Find a nursing home

Home / Texas / Hemphill

Legacies Nursing and Rehabilitation

355 Fm 83 W, Hemphill, TX 75948 · Sabine County · (409) 787-5300

90 certified beds, about 87 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 2013

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
5 of 5
Staffing
2 of 5
Quality measures
2 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 676344 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on March 18, 2026, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).

None of its 12 health citations since December 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.55 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.19 of those hours.

47.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).

CMS links it to Chambers County Public Hospital District No. 1, an affiliated group of 7 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 12 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
8D
3E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
March 18, 2026Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 20, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food under sanitary conditions in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure the temperature for the dish machine was at the appropriate temperature of 120 degrees Fahrenheit during the wash cycle according to the manufacturer's guidelines to sanitize dishes appropriately on 03/01/26 through 3/17/26. This failure could place residents who eat from the kitchen at risk of foodborne illnesses.
  2. D
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    F583 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 20, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident had a right to privacy during medical care for 1 of 6 residents (Residents #73) observed for privacy. The facility failed to ensure full visual privacy during incontinent care for Resident #73 on 03/16/2026. This deficient practice placed residents at risk of loss of privacy and dignity.
  3. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 20, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) and 1 of 7 staff (MA C) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure MA C followed contact precautions for Resident #1 on 3/16/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of exposure to infectious diseases due to improper infection control practices.
January 15, 2025Standard inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 5, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for 2 of 12 residents reviewed for accident hazards. (Resident #50 and #63). 1. The facility failed to develop and implement a policy and procedure to properly handle the care of mechanical lift slings including interventions to inspect the Hoyer sling for signs of damage before each use and not removing damaged slings from service for Resident #50. 2. NA D failed to properly transfer Resident #63 on 01/14/2025. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of falls and injuries during transfers.
December 20, 2023Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 8 citations
  1. E
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    F644 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 16, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to refer all residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition for level II resident review upon a significant change of condition for 4 of 6 Residents (Resident #49, Resident #56, Resident #67, and Resident #76) reviewed for PASSAR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review Services) in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #49 had a PASSAR level II evaluation completed with a diagnosis of psychotic disorder (abnormal thinking and perceptions). 2. [...]
  2. E
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    F690 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 16, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #1 and Resident # 24) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure Residents #1 and 24's indwelling catheters (drains urine from your bladder into a bag outside your body) had a securement device to anchor their catheters. This failure could place residents at risk for urinary tract infections and catheter related injuries.
  3. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 16, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 8 staff (CNA G, CNA Q, CNA N) and for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for infection control (Resident #9 and Resident #45). 1. The facility failed to ensure MA P wore gloves when administering eye drops to Resident #45. 2. The facility failed to ensure the Treatment nurse used a clean gauze pad to dry a wound for Resident #9. 3. The facility failed to ensure CNA G, CNA Q, and CNA N washed or sanitized their hands when passing out meal trays to residents on Hall 200 and Hall 300. These failures could place residents at risk of exposure to communicable diseases and infections.
  4. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 16, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to treat residents with respect and dignity and care for them in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life for 1 of 22 residents (Resident #20) and 1 of 10 staff (CNA N) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to treat Resident #20 with respect and dignity when she did not receive her lunch meal tray while the other residents seated with her in the dining room were already eating. The facility failed to ensure staff referred to residents in a dignified manner when CNA N referred to residents requiring assistance with meals as feeders where residents could hear her. This failure could place residents at risk for decreased quality of life, decreased self-esteem and increased anxiety.
  5. D
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    F554 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 16, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the interdisciplinary team had determined that self-administration of medications by a resident was clinically appropriate for 1 of 4 (Resident #34) residents reviewed for resident rights, in that: The facility failed to assess, obtain physician orders, and interdisciplinary team approval for Resident #34 to self-administer his Ventolin inhaler. This failure placed the resident at risk of not receiving the proper medication or the therapeutic benefits of medications.
  6. D
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    F760 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 16, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #45) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure MA P held Resident #45's Losartan Potassium 25mg (for high blood pressure) for a blood pressure reading that was lower than ordered parameters. This failure could place residents at risk for inaccurate drug administration resulting in decline in health and decreased quality of life.
  7. D
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    F813 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 16, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and ensure safe and sanitary storage of residents' food items, per facility policy, for 2 of 7 resident's (Resident #21 and 38) personal refrigerators reviewed for food and nutrition services. The facility failed to ensure the refrigerator for Resident #21 did not contain strawberry and chocolate boostdated 11/5/2023 and 12/5/2023 and a plastic container with something orange that was undated. The facility failed to ensure the refrigerator for Resident #38 did not contain chocolate boost and a bowl of pot pie that was undated. These failures could place residents at risk for food borne illnesses.
  8. D
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    F919 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 16, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents could call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area from each resident's bedside; and toilet and bathing facilities for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #51) reviewed for call lights. The facility failed to ensure Residents #51's emergency call light located in the bathroom would reach the floor. This failure could affect residents who used their call light or desired to use the call light and place them at risk of not being able to notify staff of their needs.

Fire safety inspections

9 fire safety citations on file: 2 on March 18, 2026, 2 on January 15, 2025, 5 on December 20, 2023.

Every fire safety citation9 citations
  1. F
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · March 18, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · March 18, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. F
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · January 15, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. E
    Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
    K 374 · January 15, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. F
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · December 20, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. D
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · December 20, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. D
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · December 20, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. D
    Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
    K 511 · December 20, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. D
    Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
    K 923 · December 20, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeTexasUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.553.393.86
Registered nurses0.190.430.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.122.983.42
Nurse aides2.58
Licensed practical nurses0.78
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)47.7%55.3%45.8%
Registered nurse turnovernot reported54.6%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.52 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.73 on weekdays and 3.12 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.52 in April to June 2025 to 3.55 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.550.193.733.12 0.0%0 of 9087
Oct to Dec 20253.480.193.623.10 0.0%0 of 9287
Jul to Sep 20253.630.203.793.22 0.0%0 of 9285
Apr to Jun 20253.520.203.673.12 0.0%0 of 9184
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Texas, Jan to Mar 20263.330.403.502.932.2%0.7% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.

Official wage estimates for Texas

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Texas, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$18.03$16.97 to $20.7188,680
LPNs and LVNs$29.92$27.46 to $32.8957,560
Registered nurses$46.14$38.06 to $50.53271,380
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeTexasUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
36.615.813.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.70.30.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.30.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.73.33.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.31.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
37.014.014.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.83.84.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
10.79.615.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
20.325.723.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
16.312.312.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.12.21.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
4.52.11.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Legacies Nursing and Rehabilitation's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (42.1% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

42.1% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Texas: 116 better, 50 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 63 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

9.8% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Texas: 0 better, 9 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 91 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

8.3% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Texas: 4 better, 11 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 67 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

61.9% this home

Median of homes: Texas57.3% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 84 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Texas0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 113 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

0.8% this home

Median of homes: Texas1.3% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 113 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

100.0% this home

Median of homes: Texas98.5% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 36 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: CHAMBERS COUNTY PUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICT NO. 1. CMS links this home to Chambers County Public Hospital District No. 1, a group of 7 nursing homes averaging 3 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Bradberry, TiffaniW-2 managing employeeIndividual12/01/2021
Cooper, KimberlyCorporate directorIndividual01/29/2024
Newton, ElizabethCorporate directorIndividual02/22/2024
Hemphill SNF Operations LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization12/01/2021
Cooriston, CraigOperational/managerial controlIndividual12/01/2021

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on March 18, 2026: "Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential."
  2. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on March 18, 2026: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
  3. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on March 18, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  4. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on January 15, 2025: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."

Other nursing homes nearby

Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Legacies Nursing and Rehabilitation's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Legacies Nursing and Rehabilitation 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 5 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Legacies Nursing and Rehabilitation get at its last inspection?
3 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on March 18, 2026. The Texas average is 9.4.
Has Legacies Nursing and Rehabilitation been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Legacies Nursing and Rehabilitation accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Legacies Nursing and Rehabilitation?
CMS lists 5 owners and managers, and links the home to Chambers County Public Hospital District No. 1. Legal business name: CHAMBERS COUNTY PUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICT NO. 1.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection