2936 Markum Dr, Fort Worth, TX 76117 · Tarrant County · (817) 831-0545
127 certified beds, about 101 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2002
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 675935 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 15, 2026, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 27 health citations since September 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $22,205 in the last three years; the largest was $22,205, and the latest is dated July 9, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.56 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.80 of those hours.
60.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Life Care Centers of America, an affiliated group of 194 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 27 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for accident and supervision. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was provided with adequate supervision on 07/03/2026 to prevent the resident from remaining outside unattended in heat for and extended time and being found unresponsive. Resident #1 was transported to the hospital via EMS and expired on 07/14/2026. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ (Immediate Jeopardy) began on 07/03/2026 and ended on 07/08/2026. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. These failures could place all residents at risk for accidents that could lead to serious injury, harm, impairment, or death.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that an alleged violation involving neglect was reported immediately to Health and Human Services State Survey Agency, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment. The Administrator failed to notify Health and Human Services State Survey Agency of an incident of neglect that occurred on 07/03/2026 when Resident #1 was found outside at 2:40 PM unresponsive with shallow breathing in his motorized wheelchair. This failure could place residents at risk for continued neglect and harm.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical and nursing needs to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #15, Resident #27 and Resident #33) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. 1. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for Resident #15 that addressed the cleaning and storage of BIPAP machine (a noninvasive ventilatory device that helps patients breathe by delivering two levels of air pressure: higher during inhalation and lower during exhalation to include cleaning or storage of the machine) and equipment.2. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure a resident who needed respiratory care, was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 3 of 4 residents (Residents #15, #27, and #33) reviewed for respiratory care.1. The nursing facility failed to clean, store, and document the use of a BIPAP (a noninvasive ventilatory device that helps patients breathe by delivering two levels of air pressure: higher during inhalation and lower during exhalation) for Resident #15 and Resident #33. 2. LVN-E failed to change and label Resident #27's nasal cannula (a tube with two prongs used to deliver supplemental oxygen to patients) and water bottle on 03/05/26. These failures could place residents at risk for respiratory infections. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that an alleged violation involving abuse was reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made for 1 (Resident #1) of 10 residents reviewed for abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment. LVN B failed to immediately report an allegation of sexual abuse on 02/17/26 at 3:00 AM after Resident #2 wandered into the wrong room, and Resident #3 alleged that Resident #1 was molested by Resident #2. The Administrator was made aware of the allegation by Resident #3 on 02/17/26 at 11:00 AM and reported it to the state agency at that time. This failure could place residents at risk for continued abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feedings for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #13) reviewed for enteral nutrition. The facility failed to include Resident #13's down time in the physician orders for enteral feeding. The facility failed to include Resident #13's down time from enteral feeding on her Medication Administration Record. These failures could affect residents receiving enteral nutrition/hydration and place them at risk of health complications and decline in nutrition.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals, to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 6 medication carts (Hall B cart) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure one bottle of zinc, with an expiration date of November 2025, had been removed from the Hall B medication cart. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving expired medications that were ineffective.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to collaborate with hospice representatives and coordinate the hospice care planning process for each resident receiving hospice services, to ensure quality of care for the resident, ensuring communication with the hospice medical director, the resident's attending physician, and others participating in the provision of care for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #13) reviewed for hospice services. The facility failed to obtain Resident #13's physician's order for hospice services. This deficient practice could place residents who receive hospice services at-risk of receiving inadequate end-of-life care due to a lack of documentation, coordination of care and communication of resident needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation for 3 of 5 residents (Residents #2 and #3, and #4) Record reviewed for abuse.1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 did not verbally abuse Resident #2 on 03/18/25 .2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 did not verbally abuse Resident #3 on 06/28/25. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4 had the right to be free from abuse when CNA A threatened to hit the resident back on 06/06/25. This failure could place residents at risk for abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 3 residents (Residents #5 and #7) reviewed for infection control.1. CNA G failed to wear a PPE when she provided Resident #5, who was on enhanced barrier precautions, with incontinence care on 08/06/2025 with a physician order for PPE dated 07/16/2025. 2. CNA H failed to perform proper hand hygiene practices to include changing her gloves and washing/sanitizing her hands when she provided Resident #7 incontinence care on 08/07/2025. These failures placed residents at risk of cross contamination and the spread of infection.1. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility must ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown origin source and misappropriation of resident property are reported immediately but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency) for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #2) Record reviewed for reporting. The facility failed to report to the Administrator when Resident #1 verbally threatened Resident #2 on 03/18/25. This failure places residents at risk for further abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to have evidence that all alleged violations in response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment were thoroughly investigated for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #5) Record reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to thoroughly investigate and an incident when CNA A asked Resident #5 for $0.50 to buy a soda on 07/23/2025. This failure places the residents at risk for misappropriation and exploitation.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident with pressure ulcers receives necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for wound care . The facility failed to ensure Resident #5's stage 4 pressure ulcer wound her sacrum was covered with a dressing. This failure could place residents at risk of severe pain, and lead to systemic infections causing harm for residents. Record review of Resident #5's entry MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female, who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, the facility ensured a resident received care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers and did not develop pressure ulcers unless the individual's clinical condition demonstrated that they were unavoidable; and a resident with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #1 and Resident#2) reviewed for pressure ulcers/injuries. The facility failed to provide pressure relieving devices to support the residents being repositioned on their side. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for two of six residents (Resident #2 and #3) residents reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to provide Enhanced barrier precaution signage and PPE outside of Resident#2 door. 2. The facility failed to provide PPE inside and/or outside of Resident# 3 room. These failures could place residents at risk for infection.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that prohibit mistreatment, neglect, and abuse of residents, for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to implement the abuse and neglect policy and procedure regarding reporting an injury of unknown origin for Resident #1 to the Administrator or HHSC. These failures could place the residents at an increased risk for abuse and neglect.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source were reported immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse to the Administrator of the facility and to other officials, including the State Survey Agency, in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to report to HHSC when Resident #2 was found to have a significant bruise of unknown origin on his left forearm on 01/24/25. This failure to report could place the residents at risk for abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for accidents. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was provided with adequate supervision to prevent falls when Resident #1 fell when attempting to self-transfer, due to staff not returning to assist her. 2. CNA E failed to obtain assistance from another staff member when using a mechanical lift to transfer Resident #2 from his geri chair to his bed on 01/21/25. Agency CNA failed to obtain assistance from another staff member when using a mechanical lift to transfer Resident #2 from the shower chair to his bed on 1/23/25. This failure could place residents at risk for accidents and injuries.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are complete and accurately documented for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for accuracy of medical records. The facility failed to ensure a bruise found on Resident #2's left forearm was documented accurately and completely in the resident's EHR when it was noticed on 01/24/25. This failure could place the residents at risk for incomplete and inaccurate clinical records which could lead to miscommunication or a delay in services.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who required dialysis received such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #20) reviewed for dialysis. The facility failed to ensure post-dialysis assessments were completed for Resident #20 after returning from dialysis treatment. This failure could place residents at risk of inadequate post dialysis care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate dispensing and administering of all drugs and biologicals, to meet the needs of each resident for 4 of 4 medication carts (Hall A, Hall D, Hall E, and Hall F medication carts) and establishing a system of records receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation one of one storage area for drugs pending destruction (DON's office) reviewed for storage of medications 1. The facility failed to ensure insulin pens that were opened and used for Hall E and Hall F were labeled with opening dates. 2. The facility failed to ensure expired medications (sodium carbonate, nitroglycerin, and calcium) stored on the the Hall A and Hall D medication carts were securely stored and reconciled. 3. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' right to formulate an advance directive for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #17) reviewed for advanced directives, in that: Resident #17's Out-of-Hospital Do Not Resuscitate (OOHDNR) was not dated by the resident and the physician at the time it was signed, rendering the document invalid. This failure could place residents at-risk of having their end of life wishes dishonored, and of having CPR performed against their wishes.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to respect the resident's right to personal privacy for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #54) reviewed for privacy issues in that: RN A failed to provide full privacy for Resident #54 during intravenous medication administration by not closing privacy curtains or door during care. This failure could cause residents to feel uncomfortable, disrespected, and possible exposure to anyone passing by.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure parenteral fluids were administered consistent with professional standards of practice and in accordance with physician orders, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goal and preferences for 1 of 2 resident (Resident #120) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #120's intravenous medication bag was labeled with date, time, and initials. These failures could place residents at risk for medication error, and delay in medication administration.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, comfortable, and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of diseases for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #13) reviewed for infection control. CNA E failed to wear an N95 mask and eye protection when entering Resident #13's room who was COVID positive on 10/08/24. These failures could place residents at risk for infection and cross contamination.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff for 6 (CNA G, CNA H, CNA I, CNA J, CNA K and LVN B) of 16 facility staff reviewed for trainings consistent with their expected roles. 1. The facility failed to provide CNA G, CNA H and LVN B's annual trainings consistent with their expected roles. 2. The facility failed to provide CNA I, CNA J, CNA K's new hire trainings consistent with their expected roles. This failure could place residents at risk of being cared for by staff who have been insufficiently trained.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for one (Resident #242) of ten residents reviewed for accidents. The facility failed to provide Resident #242 with the proper wheelchair cushion to prevent a fall from his wheelchair in the transportation van on the way to dialysis. This failure could place residents at risk for serious injury or harm, decline in health, and decreased quality of life.
13 fire safety citations on file: 9 on January 15, 2026, 4 on September 14, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| July 9, 2026 | Fine | $22,205 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.56 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.80 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.08 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.88 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.88 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 60.2% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 71.4% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.67 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.75 on weekdays and 3.08 on weekends, 18% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 2.6% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.81 in April to June 2025 to 3.56 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.56 | 0.80 | 3.75 | 3.08 | 2.6% | 0 of 90 | 101 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.75 | 0.75 | 3.94 | 3.28 | 5.5% | 0 of 92 | 91 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.72 | 0.59 | 3.91 | 3.26 | 9.5% | 0 of 92 | 89 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.81 | 0.46 | 3.98 | 3.37 | 15.4% | 0 of 91 | 80 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $16.97 to $20.71 | 88,680 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.92 | $27.46 to $32.89 | 57,560 |
| Registered nurses | $46.14 | $38.06 to $50.53 | 271,380 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 20.4 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.2 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.4 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.1 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 20.6 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.7 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.3 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 26.3 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 10.6 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.7 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Life Care Center of Haltom's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (61.3% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
61.3% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Texas: 116 better, 50 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 124 eligible stays.
10.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Texas: 0 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 131 eligible stays.
8.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Texas: 4 better, 11 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 70 eligible stays.
73.5% this home
Median of homes: Texas57.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 68 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Texas0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 116 residents counted.
2.1% this home
Median of homes: Texas1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 116 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: Texas98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 51 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: HALTOM OPERATIONS, LLC. CMS links this home to Life Care Centers of America, a group of 194 nursing homes averaging 3.4 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developers Investment Company II, Inc | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 02/16/2007 | |
| Preston, Forrest | Direct ownership interest | Individual | 02/16/2007 | |
| Preston, Forrest | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 02/16/2007 | |
| Berck, Joseph | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 12/01/2022 | |
| Butner, Nancy | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 09/16/2018 | |
| Wyatt, Julie | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/02/2025 | |
| Cross, Cindy | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/01/2007 | |
| Henry, Terry | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/16/1999 | |
| Lay, Lisa | Corporate officer | Individual | 02/09/2018 | |
| Preston, Forrest | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/01/2007 | |
| Swanker, Richard | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/01/2011 | |
| Thurmond, Joan | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/22/2000 | |
| Developers Investment Company II, Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 02/16/2007 | |
| Life Care Centers of America, Inc. | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 08/01/2007 | |
| Behnam, Soroush | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2017 | |
| Berck, Joseph | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/01/2022 | |
| Butner, Nancy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/16/2018 | |
| Fletcher, Todd | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/13/2024 | |
| Preston, Aubrey | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/13/2024 | |
| Wyatt, Julie | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/02/2025 | |
| Ziegler, James | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/13/2024 | |
| Life Care Centers of America, Inc. | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/03/2025 | |
| Behnam, Soroush | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/03/2025 | |
| Berck, Joseph | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/03/2025 | |
| Preston, Forrest | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/30/2002 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.