11100 Springfield Pike, Cincinnati, OH 45246 · Hamilton County · (513) 782-2788
80 certified beds, about 73 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1978
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 365350 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 11, 2026, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).
Of 17 health citations since January 2020, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.54 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.75 of those hours.
46.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).
CMS links it to Bhi Senior Living, an affiliated group of 9 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 17 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, resident and staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to safely and properly position a resident during incontinence care. Actual harm occurred on 04/08/26 when Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) #525 rolled Resident #10 in bed away from her and the resident fell onto the floor sustaining a closed fracture of left femur and a laceration of upper forehead which required sutures. This affected one (Resident #10) of one resident reviewed for falls. The facility census was 68 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to store and prepare food in a sanitary manner to prevent contamination and spoilage. This had the potential to affect all residents except for one (#68) that did not consume food from the kitchen due to a diet of nothing by mouth. The facility census was 68 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate grooming and nail care. This affected two (Residents #44 and #70) of two residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The facility census was 68 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure insulin vials were properly labeled and stored. This affected two (Residents #2 and #25) of 17 residents with medications stored in the Three North medication cart. The facility census was 68 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff provided timely incontinence care. This affected two (Residents #15 and #16) of three residents reviewed for call light response. The facility census was 66 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility staff failed to safely and properly position a resident in bed during incontinence care in order to prevent falls. This affected one (Resident #10) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 66 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of self-reported incidents (SRI's), review of the staffing schedule, review of time card punches, staff interviews and review of facility policy, the facility failed to implemented their policy to remove a staff from the duty following an abuse allegation and while an investigation was being completed. This affected one (#42) of 22 residents reviewed for abuse. Facility census was 75.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a residents air mattress was plugged in and properly functioning to potentially prevent pressure ulcer development. This affected one resident (#55) out of two residents reviewed for skin breakdown. Facility census was 75.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interviews and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a residents hemodialysis access site was monitored and documented per the facility policy. This affected one (#61) out of one residents reviewed for dialysis services. The census was 75.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff used appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) while in a residents room who was positive for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) This affected one (#46) of one residents reviewed for transmission based precautions for COVID-19. The facility census was 75.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, mechanical lift manufacturer's recommendation review, facility policy review, facility investigation, witness statement review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide two staff members when utilizing a mechanical lift for a resident transfer This resulted in actual harm when Resident #19 sustained a fall from the bed which resulted in a left distal midshaft hip fracture that required surgical intervention. This affected one (#19) of one residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 122.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interviews, review of the planned menus, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to prepared ground meat in accordance with the planned menu in order to meet the individual needs of residents with chewing/swallowing difficulties. This had the potential to affect 18 (#114, #69, #89, #15, #1, #86, #9, #60, #73, #68, #44, #43, #96, #19, #109, #50, #17 and #85) of 18 residents with a physician's orders for a soft/mechanically soft diet. The facility census was 122.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident was treated in a manner that promoted their individuality and dignity during dining. This affected two(#7 and #79) residents, who were dependent on the physical assistance of one staff to eat, of 36 residents located on the third floor of the facility. The facility census was 122.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment. This affected one (#113) of 24 residents reviewed for environment. The census was 122.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, medical record review, facility policy review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure tubing for oxygen and respiratory treatments was dated when opened and changed regularly. This affected two (#113 and #316) of two residents reviewed for respiratory care. The census was 122.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, medical record review, facility policy review, pharmacy online resource review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure expired medications were discarded and medications had an open date and expiration date. This had affected three (#79, #3 and #42) of 122 residents who received medications in the facility. The census was 122.
Inspectors wroteBased on the medical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident medical records contained documentation of resident incident resulting in injury. This affected one (#92) of 24 resident's medical records reviewed. The census was 122.
17 fire safety citations on file: 3 on May 11, 2026, 7 on December 21, 2023, 7 on January 16, 2020.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2026 | Payment Denial | 29 days from June 2, 2026 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.54 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.75 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.32 | 3.28 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.70 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.09 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 46.9% | 48.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 10.0% | 43.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.69 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.63 on weekdays and 3.32 on weekends, 9% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.76 in April to June 2025 to 3.54 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.54 | 0.75 | 3.63 | 3.32 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 73 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.53 | 0.68 | 3.65 | 3.24 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 73 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.60 | 0.53 | 3.72 | 3.30 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 73 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.76 | 0.54 | 3.84 | 3.56 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 73 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.60 | 3.80 | 3.24 | 4.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Trains nurse aides: this home runs a state-approved CNA program (state list: ODH Nurse Aide Training Program Locations, as of October 8, 2026). A nursing home cannot charge aides it employs, or has offered a job, for state-approved training (42 CFR 483.152(c)). See Maple Knoll Village Nurse Aide Trai on CareerFunded, our sister site for career training.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.76 | $17.93 to $21.44 | 63,280 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.78 | $27.34 to $31.68 | 39,900 |
| Registered nurses | $39.67 | $38.08 to $47.61 | 143,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.1 | 5.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.9 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.7 | 6.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.5 | 8.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 35.1 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 13.2 | 12.9 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.4 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.0 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Maple Knoll Village's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (59.8% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
59.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Ohio: 147 better, 20 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 86 eligible stays.
9.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Ohio: 3 better, 7 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 91 eligible stays.
6.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Ohio: 1 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 45 eligible stays.
75.4% this home
Median of homes: Ohio55.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 57 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 72 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 72 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Ohio100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 6 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: MAPLE KNOLL COMMUNITIES, INC. CMS links this home to Bhi Senior Living, a group of 9 nursing homes averaging 4 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tcf National Bank | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 01/01/2025 | |
| Bloomstrom, John | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2012 | |
| Caldwell, Jeffrey | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| Cattran, Debbie | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Dalton, Douglass | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Ellis, Brian | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| George, Marc | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Jones, L. Dean | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| Kelly, Beth | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| Koselke, Elizabeth | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Meredith, Wendy | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| Miller, Roger | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| Perez, Laura | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Rhyan, Katherine | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Richardson, Jane | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| Robbins, Fred | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Seigel, Jane | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| Taylor, Sharon | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Terp, Jeffrey | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| Volker, Joseph | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Dattilo, John | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| McGowan, Tim | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/13/2005 | |
| Ulrich, Megan | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| Weideman II, Roger | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| Bhi Retirement Communities Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/2025 | |
| Concept Rehab, Inc. | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/2025 | |
| Forvis Mazars, LLP | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 06/01/2023 | |
| Tcf National Bank | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/2025 | |
| Bloomstrom, John | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2012 | |
| Caldwell, Jeffrey | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| Cattran, Debbie | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Chinta, Vijayalakshmi | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Dalton, Douglass | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| Dattilo, John | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| Dawson, Nancy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Ellis, Brian | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| George, Marc | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Jones, L. Dean | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| Kelly, Beth | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| Koselke, Elizabeth | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| McGowan, Tim | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Meredith, Wendy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| Miller, Roger | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| Oakes, Margaret | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Perez, Laura | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Rhyan, Katherine | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Richardson, Jane | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| Robbins, Fred | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| Seigel, Jane | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| Stevenson, Cordaisha | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Taylor, Sharon | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Terp, Jeffrey | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| Ulrich, Megan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Volker, Joseph | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Weideman II, Roger | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Bhi Retirement Communities Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2025 | |
| Concept Rehab, Inc. | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2025 | |
| Forvis Mazars, LLP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/01/2023 | |
| Plante & Moran PLLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2025 | |
| Tcf National Bank | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2025 | |
| Cattran, Debbie | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Chinta, Vijayalakshmi | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Dattilo, John | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| Dawson, Nancy | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| George, Marc | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| McGowan, Tim | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Oakes, Margaret | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Perez, Laura | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Rhyan, Katherine | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Stevenson, Cordaisha | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Taylor, Sharon | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Volker, Joseph | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Weideman II, Roger | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.