Home / Texas / North Richland Hills
7625 Glenview Dr, North Richland Hills, TX 76180 · Tarrant County · (817) 284-1427
163 certified beds, about 102 residents a day · Government - Hospital district · Medicare and Medicaid since 1985
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 455494 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on August 19, 2025, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 25 health citations since June 2023, 4 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (4 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $23,970 in the last three years; the largest was $15,887, and the latest is dated March 28, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.40 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.30 of those hours.
57.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Opco Skilled Management, an affiliated group of 68 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 25 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately inform the resident; consult with the resident's physician; and notify, consistent with his or her authority, the resident representative when there is to commence a new form of treatment for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for resident rights. On 06/29/26, LVN B failed to notify Resident#1's legal representative about a new order for intravenous Vancomycin (glycopeptide antibiotic used to treat severe bacterial infections) to treat leukocytosis (an increase in the number of white blood cells in the bloodstream). This failure placed residents at risk of not making an informed decision about treatment, and risking side effects and allergic reactions.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of 6 residents observed for infection control. The facility failed to clean up blood on the door frame of Resident #1 and Resident #2 bathroom. This failure could place residents at risk for healthcare associated cross contamination and blood borne infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to treat the residents with respect and dignity for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed. 1. The facility failed to place Resident #1's name on the nameplate outside her room. 2. CNA A failed to wear her name tag when she provided care to Resident #1 .This failure placed residents at risk of needs not being met and not having their rights and dignity respected. Findings Included:Record Review of Resident #1's admission Record revealed Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia (a life-threatening, sudden worsening of gas exchange in patients with pre-existing, long-term lung disease) Record Review of Resident#1's Care Plan revision date 03/20/2025 revealed; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 3 (Resident #1) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to identify on the exterior of Resident #1's room that contact precautions were required before entering and did not provide the appropriate PPE at or near the door for Resident #1. This failure could place residents at risk of being infected by staff in contact with other residents with infections. Findings Included: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility. A facility must protect and promote the rights of each resident. for 4 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3 and Anonymous Person) of 5 residents reviewed. The facility failed to protect and promote the rights of Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3 and Anonymous Person who wanted to continue to be able to sit in the front patio. This failure could place residents at risk of a diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials including to the State Survey Agency where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities in accordance with State law through established procedures for 2 of 2 residents (Residents #1 and #2), reviewed for abuse, neglect, and exploitation. The facility failed to report an incident of resident to resident abuse between Resident #1 and Resident #2 that occurred on 10/10/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse, neglect and exploitation.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's weekly skin assessment was completed on 10/17/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of not identifying skin breakdown or injuries, and delayed treatment and monitoring.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours if the alleged violation involved abuse or neglect and resulted in bodily injury, to other officials (including the state Agency) and the administrator of the facility for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for reporting abuse. CNA A failed to notify the ADM and DON about an accident/hazard regarding Resident #1 that happened on 08/27/25. This failure could place residents at risk for abuse and neglect.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for supervision and ensured the environment remained free of accidents hazards. The facility failed to ensure CNA A appropriately transferred Resident #1 from the bed to the motorized wheelchair to ensure accidents did not occur. This failure could place residents at risk of being in an unsafe environment and at risk of accidents and injury.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review (PASRR) and refer all level II residents and all residents with possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition for one (Resident #8) of one residents reviewed for PASRR screenings. The facility failed to ensure Resident #8's PASRR Level One screening accurately reflected their diagnosis of mental illness. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving specialized therapy and equipment services they may benefit from.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (Resident #2) of 8 residents, and 1 of 1 laundry room reviewed for infection control in that: 1. ADON B did not wear PPE during wound care for Resident #2 who was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions for wounds. 2. The facility failed to prevent cross contamination of three racks of clean residents' clothing by placing the racks in front of two washing machines in the soiled area of the laundry room. 3. The Laundry Aide failed to keep the clean laundry folding table clean, when she placed her shoes on the table next to residents' clean clothing. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, for 3 of 18 residents (Resident #81, Resident #5, and Resident #18) reviewed for maintenance services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #81's ceiling tile was repaired and maintained around the air vent. The facility failed to ensure Resident #5's air vent was cleaned and free of debris. The facility failed to ensure a hole in the wall of Resident #18's room was repaired. The facility failed to ensure resident #18 had sufficient lighting in the bathroom. These failures could place residents at risk of living in an unclean, unsanitary, and accident-free environment which could lead to a decreased quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication was stored in locked compartments for 1 of 7 Medication Carts (Cart A) and 1 of 2 Treatment Carts (Cart B) reviewed for drug security. 1. A medication cart (Cart A) was left unlocked when not in use, unattended, and out of nurse's view while Resident #15 sat across from medication Cart A on 08/17/25. 2. A treatment cart (Cart B) was left unlocked when not in use and unattended on 08/17/25. These deficiencies could place residents at risk of medications loss, drug diversion, or harm due to accidental ingestion of unprescribed medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living receives showers to maintain grooming and personal hygiene for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for ADL care. The facility did not provide showers or baths to Resident #1 as scheduled. This failure can affect residents by decreasing their quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents with pressure ulcers receive necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for treatment of pressure ulcers. The facility failed to follow their Wound Care management protocol when they failed to refer Resident #1 to the Wound care consultant at the time of her re-admission to the facility when she was admitted with a sacral pressure ulcer. Resident #1 was readmitted on [DATE] and facility did not refer the resident to the Wound Care consultant until 03/25/25. The noncompliance was identified as Past Noncompliance (PNC). The noncompliance began on 03/17/25 and ended on 03/25/25. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's only garbage storage dumpster, and surrounding area, was maintained in a sanitary condition to prevent the harborage and feeding of pest. 1. The facility failed to ensure the trash dumpster's door, located outside the facility's building, was closed., 2. The facility failed to ensure trash was not left outside of the dumpster on the ground. This failure could place residents at risk of contracting disease by attracting pest, disease carrying rodents, and having debris dangerous to residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area for 7 residents (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #7, #8) of 8 residents reviewed for resident call system in that: The facility failed to ensure 7 out of 8 Resident's (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #7, #8) call buttons were accessible on 4/9/24 to residents on the secured unit. This failure could have placed 20 residents on the secured unit at risk of being unable to obtain assistance for activities of daily living or in the event of an emergency.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents for one of seven residents (Resident #2) reviewed for accidents and supervision . The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 was transferred by two staff, which resulted in a fall with fracture of her distal left Femur (a distal femur is a fracture of the thighbone that occurs just above the knee joint) on 01/19/24 . The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 01/19/24 and ended on 01/22/24. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk for serious injury due to unsafe transfers.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that caused the allegation did not involve abuse and did not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for abuse and neglect. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident has the right to be free from neglect for one (Resident #1) of 6 residents reviewed for neglect. The facility failed to provide necessary x-ray services in a timely manner and failed to follow up to get results in a timely manner for Resident #1. The facility failed to provide education and training for nursing staff on how to carry out carry out physician orders for x-rays and follow up on the results in a timely manner. The facility failed to follow their policies for laboratory, diagnostic and radiology services and physician orders. Resident #1 fell on 9/28/2023 at 2:00 PM and sustained an injury, the order for an x-ray was obtained on 9/28/2023 at 5pm. The x-ray was completed on 9/29/2023 at 1:15 PM (20 hours delay). The facility was notified of results at 8:00 PM on 9/29/2023. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care and considering acuity of the facility residents for 4 ( LVN A, LVN B, LVN C, and ADON) of 6 nurses reviewed for competency, in that : The facility failed to ensure: - LVN B carried out an x-ray for Resident #1. - RN C followed up with the x-ray order for Resident #1. - LVN A followed up with the x-ray order in timely manner and to get results for Resident #1. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to provide radiology or other diagnostic services to meet the needs of its residents in a timely manner for 1 (Resident #1) of 6 residents reviewed for radiology services. 1. The facility failed to ensure that an x-ray was completed in a timely manner for Resident #1 2. The facility failed to follow up to get Resident #1's x-ray results in a timely manner. Resident #1 had an unwitnessed fall on 9/28/23 at 2pm and sustained an injury, The order for an x-ray was obtained on 9/28/23 at 5pm. The x-ray was completed on 9/29/23 at 1:15pm (20 hours delay). The facility was aware of results on 9/29/23 at 8:00 PM. Resident #1 had a fracture to the right hip. Thirty hours after the fall with fracture, the resident was sent to the hospital for treatment. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent neglect of residents for one (Resident #1) of six residents reviewed for neglect. The facility failed to implement a policy and process for immediately investigating and reporting allegation of neglect related to facility's failure to obtain an x-ray and send Resident #1 to the hospital in a timely manner when facility became aware on 09/29/23 of Resident #1's delay in x-ray result. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for delayed treatment and neglect.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving neglect were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegations were made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, for one (Resident #1) of six residents reviewed for neglect. The facility failed to ensure an allegation of neglect related to facility's failure to obtain an x-ray and send Resident #1 to the hospital in a timely manner when facility became aware on 09/29/23 of Resident #1's delay in x-ray result. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for delayed treatment and neglect.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only kitchen. The facility failed to ensure food items in the refrigerator, freezer and dry storage were dated, labeled and properly sealed. These failures could affect residents by placing them at risk for food-borne illness.
17 fire safety citations on file: 3 on August 19, 2025, 9 on July 11, 2024, 5 on June 1, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| March 28, 2024 | Fine | $15,887 |
| October 5, 2023 | Fine | $8,083 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 2.40 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.30 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.13 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.28 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.82 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 57.3% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 66.7% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.70 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 2.51 on weekdays and 2.13 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.87 in April to June 2025 to 2.40 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 2.40 | 0.30 | 2.51 | 2.13 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 102 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 2.74 | 0.40 | 2.88 | 2.38 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 92 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 2.74 | 0.40 | 2.89 | 2.36 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 94 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 2.87 | 0.45 | 3.04 | 2.42 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 90 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $16.97 to $20.71 | 88,680 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.92 | $27.46 to $32.89 | 57,560 |
| Registered nurses | $46.14 | $38.06 to $50.53 | 271,380 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.9 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.7 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.3 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.3 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.8 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 25.7 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 15.4 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.4 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Glenview Wellness & Rehabilitation's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (51.3% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
51.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Texas: 116 better, 50 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 89 eligible stays.
10.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Texas: 0 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 98 eligible stays.
6.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Texas: 4 better, 11 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 58 eligible stays.
80.7% this home
Median of homes: Texas57.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 31 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Texas0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 53 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Texas1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 53 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Texas98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 10 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: CORYELL COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AUTHORITY. CMS links this home to Opco Skilled Management, a group of 68 nursing homes averaging 2.3 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coryell County Memorial Hospital Authority | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 08/16/2018 |
| Byrom, David | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/16/2018 | |
| Glenview Post Acute LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 08/16/2018 | |
| Garetz, David | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/16/2018 | |
| Gurwitz, Solomon | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 06/25/2025 | |
| Hagins, Elizabeth | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 03/31/2025 | |
| Kaplan, Esther | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 06/25/2025 | |
| Kaplan, Mordechai | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 03/31/2025 | |
| Mindle, Adam | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 06/25/2025 | |
| Unger, Jeffrey | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 06/25/2025 | |
| 7625 Glenview Drive Tx, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/16/2018 | |
| Continuum Rehab Group LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/16/2018 | |
| Gibraltar Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/16/2018 | |
| Magnolia Realty, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/16/2018 | |
| Millennial Acquisitions, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/16/2018 | |
| Montgomery Sky Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/16/2018 | |
| Opco Ca Skilled Mgmt Inc. | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/16/2018 | |
| Opco Texas Skilled Mgmt LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/16/2018 | |
| Oregon Realty, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/16/2018 | |
| Scooper Realty, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/16/2018 | |
| Windsor Square Realty, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/16/2018 | |
| Abitoye, Olutoyin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2019 | |
| Roberts, Jasmine | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/22/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.