603 Wright Street, Tuskegee, AL 36083 · Macon County · (334) 727-4960
111 certified beds, about 85 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1975
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 015112 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on June 30, 2026, inspectors cited 19 health deficiencies (the Alabama average is 4, the national average 9.2).
Of 30 health citations since October 2019, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.86 hours per resident per day, against 3.88 across Alabama and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.59 of those hours.
42.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Alabama average 46.9%).
CMS links it to Ball Healthcare Services, an affiliated group of 9 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 30 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, interviews, and a policy titled .Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) # 90 was free from resident to resident physical abuse perpetrated by RI #57. The facility failed to implement timely and effective interventions to prevent resident to resident abuse on 04/15/2025 after RI #57 complained to staff about RI #90 entering his/her room without permission. On 04/16/2025, RI #57 pushed RI #90 from his/her room into the hallway, causing him/her to fall and sustain a laceration above the left eye and Contrast Tomography (CT) confirmed fractures of the left maxillary sinus wall and left orbital wall. This deficient practice affected RI #90, one of six sampled residents reviewed for abuse. This deficiency was cited as a result of the investigation of complaint/ report number #463612. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, the facility's CERTIFIED DIETARY MANAGER JOB DESCRIPTION, and a certificate of completion for Nutrition and Foodservice Professional Training Pathway III(b) from the University of Florida; the Dietary Supervisor in charge of the facility's Food Service Department/Dietary Department did not meet minimum qualifications as a director of food and nutrition services. This had the potential of affecting 84 of 84 residents receiving meals from the facility's Food Service Department/Dietary Department while it was under the direction of an unqualified individual. Findings Include: The facility's CERTIFIED DIETARY MANAGER JOB DESCRIPTION, dated 5/2003, included the following: . General Purpose: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, the facility's policies for DIET MANUAL and MENUS, the facility's menus for Spring/Summer 2026, and the facility's posted SCOOP AND DIPPER SIZES; the facility failed to ensure a #10 dipper/scoop was used for Chopped Meat (Hamburger Steak) for Lunch on Tues. 6/23/2026, a #6 dipper/scoop was used for Puree Lasagna for Dinner on Tues. 6/23/2026, and a #10 dipper/scoop was used for Chopped Fried Chicken and a #10 dipper/scoop was used for Puree Chicken when serving Lunch on Wed. 6/24/2026. This affected residents receiving chopped meats, Mechanical Soft diets, and Puree diets; 36 of 84 residents receiving meals at the facility and had the potential to result in weight loss. The facility's policy for DIET MANUAL, revised 8/2017, included the following: . PROCEDURE: . 4. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, a repair/service report, and the 2022 United States (U.S.) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code; the facility failed to ensure food was frozen solid in the Reach-in Bread Freezer on 6/22/2026 and further failed to ensure the internal temperature did not reach 45 (degrees) Fahrenheit (F). This had the potential to affect 84 of 84 residents receiving meals from the facility's Food Service Department and possibly exposing them to food borne illness. The 2022 U.S. FDA Food Code included the following: . Temperature and time Control3-501.11 Frozen Food. Stored frozen FOODS shall be maintained frozen.3-501.16 Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Hot and Cold Holding.(A) . TIME/TEMPERATURE CONTROL FOR SAFETY FOOD shall be maintained: .(2) At 5 C (41 F) or less. FDA Food Code 2022 Annex 3. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, the Resident Council, and the facility's policy for FOOD FROM OUTSIDE SOURCES, the facility failed to ensure there was a refrigerated area for storage of food brought in to the residents by family and friends. Eleven of eleven residents attending Resident Council on 6/24/2026 affirmed they wanted refrigeration space to be able to store personal food. This had the potential to affect all residents requiring safe storage for personal food requiring refrigeration, 84 of 84 residents eating meals in the facility. The facility's policy for FOOD FROM OUTSIDE SOURCES, revised 10/2017 and reviewed 11/2023, included the following:POLICY: . Food that is brought to residents from family, visitors or volunteers is handled in a safe and sanitary manner. PROCEDURE: . 4. Residents may accept precooked foods from family members or other visitors. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, Resident Council, the facility's policy for Daily Dumpster Monitoring, the 2022 United States (U.S.) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code, and the facility's pest control service records; the facility failed to ensure there was not a build-up of greasy particles on the oil/grease refuse container, there was not a scattering of small particles of trash around the two dumpsters, and there was not a concentration of 30 to 40 flies in the dumpster area on 6/22/2026. This had the potential result of attracting rodents and flies, which could enter the facility to cause contamination and exposure to bites and maggots. This affected Resident Identifier (RI) #8, six of eleven residents in Resident Council, and had the potential to affect all residents in the facility, 88 of 88 residents. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Report, the facility failed to report accurate staffing data from January 01, 2026 - March 31, 2026, to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). This failure affected one quarter of data reviewed during the survey. Findings Include: The PBJ report generated for the quarter of 01/01/2026 through 03/31/2026 documented: . This Staffing Data Report identifies areas of concern that will be triggered . Metric .Excessively Low Weekend Staffing . Triggered = Submitted Weekend Staffing data is excessively low .On 06/25/2026 at 3:45 PM, during an interview, the Administrator (ADM) stated she was responsible for submitting staffing data to CMS. The ADM said she did not know why low weekend staffing was triggered for the second quarter of 2026. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and facility policies titled, . TELS Maintenance Services Work Order and . Standard Method of Cleaning Checklist the facility failed to ensure a clean, safe, and homelike environment. Specifically, the facility failed to maintain resident care areas were in good repair and in a sanitary condition as evidenced broken tiles behind the commode in the bathroom belonging to Resident Identifier (RI) #34, RI #26, RI #72, and RI #1. Additionally, the bathroom belonging to RI #8, RI #57, RI #5 and RI #36 had a water damaged wall and dirty floors with urine observed on the floor. These failures affected RI #34, #26, #72, #1, #8, #57, #5, and #36. These failures had the potential to affect residents by exposing them to an environment that was not maintained in a clean, safe and homelike condition. Findings Include: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and a policy titled, . Advance Directives and Refusal of Treatment the facility failed to ensure documentation regarding advance directives was complete and accurate. Specifically, the facility failed to maintain documentation that advance directives were discussed with Resident Identifier (RI) #81 and failed to ensure the advance directive documentation for RI #7 accurately reflected the resident's status. These failures had the potential to affect residents by preventing the facility from accurately identifying and honoring residents' advance directive decisions for 2 of 7 residents reviewed. Findings Include: A facility policy titled, . Advance Directives and Refusal of Treatment revised 11/2013 documented: PURPOSE:The resident has the right to refuse treatment, . to formulate an advance directive for management of his/her care. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed a physician's order to notify the medical provider when the Resident Identifier (RI) #89's blood glucose exceeded the ordered parameter of 250 mg/dL (milligrams/deciliter). Record review revealed a physician's order dated 03/07/2025 directing staff to check the resident's blood glucose four times daily before meals and at bedtime, document the results, and notify the medical provider for blood glucose readings below 70 mg/dL or above 250 mg/dL.Review of the Nurse Medication Administration History dated 03/01/2025 through 03/31/2025 revealed RI #89's had multiple blood glucose readings that exceeded the physician ordered notification and the medical provider was not notified. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and review of the Alabama Department of Mental Health Preadmission Screening and Resident Review ( PASRR) Level I Screening and Determination documentation, the facility failed to ensure compliance with PASRR requirements for Resident Identifier (RI) #5 by failing to ensure completion of the required PASRR Level II Evaluation. Record review revealed RI #5 had diagnoses including Generalized Anxiety Disorder and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Despite the Level I screening dated 11/07/2024 identifying the need for a Level II Evaluation, the required evaluation was not completed until 01/23/2026. This deficient practice placed RI #5 at risk for not being comprehensively evaluated to determine the need for specialized services and support to address RI #5 mental health needs, as required under PASRR regulations. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, observations, record review and review of a facility policy titled, Care Plans the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan to address the use of oxygen for Resident Identifier (RI) #1 and RI #35. This deficient practice affected RI #1 and RI #35 two of 30 residents whose care plans were reviewed. Findings Include:Review of a facility policy titled, Care Plans with a revised date of 09/2009 documented: . PURPOSE: Plans of Care are developed by the interdisciplinary team, to coordinate and communicate the plan of care for the resident. STANDARD: . the facility develops a comprehensive plan of care for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet a resident's medical needs, nursing and mental/psychological needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. PROCESS: . [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record review, review of an anonymous complaint received by the State Agency, and review of the facility's investigative file, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #43's left foot plantar wound was covered/dressed in a manner to prevent environmental contamination including flying insects, eggs, and larvae. On 08/04/2026, when RI #43 was brought back to his/her room from the shower, six live larvae (maggots) were observed in RI #43's left foot plantar wound bed. According to facility staff, when RI #43's left foot wound was dressed and wrapped with Kerlix, the toes were left exposed which could have been an entry point for flies to enter and lay eggs. This deficient practice affected RI #43, one of three residents sampled with wounds. Findings Include: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record review and review of a facility policy titled, Incident and Accidents, the facility failed to provide evidence how it was determined Resident Identifier (RI) #91 acquired skin tears to the right upper shin, left knee, right buttocks, right hip, right knee and right lower shin on 11/05/2025. This deficient practice affected RI #91, one of two residents sampled for accidents. Failure of the facility to investigate to determine how RI #91 acquired the skin tears placed RI #91 at risk of acquiring further skin tears due to no interventions being implemented to reduce the risk of RI #91 acquiring skin tears. When incidents are not investigated, underlying root causes remain unknown. F689 was cited as result of the investigation of complaint/report number 2653290. Findings Include: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review and review of a facility policy titled, DIET AND SUPPLEMENT ORDERS, the facility failed to ensure a water pitcher containing thin liquids was not at the bedside of Resident identifier (RI) #11, resident at risk for aspiration, who was to receive nectar-thick liquids per physician's orders. These observations were made on three of seven days of the survey. This deficient practice affected RI #11, one of four resident's reviewed for nutrition/hydration, and had the potential to result in the resident consuming liquids of an unsafe consistency, placing the resident at increased risk for aspiration and choking. Findings Include: Review of a facility policy titled, DIET AND SUPPLEMENT ORDERS, with a reviewed date of 12/2023 revealed the following:POLICY:The resident's diet is prescribed by the attending physician. PROCEDURE:1. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review, and review of a facility policy titled, Oxygen Administration, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #1's oxygen tubing and RI #35's humidified water bottle was maintained in a manner to prevent contamination. Specifically: 1) RI #1's humidified water bottle was not dated when observed by the surveyor on 06/23/2026.2) RI #35's humidified water bottle was not dated when observed by the surveyor on 06/23/2026 and 6/24/2026. This deficient practice affected RI #1 and RI #35 two of four residents sampled for Respiratory Care. Findings Include:Review of a facility policy title, Oxygen Administration with an effective date of February 1, 2004, revealed the following: . PURPOSE: To administer high purity oxygen for the treatment of certain diseases or conditions. PROCESS: .11. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and a policy titled . Behavior Management Program the facility failed to timely assess the behavior change and timely implement additional behavior interventions for Resident Identifier (RI) #90 a resident with a history of wandering behavior. Specifically: On 04/16/2025 RI #90 wandered into RI #57's room. RI #57 had a diagnoses of dementia with mood disturbance and staff had been made aware on 04/15/2025 that he/she did not want RI #90 in his/her room. Although staff were aware no interventions were in place to ensure RI #90 did not wander into RI #57's room. When RI #90 entered RI #57's room on 04/16/2025 RI #57 pushed RI #90 out of the room causing him/her to fall and sustain a fracture to the left maxillary sinus wall and lateral border of the left orbit. This deficient practice affected one of two residents reviewed for behavior health. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record review and review of a facility policy titled, Oral Medication Administration, the facility failed to ensure the medication nurses initialed on Resident Identifier (RI) #54's Medication Administration Record (MAR) that RI #54's Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen (Norco) 10/325 mg (milligram) and Pregabalin (Lyrica) 200 mg, both narcotic medications, had been administered to RI #54 on 05/02/2026 at 6:00 AM; and on 05/25/2026 at 6:00 PM.This deficient practice affected RI #54, one of four residents whose MARs was reviewed for medication administration. When nurses do not initial or document on the MAR immediately after administering a medication, another nurse may assume the resident did not receive the medication and administer a second dose, which could place the resident at risk of a dangerous overdose. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, interviews and review of a facility policy titled, DIET AND SUPPLEMENT ORDERS, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #3 was served double portions of proteins as a part of the resident's therapeutic diet. This deficient practice affected RI #3, one of four residents that were reviewed for nutrition and was observed during the breakfast and lunch meals on 06/24/2026. RI #3 not receiving his/her double portions of protein placed RI #3 at risk of a decrease in his/her protein levels which may lead to malnutrition, weight loss and muscle wasting. Findings Include: Review of a facility policy titled, DIET AND SUPPLEMENT ORDERS, with a reviewed date of 12/2023 revealed the following:POLICY:The resident's diet is prescribed by the attending physician. PROCEDURE:1. The attending physician writes an order for regular or therapeutic diets . [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record review, and review of a facility document titled Administrator Job Description, the facility Administrator (ADM) failed to take appropriate corrective action to ensure the facility's compliance with Federal Regulations. The ADM failed to develop an approved plan to correct the non-compliance and failed to take appropriate corrective action to correct deficiencies identified during the Recertification survey that was conducted on 06/30/2026. F801 and F847 were recited during the revisit survey. This had the potential to affect 90 out of 90 residents residing at the facility. Findings Include:Cross-Reference F801 and F847. An unsigned and undated facility document titled ADMINISTRATOR JOB DESCRIPTION documented: . General Purpose: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and a document titled ARBITRATION AGREEMENT AND WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL the facility failed to ensure arbitration agreements were implemented in a manner that protected resident rights. Specifically, the agreement required residents or families to submit written notice to rescind the arbitration agreement within 30 days and did not allow the resident to rescind the agreement verbally. This failure had the potential to affect all residents who executed arbitration agreements with the facility. Findings Include: An agreement titled ARBITRATION AGREEMENT AND WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL documented: . C. Right Not To Sign And To Rescind This Agreement . You are NOT required to sign this agreement in order to be admitted to, or continue to receive care at, the facility. You are permitted to rescind this Agreement within the first 30 days after you sign this Agreement. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, the Resident Council Meeting, the facility's MEAL SERVICE TIMES, and the facility's policy for FREQUENCY OF MEALS; the facility failed to ensure cart deliveries of meals were not scheduled to exceed 14 hours between service from Dinner to Breakfast for Rehab/West Hall, North Hall, South Hall, and Meal Assist. This had the potential to affect 84 of 84 residents receiving meals at the facility. Findings Include: The facility's policy for FREQUENCY OF MEALS, last revised 6/2017 and last reviewed 12/2023, included the following: . POLICY: . There is no more than a fourteen (14) hour span between a substantial evening meal and breakfast. The facility's MEAL SERVICE TIMES, undated, included the following: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and a review of the facility's Resident Rights the facility failed to ensure residents received mail in a timely manner by not delivering mail received on Saturdays. This failure had the potential to affect all residents who received mail at the facility by delaying access to correspondences and other mailed information. Findings Include: A review of the Resident Rights with a revised date of 01/2017, revealed: . SUBJECT: Residents Rights .15. The Resident has the . right to access private communication of all kinds, . On 06/23/2026 at 10:00 AM a Resident Council Meeting was held. The eleven residents in the meeting stated that they did not receive mail on the weekend. When the residents were asked why they did not receive mail on Saturday, residents stated that there was no one to pass the mail out. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide Resident Identifier (RI) #80 and RI #80's representative a written notice of transfer when RI #80 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and 03/16/2026. This deficient practice affected RI #80, one of three residents reviewed for hospitalization. Failing to provide a written transfer notice when a resident is transferred to the hospital violates the residents right to return to their nursing facility after a hospital stay. Without a written notice documenting the specific medical reason for the transfer, the facility could discharge the resident and fill their bed while the resident is in the hospital. RI #80 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a last readmit on 03/20/2026. RI #80 had diagnoses to include Epilepsy, Cognitive Communication Deficit, Hypertension and Chronic Kidney Disease. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and review of the facility NURSING HOME RESIDENT RIGHTS, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #77 received their meal at the same time as their roommate, this was observed on 7/16/23 at the supper meal and 7/17/23 at the breakfast meal. This affected one of 24 sampled residents. Findings Include: A review of the facility NURSING HOME RESIDENT RIGHTS revealed Residents of Nursing Homes have rights that . promote and protect the rights of each resident and stresses individual dignity . Right to a Dignified Existence * Be treated with consideration, respect, and dignity, . RI # 77 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Dementia. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review and review of the Centers for Medicare & (and) Medicaid Services Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual Version 1.17.1, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #40's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], was coded accurately to reflect RI #40 did not receive an antidepressant, medication during this assessment period. This deficient practice affected RI #40, one of 23 sampled residents whose MDS assessments were reviewed. Findings Include: RI #40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Mood Disorder due to known psychological condition with Depressed Features. A review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual Version 1.17.1, dated 10/2019, revealed the following: . SECTION N: MEDICATIONS . [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, a facility policy titled, Pre-admission Screening for Mental Retardation and Mental Illness, and review of Resident Identifier (RI) #57's PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review), the facility failed to ensure RI #57's PASARR was accurately marked with an admission diagnosis of Major Depression, which would have indicated a Level II. The facility further failed to resubmit a Level I or II when RI #57 was readmitted to the facility with a diagnosis of Psychosis. This affected one of one resident sampled for PASARR. Findings Include: A review of an undated facility policy titled Pre-admission Screening for Mental Retardation and Mental Illness revealed, . PURPOSE: To ensure that individuals with mental retardation and mental illness receive the care and services they need, in the most appropriate setting. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, interviews, and a facility's policy tilted, Care Plans the facility failed to ensure a care plan for depression was developed for RI (Resident Identifier) #72 a resident with a diagnosis of depression and a smoking care plan was developed for RI #74, a resident who was identified as a smoker. This deficient practice affected two of 23 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. Findings Include: A review of a facility's policy titled, Care Plans with a revised date of 09/2009 documented: . PURPOSE: Plans of Care are developed by the interdisciplinary team, to coordinate and communicate the plan of care for the resident. STANDARD: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of the medical record, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure a splinting device for Resident Identifier (RI) #3's hand was in place on 7/18/2023 to prevent decreased Range of Motion (ROM). This deficient practice affected RI # 3 one of two residents sampled for position/mobility concerns. Findings Include: Resident Identifier (RI) #3 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Intracerebral hemorrhage and muscle weakness. A review of RI #3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date of 04/25/2023 revealed RI #3's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 10, indicating moderately impaired. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and review of facility policies titled, MACHINE WAREWASHING, SAFETY GUIDELINES, FOOD SERVICE OPERATION STANDARDS FOR PURCHASING, RECEIVING, COOKING AND STORAGE, OF FOOD and STORAGE OF FROZEN FOOD, the facility failed to ensure: 1. silverware in bags and in a silver ware holder were not wet at the tray line; 2. bowls were not wet and chipped; 3. new food was not poured over old food; and 4. chicken wings were labeled in the freezer. This had the potential to affect 88 of 88 residents who receive meals from the kitchen. Findings Include: 1) A review of a facility policy titled, MACHINE WAREWASHING with a reviewed date of 2/15, revealed: POLICY All dishes and utensils will be washed and sanitized after each use. PROCEDURE: .4. Wash dishes according to machine direction.d. All dishes, glassware, and silverware are air dried. [...]
11 fire safety citations on file: 2 on June 30, 2026, 4 on July 19, 2023, 5 on October 10, 2019.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Alabama | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 2.86 | 3.88 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.59 | 0.65 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.36 | 3.26 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.61 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.66 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 42.1% | 46.9% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 54.5% | 39.5% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.25 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.06 on weekdays and 2.36 on weekends, 23% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.61 in April to June 2025 to 2.86 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 2.86 | 0.59 | 3.06 | 2.36 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 85 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 2.71 | 0.51 | 2.86 | 2.33 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 88 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 2.73 | 0.46 | 2.87 | 2.34 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 84 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 2.61 | 0.44 | 2.77 | 2.18 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 86 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Alabama, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.88 | 0.63 | 4.13 | 3.27 | 0.9% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $16.41 | $14.45 to $17.49 | 25,250 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $27.42 | $23.15 to $29.71 | 11,580 |
| Registered nurses | $37.06 | $30.53 to $40.09 | 54,340 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Alabama | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.3 | 12.0 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.1 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.9 | 2.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.3 | 12.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.8 | 5.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.5 | 21.2 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 16.4 | 24.8 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.6 | 11.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.2 | 2.0 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Magnolia Haven Health and Rehabilitation Center's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 51.5% · Alabama: 41 better, 10 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 18 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 10.7% · Alabama: 1 better, 3 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 19 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Alabama: 0 better, 1 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 9 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Alabama50.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 15 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Alabama0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 22 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Alabama2.1% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 22 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Alabama100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 9 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: MAGNOLIA HAVEN NURSING HOME LLC. CMS links this home to Ball Healthcare Services, a group of 9 nursing homes averaging 2.4 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ball, Clarence | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 100% | 07/01/2003 |
| Ball, Clarence | Corporate director | Individual | 07/11/2003 | |
| Hall, Matthew | Corporate officer | Individual | 10/01/2014 | |
| Chambliss, Tiffany | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/29/2023 | |
| Holt, Thomas | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2021 | |
| Ball Healthcare - Macon, Inc. | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/06/2003 | |
| Ball Healthcare Service, Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/09/2025 | |
| Inpatient Consultants of Alabama, Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2021 | |
| Chambliss, Tiffany | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/26/2023 | |
| Hall, Matthew | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/01/2014 | |
| Holt, Thomas | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/01/2021 | |
| Johnson, Angela | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/27/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Alabama. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.