Majora Lane Ctr for Rehab & Nsg Care Inc
105 Majora Lane, Millersburg, OH 44654 · Holmes County · (330) 674-4444
80 certified beds, about 60 residents a day · For profit - Individual · Medicare and Medicaid since 1984
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 365632 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 8, 2026, inspectors cited 9 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).
None of its 26 health citations since July 2022 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.56 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.68 of those hours.
52.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).
CMS links it to Altercare, an affiliated group of 22 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 26 health citations on file.
June 2, 2026Complaint inspection · 3 citations
- D Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, Self-Reported Incident review, witness statement review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #21, who was diagnosed with dementia with behaviors, was assessed as severely cognitively impaired and had a history of sexually inappropriate behaviors, had appropriate care-planned interventions in place to protect Resident #23's right to be free from alleged sexual abuse by Resident #21. This affected one resident (#23) of four residents reviewed for abuse. The census was 52.
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, Self-Reported Incident review, witness statements, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff immediately reported an allegation of mistreatment to the Administrator. This affected one (Resident #27) of four residents reviewed for abuse and had the potential to affect all 14 residents (#2, #6, #7, #8, #9, #17, #20, #26, #27, #28, #29, #30, #34, and #47) who resided on the Speret hall (the secured memory care unit) whom the alleged perpetrator cared for. The census was 52.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, Centers of Disease Control guidance, policy review and interview, the facility failed to implement written infection control policies and procedures for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) during a two-person staff transfer of Resident #27 within the resident's room. This affected one (Resident #27) of three residents reviewed for transfers. The census was 52.
April 4, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
Inspectors wroteTHE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY.Based on review of a closed medical record, review of a self-reported incident, facility investigation, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of misappropriation when a staff member accepted financial gifts from Resident #65. This affected one (Resident #65) out of three residents reviewed for misappropriation. Facility census was 60.
January 8, 2026Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 9 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to monitor and record dishwasher temperatures and Quatinary sanitizer solution levels. This had the potential to affect 61 residents receiving meals from the facility. The facility further failed to ensure appropriate drying times after cleaning equipment prior to preparing pureed meals for two residents. The facility census was 62. Findings Include: 1. Review on 01/05/25 during the initial kitchen tour between 8:55 A.M. and 9:20 A.M. of the facilities monthly dishwasher temperature check log revealed for the month of January 2026 three slots each day (breakfast, lunch, and dinner) to record temperature checks of the high temperature dishwasher. Further review revealed no temperatures recorded for breakfast, lunch, or dinner on 01/02/26 and 01/03/26. There was no temperature recorded for breakfast on 01/04/26. [...]
- E Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the secured unit provided meaningful activities to meet Resident #9's needs. The facility also failed to ensure Resident #11 received preferred activities. This affected two residents (Resident #9 and #11) of three residents reviewed for activities but had potential to affect all 14 residents (#9, #10, #18, #20, #28, #31, #36, #37, #38, #40, #45, #49, #58, and #61) who resided on the secured unit. The facility census was 62.
- D Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #11 was provided accommodations to ensure appropriate and dignified seating and had access to fluids if needed This affected one resident (#11) out of three residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 62. Findings Include: Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/11/25 with diagnoses including legally blind, cognitive communication deficit, difficulty walking, and high blood pressure. Review of Resident #11's physician orders revealed an order dated 12/12/25 for a regular texture diet with thin liquids. Observation on 01/05/26 at 2:20 P.M. revealed Resident #11 was lying in a recliner in the common area near the front desk and the facility main entrance. [...]
- D Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation and interviews, the facility failed to maintain range of motion for a resident with contracture. This affected one resident (#17) out of three residents reviewed for range of motion and positioning. The facility census was 62. Findings Include: Review of Resident #17 ' s medical record revealed an admission date 04/30/24 with diagnoses including but not limited to stroke, contractures, vascular dementia, high blood pressure, depression and anxiety. Resident #17 required assistance from staff to complete Activities of Daily Living (ADL) tasks and had intact cognition. Review of Resident #17 ' s physician orders revealed an order dated 11/08/24 for a Left hand palm protector to be applied in A.M. and removed at bedtime (HS). [...]
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement fall interventions for a fall risk resident. This affected one resident (#50) out of six residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 62. Findings Include: Review of Resident #50 ' s medical record revealed admission date 09/02/25 with diagnoses including but not limited to high blood pressure, hallucinations, weakness and cognitive communication deficit. Review of Resident #50 ' s Falls Risk Observation dated 09/02/25 revealed Resident #50 was at moderate risk for falls with a score of eight, (a score of 10 or higher represents a high risk for falls). Further review revealed Resident #50 ' s Falls Risk Observation dated 10/09/25 revealed Resident #50 was at a high risk for falls with a score of 14. [...]
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to store portable oxygen tanks in an oxygen storage area. This deficient practice affected one resident (#1) out of two residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 62. Findings Include: Review of Resident #1 ' s medical record revealed admission date 11/01/25 with diagnoses including but not limited to cerebral infarction, dysphagia, hemiplegia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and anemia. Review of Resident #1 ' s physician orders revealed no orders for oxygen use. Review of Resident #1 ' s care plan dated 11/07/25 revealed no implementation of oxygen use for any disease process. Observation on 01/05/26 at 10:15 A.M. [...]
- D Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, self-reported incident review, interviews, facility assessment review, and dementia training review, the facility failed to ensure staff had the skills necessary to provide direct care in a way to relieve and accommodate Resident #38's distress. The facility also failed to ensure staff approached Resident #59 appropriately after a behavior occurred. This affected two (Residents #38 and #59) of two residents reviewed for dementia care. The facility census was 62.
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records. This affected three residents (Resident #10, Resident #41, and Resident #43) of twenty-five residents reviewed for accurate medical records. The facility census was 62.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain transmission-based precautions. This deficient practice affected two residents (#17 and #70) out of three residents reviewed for transmission-based precautions. The facility census was 62. Findings Include: 1. Review of Resident #17 ' s medical record revealed admission date 04/30/24 with diagnoses including but not limited to stroke, contractures, vascular dementia, high blood pressure, depression and anxiety. Resident #17 required assistance from staff to complete Activities of Daily Living (ADL) tasks and had intact cognition. Review of Resident #17 ' s physician orders revealed an order dated 11/04/25 for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) related to chronic wounds and urinary catheter use. [...]
July 29, 2025Complaint inspection · 6 citations
- E Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment in the secured unit was clean and homelike. This had the potential to affect all 17 residents (#6, #9, #11, #19, #22, #24, #26, #27, #28, #33, #35, #38, #41, #44, #46, #51, and #57) residing in the secured unit. The facility census was 62.
- D Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to notify the physician and/or responsible party of a change in condition. This affected three residents (#7, #35, and #46) of four residents reviewed for notification of change in condition. The facility census was 62.
- D Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #35 was free from physical restraints. This affected one resident (#35) of one resident reviewed for physical restraints. The facility census was 62.
- D Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident, Resident #7, was provided with timely incontinence care. This affected one resident, (Resident #7) of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 62.
- D Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to timely assess and notify the physician when Resident #7 was noted to have blood in her urine. This affected one resident, Resident #7 of three resident reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 62.
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure injuries for two residents (#35 and #46) were recorded in each resident's medical record. This affected two (#35 and #46) of three residents reviewed for documentation. The facility census was 62.
September 26, 2024Standard inspection · 3 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate food storage in the kitchen's dry storge area. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure the Robo-coupe (food processor) was clean and dry prior to pureeing Resident #21 and #23 meals and ensure a contained spoon was not placed into the mixture. This affected two residents (#21 and #23) and had the potential to affect 56 of 56 residents who received meals from the kitchen. The facility identified two residents (#1 and #30) who received nothing by mouth (NPO) and had NPO diet orders The facility census was 58.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, facility policy review and interview the facility failed to prevent a potential accident hazard when a compressed gas cylinder (oxygen tank) was not properly stored/secured in Resident #34's room. This affected one resident (#34) of 58 residents residing in the facility.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and policy review the facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were in place while completing wound care for Resident #27. This affected one resident (#27) of one resident observed for wound care. The facility census was 58. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed an admission date of 11/16/22. Diagnoses include a Stage III pressure ulcer to the residents left buttock, Alzheimer's Disease, and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. Review of Resident #27's September 2024 physicians orders revealed an order for use Enhanced Barrier Precautions for pressure injury on left buttock. Review of Resident #27's care plan dated 09/23/24 revealed the resident required enhanced barrier precautions related to a chronic wound (pressure ulcer). [...]
June 17, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure Resident #31's redness and excoriation to the buttocks was documented and treated timely. This affected one resident (#31) out of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 64.
- D Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure Resident #43's pain was accurately documented and treated timely. This affected one resident (#43) out of three residents reviewed for pain. The facility census was 64.
January 8, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions/physician orders were implemented for one (Resident #33) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 59.
November 6, 2023Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the medical record, review of the facility investigation, and interview with staff the facility failed to safely transport Resident #57 in a wheelchair resulting in Resident #57 falling out of her wheelchair and hitting her head. This affected one resident (#57) of three residents reviewed for accidents/hazards. The facility census was 60.
July 21, 2022Standard inspection · 0 citations
Fire safety inspections
3 fire safety citations on file: 2 on January 8, 2026, 1 on July 21, 2022.
Every fire safety citation3 citations
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.56 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.96 | 3.28 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.26 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.62 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 52.2% | 48.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 33.3% | 43.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.03 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.80 on weekdays and 2.96 on weekends, 22% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.47 in April to June 2025 to 3.56 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.56 | 0.68 | 3.80 | 2.96 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 60 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.43 | 0.60 | 3.67 | 2.84 | 4.1% | 0 of 92 | 65 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.55 | 0.70 | 3.79 | 2.96 | 4.9% | 0 of 92 | 61 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.47 | 0.59 | 3.67 | 2.97 | 4.2% | 0 of 91 | 62 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.60 | 3.80 | 3.24 | 4.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 5.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.7 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 6.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.2 | 8.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 12.5 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 7.7 | 12.9 | 12.0 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: MAJORA LANE CENTER FOR REHABILITATION & NURSING CARE, INC.. CMS links this home to Altercare, a group of 22 nursing homes averaging 3.3 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tsg Nursing Centers, Inc | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 01/01/2003 |
| Gerald F Schroer Dynasty Tr Ua 12312009 Fbo Andrew M Schroer | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 12/15/2015 | |
| Gerald F Schroer Dynasty Tr Ua 12312009 Fbo Gerald F Schroer Jr | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 12/15/2015 | |
| Gerald F Schroer Dynasty Tr Ua 12312009 Fbo Matthew Schroer | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 12/15/2015 | |
| Gerald F Schroer Dynasty Tr Ua 12312009 Margaret S Goodman | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 12/15/2015 | |
| Susanne Schroer Dynasty Trust U/a | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 12/15/2015 | |
| The Schroer Group, Inc. | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/01/2003 | |
| Mock, Douglas | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 09/20/2021 | |
| Mock, Douglas | Corporate director | Individual | 09/20/2021 | |
| Film, George | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/01/2019 | |
| Goodman, John | Corporate officer | Individual | 05/15/2003 | |
| Logan, Justin | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/01/2022 | |
| Mock, Douglas | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/20/2021 | |
| Nutter, Orian | Corporate officer | Individual | 10/01/2021 | |
| Tikkanen, David | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/30/2019 | |
| Altercare of Ohio, Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 05/01/2003 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 12 problems in this area, most recently on January 8, 2026: "Provide activities to meet all resident's needs."
- How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on June 2, 2026: "Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on June 2, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on January 8, 2026: "Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.96 hours per resident per day, below the Ohio average of 3.28.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Scenic Pointe Nursing and Rehab Ctr Millersburg, 2.2 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 12 citations
- Sycamore Run Nursing and Rehab Ctr Millersburg, 2.8 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 20 citations
- Walnut Hills Nursing Home Walnut Creek, 10.3 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 32 citations
- Oak Pointe Nursing & Rehabilitation Baltic, 13.1 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 11 citations
- Wayne County Care Center Wooster, 16.8 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 12 citations
- Roscoe Gardens Skilled Nursing and Rehab Coshocton, 18.8 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 52 citations
- Glendora Health Care Center Wooster, 19.1 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 37 citations
- West View Healthy Living Wooster, 19.2 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 20 citations
Ohio contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Ohio Department of Health, Nursing Homes and Facilities, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Ohio Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 1-800-282-1206. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Ohio Long-Term Care Quality Navigator (Ohio Department of Aging), where Ohio publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Majora Lane Ctr for Rehab & Nsg Care Inc's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Majora Lane Ctr for Rehab & Nsg Care Inc 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Majora Lane Ctr for Rehab & Nsg Care Inc get at its last inspection?
- 9 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on January 8, 2026. The Ohio average is 10.5.
- Has Majora Lane Ctr for Rehab & Nsg Care Inc been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Majora Lane Ctr for Rehab & Nsg Care Inc accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Majora Lane Ctr for Rehab & Nsg Care Inc?
- CMS lists 16 owners and managers, and links the home to Altercare. Legal business name: MAJORA LANE CENTER FOR REHABILITATION & NURSING CARE, INC..
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.