400 Barks Road West, Marion, OH 43302 · Marion County · (740) 387-1225
135 certified beds, about 107 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2004
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 366304 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on July 1, 2025, inspectors cited 17 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).
None of its 37 health citations since September 2019 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.15 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.28 of those hours.
37.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).
CMS links it to PACS Group, an affiliated group of 275 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 37 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, dishwasher temp logs, manufacturer recommendations, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure the dishwasher temp was high enough for sanitation. This had the potential to affect all residents who reside in the facility. The facility census was 113.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure code status forms were in the medical record. This affected one (#116) of three residents reviewed for code status. The facility census was 113.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin to the State Agency as required. This affected one (#84) resident out of three residents reviewed for incidents/accidents. The facility census was 113.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to investigate an injury of unknown origin. This affected one (#84) resident of the three residents reviewed for incidents/accidents. The facility census was 113.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan included all skin issues. This affected one (#68) of four residents reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 113.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record reviews, staff interviews, and policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive skin evaluations were completed upon admission for Resident #35 and failed to ensure wound care was completed as per physician orders for Resident #117. This affected two (#35 and #117) residents out of the three residents reviewed for skin breakdown. The facility census was 113.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff and resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide care/services to prevent a fall. This affected one (#84) resident out of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 113.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) sign in sheets, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the Medical Director attended QAPI meetings quarterly, as required. This had the potential to affect all 80 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 80.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview and review of the Medscapes (online resource for healthcare professionals) indications for medication use, the facility failed to ensure residents were not ordered psychotropic medications without an appropriate indication for use and further failed to ensure residents were monitored for the use of psychotropic medications. This affected three (#43, #71, and #76) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 80.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure foods were labeled, dated, and stored in a manner to ensure food safety. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility, except for one (#9) resident identified as receiving no food from the kitchen. The facility census was 80.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, review of Binding Arbitration Agreements, resident interview, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were able to understand and comprehend the terms of a Binding Arbitration Agreement before entering into one. This affected five (#27, #31, #60, #64, and #84) of six residents reviewed for arbitration agreements. The facility census was 80.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered or provided the COVID-19 vaccination. This affected four residents (#28, #33, #47, #50) of five residents reviewed for immunizations. The facility census was 80.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, medical record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain resident dignity by ensuring catheter collection bags were covered in common areas. This affected two (#45 and #70) of three residents reviewed for catheter care. The facility census was 80.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were developed to address resident care needs. This affected one (#53) of six residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 80.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident and staff interview, medical record review, review of bathing documentation and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received timely and adequate staff assistance with personal hygiene. This affected one (#32) of two residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The facility census was 80.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident and staff interview, medical record review, and review of activities documentation, the facility failed to ensure activities were offered to all residents. This affected one (#342) of one resident reviewed for activities. The facility census was 80.
Inspectors wrote2. Review of medical record for Resident #53 revealed an admission date of 07/31/24 with diagnosis including, but not limited to, obstructive sleep apnea (difficulty breathing when sleeping). Review of current physician orders revealed an order dated 02/19/25 to schedule a sleep study for Resident #53. Further review of Resident #53's medical record revealed no evidence a sleep study was scheduled or completed. Review of a nursing progress note dated 06/09/25 revealed the Certified Nurse Practitioner (CNP) called into the facility to give a new order for a sleep study. Per the resident, they used a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) at home and did not bring it to the facility due to it being broken. Interview on 06/29/25 at 10:22 A.M. with Resident #53 revealed that he was supposed to have a sleep study done but it had not happened. Interview on 06/30/25 at 11:04 A.M. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was changed routinely. This affected two (#50 and #78) of three residents reviewed for oxygen. In addition, the failed to monitor and document as needed oxygen use. This affected one (#32) of three residents reviewed for oxygen. The facility census was 80.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, medical record review, and policy review the facility failed to ensure parameters were in place for pain medication administration and ensure non-pharmacological interventions were implemented and descriptions of pain were documented with administration of pain medication. This affected one resident (#48) of two residents reviewed for pain. The facility census was 80.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure pre and post dialysis evaluations were completed. This affected one (#15) of one resident identified as receiving dialysis. The facility census was 80.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were seen by the physician as required. This affected one (#4) of one resident reviewed for physician visits. The facility census was 80.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure blood pressure medications were administered per physician order. This affected one (#75) of one resident reviewed for medication monitoring. The facility census was 80.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, review of pharmacy recommendations, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician addressed pharmacy recommendations timely. This affected one (#76) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 80.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, review of urine culture results, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure urinary tract infections (UTIs) were treated appropriately. This affected one (#70) of two residents reviewed for UTIs. The facility census was 80.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure the crash carts were inspected routinely. This had the potential to affect all 47 residents the facility identified to have a Full Code status. The facility census was 87.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place. This affected one (#71) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 87.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a clean and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all residents who receive food and beverages from the kitchen in the facility. The facility census was 103.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene during lunch meal service. This had the potential to affect 113 residents who ate food served from the kitchen. The facility identified two (#21 and #107) residents who received no food from the kitchen. The facility census was 115.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident personal needs accounts (PNA) reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure Medicaid residents were provided notification to spend down when their account was reaching the Medicaid Resource Limit. This affected one (#65) out of five residents accounts reviewed. The facility census was 97.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observations and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with timely incontinent care. This affected two (#24 and #25) of four residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 97.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to implement as needed laxatives when a resident was experiencing constipation. This affected one (#73) out of six residents reviewed during the annual survey. The facility census was 97.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation and staff interview the facility failed to provide the correct enteral feeding to a resident. This affected one (#90) out of one resident reviewed for enteral feeding. The total facility census was 97.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observations and staff interview the facility failed to provide therapeutic diets as ordered. This affected three (#53, #67, and #13) out of three residents reviewed for therapeutic diets. The facility census was 97.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview of facility staff, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to store and label food in an appropriate manner. This had the potential to affect all 115 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on the medical record review, observation, staff interview, review of manufacturer recommendations and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff administered the proper dose of insulin, which results in a significant medication error. This affected one (Resident #57) of five residents observed for medication pass. This had the potential to affect 20 residents who received insulin via the Kwik Pen. The facility census was 115.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff were properly securing medication carts when left unattended. This had the potential to affect five cognitively impaired residents who reside on the 300-hall. The facility census was 115.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, review of facility's admission packet and record review, the facility failed to issue a bed hold notification letter to a resident. This affected one (Resident #115) of one resident reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 115.
21 fire safety citations on file: 7 on July 1, 2025, 4 on September 22, 2022, 10 on September 26, 2019.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.15 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.28 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.88 | 3.28 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.02 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.85 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 37.8% | 48.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 36.4% | 43.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 4.05 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.26 on weekdays and 2.88 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 1.6% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.31 in April to June 2025 to 3.15 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.15 | 0.28 | 3.26 | 2.88 | 1.6% | 0 of 90 | 107 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.23 | 0.30 | 3.31 | 3.02 | 1.3% | 0 of 92 | 94 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.49 | 0.34 | 3.60 | 3.20 | 1.3% | 0 of 92 | 83 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.31 | 0.36 | 3.47 | 2.90 | 4.7% | 0 of 91 | 89 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.60 | 3.80 | 3.24 | 4.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.76 | $17.93 to $21.44 | 63,280 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.78 | $27.34 to $31.68 | 39,900 |
| Registered nurses | $39.67 | $38.08 to $47.61 | 143,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.1 | 5.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.2 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.0 | 6.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.4 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.1 | 8.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 30.7 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 10.8 | 12.9 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.3 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Marion Valley Post Acute's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (57.6% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
57.6% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Ohio: 147 better, 20 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 216 eligible stays.
10.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Ohio: 3 better, 7 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 219 eligible stays.
7.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Ohio: 1 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 156 eligible stays.
38.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio55.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 71 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 106 residents counted.
0.9% this home
Median of homes: Ohio1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 106 residents counted.
97.8% this home
Median of homes: Ohio100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 46 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: MARION VALLEY SNF HEALTHCARE LLC. CMS links this home to PACS Group, a group of 275 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apt, Frederick | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 12/01/2024 | |
| Jergensen, Joshua | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 12/01/2024 | |
| Mitchell, John | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 12/01/2024 | |
| Apt, Frederick | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/01/2024 | |
| Jergensen, Joshua | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/01/2024 | |
| Mitchell, John | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/01/2024 | |
| Providence Group Nh, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 12/01/2024 | |
| Kellogg, Shannon | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/01/2024 | |
| 400 Barks Road West Oh Owner LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2024 | |
| Providence Administrative Consulting Services Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2024 | |
| SNF Oh Holdco LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2024 | |
| Well Integra Master Jv LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2024 | |
| Well Pm Holdco Jv LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2024 | |
| Welltower Op, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2024 | |
| Welltower, Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2024 | |
| Idrees, Ghulam | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/01/2024 | |
| Kellogg, Shannon | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/01/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.