Beebe Sadler Danos and Her Descendants	Adp of the SNF	Organization		01/01/2025
Tristar Rehab Inc	Adp of the SNF	Organization		01/01/2024
Verdin Enterprises, LLC	Adp of the SNF	Organization		11/01/2021
Lafuria, Mark	Adp of the SNF	Individual		10/03/2013
Parkinson, Toni	Adp of the SNF	Individual		01/01/2010
Pugh, William	Adp of the SNF	Individual		01/02/2017
Stallard, David	Adp of the SNF	Individual		09/01/2009

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 8 problems in this area, most recently on September 10, 2025: "Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment."
Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on September 10, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on September 10, 2025: "Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies."
How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on September 25, 2024: "Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed."

Other nursing homes nearby

Calcasieu Community Care Center
Lake Charles, 1.5 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 28 citations
Rosewood Nursing Center
Lake Charles, 1.8 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 19 citations
Lake Charles Care Center
Lake Charles, 2.2 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 12 citations
Resthaven Nursing & Rehab Center, LLC
Lake Charles, 3.5 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 20 citations
Grand Cove Nursing & Rehabilitation Center
Lake Charles, 3.9 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 23 citations
The Gardens and Guardian
Lake Charles, 4 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 10 citations
Holly Hill House
Sulphur, 8.7 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 59 citations
High Hope Care Center
Sulphur, 11.8 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 11 citations

Louisiana contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Louisiana. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Inspections and complaints: Louisiana Department of Health, Health Standards Section, Nursing Facilities, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
Resident advocate: Louisiana Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, Governor's Office of Elderly Affairs, (866) 632-0922. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.

Common questions

What is Landmark of Lake Charles's Medicare star rating?: CMS rates Landmark of Lake Charles 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 1 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Landmark of Lake Charles get at its last inspection?: 6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on September 10, 2025. The Louisiana average is 6.4.
Has Landmark of Lake Charles been fined?: CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Landmark of Lake Charles accept Medicaid?: It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Landmark of Lake Charles?: CMS lists 41 owners and managers, and links the home to The Beebe Family. Legal business name: LAKE CHARLES PROPERTIES LLC.

Sources

Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.